George W. Bush Delivers a Basic Economics Lesson to Matt Lauer
In a follow-up interview to his prime time special with George W. Bush, NBC's Matt Lauer invited the former president on Wednesday's Today show and in the process got an education on how tax cuts can create jobs. During the wide ranging interview that covered everything from the Ground Zero mosque to Kanye West, it was Lauer's questions about Bush's tax policy where he revealed his bias. Noting that "there's a heated debate" over whether "we should continue in this country with your tax policies" Lauer pressed Bush "We've been living under that system for seven years now and we've seen incredibly slow growth...why should we continue down that path?" Bush shot back with a basic economics lesson for the Today co-anchor, as seen in the following exchange (video after the break):
MATT LAUER: There's a heated debate, right now over whether we should continue in this country with your tax policies. They call them the Bush tax cuts. Give me your best argument for continuing those tax cuts.
GEORGE W. BUSH: Well first of all, you know, it's too bad they call them the Bush tax cuts, they might have a better chance of being extended if they were the Lauer tax cuts.
(Laughter)
LAUER: Probably not gonna happen.
BUSH: Here's, here's the deal. Most new jobs are created by small businesses. Many small businesses pay tax at the individual income tax level because of how the are organized. For example, sub chapter S corporations or limited partnerships. Therefore, if you raise the top rate you're taxing job creators.
LAUER: But we've been living under that system for seven years now and we've seen incredibly slow growth in jobs. So why should we continue down that path?
BUSH: I don't accept that premise. For 53 or nearly 53 weeks we had consecutive job growth. The longest period in, one of the longest periods in economic history. You gotta remember, let me put this, put this in perspective. I come to office, there is a dotcom bubble burst. Then 9/11 comes and the country is in severe economic hardship. The tax cuts, in my judgment, stimulated an economic vitality and a lot of jobs were created. Now the question is, how do we create them? And part of the debate is should government try to create the jobs or should the private sector try to create the jobs. My argument is keeping taxes low will encourage the private sector to create jobs.
Before the question on taxes Lauer wanted to know how much "blame" Bush was willing to give himself for the economic meltdown and argued that "some would say you didn't call enough for regulation" to which Bush fired back his administration did its best to prevent the housing crisis by calling for better oversight, as he told Lauer: "The housing bubble was fueled by government policy" which was the result of "Congress refusing to regulate Fannie and Freddie."
The following are the relevant portions of the interview as it was aired on the November 10 Today show:
MATT LAUER: Now to a Today exclusive, a live conversation with George W. Bush. The former president's new memoir, Decision Points is now out. President Bush, good to see you again. Good morning.
GEORGE W. BUSH: Good morning, Matt. Thank you.
LAUER: You spent a year and a half writing this book and I'm sure during the process you stopped and thought about what you were putting in there and what would the media react to? What would people really find that resonates with them? So now you've had a chance to hear a little bit of the reaction, over the last couple of days, any surprises to you?
BUSH: Well first let me debunk your premise. I really didn't spend time thinking about what the media would say about my book. I took the key issues, the key decisions I made and tried to explain to the reader why I made them. And, look, I was aware that some of the decisions I made were very controversial, and, and I knew that putting them in the book would create controversy, but I really wasn't concerned about what the media would think. What I'm more concerned about is how history will judge the decisions I made.
LAUER: I was interested in the New York Times this morning, there's an article that, that says that perhaps inadvertently, by sharing the story you shared about your mother's miscarriage when you were a teenager, you may have started a national conversation about the-
BUSH: Really?
LAUER: -complex psychological fallout of miscarriage.
BUSH: Yeah.
LAUER: That must be rewarding to you.
BUSH: Yeah it is. I had no intention of creating a national dialogue. My intention was to describe a relationship between a mom and her son and a interesting anecdote that helped the reader understand why my mother and I are so close.
LAUER: Perhaps surprisingly, maybe not surprisingly one of the subjects that's gotten the most attention in the last couple of days is what you write about Kanye West and what he said about you after Hurricane Katrina.
BUSH: Yeah.
LAUER: "George Bush doesn't care about black people." He, he clearly has heard the furor over that and he has read the headlines. He stopped by to see me yesterday.
BUSH: Oh really?
LAUER: And I want to play you a small portion of what he said because he seems to have changed his tone rather dramatically.
(Begin clip)
KANYE WEST: I would tell George Bush, in my moment of frustration, I didn't have the grounds to call him a racist. But I believe that in a situation of high emotion like that, we as human beings don't always choose the right words. And that's why I'm here-
(End clip)
LAUER: He seems to have regret and what's your reaction to that?
BUSH: I appreciate that. I, it wasn't just Kanye West who was talking like that during Katrina. I cited him as an example, I cited others in an example as well.
LAUER: Right.
BUSH: And you know, I appreciate that.
LAUER: But you called his comment "a low point" and one of the things you and I have spoken about a lot over our conversations over these past couple of weeks is your faith. Does your faith allow you to forgive Kanye West?
BUSH: Oh absolutely, of course it does. And I didn't, you know I'm not a hater, I didn't hate Kanye West. But I was talking about an environment in which people were willing to say things that, that hurt. And nobody wants to be called a racist, if, if, if, if in your heart you're, you believe in equality of race.
LAUER: You spend an entire chapter in the book talking about the financial meltdown-
BUSH: Right.
LAUER: -in the last year of your presidency. In that year, the country lost about 2.6 million jobs. The banking system nearly collapsed. The housing market did collapse and we fell into the deepest recession since the Great Depression. How much of the blame for that, should be laid at your feet and on your policies?
BUSH: Well I think a lot of the blame should be laid on, on a lot of people including my administration. Now in the book, I make it clear that we did recognize a looming problem and that is Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with their implicit government guarantees were making risky investments. And therefore I called for the regulation of those two entities and was thwarted at every turn by powerful forces on Capitol Hill.
LAUER: And yet some would say you didn't call for enough regulation in other areas that doomed the economy.
BUSH: Well I don't think this was a matter of lack of over-regulation or lack of regulation. It was a matter of poor judgment by, by Wall Street and others. And, but no question, the housing bubble was fueled by government policy and that is a result of people in Congress refusing to regulate Fannie and Freddie. So my conscience is clear when it came time to recognize an impending problem. Now-
LAUER: But back to the original question. How much of the blame do you deserve for that economic meltdown?
BUSH: Well any time you're in power and there's a problem, you're gonna get blamed and I fully understand that, and I walk people through the reason why I used taxpayers' money to bail out Wall Street. And the lesson there is, is that I had to set aside an ideology - which was if you make a bad mistake you pay for it in the marketplace. And this, and the hardest thing for me was not whether or not blame was assigned. The hardest thing for me was to explain to hard working Americans why we were using their taxpayers' money-
LAUER: Right.
BUSH: -to prop up those who they were blaming for the crisis.
LAUER: While we're talking about taxpayers, there's a heated debate, right now over whether we should continue in this country with your tax policies.
BUSH: Yeah.
LAUER: They call them the Bush tax cuts. Give me your best argument for continuing those tax cuts.
BUSH: Well first of all, you know, it's too bad they call them the Bush tax cuts, they might have a better chance of being extended if they were the Lauer tax cuts.
(Laughter)
LAUER: Probably not gonna happen.
BUSH: Here's, here's the deal. Most new jobs are created by small businesses. Many small businesses pay tax at the individual income tax level because of how the are organized. For example, sub chapter S corporations or limited partnerships. Therefore, if you raise the top rate you're taxing job creators.
LAUER: But we've been living under that system for seven years now and we've seen incredibly slow growth in jobs. So why should we continue down that path?
BUSH: I don't accept that premise. For 53 or nearly 53 weeks we had consecutive job growth. The longest period in, one of the longest periods in economic history. You gotta remember, let me put this, put this in perspective. I come to office, there is a dotcom bubble burst. Then 9/11 comes and the country is in severe economic hardship. The tax cuts, in my judgment, stimulated an economic vitality and a lot of jobs were created. Now the question is, how do we create them? And part of the debate is should government try to create the jobs or should the private sector try to create the jobs. My argument is keeping taxes low will encourage the private sector to create jobs.
LAUER: In your book, you wrote, quote, "When I finished, when I entered politics I made a decision. I would confront problems, not pass them on to future generations," end quote. Let's talk about the deficit.
BUSH: Right.
LAUER: In the case of deficit, didn't you do the opposite, didn't you pass it along to a future generation?
BUSH: Actually if you look at the statistics, my deficit to GDP during my presidency was lower than Ronald Reagan's by half. Lower than my dad's. And only Bill Clinton among modern presidents, let me finish-
LAUER: Go ahead.
BUSH: My debt to GDP was the lowest or one of the lowest of modern presidents. My taxes to GDP was the lowest and my spending to GDP. Now I argued my fiscal record was strong, especially given the fact that we had to deal with recession and funding two wars necessary to protect the American people.
LAUER: But you were the only president since the Civil War who didn't raise taxes to pay for those wars. And you left office with a $10.7 trillion deficit, debt.
BUSH: No I think the way to look at it is the debt relative to the size of the economy. It's the only fair way to judge previous administrations to this, to my administration. And our debt to GDP was one of the lowest in modern history.
LAUER: Even some Republicans say that, that perhaps your fiscal policies gave birth to the Tea Party. Did you give birth to the Tea Party?
BUSH: I don't think I was that powerful. I think what gave birth to the Tea Party was severe frustrations in the political system in general. And no, again, I understand perceptions, the purpose of this book is to state reality. And I'm confident over time when people take an objective look at the fiscal record of my administration, they will have a better understanding of why I said I was proud of the fiscal record.
LAUER: Alan Greenspan, your Fed chairman, wrote a book and came out in 2007. In it he said, quote, "My biggest frustration remained the President's unwillingness to wield his veto against out of control spending."
BUSH: Well actually it's interesting you said that, because in 2007, I did veto bills and they were overridden quickly. I vetoed the farm bill which was overridden, I vetoed a public works bill which was overridden. Prior to that we were able to negotiate budget deals with Republican controlled Congress that actually, other than defense spending, was able to ratchet down spending and at the end, less than, than the rate of inflation.
LAUER: You wanted to be a uniter. Along came 9/11 and you did something that a lot of people thought was a real effort to unite. You reached out to the Muslim world-
BUSH: Right.
LAUER: -and you visited mosque and you said the following, quote, "The face of terror is not the true face of Islam" and you said, quote, "In our anger and emotion, our fellow Americans must treat each other with respect." You know there's a major controversy brewing here in New York City, downtown, where there's a proposed Islamic community center sited for just two blocks from Ground Zero. If I look at your words there, it makes it seem to me as if you're saying that the rights of Muslims should not be denied for the sake of the sorrow of others, is that fair?
BUSH: If I listened to what you're trying to rope me into, you're trying to get me to talk about this mosque issue.
(Laughter)
LAUER: Which is fair.
BUSH: Again, again.
LAUER: Why wouldn't - I know I tried the other day too, didn't I? Why-
BUSH: Yeah, because...
LAUER: Why wouldn't you speak out...
BUSH: Because there's gonna be-
LAUER: ...to calm a lot of rhetoric?
BUSH: Because there's a lot, there's a lot of events and a lot of opportunities for me to speak out over the next years and I have chosen not to. And the reason I've chosen not to is, I don't want do intrude on my successor's ability to get the job done. Inevitably if you were able to get me to answer this question, they will then compare that answer to what President Obama or other presidents might say on the issue. And I don't-
LAUER: Well then without saying whether they should build the community center or not, are you disappointed by the increase in anti-Muslim rhetoric in this country that we've seen...
BUSH: I think most Americans welcome freedom of religion and honor religions. I truly do. And the problem with the, the arena today is a few loud voices can dominate the discussion and I don't intend to be one of the voices in the discussion.
—Geoffrey Dickens is the Senior News Analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here
- Geoffrey Dickens's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Bush 2012
Submitted by AgentAmerican on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:14pm.
The Constitution says that you can only serve 2 consecutive terms as President. Is there anything against a third? He has the finances and the experience. Obama wouldn't stand a chance.The Constitution dosent say
Submitted by bassndude on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:33pm.
The Constitution dosent say "consecutive". It says two terms.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
22nd Amendment
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 2:24pm.
22nd Amendment:
Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.
Section 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.
Would this apply, for
Submitted by stratman on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 3:48pm.
Would this apply, for instance, if Bush was the VP and the President no longer held the office? In this case, Bush would not be "elected" to the office of the President.
On second thought, I could see Slick Willie trying this, so fuggidaboudit.
Still would not work because
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:02pm.
Still would not work because theVP would be expected to be President if anything happened to the POTUS. Threby being President for more than two terms.
All facts by W and and about damn time
Submitted by Tomorama on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:55pm.
The 53 months is a factual statement, but Bush SHOULD have stated that HE holds the record for most consecutive quarters of growth in our nations history (not the Clinton years), nope, GEORGE W BUSH.
Glad he is fighting back and exposing these a-hats and newsbusters a while ago showed the utter bias when unemployment was at 4.5 and we were CREATING thousands of jobs THEY HAMMERED BUSH, but we are losing jobs and we are at 9.6, they are finding silver linings all of a sudden.
Bush mostly lost me his last term and have never been afraid of saying that, but only he can shove the facts down the a-hats throats as the media LIED for years.
Hey Matt, when unemployment gets to around 4 percent and the market is swimming around 14,500 and Oblunders has broken Bush's record for GROWTH, come a callin', I WILL CONGRATULATE Oblunder.
For a useful resource ...
Submitted by KC Mulville on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:23pm.
Peter Robinson of National Review hosts an excellent series of interviews with various guests called Uncommon Knowledge. This week, he interviews Gary Becker, the well-respected economist. Given the Bush-Lauer interview, this segment is well worth the time.
Too bad more of our guys
Submitted by Bruzilla on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:24pm.
Too bad more of our guys can't just say 'I reject your premise" instead of trying to argue bogus questions that are based on false premises.
Excellent point. The
Submitted by mattm on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:34pm.
Excellent point. The premises of the libtard media should be questioned as part of standard practice for any non-leftist who is interviewed by them.
The very best at rejecting bogus premises is
Submitted by texasborngranny on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 2:17pm.
The very best at rejecting bogus premises is Liz Cheney. Second best is her dad.
class act
Submitted by caveman1313 on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:26pm.
class act compared to the idiots that occupy the WH now.
"...the housing bubble was
Submitted by mattm on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:27pm.
"...the housing bubble was fueled by government policy and that is a result of people in Congress refusing to regulate Fannie and Freddie."
That's it in a nutshell.
BTW - Lauer is a dumb ass.
BTW - Lauer is a dumb ass.
Submitted by ConcernedOne on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:56pm.
Agreed!
I concur, sir.
Submitted by ML Stovall on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 2:08pm.
I concur, sir.
And wasn't Barney Frank
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 2:27pm.
And wasn't Barney Frank involved with Freddie & Fannie?
Barney Frank in the House and
Submitted by mattm on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 2:36pm.
Barney Frank in the House and Chris Dodd in the senate. They were pretty much running that system, which was created by Jimmy Carter as a way of using the banking system as a defacto welfare program.
Yet both deny any
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 3:17pm.
Yet both deny any responsibility whatsoever.
Cleared up some misconceptions
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:35pm.
I had. Like Farm Aid. For some reason, I thought he supported that.
Funny how the year 2007 seems to be the turning point in the economy. Wonder who controlled the purse strings then??? /sarc.
Happy Birthday Marines
Submitted by sentry_99 on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:43pm.
Sorry to post here but there is no Open Thread at this moment.
Happy Birthday to my fellow Marines. Semper Fi!!
http://www.usmc.mil/usmc/Documents/lejeuneMessage2004.pdf
Ditto! Happy 235th Birthday Marines!
Submitted by PrairieSky on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:50pm.
Thanks to all of them, for what they have done for the last 235 years to help keep us all safe and FREE!
Semper Fi!!!
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them (our children) to do the same." ~President Ronald Reagan
Semper Fi, Devil Dog! Ooh
Submitted by ML Stovall on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 2:09pm.
Semper Fi, Devil Dog! Ooh Rah!
Happy Birthday Marines
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 2:10pm.
I, for one, think a George W. Bush thread is a perfectly appropriate place to post it, too. President Bush would approve, and give the Marines a hearty Happy Birthday as well.
Thank you, Marines one and all, for your service and your dedication to the country and the Corps.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Bush misspoke when he said "53 weeks"
Submitted by Arminius on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:46pm.
It was not 53 weeks of consecutive job growth. It was 52 MONTHS, which indeed is a record.
Yep, you are correct
Submitted by Tomorama on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:59pm.
You are right, I also mistyped it, but the point about GEORGE W BUSH having the most consecutive quarters of growth in our nations history sounds so much better than how he put it......
The 9-11 part that he DID state is also a huge part of the story as our economy TOOK a huge hit across the board.
Glad he is fighting back, I WISH HE DID BEFORE.....
That's one of the reasons why he lost me the last few years of his presidency, he tried being to bleepin' nice and he spent too much bleepin' money.
Some would say...?
Submitted by ML Stovall on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 2:12pm.
LAUER: And yet some would say you didn't call for enough regulation in other areas that doomed the economy.
......................................................
What a cowardly little weasel Matt LIAR is. Whay doesn't he just come on out with it and say what he really means? "...And, Mr. President, I say that you didn't call for enough regulationin other areas that doomed the entire planet..."
I recall in some of my higher
Submitted by AJ on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 3:49pm.
I recall in some of my higher level communication courses in college that using phrases like "some people" or "people say" in oral presentations or debates would knock off about 25% of your grade for the assignment. Who the hell is "some"? But of course, if you're in the media, there's no one checking your verbiage, so you have free reign to say whatever, regardless of clarity. Granted, I know Lauer is referring to his homies, the democrats.Gee, that Bush guy ain't so
Submitted by T-Bone Mass on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 2:21pm.
Gee, that Bush guy ain't so dumb sounding.
That folks is the difference between
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 3:17pm.
A President with Class and a prezeedeent dat ain't got none aiiyeee?
What a difference
Submitted by CrazyHungarian on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 3:49pm.
And he did it without any teleprompter or softball questions. Ever listen to Obama try to answer questions that aren't prearranged (which is rare for a reason) ? Nothing but er, er, er, er, ah, ah.....
The difference is so striking
Submitted by IgnatzJFahrquar on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 3:34pm.
After all this time with GW out of the limelight and laying low while writing the book all we have been subjected to is the Liberal drivle from Oblahblah, Gibbs and the LSM. While you don't forget GW, memories are softened a bit.
Wow! It's so damn friggin' refreshing to hear intelligence coming from a President, albeit, a former President. Stack these latest conversations against that big-eared idiot in the Whitehouse and the difference is striking.
Maybe Oblahblah will decide to stay in Indonesia this time ... I can dream, can't I?
That would be nice
Submitted by HockeyKid on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 4:16pm.
especially if he kept the Lime Jello Fashion Wreck with him."Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
W was, and is, right
Submitted by HockeyKid on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 4:14pm.
But, lest we forget, our only alternative to Obysmal was McLame. I, for one, am glad that the lib with a D next to his name is taking the blame. And I apologize to HW's son for angrily accusing him of overspending when, at least in some cases, it was simply the Dumbocrap majority overriding him."Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Don't spend anytime on the personal?
Submitted by exLib on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 4:21pm.
I don't know if it was left out of the transcript but it seems that Matt didn't want to dwell at all on any personal story that might let people think Bush was a caring person with a great family life.
Contrary to an obama interview where the majority of questions are about how he grew up or in some way personalizing him so more people will like him.
Seems the opposite here, just rapid fire attack after attack.
Another point...........
Submitted by Tomorama on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 4:44pm.
Good point ex-lib, I would have loved if Matt had simply asked "when the current president stated over and over that "the other guys did nothing for aids funding around the world so you should go picket them", how did those LIES make you feel.
I mean a real journalist might ask something like that considering IT IS TRUE and Bush is BELOVED in Africa for his outreach in that area, BELOVED.
But strangely when the POS in chief stated it NOT ONE "journalisT" did any easy as all hell research.
Hannity and O'Reilly did state the truth, but the "elite and smahhhhht media" must have just missed that part.
Couldn't believe that let that slide
Submitted by exLib on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 5:03pm.
Then again, I expected it, like when Obama said on 60 minutes that he will "continue" to try to reach out Republicans and be in the middle, but if "THEY" don't want to, it's not his fault". No follwo up on that one either.
Lauer is always learning.
Submitted by Six String Spiff on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 5:37pm.
My friggin pets could teach him ecenomics.
..like NBC"s Brian Williams trying to keep the pathetic smear
Submitted by Gary Hall on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:35pm.
BUSH: I appreciate that. I, it wasn't just Kanye West who was talking like that [calling, or inferring, Bush a racist] during Katrina. I cited him as an example, I cited others in an example as well.
LAUER: Right.
BUSH: And you know, I appreciate that.
..like Lauer should understand that he and NBC's Brian Williams is still out there using their national podium (sometimes together) in this effort to keep that pathetic and sickening smear against Bush alive.
NBC, and it's affiliates, is nothing more than a walking talking hate crime in process.
(;~/ gary
PS - I'm shocked. It's about time someone came out and tried to address a little bit of the economic crisis (not to mention the many international crisis) that Bush inherited from Bill Clinton. Can we run with this now and educate the broad public now?
I'd forgotten amidst the
Submitted by ant on Wed, 11/10/2010 - 7:44pm.
I'd forgotten amidst the storm of constant criticism and complaints in the political arena that immediately after 9/11 there was much speculation about how it would destroy our economy or at least negatively affect it in a broad way. It never happened. If Obama were President then I could only imagine the world of s*** we would have found our Nation in. I cannot wait until the ignorant man-child is gone.
Lauer lesson
Submitted by Larry Young on Sat, 11/13/2010 - 12:27am.
This is typical Lauer at his best, lets his lib bias clowd his judgement, these libs just cannot help themselves, he has no knowledge of the economy and history, or just chooses to disregard it.