Laura Ingraham Tweaks 'Today' On Obama Obsession

Photo of Geoffrey Dickens.
  • Bookmark and Share

The "Today" show devoted much of last week's coverage of Obama's European trip to obsessing over such frivolous matters as what Michelle Obama was wearing and what kind of gift the Obamas gave the Queen, so when Laura Ingraham was invited on Wednesday's "Today" show, the conservative radio talk show host couldn't resist knocking the silly coverage, as seen in the following exchange with NBC's Matt Lauer (audio available here):

MATT LAUER: So let's be fair and say that he didn't come away accomplishing what he went there to accomplish, but is it possible to say, look at it slightly differently, Laura, and say some of these things take a while to bear fruit and that perhaps some of these leaders, other leaders were reluctant to come forward with some of these things under the glare of the summit spotlight and they may be more forthcoming in the coming weeks and months?

LAURA INGRAHAM: Well I don't know, I guess that's possible. But look we, we know that Europe loves President Obama. He had adoring crowds. The press loves Obama. The question is how will this date end? Okay? The question is, to what end? Why do they love President Obama? They love his personal story, they love his wife. North Korea, China and Russia don't really care about Michelle's arms and, you know, whether they gave an iPod to the Queen, okay? They care about whether America is still going to lead, exhibit strength and doesn't just talk about these vague concepts, Matt, of global cooperation.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

For his part, the one time Lauer attempted to be critical of Obama, in his over-apologizing for America, he stopped short as he claimed Obama's "apologetic" stance was just being "honest."

LAUER: Well let me take it a step further because some critics of, of President Obama say the reason the Europeans love him is, is less about respect and more about the fact that he's been somewhat apologetic, and some would call that honest, and, and, and the Europeans like this.

Right before Ingraham's appearance NBC's foreign correspondent Richard Engel contrasted the praise Iraqis had for Obama to the shoe-throwing hatred for the President who freed them from Saddam Hussein's oppression:

ENGEL: Across Baghdad, President Obama was warmly welcomed. At a barber shop, I asked Kaid Abdel-Qatar (sp?) if President Obama is turning a page in relations with Muslims? "Yes," he said, "A new chapter is what we need." Next door the baker told me, "Obama cares about Islam. We didn't see this from President Bush." During former President Bush's last visit a journalist threw two shoes at him. The reporter was sentenced to three years in prison, but many Iraqis sympathized with his anger. Yesterday a court here reduced the sentence to just one year.

The following is a complete transcript of the Engel set-up piece followed by the full interview segment with Ingraham as it was aired on the April 8, "Today" show:

MEREDITH VIEIRA: But first President Obama back home at the White House after an unannounced tour of Iraq's war zone. NBC's chief foreign correspondent Richard Engel is in Baghdad for us this morning. Richard, good morning to you.

RICHARD ENGEL: Good morning, Meredith. U.S. troops and Iraqis today are both welcoming President Obama's visit after he made a surprise stop to Baghdad's Camp Victory. At times, the room looked frenzied. Hundreds of U.S. troops clamored to take photographs of President Obama in the rotunda of what had been Saddam Hussein's favorite palace.

BARACK OBAMA: I love you back! It is time for us to transition to the Iraqis. They, they need to take responsibility for their country and for their sovereignty.

ENGEL: The President promised to stick to a plan, to pull out combat forces by August 2011.

OBAMA: We have not forgotten what you've already done. We are grateful for what you will do, and as long as I'm in the White House, you are going to get the support that you need.

ENGEL: Across Baghdad, President Obama was warmly welcomed. At a barber shop, I asked Kaid Abdel-Qatar (sp?) if President Obama is turning a page in relations with Muslims? "Yes," he said, "A new chapter is what we need." Next door the baker told me, "Obama cares about Islam. We didn't see this from President Bush." During former President Bush's last visit a journalist threw two shoes at him. The reporter was sentenced to three years in prison, but many Iraqis sympathized with his anger. Yesterday a court here reduced the sentence to just one year. Reaching out to Muslims was one of President Obama's main themes. He arrived in Baghdad from Istanbul, Turkey, once the capital of the Muslim world. With his shoes off he toured the city's famed Blue Mosque.

OBAMA: It's spectacular.

ENGEL: And Hagia Sophia, itself a symbol of reconciliation. Once a church, then a mosque, now it's a museum. The President told Turkish students he's committed to more engagement with Muslims.

OBAMA: We can't afford to talk past one another to focus only on our differences.

ENGEL: Asked how he was different from President Bush, Mr. Obama said, "Steering the U.S. is like piloting a big tanker."

OBAMA: They're not like speedboats. You can't just whip them around and go in a new direction. Instead, you've got to slowly move it and then eventually you end up in a very different place.

ENGEL: Tomorrow marks the sixth anniversary of the fall of Saddam Hussein's government. Thousands of demonstrators are expected to gather in the square where Saddam's statue was pulled down. They will be calling for all U.S. troops to leave Iraq. Matt?

MATT LAUER: Alright Richard Engel in Baghdad for us this morning. Richard thank you very much. So was the President's first trip overseas a success? Laura Ingraham is a Fox News analyst and nationally syndicated radio host. Laura, good to see you, good morning.

[On screen headline: "Conservative Criticism, Is Obama Apologizing For America?"]

LAURA INGRAHAM: Hey Matt.

LAUER: Let, let's start with the brass tacks of the trip. The, the President went with some stated goals. He wanted money from these other leaders to help with the global economic recovery. He wanted some help in Afghanistan, whatever form that might have taken, whether military or financial. Wanted to talk about nuclear non-proliferation. So give him a report card on those subjects.

INGRAHAM: Well look, first when it comes to getting all these countries to give two percent of their GDP for this global stimulus, I mean they took that off the table before they even went overseas on this big trip. So that was completely lost. This idea that we were going to, you know, bring people to the table and we were going to, you know, come up with this, this, this plan that was gonna make the world safer. I mean look, we're gonna meet with the Russians at some point in the next year. There's no clear sense that, that's going to accomplish anything. We know Russia, Matt, was set to eliminate some of these defense systems and update their defense systems and this was a conversation that the Russians started to have with President Bush. So I don't think we've, we've seen much there. Look what we do-

LAUER: So let's be fair and say that he didn't come away accomplishing what he went there to accomplish, but is it possible to say, look at it slightly differently, Laura, and say some of these things take a while to bear fruit and that perhaps some of these leaders, other leaders were reluctant to come forward with some of these things under the glare of the summit spotlight and they may be more forthcoming in the coming weeks and months?

INGRAHAM: Well I don't know, I guess that's possible. But look we, we know that Europe loves President Obama. He had adoring crowds. The press loves Obama. The question is how will this date end? Okay? The question is, to what end? Why do they love President Obama? They love his personal story, they love his wife. North Korea, China and Russia don't really care about Michelle's arms and, you know, whether they gave an iPod to the Queen, okay? They care about whether America is still going to lead, exhibit strength and doesn't just talk about these vague concepts, Matt, of global cooperation-

LAUER: Right.

INGRAHAM: -but actually backs up talk with action. And that's-

LAUER: And let me take that-

INGRAHAM: -where I think he failed. The North Korea missile test was his first test and what's happened since? The UN Security Council - a deafening silence. Now the popularity of Obama is so far not translating into a lot. But look he's well liked and you know he has succeeded, I think, in turning page. But the Europeans haven't done much yet.

LAUER: Well let me take it a step further because some critics of, of President Obama say the reason the Europeans love him is, is less about respect and more about the fact that he's been somewhat apologetic, and some would call that honest, and, and, and the Europeans like this. This is less about respect and more about Schadenfreude. They like to see a diminished United States. Would you be on that bandwagon?

INGRAHAM: Well yeah they, they like to see America on her knees, until they need America. So they love the fact that he said, "We're arrogant, Americans don't understand Europe." They love the fact that he continues to talk about, you know, America and her flaws and, and "Yeah, America, I believe in American Exceptionalism but the Greeks believed in their exceptionalism and, and Britain believes in her exceptionalism."

LAUER: But wasn't he pretty even-handed with that Laura? I think the, the part of the speech that you're referring to right now, let me read it as I throw my glasses on here. He said, quote, "In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even, even derisive." But in the next sentence he went on to say, "But in Europe there's an anti-Americanism that is at once casual but can also be insidious." So what's wrong with kind of starting from that base level of saying, "We've both been to blame in the past?"

INGRAHAM: Well it, it, that's fine, that's fine. And he did say that. There was one or two mentions of that. But I think what we didn't hear from the President is a challenge to Europe, a strong challenge, to say, "Look I'm asking my people back at home to sacrifice in this time of, of global crisis. We need Europeans to sacrifice more. We need you to make a real commitment, militarily to securing liberty and freedom in the world and we will lead, we always have and we will continue to lead. I'm not making apologize, apologies for America's desire to lead the world. We believe we have the right path forward. We're listening to you but we're leading." He got not a single French troop, Matt. Not a single French troop to join the effort in Afghanistan. Nothing! They got a paltry increase in the number of troops going to Afghanistan on this trip. For someone who is this popular and so, you know, laudatory about global cooperation and these ideals, he comes home with precious little in terms of results, in global cooperation. That's my point. Is he well liked? Absolutely.

LAUER: Okay.

INGRAHAM: Does he have a beautiful family? Yes. Does it result in actual benefits to us and the American people? I don't think so.

LAUER: Alright Laura Ingraham. Laura, it's good to have you here. As always, nice seeing you, thanks.

INGRAHAM: Thanks Matt.

—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Obama's Europe Trip

So Europe likes America again?  This must mean that America has again committed to do Europe's fighting for her (again).

Obama believes that His skills are so great that He can talk an enemy out of taking action against us.  We'll see what he does when Islamic militants manage another major attack on US soil.  

His arrogance and belief in His oratory are hugely dangerous.

 

 

The new game

You are on the money, here! Let me be the first here, however, to let all those at this site know exactly what will happen if another attack on us soil happens....IT WILL BE BLAMED ON BUSH AND THE REPUBLICANS. You think it is bad now...you will witness a stunning twisting of truth and reality by the MSM like no other in your lifetime. Let me say it again, BAM BAM will not and will not have to take responsibility...the attack will be used to further their agenda...You will all sit in disbelief when this all goes down... as it will....

Re the new game

I expect that when Obammy is running for his second term or in the primary, he will still be saying 'I take full responsibility but none of this is my fault' or some similar garbage, and the liberal media will still be sucking it up. If there is an attack, of course they will look for some way to blame it on President George W. Bush.

It looks like the Somali

It looks like the Somali Pirates are pissed the Great and Mighty O didn't apologize to them for America's faults.  It's always the ones left out that feel pouty.

 

Obama:  "The Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers." -Ed Mahmoud

The doofus-in-chief

Diplomacy is not about honesty. Let's hope the Bamster learns this before it's too late.

"look at it slightly differently, Laura"

dig a hole and put your head in it.  Then you can get an idea of Mr Lauer's perspective.

Oh I thought you were going to say something else

Such as bend over, put your head up your ass and then you'll see Lauer's perspective.  But yours works too.

"To sin by silence when we should protest, makes cowards of men" -Ella Wheeler Wilcox

Why would any American want

Why would any American want to jump on any bandwagon that promotes a diminished America?  And maybe the reason Americans don't recognize leadership in Europe is simply because there is none! 

→ Don't know rimsky

There exists that group who believe mightily on every word that gives their imagination a tickling twinge.

Sitting around thinking high thoughts of self-flagellation, they just know it must be true the Earth is warming, and we, are the culprits.

It must be true that Europe is more content than we, else why would they have such unkind things to say about us?

It must be true that we are the sole contributors to world squalor.  Are we not rich, and the rest of the world poor?   Is there not a finite quantity of wealth in the World, and we control it to the death and detriment of other countries?

These are the thoughts they entertain.  They believe we should suffer.  Those of them who believe in a God pray that He will send them suffering.


LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

CA, I love your comment

CA, I love your comment about the belief of many that there is a finite quantity of wealth in the world, that somehow needs to be redistributed. Ludicrous! 

I think that if the masses had just a hair's worth more economic sense in their brains we wouldn't have half the problems we have right now. 

Iraqis are not like this

I happened recently to have a conversation with a reservist who was back from Iraq and he had been nailed in a roadside ambush.  He was the gunner and he says the humvee exploded and he went flying up and came down on the hood of the humvee and that's all he remembers.  Regardless of this, he says that the Iraqis he met were grateful to GWB and men like himself for providing them freedom from Saddam and this nonsense of finding one guy who otherwise disagrees is garbage.

But we also need not point out the obvious hypocrisy in worshipping Obama's sycophantic ass sucking of the King of Saudi Arabia and all other nations, saying 'it needs to bear fruit' and GWB liberating this entire nation for the cause of freedom and allowing THAT time to bear fruit.  I think GWB's change will be more meaningful and relevant.

"To sin by silence when we should protest, makes cowards of men" -Ella Wheeler Wilcox

Interests

The problem with Obama's foreign policy is that it depends on other countries looking out for Obama's interests, and not their own. That doesn't happen. The strategic problem is that Europe knows that America is going to address the problems in Afghanistan and Iraq on its own, no matter what they do. So why should they contribute? Their contribution won't make that much difference, but it may cost them a great deal. To broadly claim that "we're all in this together" really doesn't mean anything.

  • This is standard game theory. Game theory has standard models to describe different strategic situations, the logic involved, and what strategies succeed or fail. The models are called games.
  • The game being played here is the most common game of all: Prisoner's Dilemma. You get a Prisoner's Dilemma when everyone would do better if they all cooperated, but each individual might do better if they "cheat." But, since every individual has the same chance and likelihood to cheat, the logic makes it extremely difficult to get a group to voluntarily take on a tough job. The question each individual asks is: "If the group is going to succeed but doesn't need me, I can save the cost of participating and still enjoy the result. On the other hand, if the group is going to fail no matter what I do, why bother?" The logic forces non-cooperation.
  • Why doesn't Europe ever contribute? Because they know that America is going to act, no matter what Europe does. So, Europe has every motive to hold back. The only way to get Europe to act is for America to refuse to save their ass.

Europe occasionally adds insult to ignorance. France, for instance, not only refused to help America with Iraq, they actively undermined the effort to enforce the UN resolution - for exactly the Prisoner's Dilemma reason I mentioned above. But then, in an act of spectacular arrogance, they demanded to compete on equal terms with American firms when bidding for contracts within Iraq. Bush answered firmly: you didn't help liberate Iraq, so you don't get to profit from it.

How did the media report it? "Bush Snubs Allies." Then the Democrats wailed that Bush was being arrogant, spurning our allies when they wanted to help. Bastards.

Obama's proposed Cap & Trade is Economy Killer

Chip off the old block blogging here. (Pleasant aka Plez)

http://youhavetobeth...

"Obama cares about Islam.

"Obama cares about Islam. We didn't see this from President Bush."

(Probably because Obama is a muslim.)

With his shoes off he toured the city's famed Blue Mosque. 

I remember after 9/11 Bush went to mosques and took his shoes off and spoke to the Am. people that we must respect the peaceful religion of Islam.

Thousands of demonstrators are expected to gather in the square where
Saddam's statue was pulled down. They will be calling for all U.S.
troops to leave Iraq.

If they do that, I say we tell them all to go to hell and leave their country.  We'll see how they like that.  What ingrates!

Just the rest of the world going along with the script

Oh it doesn't matter that GWB did exactly all the same things.  The world is going to make the blind peons over here think that they LOVE Obama and America when the only thing they LOVE about him is the percentage of brain dead idiots who voted to put this incompetent boob in office.  Now they are going to REALLY go to town on America.  God help us all.

"To sin by silence when we should protest, makes cowards of men" -Ella Wheeler Wilcox

The platitudes

and empty rhetoric of Obama sounds oh so good to the mindless minions from the 30,000 foot level, but when we drill down, not only are they almost completely devoid of specifics, but what little  seems to exist is nothing more than useless tripe meant to weaken the United States, embolden our enemies and make the Europeans like us more (because apparently that is oh so important).

Anyone ever hear the phrase, "misery loves company".  Well that is exactly what Obama gave the Europeans via his scripted apology gaffe at the G20 summit -- company.

These Europeans (and many Americans) think freedom is just "there", like a summer breeze or a rainy day in April.  You know, I really wish they were right about that, but something tells me they are terribly, terribly wrong.

God made man, but he used a monkey to do it  -- DEVO

Didn't European nations

Didn't European nations give the world colonialism, fascism, nazism, and communism?  Yet America is constantly berated for being imperfect (like there is a perfect nation). 

As always, Laura makes...

mincemeat out of these liberal lightweights.  Laura lives to lower the lights on the likes of Lauer.  Jim Webster