Barney Frank was allowed, by NBC's Meredith Vieira, to go on a tear against AIG for wasting bailout money on corporate bonuses, on Monday's "Today" show, yet Vieira never once interrupted Frank to point out his own wasteful stimulus spending on earmarks going to Frank's home district, including $1 million for scallop research. Vieira also didn't interject when Frank blamed the Bush administration for failed economic oversight, even though it was Frank who blocked reforms of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, something former Vice President Dick Cheney brought up on this Sunday's "State of the Union," on CNN.
Vieira never asked a challenging question throughout the whole interview, instead choosing to let Frank rant: "The time has come for the federal government to put some people in charge...When we were asked by the Bush administration and the Federal Reserve last fall, to do these things, they resisted some of the conditions we wanted to put on."
The following is a complete transcript of the interview with Frank as it was aired on the March 16, "Today" show:
MEREDITH VIEIRA: Congressman Barney Frank, a Democrat from Massachusetts, is the chairman of the House Financial Services committee. Congressman Frank, good morning to you.
REP. BARNEY FRANK: Good morning.
VIEIRA: You heard what, what was just said about Secretary Geithner being outraged by the bonuses. He has worked with Mr. Liddy to try to reduce them. Has he done enough, do you think?
[On screen headline: "Bailout Bonuses, Why Can't Government Stop AIG?"]
FRANK: I'm going to check. I believe, I know he is trying very hard. People should note this one did not come out of the Treasury initially. This is a Federal Reserve decision. This, this decision to give the billions, $80 billion initially to AIG actually came before Congress even passed the rescue plan. There's a statute that we're gonna have to reexamine, I've already said this, that dates from the, 1932, which gives the Federal Reserve the power to lend money to anybody it wants to, if it thinks it's, it's important. And it was under that statute that the AIG thing began.
Clearly not enough was done at the very beginning to put conditions on AIG. And people may have noticed, we've now got complaints from some banks that did get some of the subsequent money we voted, that our conditions were too tough and they're gonna quit the program. My answer is, goodbye please leave quickly and send back the money. So there was an initial mistake. But there are other things we can look at.
VIEIRA: Yeah well-
FRANK: It is true, I'm sorry?
VIEIRA: Congressman, Mr. Liddy said -- no that's okay -- Mr. Liddy wrote that AIG, AIG's hands were essentially tied in all of this. Do you agree?
FRANK: I don't know. And I want to look at it very carefully. But there is one other point here. These people may have a right to their bonuses, they don't have a right to their jobs forever. The federal government now is the 80 percent owner. One of the things we can do to make sure his doesn't happen again, we've got people who are so irresponsible. And by the way, it does appear we're rewarding incompetence. Forget about the legal matter here for a second.
These bonuses are going to people who screwed this thing up enormously, who made terrible decisions. So since the federal government now, thanks to the Federal Reserve's use of the power under that 70-year-old statute, now essentially owns that company, maybe it's time to fire some people. We can't keep them getting the bonuses, but we can keep some of them from continuing in their jobs. And I'm very skeptical that these retention bonuses, these people got retention bonuses. Well if they were in high school, they wouldn't have gotten retention, they would have gotten detention. And the, and the time-
VIEIRA: Detention.
FRANK: -has probably come to now look at it and get rid of some of them.
VIEIRA: You know you had said that executives at AIG, about them, that it's inappropriate for those people to stay in power at that company. What you just reiterated, just now. Does that include Mr. Liddy?
FRANK: Probably. You know, we keep getting bad surprises. Mr. Liddy's been there for a while. I know Mr. Liddy. My first contact with Mr. Liddy, was when he called me last year to see if he could enlist me in renegotiating the terms under which he got money from the Federal Reserve to make it easier. I, I refused to, to get involved in that. And yeah, I think the, the, the time has come for the federal government to put some people in charge. We need to examine whether we can get some of these bonuses back. If we can't, as I said, some of these people, maybe they should choose between keeping their bonus, and keeping their jobs.
You can't fire a man for having his legal right, but I'm ready to look and say, this guy get a bonus? This is a guy who cost us 'x' billion dollars? Let him, let him live off his bonus and no salary for the future. But yeah I, I am at this point, in kind to believe, we're gonna have a hearing, we have a very good former district attorney, Dennis Moore, who is the chairman of our oversight committee. Mr. Kanjorski from Pennsylvania already has a hearing planned on AIG. We're gonna look at this very, very carefully and do the maximum to try and reduce the current outlay. But we can absolutely make sure that something like this never happens again.
And by the way this is the difference. When we were asked by the Bush administration and the Federal Reserve last fall, to do these things, they resisted some of the conditions we wanted to put on. We have since toughened the conditions and we, we are gonna make it very clear to people that there will be no further abuses of this sort because [inaudible] those in place. And now we'll go back and we'll see if we can undo what's already happened.
VIEIRA: Alright Congressman Barney Frank, as always, thank, thank you for your time this morning.
FRANK: You're welcome, [inaudible] to Fall River.
VIEIRA: Thank you very much. Happy St. Paddy's Day to you as well.
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
and did Viera apologize to
March 16, 2009 - 11:35 ET by Chris Normanand did Viera apologize to Barney Frank for the media's audacity in actually doing it's job (for once) like the groveling Andrea Mitchell did last week? I don't know the specifics, but Laura Ingraham played the tape of the ineterview where Frank accuses the media of going after congress about something and Mitchell actually admits that they were "wrong" to do so and apogizes to him. I almost ran off the road...
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Hey, Chris, I'll share my
March 16, 2009 - 13:13 ET by motherbeltHey, Chris, I'll share my duct tape with you...I just got in a new shipment! LOL
Meredith wouldn't challenge Barney Frank (or any other liberal for that matter) if he claimed that the Pope was Jewish!
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
such hard hitting questions
March 16, 2009 - 11:31 ET by katainkentI hope she didn't strain herself.
"AIG cost us 'x' billion
March 16, 2009 - 11:43 ET by SickofLibs"AIG cost us 'x' billion dollars."
There's the effing problem, right there. They don't have a clue if it's W, X, Y or Z or 10X, 100X. etc. Just ask Turbotax "Duh, I don't know" Timmy.
This paradigm of Frank's (and who he is the poster boy for) that government pigs are somehow holier than corporate pigs is BS.
(And that fact that he actually looks like a pig-human cloning experiment doesn't help his cause, either.)
→ Poster boy Bawney
March 16, 2009 - 11:55 ET by Cool Arrow(and who he is the poster boy for)
Why do I see him squealing like a pig and banjo pickin' in the background?
Oh, I know! Because he's a king of pork.
Bawney Fwank, our deliverance.
Obama is succeeding and it hurts
Soooweee!
March 16, 2009 - 12:13 ET by SickofLibsYou bring the [→] arrows!
Pure coincidence
March 16, 2009 - 12:08 ET by cocodrieIf I remember correctly AIG handles the meager funds for the frugal retirement system of congressional members. That couldn't be the reason for their huge monetary gifts could it?
BBBBawney FFFuwank is so innocent he should be the centerfold in the Alcatraz Memorial Gazette, or the NAMBLA monthly.
Jesus Loves You
→ AIG
March 16, 2009 - 12:11 ET by Cool ArrowAIG jumped 70% this morning.
Speculators made a killing on this 50 cent stock.
Obama is succeeding and it hurts
speculators
March 16, 2009 - 12:15 ET by SickofLibs70%??? let's hope at least some of them were US citizens.
So we can get our money back and all.
→ 70% And holding
March 16, 2009 - 12:20 ET by Cool ArrowOpened at .50 and now trading at .84
Didn't budge an inch on Obama's browbeating.
Obama is succeeding and it hurts
So now Bawny wants to fire people?
March 16, 2009 - 11:43 ET by ConservativeFL"So since the federal government now, thanks to the Federal Reserve's use of the power under that 70-year-old statute, now essentially owns that company, maybe it's time to fire some people. We can't keep them getting the bonuses, but we can keep some of them from continuing in their jobs."
Since when does the federal government get to fire people in the private sector...oh, wait since the "One" began his reign. I'd be happier if we started to fire these ridiculous politicians.
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the democrats believe every day is April 15." Ronald Reagan
BARNEY FWANK...
March 16, 2009 - 11:47 ET by danybhoyA couple of things...
Viera is a lightweight who agrees with Frank on most things, so she has no real reason to challenge him.
The other thing is that Barney Frank is an angry mean spirited bastard. Meredith Viera wants no part of a man who may very well the biggest jerk on Capital Hill. This guy looks for reasons to be pissed off, he did that with Chris Wallace on Sunday. Really for no reason, hate got upset & detracted from the segment he was involved in.
Barney Frank, along with Kennedy & Kerry are major reasons I have very little respect for the people of Massachusetts. Idiot chowds.
"The Fairness Doctrine = Jim Crow laws for Conservatives". Jim Quinn from "Quinn & Rose"
When you don't have the facts
March 16, 2009 - 11:53 ET by KC Mulville... pound the table. Have we ever come across anyone who is so obviously pounding the table more than Barney Frank?
A real journalist would have asked Frank what conditions he asked for. Pin him down, because he's constantly throwing out red herrings. For example, he has long argued that the reason why he shouldn't be held responsible for Fannie and Freddie is that he was in the minority when regulation was required, and Republicans didnt pass the regulations. What he doesn't tell you is that the reason it didn't pass was because the Democrats defended and blocked it.
He's an irresponsible blowhard.
Bernard Madoff in Jail, Barney Frank Gets Re-Elected
March 16, 2009 - 13:13 ET by deerjerkydaveIn the free market, crooks eventually get discovered and wind up in prison. But in the public sector, crooks like Barney Frank get re-elected. This is why government and politicians are almost NEVER the answer.
The propagandist media share much of the blame. In another major double standard, we have the Senator from Idaho playing footsies in a bathroom and the media can't get enough of it, feigning outrage and the need for the Senator's resignation. But here we have Barney Frank running a gay prostition business out of his house and the propagandist media goes into defense mode and quickly drops the story.
AIG's contributions favor Democrats.
March 16, 2009 - 13:22 ET by Gary HallJust a note: AIG's contributions favor Democrats, in recent election cycles. From Open Secrets:
Cycle to D's to R's
2008 $576,826 $265,579
2006 $361,081 $274,294
2004 $593,612 $482,336
And the MSM still don't
March 16, 2009 - 13:51 ET by d1carterAnd the MSM still don't understand why no one is listening to them.....When Barney is fired then we can talk.
NBC actually
March 16, 2009 - 15:51 ET by zoro7957............regards this woman as a journalist? She's a friggin game show host.....
Journalism?
March 16, 2009 - 17:35 ET by blazermaniacAnd not a very good game show host at that!
It's eerie when Barney
March 17, 2009 - 00:46 ET by RR GOPIt's eerie when Barney Frank gets interviewed and there is no assumption in his guilt in this entire mess...as if it doesn't exist and he's an innocent bystander who is just trying to help.
Kind of like a murder mystery where a detective's protege is actually the one who committed the horrific murder he's investigating.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
RR GOP
March 17, 2009 - 00:49 ET by MotherExcellent analogy.
The Vampire killer is half vampire.
Get the torches. j/k