Matt Lauer 'Worried' Government Won't Be Able to Dictate to Business Any More

Photo of Geoffrey Dickens.
  • Bookmark and Share

The announcement that Goldman-Sachs may be able to pay back its bailout loan, sooner rather than later, was met with a grim assessment by NBC's Matt Lauer, on Tuesday's "Today" show as the co-anchor fretted to the Obama administration's Christina Romer: "I'm worried if you think if that's a good thing. Are they doing this because of financial stability or might they be talking about that, simply to get out from under the thumb of the federal government and be allowed to go back to running the business the way they want to run it as opposed to the way the government wants them to run it?"

Lauer invited on Romer, the chair of Obama's Council of Economic Advisers to preview the President's speech on the economy and pressed her about companies going back to "business as usual" but Romer assured Lauer that, "We are going to be working on financial regulatory reform."

The following is a complete transcript of the interview as it was aired on the April 14, "Today" show:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

MATT LAUER: Christina Romer is chair of President Obama's Council of Economic Advisers. Dr. Romer, it's nice to see you. Good morning.

CHRISTINA ROMER: Good morning.

LAUER: When the President gives his economic speech today, he's gonna be able to point to some things that are going well and he's also gonna be able to talk about some things that are still deeply troubling. So is the view in the administration right now, that when it comes to the economy the glass is half empty or half full?

ROMER: I think we are being very pragmatic. We're being very reasonable. We know that the economy is still in a lot of trouble. You couldn't look at that job report from last week and not know that, that is the case. But what the President has said and what we certainly all believe, there are his glimmers of hope or his shoots of green, whatever metaphor you want to use, small little signs that, that maybe some parts of the economy are stabilizing.

LAUER: I guess what's puzzling Dr. Romer to me, and maybe this goes to this, this idea that, you know, if it sounds to good to be true it is, but for the past six months or so we've had economic experts parade through this show and do interviews and almost all of them said this was gonna be a long and deep recession, perhaps lasting all through 2009 even into 2010. So if we compare that to these glimmers of hope already it makes me worried that we're getting ahead of ourselves.

ROMER: Well I think you want to understand what a glimmer of hope means. I mean as I said, we know the economy is still sick, we know we've got several more months job loss, for example. We know that the, the numbers on the GDP are almost surely gonna be very bad for this quarter and next. So we certainly don't want to lead people to think that, you know, spring is, is right here for the economy. It's more giving them a sense that we are seeing signs that the programs are working, that we're seeing a sense of some parts of the economy are starting to, to find their bottom, and that's a useful thing for the American people to know.

LAUER: Let, let me ask you about this report on Monday from Goldman Sachs. They, they beat investors' expectations, reported a profit for the first three months of this year of $1.66 billion. And some people at Goldman are starting to talk about the possibility of paying off the bailout money ahead of schedule and I'm worried if you think if that's a good thing. Are they doing this because of financial stability or might they be talking about that, simply to get out from under the thumb of the federal government and be allowed to go back to running the business the way they want to run it as opposed to the way the government wants them to run it?

ROMER: Well, the important thing of course is any time an American company earns profits, that's a good thing. In terms of firms paying off their money from the government, the TARP money that they took, that's gonna be something that, that the regulators and the Treasury will be working with, with each bank to figure out if it is exactly a sign that they're very healthy. But we certainly are going to be looking at that on a case-by-case basis. The important thing is-

LAUER: But are you worried about, are you worried about companies like this, banking companies in particular, going back to business as usual?

ROMER: No, because one of the things that the President will talk about in his speech is how we are going to be working on financial regulatory reform to make sure that we can't just go back to business as usual, to make sure that we go back to a stronger, more secure economy.

LAUER: Alright Christina Romer. Doctor it's nice to see you this morning, thanks, excuse me, thank you for your time.

ROMER: Nice to see you.

—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Correct

You are very correct in your assessment, comrade Matt. You are correct to worry, beings that we all know exactly what your inclinations are.

 

I'm Worried Also

as a GE shareholder, I'm worried that Matts salary is way too high, and NBC earnings are way down.

Isn't it ironic that the

Isn't it ironic that the media, like congress, is worries that a person in charge of a company with thousands of employees  might make as much as themselves, sports figures, movie stars etc. all of which can't even run their own lives.

"DumbAssity of Dope"

Award winning comment by Lauer

That has got to be a front-runner for the 2009 awards for idiot leftwing bias on prominent display.

Are they doing this because of financial stability or might they be talking about that, simply to get out from under the thumb of the federal government and be allowed to go back to running the business the way they want to run it as opposed to the way the government wants them to run it?"

Stunning in its stupidity.  Drenched in kool-aid. 

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

Agreed Blonde

I never thought I'd hear such idiocy in private, never mind on a public news/tv broadcast.

"To sin by silence when we should protest, makes cowards of men" -Ella Wheeler Wilcox

Why would anyone want the

Why would anyone want the Government to tell them how to run their business since the government can't even run the government!!!

Chains you can believe in!!!

best slogan for 2012

Freedom!

 Obama gained applause with "Change".  The best slogan for 2012 or 2010 for that matter is "Freedom to Prosper"   That seems to be a foreign concept to the liberal media!  It seems the only ones allowed to prosper are politicians.  I should be used to this.  As my father used to say "you can't blame fire for being hot or ice for being cold and you can't blame a fool for being foolish!"  Matt Lauer is a fool.

keeping business on a short leash?

sensible regulations.  not nationalisation.  Say it with me now, Matt.

Nothing Good Will Come of TARP

This is where it leads, -from yesterday's WSJ: Bailed Out Banks Face Probe Over Fee Hikes: http://online.wsj.com

Government micromanagement will kill any company, just look at the American auto manufacturers.

"Business as usual"

All of a sudden we are worried about "business as usual". Hey Lauer, business as usual got America where it was, until last October, when government "intervened". And what did that bring?---corruption and waste. It has put us on the road to economic Hell. But, of course, it wouldn't be so bad if they capped your salary, Matty boy. I'd say you're worth about 25 grand a year. How about it buddy?

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Notice the Banner....

always positive when getting out the Messiahs message. I can always tell how they'll spin it even with the volume off! Preceding the interview with this Kool aid drinker was Matty talking to Chuck Todd about Barry's speech. Matt said that all this economic talk was being upstaged by the "First Dog"! No really, they're having a press conference to introduce Bo today and Chuckles said that all those in the press room will be bringing their "scoopers". Too funny, too bad they're serious. Too bad for us that is.

 

25 Grand? That's way more than he's worth

I say we pay Komrade Lauer a DOLLAR A MONTH!!!  That is commensurate with his skill as an interviewer and a tv personality.

"To sin by silence when we should protest, makes cowards of men" -Ella Wheeler Wilcox

Let's see...

Let's see, is it a good idea for the banks to pay back the loan the citizens gave to them, or shall we let the banks keep the money and force our children pay for the deficits this money caused? Humm... such a hard decision to make, especially since it was "toxic" loans, ones that were never payed back, that caused the banks to fail in the first place. Right Matt?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

oh poor matt'e

so worried ,is he ,this cry baby from, the far left field of "dream stream" media. he's selling the people out every time he's on the the tellie.

Business as usual

Why not, Matty? You and your ilk continue to conduct bias as usual while your business continuing to go down the tubes. 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

regulations

So Comrade O & company are planning regulations.  Do you think Fannie &Freddie will be subject to them?  Will they be regulated by an independent board with premium costs like the FDIC? Will they continue to be the only Fortune 500 companies not subject to Sarbanes-Oxley? If either, or both of these two standards were applied do you think the underwrinting guidelines for mortgages would have been loosened so dramatically? This is over and above CRA loans or even sub-prime.  This has to do with influential Congressmen( Frank/Dodd) prohibiting regulation of those 2 GSEs which allowed politicians, mosly in the 51 "community service office" areas to use Fannie and Freddie like earmarks.

Why do these knuckleheads

Why do these knuckleheads think the government can run anything?

The main reason the U.S. won several wars was because our enemies' governments interfered with their militaries more than ours did.  When we come up against small, decentralized outfits we've had the most problems.

My theory anyway.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).