NBC's Mitchell Pushes Hillary to Bring Back Assault Weapons Ban

Photo of Geoffrey Dickens.
  • Bookmark and Share

NBC's Andrea Mitchell, in a taped interview from Mexico with Hillary Clinton on Thursday's "Today" show, partially blamed the Bush administration for Mexico's current drug cartel violence as she charged that "90 percent of the guns used by gangs," were available because the Bush White House and Congress let the assault weapons ban lapse. Mitchell even went as far to push the Secretary of State to "challenge the gun lobby," and "reinstitute," the ban.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And 90 percent of the guns used by the gangs come from the U.S., including the powerful assault weapons that were banned until Congress and the Bush White House let the ban expire.

MITCHELL TO HILLARY CLINTON: Why not take that on? It would be tough but why doesn't the administration challenge the gun lobby and take on the assault weapons ban and reinstitute it?

CLINTON: I'm, I'm not gonna, you know sugar coat it. It's a very heavy lift. I think that's a mistake. I think these assault weapons, these military style weapons don't belong on any one's street.

The following is a complete transcript of the segment as it was aired on the March 26, "Today" show:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

NATALIE MORALES: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is in Mexico today pledging to help the government there battle the drug wars affecting both countries. NBC's chief foreign affairs correspondent Andrea Mitchell is traveling with Secretary Clinton. Andrea, good morning.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Good morning, Natalie. Top U.S. officials now say that the Mexican drug cartels are the largest organized crime organizations in the United States. Here in Mexico Hillary Clinton said that, that would not be happening. They wouldn't be thriving if Americans didn't have an insatiable demand for illegal drugs. A shootout between Mexican police and kidnappers in Baja and another victim in Tijuana, part of an escalating battle that has claimed 7000 lives in the last 15 months. Hillary Clinton came to Mexico with a message Mexico's President Felipe Calderon wanted to hear.

HILLARY CLINTON: Congratulate you on your leadership.

MITCHELL: In an interview with NBC News she said the U.S. shares responsibility for the drug war.

CLINTON: It is drug demand in the United States which drives the drugs north across our border.

MITCHELL: And 90 percent of the guns used by the gangs come from the U.S., including the powerful assault weapons that were banned until Congress and the Bush White House let the ban expire.

MITCHELL TO CLINTON: Why not take that on? It would be tough but why doesn't the administration challenge the gun lobby and take on the assault weapons ban and reinstitute it?

CLINTON: I'm, I'm not gonna, you know sugar coat it. It's a very heavy lift. I think that's a mistake. I think these assault weapons, these military style weapons don't belong on any one's street.

MITCHELL: The Obama administration is sending more agents and screening equipment to the border, including helicopters. Clinton says clearly Mexico needs the help.

CLINTON: They are facing ruthless, well-armed, absolutely violent, to an extreme, conscienceless foes and we're, we're gonna be there to help them all the way.

MITCHELL: And in fact President Obama will be here, following Clinton, and other top officials. He'll be here in three weeks. Meanwhile another crisis looms. North Korea has now placed a long range missile on a launch pad, a step closer to launching a missile. Hillary Clinton said, told us last night, that, that would be a provocative step and there would be consequences. Natalie?

MORALES: Alright, Andrea Mitchell in Mexico City, thank you Andrea.

—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Let them prove it.

"MITCHELL: And 90 percent of the guns used by the gangs come from the
U.S., including the powerful assault weapons that were banned until
Congress and the Bush White House let the ban expire."

 

Any gun manufactured in the United States can be traced right back to the last time it was sold.If those guns are really coming from America then  it should be easy enough to verify.Nobody in this country can just anonymously buy or sell a gun anymore.

 

Because with a name like Obama... you know it has to be good.

They (the Libs and Media)

They (the Libs and Media) are using this bogus 90% claim to push their agenda.  While I don't doubt stolen and illegally purchased US firearms are being smuggled to Mexico, I seriously doubt that country is being crippled by gangs armed with shotguns, .22s, and handguns.  Anyone with a lick of sense can see that they're using weapons are stolen from the Mexican military/police, and buying them on the black market.  The automatic weapons aren't coming from the US.  More likely, they're coming from Cuba, Venezuela, China, and other Central American nations.

Chaos serves these usurpers purposes.  If you want to find the source of the problem, find who it's benefiting the most.

Poor, innocent, mistreated Mexico.

Hey, Andrea Mitchell, how about the tons and tons of marijuana, heroin and cocaine Mexico ships to urban slums and schools in OUR country?

Where's your outrage over the millions of illegal aliens from Mexico invading OUR country, killing and attacking OUR citizens and bankrupting OUR social safety net?

How about saving a little anger for Democrat politicians who openly campaign for the illegal votes of illegal aliens by giving them driver's licenses (with 'motor voter' automatic voting registration)? 

This is the opening shot in Obama's war on the Second Amendment.

NOLI PUGNARE ME OCCIDERE

I'm, I'm not gonna, you

I'm, I'm not gonna, you know......Her Royal Clintoness

Nice to know that some things don't change....

Hey Annnn-drea!!

What the heck power does the SoS have over gun laws?????

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

Looks

If I looked and talked like Andrea, I would also want guns banned; especially those used for camel hunting.

Andrea Ditz!

The only ban that would work, is one that bans Andrea Mitchell from ever doing any television work ever again. She is HOPELESS!!

Andrea Ditz!

The only ban that would work, is one that bans Andrea Mitchell from ever doing any television work ever again. She is HOPELESS!!

Yea, right.....

Hey Andrea,

Most (the majority) of the weapons shown in pictures, include AK 47's, Uzi's & full auto M16's. Some even show mortars & grenade launchers.

So which sporting goods stores in the US are allowing any ol' joe blow off the street to walk in and purchase a full blown automatic weapon or grenade launcher?

Yea, I thought so......NONE!

Don't let facts get in the way of a good "story" though.

You keep plugging away there girl. Someday, you just might get Katie's job.

The 2nd Ammendment is for FEAR!

Yep, I said it. It's described by several of the founding fathers. The purpose of the 2nd Ammendment is so the government is AFRAID of We The People. Keeping assault weapons legal is a large part of that. I want my senators and congressmen fearing for their lives that if they screw something up bad enough "me and Bubba" will fire them personally. THAT was the purpose of the 2nd Ammendment.

 Yeah, label me honest, historically accurate and definitely non-PC.

Amen.

I am so freaking sick of folks, to include "Constitution-loving Conservatives", who have a tizzy when a person says, "Hey, the 2nd Amendment says we can fight tyranny."  It's like, (whispering) "Shhhhh, you can't say that out loud!  What's wrong with you?  Don't you know that's treason?"

I am a firm supporter of this particular amendment, as it gives power to the people when their government messes things up.  Because of this, I am considered a militiaman.  I am considered to be viewed as a possible anarchist.

Loving and supporting the US Constitution means that one day you may actually have to DO what it gives you power to do.  Would people be so cautious if the 2nd Amendment said that as Americans we have the right to keep and bear pink dresses?  And then when I, as an American, said, "Hey, I'm going to exercise my Constitutional right to wear a pink dress.", would these folks say to me to NOT do it, for fear that the government may view me as an anarchist and a trouble-maker?

Of course not.  No one would care.  There are no Anti-Dress political activist groups that I know of.  But, oh look out now, if you say you support this 2nd Amendment, what with its inferrence that you will seek to usurp and overthrow the government, then you is one bad fella.

You cannot support just parts of the Constitution, anymore than you can only support certain parts of the Scriptures.  It's either all or none, no middle ground.

======================

Brace yourself

For the backlash

Of your ignorance.

If we could be more like Turkey.

<blockquote>Shhhhh, you can't say that out loud!  What's wrong with you?  Don't you know that's treason?</blockquote>

 Other people call that superpatriotism. =^_^=

 ===============================

King Ataturk (of the Turkomen) founded a new country with a revolution and called it Turkey. The unique piece of legislature that has withstood several bad sects of religious zealots as well as other bad groups of government is the Turkish military's right to clean house and kill (if necessary) all members of the ruling party, but not to rule themselves. If not for this piece of wisdom Turkey would most assuredly be a shariah-ruled country, instead of the democracy that remains. For an example of how urgently effective this is there has been at least one deposed government in Turkey since 9/11 when Turkey couldn't decide if they were going to let us fly over into Iraq. Hopefully we all understand the metaphoric similarities between Turkey and the USA in this regard.

We should ban Mitchell's

We should ban Mitchell's mouth.

======================

Brace yourself

For the backlash

Of your ignorance.

Their anti-gun argument is flawed from the get-go

Ok, I'll admit, do I think people should have access, as citizens, to purchase high power assault rifles?  Not personally, but as long as a system of background checks and strict accountability is in play, I fail to see how that is riskier than making it illegal for anyone to purchase a gun without resorting to the black market.

 

Liberals rail on this issue day in and day out that, if only we made guns illegal, well, then there'd be no violent crime!  Baloney.

 

Here's an example, and since this story relates to drug cartels in Mexico, its fitting as well.  We made pot illegal.  However, people still know where to find it.  Seriously.  I myself could find probably 4 different people in just the next ten minutes if I wanted to.  This is not my pushing for legalization of weed, but rather, to illustrate a point on gun control that liberals *fail* to ever face, and its quite blatant hypocrisy.

They claim that people can get drugs anyway, so why waste money on the drug war?  Fair enough, that argument, although too broad to be viable, does have some merit to it in some senses.  People, indeed, will still find drugs, legal or not.  What makes them think its any different for guns?!

 Here's what happens in today's world.  If you give people the freedom to prove they are capable, responsible, and willing to go through the process of registration, to own a firearm, they are not only accountable in the case of actions with said weapon outside what is legal, but it also allows them to provide some sense of personal security.  I know for a fact that a burglar would be much more inclined to break into a home in a liberal, anti-gun ownership supporting area rather than, say, the heart of Texas.  Why?

Well, in Texas, they may be met with the ugly end of a pistol, that's why.

 

Liberals have it in their head that making guns illegal will keep them out of the hands of violent criminals.  *WRONG!*

 Look, most people commiting violent crimes do so with illegally obtained weapons.  If you remove the ability of responsible civilians who want some protection for their own home, then you essentially *remove* weapons from everyone *but* the criminals.

 

I only hope one day these vacant minded footsoldiers of the socialist party that has infiltrated the Dems camp and now functions under the guise of the Democratic party are held accountable for their dangerous views and already failed administration so far.

 

The people should not fear their Government,

The Government should fear the people. 

Is it just me or does Andrea

Is it just me or does Andrea Mitchell seem drunk today?  I haven't heard her speak one clear sentence yet. 

Mitchell has been

Mitchell has been incoherent for quite awhile now. Either she has had one face lift too many or she is on a cocktail of drugs. Probably both. 

"DumbAssity of Dope"

wife of Imhotep II, Ruler of the 2nd Dynasty

You wouldn't speak too good either if you had been embalmed 4,000 years and then re-animated.

You'll also notice that any footage of her is shot with a super-gauze lens to minimize the cracking on her mummified face.

Perhaps this is why MSNBC

Perhaps this is why MSNBC has chosen not to join the 21st century and broadcast in HD.  Contessa's pissed!

"If I looked and talked like Andrea"

Shes either drunk or snorting Pltonium Nyborg.

I think Mr. Obama needs to

I think Mr. Obama needs to give her a lesson in prompter reading.

Assault weapons

 THANK GOD OUR FAMILY BOUGHT OUR ASSAULT WEAPONS & LOTS OF AMMO BEFORE BO WAS ELECTED!!!

 =============================

 

The great Socio/Economic Experiments of the 20th cent. (communism, socialism, fascism) only killed a few hundred million.  Let's give 'em another try! - me

Enough

It's time to stop using facts and reasoning with these people.

Fight them with their own psychological, put down, rhetoric.

Andrea Mitchel is a hoplophobe.

Anybody who opens their mouth and irrationally want guns banned so that crime goes up like it did in DC are to be called hoplophobes. Pass it on.

I agree, it seems to be the

I agree, it seems to be the only thing that will work, when using facts they just question the source and brush it off. It is time for warfare, psychological to start with, but I am warning them they have started down the road to the 2nd civil war.

 vicis pro insurgo est propinquus

Is she still under

Is she still under anaesthesia from another plastic surgery? If not someone needs to get this idiot a dictionary because she OBVIOUSLY doesn't know what an assault weapon is.

This is why conservatives need a voice, and a loud one at that. America wake up, cause it will be to late very soon!

vicis pro insurgo est propinquus

I heard that part of this

I heard that part of this 'plan' is to deploy $6 million Blackhawk helicopters to the border.

Why in the world would we have these deadly aircraft patrolling the border when border agents go to jail for shooting a drug-smuggling Mexican in the ass on U.S. soil?

To protect the illegals

To protect the illegals while they cross "hostile" landowners' property, of course. 

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

duh

of course you're right - what the hell was I thinking?

"Pelosi says you Mexican patriots don't even have to run anymore." 

In fact, 100% of the guns

In fact, 100% of the guns used in the drug trade are already illegal, "military style" or otherwise.  Hillary knows it; Annnnndrea is too drunk to figure it out. 

Hillary will just keep playing the demagogue; Annnnnndrea will have another drink.

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

Chip, chip, chip

Chip, chip, chip away...everyday somewhere you read or hear something to try to get rid of the 2nd Amendment one way or the other, that is what it boils down to...I don't care what BS excuses they use...that is jut what they are doing, with Holder smiling all the way along with the rest of the O-Team...the only way for the govt. to have complete power is just what they are doing, and they have been blatant about it in the last two months.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Well...the liberals don't

Well...the liberals don't need to take the guns!

HAVE YOU SEEN THE PRICE OF AMMO LATELY?????

This stuff scares the crap outta me, I mean its like Gillette, charge 50 cents for a razor, charge 20 bucks for the blades.....

thats where they're going with this now.

Barack Obama= Half Honkey...ALL Donkey

Mexican Drug Lords are Smarter than Mitchell

Evidently Mexican drug lords are smarter than Mitchell.

They know they can purchase  fully automatic M16 rifles by diverting lawful shipments to Mexican authorities with bribery. As for AK47's, the drug cartels can purchase these weapons through arms dealers.

That's not counting the local police and corrupt soldiers and US trained drug thugs who have access to these weapons.

You must really think these people are incompetent Andrea. They are not!!! They are very dangerous.

More BS from Hillary

Just saw Hillary on Greta, spewing nonsense about the Mexican gun issue. There was so much BS in what she said that I would need a transcript to take it all apart. Hillary said that our country was safer during the years of the 'assault weapons ban'; no statistics provided of course. Hillary (and others during Greta's Mexican trip) repeat the garbage about Mexican gangs getting 'all their weapons' just across the border. The distinction between military automatic weapons, grenades, rocket launchers and civilian weapons was totally ignored. The BS was knee deep.

I don't know if Greta is so totally ignorant about guns, or if she is a liberal on this issue, but never before have I heard so much crap on Fox News go unchallenged.

I've been lying here on NB...

When I first posted, I told you people I was a college graduate and all, but that was a lie. Actually, I'm a guy who mugs people on the street.

Now, of course you could imagine stopping me with law enforcement, but we all know that is a racist solution to a cultural problem. Not to mention, it's your own fault for being productive and earning money and all... Really, how greedy are you people?

So, I propose the following...

1. Everybody on NB mails me $5.00 per day, so that I don't have to mug anybody. I know times are hard and all, so I won't mind if you miss a payment, it's not like mugging is my only illegal activity after all...

2. I won't bring a weapon into your house when I rob you (after all, you missed a payment on my extortion plan mentioned above,) just so long as you outlaw baseball bats and knives as well. Only chefs need knives and bats really are the domain of the MLB association. Besides, you don't need a weapon, I promise to try really hard not to hurt your family and all, also, when you call the police, I'll happily wait outside until the arrive, let's be civil about this...

3. There should be a curfew against little old ladies going to the ATM's at night. All that does is tempt me. See, it's your fault for why I do what I do. You really should do something to curb the addiction of people's desire to have money. Were it not for that, I'd be a priest or something...

Yes, I know this is an idiotic post, but really, if you think that the cartels wouldn't do any other crimes other than drugs, you are being foolishly optimistic. If you think that stopping law abiding citizens from having weapons will stop those that break those very laws, you are ignoring the facts.

Go to any gun store and try to find grenades or rocket launchers or fully-automatic weaponry, they simply aren't there, at least not here in Detroit.

If my pistol and rifle simply collects dust and never harms another human being, I am happy with that result.

I also know that some people in this world don't quite share that view. Which is why I have the things in the first place, secure in a safe that is bolted to the floor, so no real fears of theft there.

Sorry this post was long, it just bothers me when people think that regulating those who don't break the law will somehow regulate those that do.

Mike

 

No room for logic or facts on this issue.......

Americans are blamed for Mexico's ills due to the insatiable demand for illegal drugs in the U. S.

Americans are blamed for Mexico's ills for satisfying the insatiable demand for illegal weapons in Mexico.

Guess that we can't catch a break on either side of the supply & demand equation. I'm a tad surprised that even the good folks at FOX haven't picked up on this twisted lefty logic.

And then there's the minor detail that "assault" weapons are not legally sold to the general public and haven't been for many a year. Of course, if you want to redefine a semi-automatic rifle as an assault weapon, ban possession & sales in the U. S., it could possibly lead to the day when Mexicans have the edge in firearm choices.

Contrary to the big media deception, guns are not illegal in Mexico and that includes semi-autos. They have much tighter restrictions that mostly focus on caliber size; the restrictions don't have much enforcement and are frequently bent/ignored depending upon one's social status & connections.

Perhaps the left would be open to gun bans/restictions in the U. S. that mimic those of Canada & Mexico, laws that are strictly words on paper, but rarely enforced. Canadian complience (under 20%) w/their newest registration laws has been so bad that the government removed the criminal penalties and may eventually scrap all registration requirements.

This stuff just boils me........

It is true that demand drives the market...

It is true that demand drives the market, but that fails to address the issue at hand--how do the drugs get here, and how do the guns get there? There hasn't been real border security--ever, and enforcement of our current immigration laws has been a sad joke. Without highly structured gang networks, made up of countless illegal aliens, neither of these problems would be possible. Andrea Mitchell's comment that, "90 percent of the guns used by gangs, were available because the Bush White House and Congress let the assault weapons ban lapse" shows how oblivious she is. Guns are only the symptom, while illegal immigration with failed enforcement policy are major causes. Andrea should address the issue of governmental decisions to ignore the laws now on the books, and do a follow-up piece on how the government will no doubt screw up efforts to treat the symptoms of that failed policy. The press and government will have no difficulty finding someone to blame for all of this, of course.