Lauer to Malkin: Will 'No' Votes on Sotomayor Hurt GOP with Hispanics?

Photo of Geoffrey Dickens.
  • Bookmark and Share


NBC's Matt Lauer, on Wednesday's "Today" show, invited on conservative columnist and author Michelle Malkin to discuss several topics ranging from Henry Louis Gates Jr.'s arrest to Malkin's critique of Michelle Obama, but when the subject of only one Republican voting for Sonia Sotomayor in the Senate Judiciary committee came up, Lauer wondered if that would hurt the GOP with Hispanics as he queried: "After the, the last election it was said that the Republicans need to broaden the tent, they need to reach out to minorities. Reach out to Hispanics. Is that, are those six 'no' votes gonna hurt Republicans down the road?"

Lauer also expressed incredulity that Malkin dared to "take on," the First Lady as seen in the following exchange:

MATT LAUER: Let me ask you about your book. In it -- I mean clearly we know by the co-, we know by the title where it goes – you take on Michelle Obama-

MICHELLE MALKIN: I certainly do.

LAUER: -in this book. You call her the "First Crony."

MALKIN: Yes I do.

LAUER: Why?

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

MALKIN: Because she was steeped in the politics of the Daley machine. Her father was a patronage appointee of Daley. She's beholden to the type of hardball politics that Barack Obama says he is against. Her entire professional career was based on nepotism. And now she has brought almost every-

LAUER: Her entire? Wait, wait, wait, wait-

MALKIN: Absolutely.

LAUER: But that's, but that's a very broad comment. Her entire professional career-

MALKIN: Read, read chapter two. That's right.

LAUER: -was based on nepotism?

MALKIN: Read chapter two and you will find that despite her Princeton thesis, where she whined and moaned about the old boy network and how she couldn't get ahead because of her skin color, in fact, is a farce because it wasn't one of those old white boys who put her in that position, in the first place. And now this team of Chicago cronies, Susan Sher, Valerie Jarrett, David Axelrod and a lot of these bundlers that Obama had condemned are now installed in both the West Wing and the East Wing. They're ruining our economy and I think it, I think that the book shatters the entire era of hope and change. Now he helped kill it in a six month period.

The following is the full interview as it was aired on the July 29, "Today" show:

MATT LAUER: Alright Ron, thanks very much. Ron Allen in Cambridge for us this morning. Michelle Malkin is a conservative columnist, blogger and author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies. Michelle, good morning.

MICHELLE MALKIN: Good morning, Matt.

LAUER: What, what's the book about? No, I'm kidding.

MALKIN: I think you can't judge a book by it's cover, Matt.

LAUER: I'm kidding. On that particular case, I'll get to that in a second. But President Obama says the Gates situation is a "teaching moment." What has he learned, do you think, from the situation, the way he's handled it?

MALKIN: Well I think he is a racial opportunist and I think that he has learned that he shouldn't shoot his mouth off when he explicitly admits that he didn't know what happened.

LAUER: A racial opportunist?

MALKIN: Yes.

LAUER: He hasn't gotten to where he is today by being a racial opportunist, has he?

MALKIN: I think that he took that moment, used a health care conference that was a debacle, basically and took this story, which is really just a local parochial law enforcement story, to try and ensure some sort moment of his racial authenticity. And it backfired because he was wrong and he should have admitted it. And I think for a president that has offered up hope and change and a new politics is just another example. I wouldn't say that there is another example of corruption, but I think it is, I think it, it, it plays into this idea that a man who has hyped himself as something different and something new is nothing but that.

LAUER: You, you, you conclude all of that based on one mistake he made, in terms of a comment he made?

MALKIN: One mistake? Oh!

LAUER: I'm talking this comment. This particular comment-

MALKIN: It, it, no-

LAUER: -sets that entire scenario up for you?

MALKIN: No, I, I think it's clear that, that was a calculated move. Everything that this president does is Kabuki theater. Every townhall-

LAUER: You think this was a planned question?

MALKIN: Absolutely do.

LAUER: And, and the way he handled it and the fallout from it, was something he was looking for?

MALKIN: I think, I think that he overestimated the power of his authenticity in America. And it's just another example of a botched failure and that's what I filled Culture of Corruption with.

LAUER: Sonia Sotomayor was cleared this week by the Senate Judiciary committee-

MALKIN: Yes.

LAUER: It was pretty much a party line vote, 13 to 6. Lindsey Graham was the only Republican voting in her favor.

MALKIN: Yes no surprises, fait accompli.

LAUER: After the, the last election it was said that the Republicans need to broaden the tent, they need to reach out to minorities. Reach out to Hispanics. Is that, are those six "no" votes gonna hurt Republicans down the road?

MALKIN: No, because they were six principled votes against racial preferences and the idea that somehow identity politics has a place on the court of law.

LAUER: Why do you think Lindsey Graham voted in favor?

MALKIN: I think Lindsey Graham has a history of pandering to this idea that somehow the, the party should broaden itself for the sake of pandering to diversity.

LAUER: Let me ask you about your book. In it -- I mean clearly we know by the co-, we know by the title where it goes – you take on Michelle Obama-

MALKIN: I certainly do.

LAUER: -in this book. You call her the "First Crony."

MALKIN: Yes I do.

LAUER: Why?

MALKIN: Because she was steeped in the politics of the Daley machine. Her father was a patronage appointee of Daley. She's beholden to the type of hardball politics that Barack Obama says he is against. Her entire professional career was based on nepotism. And now she has brought almost every-

LAUER: Her entire? Wait, wait, wait, wait-

MALKIN: Absolutely.

LAUER: But that's, but that's a very broad comment. Her entire professional career-

MALKIN: Read, read chapter two. That's right.

LAUER: -was based on nepotism?

MALKIN: Read chapter two and you will find that despite her Princeton thesis, where she whined and moaned about the old boy network and how she couldn't get ahead because of her skin color, in fact, is a farce because it wasn't one of those old white boys who put her in that position, in the first place. And now this team of Chicago cronies, Susan Sher, Valerie Jarrett, David Axelrod and a lot of these bundlers that Obama had condemned are now installed in both the West Wing and the East Wing. They're ruining our economy and I think it, I think that the book shatters the entire era of hope and change. Now he helped kill it in a six month period.

LAUER: Gotta go, real quickly.

MALKIN: But we've documented it very clearly. Every inch of this administration is rife with corruption and cronyism and it's about time they look in the mirror and admit it.

LAUER: A lot of comments there. This is "Today" on NBC. We'll be back.

—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

A Question or a Political Statement

Lauer disguised a political assertion as a question. I don't recall him asking if the Democrats shoddy treatment of Miguel Estrada or Alberto Gonzalez would hurt the Democrats with Hispanics.

Political parties are about

Political parties are about ideas, ideals, and ideology.  Why would you want to draw in minorities with a giant net?  How will voting for a liberal supreme court nominee help the GOP attract hispanics with conversative ideals?  

It makes no sense.

If you want a party with a ton of people, stand for nothing and pander to everyone. If the GOP wants to be a party of conservative ideals, just trudging the bottom of the ocean with  open nets and pandering to hispanics of any kind is ludicrous.

What's the point of drawing in hispanics if most of them are hardcore liberal?  Might as well just turn over the GOP to San Francisco gay activists and ACORN.

GOP should get the ideals out there to hispanics and claim those that share the same concerns, values, etc.  No every hispanic out there is a chicano activist or illegal alien.  A lot of them came to the USA escaping the violence perpetrated by power hungry Che Guevara wannabes. Some of them own businesses.  A lot of them are legal.  

Something that can be offered to hispanics is freedom.  They aren't black, there is no reason they should bitch or why they should fall into the trap of being turned into another "victimized" ethnic group that the liberal democratic elite can manipulate at will.  Do they want to be the lap dogs of liberal white elites or do they want an atmosphere that is fair across the board and rife with competition in which they aren't treated as a weak ethnic group under the protective wings of the government?   There is no one more racist than a liberal.  Liberals think minorities are too stupid and weak to take care of themselves. 

Very good

Your right, let the Dems recrute their followers by pandoring. Conservitive should recrute using prudent thought and principals.

 

 My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

It's okay to pander as long

It's okay to pander as long as it to the right people.  GOP still markets itself as a conservative party but it panders to the wrong people in the wrong places.  It's not the blue state Republicans pandering to liberal hispanics, it's some southern Republicans like Lindsey Graham or Republicans in heavily white areas.

Even though the Democrats cast a wider net than Republicans, they seldom pander to the wrong people in the wrong places.  You don't catch Nancy Pelosi pandering to southern white males do you?  You don't catch the blue dogs pandering to California gay activists do you?  And if they pander to different groups depending on their location, they never really stray from the core liberal gospel.

So why the hell is Lindsey Graham from South Carolina pandering to hispanics and evoking "diversity" when he's from the darn SOUTH? New York Puerto Ricans aren't going to move to South Carolina to vote for him.  Is Lindsey Graham going to run in California?

Seriously.  If the GOP wants members for the sake of just getting members they should just pander to everyone and hope they don't offend anyone.  If they want to stand for something and they still want members then they have to be conscious of where they're from while not compromising the "theme" of the party.  No Republican from Arkansas or South Carolina should ever get caught pandoring to liberals across the country on national TV. 

 

Michelle and I Agree

I am glad to learn that I am not the only one who thinks the question regarding Gates was planned. I have said that from the beginning of this brouhaha.

The most telling thing in this Today Show conversation was the look of utter distaste on Lauer's face at the end of it. It was an expression he couldn't mask - loathing and revulsion.

I loved seeing him squirm. Michelle wouldn't back down. She soldiered on in spite of his aggressive warlike questioning.

I also agree Lynn

But I think 99% of questions asked of Obama are pre-planned

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Lynn... You haven't been

Lynn...

You haven't been alone, I've also said you can't help but think this was another set-up too.

Like everything else that O does.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

I saw this clip on Hot

I saw this clip on Hot Air.  Lauer looked like he stepped on a turd or something.  Somehow he doesn't have the capability of handling strong, intelligent women.  Michelle Malkin walked all over him and his Messiah and there was nothing he could do about it.

The Obama Administration: THE most fiscally irresponsible Administration EVER

Lauer: "OMG, a colored

Lauer: "OMG, a colored woman that isn't a liberal!  How dare she!"

 Nothing bothers a  "white liberal" more than a minority and/or woman that doesn't think the way they want them to.  

The Color Of Truth

Correct, NonArabOmar, not only doesn't Michelle Malkin agree with Lauer, she makes mincemeat of him when they talk. Fun to watch.

The Women

Good for Michelle Malkin (and Ann Coulter). She has more "you-know-what" than RINOS like Lindsey Graham. She is saying what must  be said if the country is ever going to straighten itself out. If McCain had talked like this, he would be president today. Avoiding the truth for perceived poitical gain might work for the "liberals", but it never works for the so-called conservatives who think they can win favor by being nice. Sad that it takes WOMEN like Michelle Malkin to be the real MEN in this country.

BTW- Michelle is right about Gates. He and Barry proved themselves to be race hustlers in the mold of Rev.Wrong, Jackson, and Sharpton. Sad.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal" 

 

Obviously Michelle Malkin didn't get the memo

that Michelle Obama is the black reincarnation of Jackie Kennedy, and is therefore beyond criticism.  The truth is not a defense.

Can Michelle O.

Can Ms. Obama explain to Americans how her salary at her last job at a Chicago hospital: 1. Jumped from $150k to $350k as soon as her husband was elected to the US Senate? 2. Why this position was not filled when she vacated it?

I think we know the answers to both and the Obamas are part of the problem in America, not part of any Change or Hope or other clap-trap.

Isu if what you say is true....

...than how long before Jackie..er.er.Michele has an affair with one of Barry's half brothers?  

 

 

Pssssst <whispers> Emperor Barry isn't wearing any clothes!

Did no votes from Dems on

Did no votes from Dems on Thomas hurt them with Blacks?

Did the Dem's vilification and railroading of AG Gonzales hurt them with Hispanics?

Did the hiring of two Black secretary's of state, and one of the most racially diverse cabinets in history (W's) help the GOP w/minorities?

No, No and No.

Bottom line, Dems want people to feel victimized so they can pretend to be their "protectors" and benefactors while painting the opposition as being the victimizers.  This keeps getting them re-elected. 

The Other Michelle

Glad to see Michelle telling the truth about the other Michelle. Wonder if Mrs.Obama's part-time $300,000+ per year sinecure at the Chicago hospital is mentioned in her book. I'm sure "cronyism" doesn't begin to explain the corruption in which the "glamor-girl" of America must have been involved. Yes, it's amazing how that "administrative position" disappeared after Barry's inauguration.

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Speaking of Cronyism and Patronage connections....

.. how many of you know that Michelle used to babysit the Rev. Jacksons kids when they were growing up. You know you had to be connected to the Chicago corruption machine for that to have happened! 

 

 

Pssssst <whispers> Emperor Barry isn't wearing any clothes!

Sad that it takes WOMEN like Michelle Malkin to be the real MEN

Great line.  I wish Malkin would run for at least a statewide office.  It would be fun to watch the exploding heads of the MSM and the Washington Repub dilettantes.

malkin

I became a Malkin fan when Chris Mathews kicked her off his show during the 04 Prez elections when whe defended the Swiftboaters. She was cool, articulate, and backed up everything. Mathews went into a tirade and told her to leave. Was wonderful. I love her.

Pandering

People are going to vote for those who they have common cause.It doesnt matter if your black,hispanic,irish it is all about your common values. 

I only know Lauer by his reputation. I have never bothered...

to watch his show.  Michelle Malkin is one of my Heroes.  Can't say the same about Lauer or any of his cronies.  Jim Webster

Michell Malkin is right on.

Michell Malkin is the smartest person I have ever heard on tv. She is exactly the kind of person we need in this country in politics. Her and  Andrea Tantaros are two of the bravest conservative women out there. They fly in the face of stereotypes and have accomplished plenty. Thay are bright women. I am glad they are not pandering to the status quo and being victimized by liberals. They are proof liberalism is a corrupt philosophy.

The entire Obama administration is corrupt and flys against everything he tricked people into thinking. No hope nor change.

Agree, but

You need to think about Lynn Chaney.  She's another hot potato for the conservative movement.

Funny how the women have more balls than the men...

A.P... Lynn always has

A.P...

Lynn always has been, but in this case I think you're talking about Liz...and I'm with ya.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

I'm sure nepotism has helped

I'm sure nepotism has helped Michelle. But her entire career seems like something you say to sell books.

Oh, wait... 

Only to the ignorant.Some

Only to the ignorant.Some people spend to much time watching Olbbie and his brother Rachel.

I don't watch any of them.

I don't watch any of them. 

And you can't tell me that Malkin isn't relishing the attention such a statement will make. 

balboa

For crying out loud.She has written 4 books.Big whup.Because she doesnt kowtow to the liberal view she is just doing it for her books.Give me abreak.

well99, I'm not saying

well99, I'm not saying that's the only reason she says something like that, but she darn well knows what attracts attention.

balboa

Which pundit doesnt?Why single her out?

...because this thread is

...because this thread is about her?

balboa

So you have done the same about others on the threads about them?

MM - you are my hero!!!

Perhaps Michelle M. can give lessons in courage and conviction to the men in the Republican Party? 

 

"The preservation of the sacred faith of liberty & the destiny of the republican model of gov't. are justly considered deeply...finally, staked on the experiment entrusted to the American people."G. Washington's 1st inaugural address

Lauer Presses Malkin on Sotomayor Opposition

I saw this coming, but despite having this leftist liberal quota queen on the Supreme Court, I for one am GLAD to see the Republican Party crash and burn: It ceased being Republican long ago. Has everyone forgotten what happened when Ron Paul stepped up to the plate? The GOP squandered the chance of a lifetime to nominate a real statesman who was honest, articulate, pro-Constitution, and whose integrity would have slam-dunked any opponent. His message was eloquent, concise and bullet-proof. He should have been a shoo-in. But instead, the Republicans marginalized him as a political cultist, cut him out of the debates, and then changed election rules to block new members from joining the GOP in time to vote him in for the primaries: And as a result, they lost the presidency and both houses to the Stalinist Politboro we have moving in full swing today.

Now Obama the sly fox hands you a choice: A stew you can choke on - or a poison pill if you don't vote for ethnic politics to win the Latino voting block: Brilliant move! And indeed, what do Sotomayor's supporters know or care? She's hispanic - that's all that counts (BTW so am I, but I can still see a wolf in sheep's clothing).  Nice work boys: Pat yourselves on the back and sharpen your sickles because you'll need them. But do look at the bright side: You'll be a "Citizen of the World" (man without a country) on Obama's great Global Plantation. Well, I guess sometimes justice really IS poetic. Sleep in peace GOP, and good riddance! You've gone the way of the wooley mammoth, and you did it to yourselves.

Video

Full Malkin interview at Breitbart.

Michelle Malkin has learned how to handle the liberal media

cronies of Obama and the Dems since she was ambushed by Chris Matthews back in 2004.

When the state-run media invite someone like Michelle Malkin or Liz Cheney for interviews, they treat them with utmost respect; otherwise, the leftist interviewer will be turned into chopped liver by them.

Also, Michelle is on the mark regarding RINO Lindsey Graham. Hopefully, many of the RINOs will be replaced by conservatives in 2010 and beyond.

-----------------------------------------------------------

"Powell's not a Republican.  McCain's not a Republican.  These guys are not even mavericks.  They are Washingtonians. Washingtonians have their own culture and their own desires, and it is to matter.  They don't care who's in power, they just want to be closely associated with whoever is.  That's the name of the game and they want press adulation.  They want to be loved and adored by the media, they want fawning treatment, they want to be thought of as something special, unique, dignified and so forth, and that's the Washington establishment." ~ Rush Limbaugh

American

Republicans did not nominate a Latina woman because she was a Latina woman, that would be a racist thing to do.

Republicans will not Confirm a Latina woman because she is a Latina woman, that would be a racist thing to do.

African-American, Latin-American (insert ethnicity here)- American, why not just be American? Liberals like to name Americans in order to divide Americans, and it is time the Republicans call them on it.

 

Michelle Good Job!

Ruth Michelle, you were great on Matt Laur.

 

Thanks for such a great voice of reason in this ungodly media.

 

 

 

 

          It's a

          It's a wonder Lauer didn't punch her in the nose.

Lauer is to wussified to

Lauer is to wussified to ever think of hitting anyone.  He'll just sit there and pout.  He probably went into the bathroom for a cry after Michelle showed him what a real woman was like.

The Obama Administration: THE most fiscally irresponsible Administration EVER