NBC's Matt Lauer, on Thursday's "Today" show, handed San Francisco Democrat District Attorney Kamala Harris a virtual campaign contribution in the form of a full interview segment in the 8:30am half-hour as he billed her as the "Female Barack Obama." Harris, who was on to plug her new book, received the full star-treament as Lauer pressed if she had "ambitions for national office." Not surprisingly, the "rising political star" featured the segment all over her official Web site.
The following teasers and full interview segment were aired on the October 29, "Today" show:
MATT LAUER: And coming up in this half hour, we're gonna meet a woman. Some are calling her "the female Barack Obama." Her name is Kamala Harris. She is a rising political star in California, has written a book on crime, and we're gonna talk, get her take on this, what she thinks we're doing wrong when it comes to fighting crime.
Story Continues Below Ad ↓...
MEREDITH VIEIRA: Up next, a career crime-fighter on what we really need to do to keep our community safe.
...
MATT LAUER: Now to a woman named one of America's most powerful women by Newsweek magazine. As San Francisco's first female African-American and Indian-American district attorney, Kamala Harris has received praise for raising conviction rates against violent criminals while creating innovative programs to reduce crime and prevent repeat offenders. Now she's out with a new book called Smart On Crime: A Career Prosecutor's Plan to Make Us Safer. Kamala good morning.
KAMALA HARRIS: Good morning, Matt.
LAUER: Nice to have you here.
HARRIS: It's wonderful to be here.
LAUER: Crime is something we think about every single day, whether you've been directly impacted by it or indirectly. We pay for it every single day in this country.
HARRIS: Absolutely.
LAUER: And you think, in large part, we're going about fighting it wrong. Why?
HARRIS: Well, first of all, as a career prosecutor, I can tell you that there is no question in my mind or in anyone's mind, serious and violent crime? Lock ‘em up. We know that. And we know about serious and violent crime because it's on the front page of our paper every day and the leading story on the evening news.
LAUER: So you don't differ from anybody on that subject.
HARRIS: Absolutely.
LAUER: It's on non-violent crime where you differ.
HARRIS: Absolutely. If you look at crime, look at on a pyramid. On the top of the pyramid, serious and most violent crime. It's our priority, let's deal with it. But truly, it is the fewest number of crimes that are occupying so much space and so much money in our criminal justice system, and frankly, we cannot have a one size fits all approach. And that's why a lot of what I talk about in the book is let's bust the myths and get over, you know the idea, that for example, when we want to talk about criminal justice policy, we want tough talk and "lock ‘em up talk." Let's realize that the bulk of what we're dealing with is crime that is recidivist in nature. There's a revolving door around it and we've got to get smarter around cycling people out.
LAUER: You surprised some people by saying, "You know who we should target? We should take a hard look at elementary school truancy."
HARRIS: Absolutely.
LAUER: And other people say, "Wait a second. Let's go to high school truancy because they're most likely to get in trouble." You think, you say no, let's go to the elementary schools. Why?
HARRIS: Let me tell you, I have seen in my city and throughout this country where we have large number of elementary school students who are literally missing 60 to 80 days of a 180-day school year. And as far as I'm concerned, a child going without an education is tantamount to a crime and we need to treat it just as seriously as any other issue, because invariably, that kid will be the high school dropout, who will be the crime victim and the perpetrator.
LAUER: You started another program that's getting a lot of attention nationwide. You s tarted out there, but it's, it's being copied nationwide, called Back On Track.
HARRIS: Right.
LAUER: I'll paraphrase it. You jump in and correct me if I'm wrong.
HARRIS: Okay.
LAUER: You get a young offender-
HARRIS: Yeah.
LAUER: -they've committed a drug offense. They don't go to jail, they go to a boot camp for a year. They plead guilty.
HARRIS: Right.
LAUER: They go through drug testing. They get a GED while they're in this program, and when they're finished with it, if they don't screw up, they get that felony conviction dropped, which allows them to go off and get a job easier.
HARRIS: And Back On Track, as an initiative, has proven over the course of four-and-a-half years to reduce the recidivism or re-offense rate for that population from 54 percent to less than 10 percent.
LAUER: But not a perfect program. And because you're running for attorney general and you're raising a lot of money, they're targeting you. And one of the things your critics have dug up is that there were some illegal immigrants involved in that prison-
HARRIS: Absolutely.
LAUER: -who got their felony convictions dropped because of it. How did that happen?
HARRIS: Well first of all, let me say this, some would say that innovation in government and innovation in law enforcement is an oxymoron. I would suggest to you, that's not true. But inherent in innovation means you're gonna try to do something as it's never been done, but based on the idea that you can actually improve the system. So I created Back on Track. Did I figure out every scenario, no? So, early on, we realized we hadn't safe-guarded for illegal immigrants being in the program. When we learned that, that happened, we fixed it. There you go.
LAUER: I mentioned in one of the teases for your segment, Kamala, that, that you have been called by some a female Barack Obama. Well, you dip your head there, and I'm wondering if that isn't a bit of a double-edged sword, because Barack Obama, for as popular as he was and continues to be, if you look at the polling we've done recently, it says they still give him, a lot of people still give him high marks on style and inspiration, but not such high marks when it comes to accomplishment, getting the job done. So are you worried about that comparison?
HARRIS: Well, I'll tell you, you now, as now second term as district attorney of San Francisco and as a career prosecutor, I know the power that I have as a prosecutor, and it is immense. And when we're in positions of leadership, I think we should do what, I mean, my prayer every night is that I will be judged based on a body of work and not the popularity of any one decision. And I applaud our president for taking on very difficult issues and not taking on these issues in pursuit of popularity, but actually thinking about what is in the best interests of our country.
LAUER: I mentioned you're running for attorney general. Do you have ambitions for national office?
HARRIS: No, you know, it's one step at a time, and I'm a career prosecutor. I really believe that California has the ability, as that old adage says, "So goes California, so goes the rest of the country," to do what I think is really necessary in terms of reform of our criminal justice system so that we're reducing crime in our communities and increasing public resources, and that's why I wrote the book Smart On Crime.
LAUER: You got it in there in the last sentence. Well done, Kamala Harris. Nice to see you. It's good to have you here.
HARRIS: Thank you, thank you.
LAUER: You can read an excerpt of from book that she just plugged shamelessly. It's called Smart On Crime, and it's on our Web site, TodayShow.com.
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Two words: Bologna Family
October 29, 2009 - 14:43 ET by Anneke9Kamala Harris is a disgrace. Unfortunately, she'll probably end up being the next Attorney General. Harris is opposed to the death penalty and refuses to apply it. Instead, she prefers to fill up California's already overburdened prison system with murders whom the taxpayers will have to house, clothe, feed and provide health care for. Check out this article for a taste of what it's like to live in SF under Kamala Harris: Edwin Ramos won't face the death penalty, http://www.sfgate.co....
Edwin Ramos, a known MS-13 gang member, is in the United States illegally. When he was arrested as a juvenile, SF refused to deport him. That would've ruined its reputation as a kind, compassionate, progressive Sanctuary City. Instead, he was allowed to remain and commit more mayhem. He is now on trial for the murder of 3 innocent people. Ramos is alleged to have killed Tony Bologna and his sons Michael (20) and Matthew (16) in cold blood.
Kamala Harris and her weak, ignorant notions of justice and compassion will only drive the state farther into ruin. We might as well just turn the government over to MS-13 and the Central American drug cartels and be done with it.
Camouflage conservative in Baghdad-by-the-Bay
Well, there you go!
October 29, 2009 - 15:02 ET by motherbeltA female Barack Obama!
Well said. As a resident of
October 29, 2009 - 15:27 ET by Cho Yi FanAnneke9,Well said. As a resident of the SF Bay area I would also add that the policies of Harris and former police chief Heather Fong have weakened law enforcements ability to do their jobs.Neither Harris or Fong believe in the death penalty no matter how violent or heinous the crime. The sanctuary policy in San Francisco and the bay area in general allows those that are illegal and commit crimes to remain here protected from deportation to commit still more crimes. Crimes that would not have been committed if they had simply been deported.Not only are they not deported but they are rewarded with programs to make their illegal stay easier. Because,here in the PC Bay Area we must think of the human spirit and the poor little children of illegals.We must be sensitive and compassionate and spare those poor illegals any criticism or responsibility for any of their actions. Their poverty and economic circumstances are responsible not the person. They are just here to work and as they are already here illegally it is already hard enough for them as it is. So we must not enforce the law, that would be too cruel.
The Bologna family tragedy should never have happened but what's worse is the perp will never truly pay for his crime.Instead of the death penalty that he deserves he will go to San Q and live among his buds in MS 13.
It is hard to live with Bay Area Politics but it is even harder to live with the Bay Area PC attitudes.It is hard to live within a culture that defies human logic on a daily basis.
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have".
Thomas Jefferson
Brrr
October 29, 2009 - 14:41 ET by StarAZFemale Barack? My blood temperature just dropped 20 degrees.
How
October 29, 2009 - 14:45 ET by MOONSTRUCKdoes one tell the two apart? Does Kamala have muscles and facial hair.
Here's how to tell: Obama is a .com and Kamala is a .org
October 29, 2009 - 14:54 ET by SickofLibsOther than that, her website design and graphics are an exact duplicate of Obama's.
no. but what she does have is
October 29, 2009 - 15:11 ET by Calypso Jonesa very soft set, just as the president does.
am i going to get in trouble for that?
That's not an endorsement any more.
October 29, 2009 - 14:50 ET by jazbo"Democrats; Breeding voters like farm animals since 1962"
Here's some tidbits on
October 29, 2009 - 14:58 ET by bse5150Here's some tidbits on Kamala Harris' failures...
http://www.flashreport.org/featured-columns-library0b.php?faID=2009082711494561
This woman is a failure
October 29, 2009 - 15:29 ET by Calypso Jonesof epic proportions. And one has to wonder about the intelligence of someone passing her off as a success...although really calling her a female barack obama doesn't exactly mean real success.
The female Barack Obama?
October 29, 2009 - 15:01 ET by TheCynicSo she can't make any decisions, lies to the people and causes infighting amongst the Democrats in her area, too?
You didn't warn me, I
October 29, 2009 - 15:07 ET by ForeverOnTheRightYou didn't warn me, I needed to grab a barff bag! LOL
My sentiments exactly. You know the passenger ship lines in
October 29, 2009 - 19:12 ET by pahuberJapan have communal places for this inside the restrooms. I remember not knowing what they were for until we hit some rough seas and it became obvious... perhaps we need this at NBs ; )
Matt Lauer is a moe
October 29, 2009 - 15:29 ET by AcoustechMatt Lauer is a moe
HOLD ON...
October 29, 2009 - 15:31 ET by MrShy"The Female Barack Obama" is something to be....... hyped??
I think the MSM is stuck on November, 2008, or January, 2009, and holding on to the myth that this guy is still popular and revered.
Think again, morons.
have seen in my city and
October 29, 2009 - 15:35 ET by Dan The Man 2have seen in my city and throughout this country where we have large number of elementary school students who are literally missing 60 to 80 days of a 180-day school year
How is this possible? Its the fault of the district, in Texas you get into big trouble for this.
Hold On There
October 29, 2009 - 15:56 ET by sergeant stogieUh, excuse me, this is one of those "who ya gonna believe" moments. Before assigning one iota of credence to this puff piece a right-thinking person should research this woman's career record. Read some of the stories (and especially reader comments) on the SF Gate/Chronicle website. She is anti-capital punishment and pro-illegal immigrant sanctuary. As an elected District Attorney her job is that of a prosecutor and she has failed miserably. Case after case bungled and lost. Undercharging and plea bargaining. Those of us in the Bay Area pray that she isn't able to pull the wool over the eyes of the rest of the State of California and be elected Attorney General. She and her cohort, Gavin Newsome, will ensure the complete destruction of our state.
So they're calling her a
October 29, 2009 - 19:30 ET by GregESo they're calling her a female hater of the greatness of America, a female socialist, a female government loving wanna-be-a-ruler. She should be offended.
http://i196.photobuc...
Can someone fill me in here?
October 29, 2009 - 20:38 ET by gopcongressI don't really follow the careers of DA's to a certain degree. But what she is saying makes sense, on the surface.
1. Violent criminals should be locked up for a long time.
2. Non-violent, overt victimless criminals (no such thing as "totally victimless" crimes; but there are gradations) should be giving a lighter sentence with a heavy emphasis on rehabilitation, both in and out of incarceration, and in some cases expungement opportunities.
Any crime that has a victim of violence or threat of violence should render a long sentence.
Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with that.While we need to punish the offenders, we also have just as much incentive to reintegrate the offenders once they leave the court system, either from incarceration or parole. This is not a "coddling" mechanism, but rather one of cumulative societal safety (not to mention saving money from future incarceration, minus their ability to contribute to society with productive employment).
What is it about her position that she is against, other than perhaps the death penalty? Even if she doesn't pursue it on her own doesn't mean that she can prevent other prosecutors from going through with their capital cases.
OK, I'm sure there is a "D" vs. "R" argument that I'm missing. But as long as the violent offenders are put away for a long time, we can work to make the overal correctional system work as a "corrective" system, which includes punishment plus rehab.
_____________________
Moderate... Democrat... Liberal... Progressive... Socialist... Communist—The progression is clear as day.
the opposition is based on her actions not her words.
October 30, 2009 - 14:32 ET by UndercoverConservativeshe talks tough but her record shows the exact opposite. I've a few links in a reply farther down that, if you're honestly concerned about opposition to her "tough talk" will explain things perfectly.
WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)
OK, gotcha. Dickens was a bit lacking this post then.
October 30, 2009 - 17:58 ET by gopcongressFair enough. When I read the post, although I know that dems / commies get the kid glove treatment, I didn't see any overt reason to diss her until I read items from your links. To that end, Harris has not provided the track record that shows she gets understands the correctional system in toto.
While I appreciate Geoffrey Dickens for posting this interview, I didn't see any explanation from him with regard to Harris' "shortcomings." Perhaps writing about Harris' actual performance as the SF DA in the post would clarify her position, and then I could appreciate how this interview was just another puff piece without any real journalistic integrity from Matty boy. Not so much a criticism as an obversation, but not everyone is attuned to all factions of everybody in public office. A bit of background would be nice. :)
______________________
Moderate... Democrat... Liberal... Progressive... Socialist... Communist—The progression is clear as day.
Did she slap Lauer???
October 29, 2009 - 21:05 ET by HogTideRebelCatsDid she slap Matt Lauer for calling her that name?
Most women would be offended if they were told they had big floppy ears like nObama.
Hmm, a female Barack Obama
October 30, 2009 - 01:51 ET by gmaniac1Hmm, a female Barack Obama huh? I would take that as an insult but the zombies seem to love it.
That's all we black folk need is another liberal slave to appeal to our white liberal massas. And people call me an Uncle Tom, hardly. I am an uncle however so that part is true but Tom is not my first name;)
Matt Lauer.......
October 30, 2009 - 02:45 ET by Big MommaI'm confused.
I thought Barack Obama was a fema.............................
"Look Ma......I'm King of the World !" B. H. Obama
This Today piece is just a love letter from NBC
October 30, 2009 - 03:52 ET by JakeMoHollywood has chosen her as a future star and they're building the foundation now.
But even the San Francisco Chronicle can't pretty her up on the Bologna case: http://www.sfgate.co...
Her complicity in the Newsom/Fong sanctuary city policy is inexcusable.
She knows how to say what the polls tell her voters want to hear, but she's got her own agenda. Hence the Barack Obama comparison.
she talks big about locking up crooks but that's not her reality
October 30, 2009 - 14:31 ET by UndercoverConservativelets travesties like this occur:
http://www.sfgate.co...
and refused to seek the death penalty for cop killers:
http://www.sfdistric...
and wow..a member of the notorious Obama Truth Squad:
http://www.ibabuzz.c...
Refuses to do her job, choosing personal ideology over duty, supports the lies over the wishes of the people. First rate scum hiding behind 'affirmative action" and racial extortion.
WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)