Updated below.
Chris Matthews questioned Rush Limbaugh’s patriotism on Wednesday night’s "Hardball," as the MSNBC host wondered how the radio talk show host could dare to oppose Barack Obama as he exclaimed to his viewers: "Does Rush Limbaugh hate this country?" Matthews jumped on a quote from Limbaugh saying of Obama, "I hope he fails," apparently not understanding the concept that Limbaugh opposes any and all who would promote liberal policies precisely because he believes they will be harmful to the country. To see Limbaugh's quote in full context visit his official site. Matthews slammed Limbaugh in the following tease before going to a commercial break (audio excerpt here):
CHRIS MATTHEWS: Up next, does Rush Limbaugh hate this country? Wait till you hear what he said about the new president. He wants him to fail. What an amazing-, I've never heard anybody say they wanted a new president to fail. Usually you want the new president to succeed and then later on you argue the politics of what he or she does. But to want them to fail at the outset? What's that about?
Later in his "Sideshow" segment Matthews aired a sound bite from Limbaugh and then snidely remarked: "Well Rush must have a lot of acorns squirreled away not to share everyone else's hopes that the economy does come back."
The following Matthews outbursts were aired on the January 21 edition of "Hardball":
CHRIS MATTHEWS: Up next, does Rush Limbaugh hate this country? Wait till you hear what he said about the new president. He wants him to fail. What an amazing. I've never heard anybody say they wanted a new president to fail. Usually you want the new president to succeed and then later on you argue the politics of what he or she does. But to want them to fail at the outset? What's that about?
...
MATTHEWS: But it turns out that not everyone has warm wishes for the new president. On Friday radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh said he was asked by a major print organization to offer 400 words on his hope for the Obama presidency. Here's what Rush had to say just days before the Inauguration.
RUSH LIMBAUGH: I disagree fervently with the people on our side of the aisle who have caved and who say, "Well I hope he succeeds. We've got to give him a chance." So I'm thinking of replying to the guy, okay I'll send you a response but I don't need 400 words. I need four. I hope he fails.
MATTHEWS: Well Rush must have a lot of acorns squirreled away not to share everyone else's hopes that the economy does come back.
Update (18:20): Later in the show Matthews returned to the Limbaugh bashing with his guest panelists:
MATTHEWS: Michael [Smerconish], Happy New Year. Happy, you’re not with Rush Limbaugh, by the way, you’re not, you’re not rooting for this guy’s failure?
JOAN WALSH, SALON: No.
MATTHEWS: I’m going to Smercon-, I know you don’t. Smerconish you’re not one of these radio guys that says, "Gee I hope this guy goes down in miserable defeat because that’ll help me, well my support group out on the highway selling stuff?" Is, is this your view? You hope Barack fails?
MICHAEL SMERCONISH, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: Hell no!
MATTHEWS: I know because-
SMERCONISH: No I think that is-
MATTHEWS: What is Rush Limbaugh’s problem? Rooting for the guy’s failure. What’s that all about?
SMERCONISH: You know unfortunately there’s a part of my industry that’s sort of predicated on stirring the pot and being the opposition. I want this guy to succeed. I looked at those images yesterday and, and I feel wonderful. Look at that First Family. Look at those daughters. You want to talk about the politics of this. Imagine the political capital that the two daughters are gonna bring to the table on behalf of the First Family. No, I want them to succeed. Absolutely!
...
MATTHEWS: But the bigger question to everybody is, if this guy fails, the only President we have, on the economy, taking office as it’s going down that’s killing everybody. How can you root for the failure of the only guy at, at the lever? At the steering wheel?
WALSH: It’s an outrageous thing. It’s an outrageous thing to say but Rush thrives on being outrageous. Michael is a smart conservative who, I believe endorsed - (interrupted)
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.





CHRIS MATTHEWS: Up next, does Rush Limbaugh hate this country? Wait till you hear what he said about the new president. He wants him to fail. What an amazing. I've never heard anybody say they wanted a new president to fail. Usually you want the new president to succeed and then later on you argue the politics of what he or she does. But to want them to fail at the outset? What's that about? 














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Chris Matthews/Rush Limbaugh
January 21, 2009 - 17:58 ET by merlin61As usual, he just read the headline on Rush's
website,or heard about the headline and didn't
read what was actually said. If anyone says
anything bad about someone who puts a thrill
up his leg, he's gonna knock them.
Chrissy should
January 21, 2009 - 18:11 ET by 10ksnookerRecycle, piss in his mouth, recycle the water.
Using Matthews own analogy,
January 21, 2009 - 18:43 ET by kgUsing Matthews own analogy, he, himself has hated this country for the last eight years. And in doing his part, he has lied to the audience by outright lies, lies of omission and lies of half truths. He has done all he could to make it seem President Bush looked like he failed. With Matthews around, who needs enemies? Too bad he didn't spare us by retiring from politics after working for Jimmy Carter.
"Forget change, I want improvement!"
That was phase 1
January 21, 2009 - 19:18 ET by general companyAnd in doing his part, he has lied to the audience by outright lies, lies of omission and lies of half truths.
This is phase 2, now they vilify all who oppose Obama as being traitors, unpatriotic, bigots, and anything else they can do to diminish all that is conservative. I am asking you folks, we have to be more assertive in your communities. Go to neighborhood meetings, PTA, School Board, and anything else you can get to. Write your Reps in DC and your County/Parish and State officials irregaurdless of their party, let them know when you dont agree with them and when they do you a good turn, thank them. Bottom line is we have to do a better job then the other side about communicating and keeping tabs on our Reps The folks that are, are the ones making all of the decisions for us. Many of us have here (in LA) and our area and State is getting redder with every election.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
While it seems like emptying a bucket with a teaspoon
January 21, 2009 - 19:58 ET by Cape Conservativehere in the bluest of all states, my husband and I are doing exactly as you suggested. We are working locally to bring about change and so far, our efforts have been rewarded. Not earth-shattering, but we can see some results ;-)
And, while it's like emptying a bucket with a fork, I also continue to write to my liberal Senators K & K ;-)
It is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue. ~ Sam Adams
Let's follow Obama's lead
January 21, 2009 - 20:21 ET by kgLet's follow Obama's lead and turn into community organizers for the RIGHT reasons.
"Forget change, I want improvement!"
Started here slowly
January 21, 2009 - 20:41 ET by general companyas well, but it does work. Although writing those 2 must seem far more useless then the rest of us. Good luck,
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
First Vilify Opposition
January 22, 2009 - 08:10 ET by Ole_SargeOkay, so I am NOT the only person in these United States that feels we are headed down a DARK and Dangerous road in our history, one that leads to events, like those of the Third Reich.
General company is correct, WE, you and me to start with MUST start taking action, otherwise we are giving approval, by our lack of disapproval -- "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men to do nothing" (Edmond Burke, 1729-1797)
Matthews
January 22, 2009 - 09:46 ET by SeashellI was hoping he'd run for the Senate and get off TV.
Matthews knows what
January 21, 2009 - 18:02 ET by motherbeltMatthews knows what Limbaugh meant.
It just wouldn't give him any mileage to talk about the fact that Limbaugh hopes that Obama fails in his attempt to turn the US into a socialist country.
It's liberals who want to see this country going downhill, in order to gain power by promising to fix things.
MB
January 21, 2009 - 18:45 ET by DoktorFrankenYou're right. Matthews does know. It's just the usual MSNBC spin - right from their Spin Playbook. (Co-Written by Olbermann and Matthews)
Rush loves America - Matthews most definitely does not.
On the other shoe, the radical nuts like Mathews and..
January 21, 2009 - 18:03 ET by Gary HallOn the other shoe, the radical nuts like Mathews and Olbermann and (oh what a list this would be), have been openly rooting for President Bush to fail since day one. And before that it was Reagan, then Bush, Sr. etc.
This from Tingle up his leg
January 21, 2009 - 18:04 ET by bigtimerThis from Tingle up his leg Matthews....that has stated on his show it's his job to see that O succeeds...
Give me a friggin' break!
Too rich.
Btw...I listen to Rush everyday if I get the chance....I agree totally with him here, it would do creatures well to listen to him before making asses of themselves like Matthews does daily.
As an aside...Rush is going to be on Hannity's how tonight, Part 1, Part 2 Thursday.
Wake up and smell the coffee, Matthews!
January 21, 2009 - 19:13 ET by GalvanicThere are those who feel the Tingle, and those who don't.
I'm pretty certain I can speak for most people when we say we don't, Chrissy.
*
January 21, 2009 - 18:05 ET by reality vs libsMathews proves in his outrage about this that the left just doesn't get it. Rush loves this country, its people like Mathews who voted for massive "change" that thought the way it was and has been is not good enough.
"Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong."
Calvin Coolidge
I guess that Rush doesn't give him a "leg thrill"
January 21, 2009 - 18:06 ET by FastEdsince the rest of the quote (I paraphrase)- "he's a liberal - and liberals/ism needs to FAIL".
I want the same - solcialism is NOT the way to make this country better. Barry and the gang need to be defeated or at least distracted, at every turn, objective to slow them down. We need to fight a distration campaign, keep them off their game, slow them down, an defeat them in 2010.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
I do wish that Rush and
January 21, 2009 - 18:10 ET by Chris NormanI do wish that Rush and others could word their opposition to Obama and his government intrusive policies with an eye towards sounding a little more sensitive to good people who are truly hurting in this economic downturn. I wish he would say, "I hope the economy gets better despite Barak Obama and the Democrats meddling" - or words to that effect. Today, he sort of dismissed a loyal listener/caller who was worrying about her and her fellow business owners chances of staying in business. He told her that Obama's policies would hurt them in the long run. The thing is, she (and me and others) are worried about making it to the long run. I don't sit around thinking that what Obama is doing will help us (we have to do that) - but Rush should know that a lot of people are dealing with this economic mess in reality and not just in the abstract.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Hi Chris... He boiled it
January 21, 2009 - 18:13 ET by bigtimerHi Chris...
He boiled it down to one sentiment later on his show...
YOU CANNOT depend on what the Got. is going to do...or any Prez...you have to depend on yourself.
I agree.
It has really always been that way when it comes right down to it...if you fear, or see that you aren't going to make it where you are at, whatever it is...you need to start looking elsewhere.
Govt. is the problem...not the solution.
Good. I didn't hear much
January 21, 2009 - 18:25 ET by Chris NormanGood. I didn't hear much past that call. I admit that sometimes I get a little annoyed with Rush when he comes off sounding a bit too disconnected from people who are obviously well below his economic stature - he does risk alienating some of his listeners. The woman was truly a supporter of Rush's - but you could tell she was terrified that the problems in the housing market would destroy her contracting business and any business dependent on the value of homes and activity in the housing market - forces beyong her ability to control. I pray every night that the market will at least stabilize - our own business depends on it also (in case you didn't know). I guess my view is that while I don't look to Obama to help the housing market, I just hope what he does doesn't hurt it even more in the short term.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Hey Chris... Don't get me
January 21, 2009 - 18:40 ET by bigtimerHey Chris...
Don't get me wrong...I know all about what govt. ect can do to one's businesses...we've been there done that.
I won't go into it...but I am still infuriated about what the congress-critters, Prez can do to one...we had to look elsewhere...had no choice...we had a great going business too...worked long and hard to get there.
My heart goes out to all who are hurting now or are going to be....and there will be...well, of course, unless you are a govt. employee that is...which is what the leftist want us all to be anyway with their agenda in the long run....adn they are gaining, there are more govt. employees than there are now manufacturing jobs.
I truly wish you well.
Btw...I know he tried to go back to her after a break and she was gone, they lost her, he wasn't happy about that either...I would have liked to hear more myself.
Thanks BT. Your kind
January 21, 2009 - 19:06 ET by Chris NormanThanks BT. Your kind thoughts are much appreciated. We have been busy reinventing ourselves and scaling back to face the downturn in business. Fortunately, we saw this coming last year and started earlier than some to deal with it. This is never a great time of the year for our business - I wish Global Warming was real - warm weather helps our sales - our sales peak is Spring and Summer. I'm glad Rush thought about his answer - I know he's a good guy.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Chris, actually Rush
January 21, 2009 - 19:22 ET by SmartypantsChris, actually Rush addressed the issue for quite an extended period of time after his commercial break, and he hit the nail on the head quite well. He stated that he made a mistake by dismissing the woman too soon, and he wished he would have held her on the line through the break. He then entered into quite a lengthy monologue about what the issue means to him. His point is that, if we're sitting around waiting for the government to solve our problems, we're going to be disappointed. He alluded to the millions of people out there now who have been doing just that, and these are the people who are in the worst situations now and have been for some time. He further stated that he has been broke twice in his life and that, if he were broke again, he would be doing everything he could to earn money--not sitting around waiting for Washington to fix everything.
SmartyPants
January 21, 2009 - 19:41 ET by thebutlerdiditThat was it exactly. I was going to say the same thing, but I think you said it better. I say this often, but i can't help but remind people, that the people who gave that sniveling b@st@rd his start where Roger Ailes, who gave him a tv program, way back when, and RUSH. Rush used to let Chris fill in for him back before he had a real job. He is ever so grateful in the way he treats these people, huh? Oh yeah, Fox also were the ones that hired that turd Olby in the beginning. Ingrates.
O/T-Does anyone know why Sweet Caroline pulled her name from nomination to Senate?
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
"Mainstream" media? No. Advocacy/adversary media.
January 21, 2009 - 18:35 ET by CKA in Red State USAAnd, indeed, it is liberal.
Given its conduct in the past few years--say, going back to the Clintons--it has given up its claim to the Fourth Estate and became the traitorous Fifth Column.
Matthews and his ilk don't really understand it yet, but through their anger and rage and outright hatred of anyone not like them, they have conspired to destroy themselves and the outlets who allow such intellectually bankrupt people such as him on the air.
Chris Matthews is the America Hater in This Picture
January 21, 2009 - 18:23 ET by R D HelmMatthews is a rabid supporter of a Marxist/socialist president, therefore, he supports Marxism, a freedom-killing, dignity-robbing, evil form of government that is diametrically opposed to every single principle this nation was founded upon.
Marxism is not what made this nation great, but Marxism will probably be what ultimately destroys it.
Chris Matthews is a fool, and about the only other person I think that may hate this country more than he is Bill Ayers.
-Dave
“Them that’s going get on the wagon. Them that ain’t get out of the way.” -While there is still time.
Mr. Tingling.
January 21, 2009 - 18:24 ET by blazermaniacRush Limbaugh loves his country. Chrissy Matthews hates his country. And they just happen to be the same country. Matthews is a total a--hole!
This makes me sick!
January 21, 2009 - 18:31 ET by jarrett.edwardsI am getting really sick of this! All
of a sudden we are all suppose to completely agree with the
President, after hearing for the last eight years about how dissent
is the highest form of patriotism. I agree with Rush, I hope he fails
because I am against what he wants to accomplish, just like Matthews
wanted President Bush to fail because he was against what he wanted
to accomplish. It is called politics!
"What an amazing-, I've
January 21, 2009 - 18:40 ET by obxray"What an amazing-, I've never heard anybody say they wanted a new president to fail. " Did he really say that? Yep crapboy none of your freinds wanted Bush to fail. God lord , these's msm pieces of crap have really lost their stupit little freak idiot butt faced mind's.I never thought I would have hate in my heart untill watching these's msm idiot's.
obxray... As to your last
January 21, 2009 - 18:48 ET by bigtimerobxray...
As to your last sentence...that is one of the main reasons why I have basically quit watching the msm for the most part...and I have always been a political junkie wanting to know what the enemy says daily without just listening to a sound-bite here and there..I cannot do it anymore...I watch a little here and there, two shows in the evening...that is about it for me...I have to keep my sanity, plus I don't want to be angry all the time.
I hear ya BT. I really don't
January 21, 2009 - 19:00 ET by obxrayI hear ya BT. I really don't watch them but I did yesterday just for the spectical of it.I lissen to Rush everyday and it really burn's me up when they start going after him but then, if they didn't then Rush wouldn't be doing his job. It's funny how they always bring up Rush on something everyday but then they say he's not important.
It is IMPOSSIBLE for me to say enough BAD THINGS ...
January 21, 2009 - 18:45 ET by Jayke... about Chris TINGLE. If I ever met him, I swear, it would take every ounce of strength in me NOT TO give him a KNUCKLE SANDWICH.
You have
January 22, 2009 - 18:41 ET by Rowanea lot more forebearance than I, If I met him I fear they'll take us both away-him to the hospital and me to jail.
I've never heard anybody
January 21, 2009 - 18:48 ET by lnthompI've never heard anybody say they wanted a new president to fail.
Usually you want the new president to succeed and then later on you
argue the politics of what he or she does. But to want them to fail at
the outset?
I think he needs to go back and review the reporting and blogging from the time between the 2000 election and the 2001 inauguration. He only "never heard" it if his ears were sealed back then.
Lee T. USN(ret)
This too shall pass.
I recognize your right to believe, without ridicule, that there is no God. I do not recognize any right for you to ridicule my belief in God.
So, suddenly, not supporting
January 21, 2009 - 18:53 ET by gopsteveSo, suddenly, not supporting the prez is a bad thing?
The right thing to say is....
January 21, 2009 - 18:56 ET by trak65I hope the new president DOES A GOOD JOB. To me, the president can accomplish this and still implement major agenda items by
If he proceeds along these lines, he will be doing a good job and I will hope such plans succeed.
oh trak... That's all
January 21, 2009 - 19:03 ET by bigtimeroh trak...
That's all just lovely, precious, priceless.
Worry not with people like McC leading the way behind the scenes all your scenarios will come to fruition.
...and people wondered why I didn't want to support the RINO...heck, I have watched him work too many years on the Senate floor.
Of course I know it won't
January 21, 2009 - 19:26 ET by trak65Of course I know it won't happen, but it illustrates realistic -- for both sides -- definitions of what might be broadly considered "success." The reason Rush and others want him to "fail" is that they know that he and the Dems won't bother trying to strike any compromise and will instead overreach and presumably fall on their faces, as happened in 1993/1994. At least, hope springs eternal.
Limbaugh/Coulter '12!
January 21, 2009 - 18:58 ET by bigtimerLimbaugh/Coulter '12!
Hi BT..
January 21, 2009 - 19:07 ET by MightyMouthJust ingore the date that flashes accross the screen at the begining.
(i know this is old but what the hey)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Mighty... Hey, hey,
January 21, 2009 - 19:25 ET by bigtimerMighty...
Hey, hey, hey...I remember that well...it is a keeper!
I really do wish they would run...talk about the msm needing to be hauled off on stretchers with the men in little white coats....LMAO!
Including the politicians...can't you just hear McC?
I am really roaring with laughter just at the thought of that alone....
MM
January 21, 2009 - 19:53 ET by thebutlerdiditI just linked that on here the other day!LOL. Classic. Isn't there a second one with them together? I think there were 3 altogether? I loved the 1/2 hr. show, does anyone know why it went away?
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
Missed that one "Clue Fan"
January 21, 2009 - 20:08 ET by MightyMouth...btw one of my favorite games :-)
Not sure about the other clips but I will say SNL really blows it sometimes! Check this unfunny example out. I did love the irony that SNL had a 14 year ratings high with Sarah Palin on!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
UNFUNNY is RIGHT! BOR
January 21, 2009 - 20:24 ET by bigtimerUNFUNNY is RIGHT!
BOR just said he was going to have a segment about this on his show in a bit.
tbdi... The Half Hour
January 21, 2009 - 20:27 ET by bigtimertbdi...
The Half Hour Show was one of my favs too.
I was very disappointed it was not renewed....still am, they should have given this more time in my opinion...I really looked forward to them.
HMMMMMMMMM
January 21, 2009 - 19:01 ET by rick007Matthews and the NSM remind me of the Vichi French. A bunch of Cowards.
Please don't hurt me!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Michael is a smart
January 21, 2009 - 19:11 ET by Chris NormanMichael is a smart conservative who, I believe endorsed - (interrupted)"
Walsh should've been interrupted before she ws able to characterize Smerconish as a "conservative" or "smart". For liberals, the only "smart" conservative is one who opportunistically turns into a liberal - if indeed he was ever "conservative" in the first place.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Smerconish has gone
January 22, 2009 - 06:48 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsSmerconish has gone completely metrosexual. He said he would vote for Obama because he 'promised' he would get Bin Laden. Smerconish harped on this point over and over on his morning show. Now that Obama has been elected, he has said he will not go after Bin Laden, and Smerconish is okay with that. Can you say wishy washy?
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
§Feed..Nooo..Smerc is looking to stay employed!!
January 22, 2009 - 06:55 ET by TheSterSmerc is loosing audience and is looking for a job on MSNBC!!
AM I WRONG??
Ster.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
MICHAEL SMERCONISH
January 22, 2009 - 11:29 ET by UtherpendWho the hell is he again??
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you."
Unlike you and your buds, Chrissy...
January 21, 2009 - 19:21 ET by wnaegele...Limbaugh doesn't have his head jammed up Obama's backside telling us all how good it smells.
Duh.
January 21, 2009 - 19:33 ET by dborschjr68I can honestly say I feel stupider for having read this.
But we all know there are the liberalism puppets out there tearing their clothes and covering their heads with ash, screaming about how hateful Mr. Limbaugh is, in full view of the public so as to garner sympathy.
Chris Matthews is getting to be more and more ignorant on a minute-by-minute basis, I declare.
Liberate tutume ex inferis, liberal puppets.
yo 68..
January 21, 2009 - 19:42 ET by MightyMouth...without GWB to kick around anymore, Sissy Matthspews will be forced to go to the next conservative standing. He has to fill his pathetic unwatched show with "content" of some kind. Watch out Joe the Plumber and K-12 graders in Christian and home Schools YOU"RE NEXT!!.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM
January 21, 2009 - 20:16 ET by RukusSpot on!! I'm saving this post because I think you have it perfectly right! Plus, I will add, Pro Life to your post. You got it right! BDS will only last so long, long, but so long. Good post freind!
Gary
"Mom's ROCK!!!" -Me
Yup. Content and
January 22, 2009 - 01:05 ET by maggieqpublicYup. Content and ratings. And I hope Rush ignores this desperate fool. I would sure hate to think that millions of Rush listeners might start tuning in to MSNBC in order to check out the latest round of the Matthews/Limbaugh fight.
This is absurd. The
January 21, 2009 - 19:32 ET by SmartypantsThis is absurd. The Democrat party (and I include the msm in that group as well) has been openly hoping for Bush's failure for eight years! They have been rooting for the economy to faulter (it finally did thanks largely to them), for a loss in Iraq (they would have had that if they had their way), high energy prices (that they could blame on Bush and his "oil buddies"), etc. Is there one thing the Dems wanted to go well over the past two Bush terms? They shot down SS reform, shot down energy reform, shot down Bush's methods for keeping us safe; they shot down everything that could have made a difference. In terms of Iraq, they declared the war to be lost on several occasions and were openly hostile to the C.I.C. How many lives did these shenanigans cost in Iraq by further emboldening the enemy and encouraging more suicide bombings to further demoralize us?
When Bush's approval ratings were > 70% after 9/11, the Democrats concocted a strategy to bring Bush down. They knew that, if those numbers remained, they had no chance of regaining power in D.C. anytime soon--in the legislature or the Oval Office. From that point on, virtually everything they have done has been expressly designed to destroy Bush and ensure that he left no legacy upon which Republicans could leverage. The media has been complicit in this. They even tried to blame a hurricane on the man--and with great success at that! Anyone who does not see through this charade is not paying attention, a complete liberal partisan or is simply a fool. Unfortunately, there are enough people in this country that fit into one of these three categories, and thus the Dems control everything.
"The Democrat party (and I
January 21, 2009 - 19:36 ET by celator"The Democrat party (and I include the msm in that group as well) has been openly hoping for Bush's failure for eight years!"
Yep. That was the game plan.
For liberal Democrats and the Old Media, everything is crisis, chaos, calamity and catastrophe. That justifies stealing your property and liberties.
They weren't just hoping: They plotted and acted . . .
January 22, 2009 - 07:42 ET by CKA in Red State USA. . . for President Bush to fail.
Not to forget: There once was junior senator from Illinois, with no experience, who had the most liberal, partisan voting record in the Senate. He was a much of the overt conspiracy to undo Bush -- our country be damned, in the meantime -- as anyone else.
Obama deserves the same in-kind support from Republicans and conservatives as he and his party gave the former president.
Of rourse, Obama and his tribe will whine and cry and blame, beccause they appear to have no functional and reasonable adult strategy for dealing with anything.
Well, personally, I intend
January 22, 2009 - 08:00 ET by SmartypantsWell, personally, I intend to give our new president every bit of respect the left has given to Bush these last eight years.
Sp... I agree. I just
January 21, 2009 - 19:41 ET by bigtimerSp...
I agree.
I just wished he would have used his Bully-Pulpit a lot more, a lot louder, in the evenings and with conviction.
I agree, bigtimer; I wish he
January 21, 2009 - 19:48 ET by SmartypantsI agree, bigtimer; I wish he would have bitten back a little more often. I really believe, though, that he holds that Office in such high regard that he did not want to disparage it by sinking to the level of his enemies. He was extremely gracious to the Obamas right up to the end. Brit Hume had him on, along with H.W. Bush, last week and gave them every chance to critique Obama. They both refused to do so, offering only praise and good wishes. And for that, he is booed at an inauguration and sarcastically mocked as he is flying away.
Sp... As to your last
January 21, 2009 - 19:54 ET by bigtimerSp...
As to your last sentence, plus the interview...
I know....I was more than disgusted and infuriated with how he was treated when leaving.
I loved the speech he gave the crowd last night in Midland.
I, for one, can't wait to read his book...which the msm talking heads will more than disparage...as we all know...starting with Matthews and Olbie.
Is it true that Chuck U
January 21, 2009 - 20:05 ET by thebutlerdiditIs it true that Chuck U Schumer wrote a memo to some Dem saying Bush had to be knocked down? I am sure they planned it, but does anyone know if that supposedly happened? I sometimes wish Bush had of gave it back to the left, but I do agree, that he had too much respect for the office and what is stands for, despite the fact that the lefty loonies don't. I also think he probably thought, screw it, what good will it do? They will just twist everything I say, anyway. Like I have posted here a few times, Bush was met at his inaugural parade with jeers and yelling, people with signs that said he was a thief who stole the election, that he should get out! Then he and Mrs. Bush weren't able to walk at the parade, as Obama was allowed, because the ever deranged loons were throwing eggs at his limo. How in the world could you say you were a Democrat and a part of the same party as these crazy people?
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
I used to ask liberals this
January 21, 2009 - 19:34 ET by KevroyI used to ask liberals this question: Given the choice, which would you prefer?:
A: America kicks butt in Iraq and George Bush is vindicated and shown to have great vision
B: America loses in Iraq and GWB is left in disgrace.
Which do you think they preferred?
Who hates America?
kevroy, see my post
January 21, 2009 - 19:37 ET by Smartypantskevroy, see my post immediately above yours. You echo my sentiments exactly. Bush was made one of the most massive scapegoats in the history of human life on this planet; there is no doubt in my mind about that. I think it is more than just hatred for this man, though; I think, as I stated above, that it was part of a concerted effort to regain power for the Dems and make sure that no other Republicans could use a Bush legacy for anything. They successfully destroyed a good man, a fine leader and a fellow American, for no other reason but to cement their power in D.C.
In the months leading up to
January 21, 2009 - 20:09 ET by GregEIn the months leading up to the 2004 election, I asked several liberals that very thing.......I asked "If it meant that we would lose everything in Iraq and al Qaeda would move in and defeat us, would you want Bush to lose the election?" Not one single liberal would answer that question. They would always ask....."what's the definition of us losing?" (or winning if I posed the question in the opposite manner). And really, they just used that comeback as a way to stall, because I'd answer definitively and they'd still not answer, instead they'd always go off on some diatribe about Bush doing this or that, blah blah blah. They'd never answer.
David Letterman didn't answer O'Reilly when he asked, and I don't remember other names but I distinctly remember other liberals being asked, and they would NEVER answer the question if there was the possibility that it meant they would be making a perceived positive statement toward Bush. They literally could not do it. Bush Derangement Syndrome. Hurting Bush was #1 on their list, and a successful America was somewhere after that.
Wanting someone to fail or
January 21, 2009 - 20:03 ET by GregEWanting someone to fail or succeed without saying what it is you want to fail or succeed is one thing, and it's what Mathews has latched onto.
I've not yet read the entire post, but I will say this........
.....If you know what the president's plans are, as he has stated them, and you believe that those plans will make America weaker militarily, diminish America's military intelligence, create a larger citizen dependency on government, bring America a step closer to a European-style Socialist state, etc etc, then I too want the president to fail at those plans.......
........but if you ask do I want America to succeed, my answer is yes I do, in the manner in which I believe success is......smaller government, less government intervention in my life, lower number of citizens on the public dole, lower taxes, greater freedoms and liberties.....then if my president also believes in those things, then I can answer YES, I want my president to succeed......because wanting the president's agenda success does NOT necessarily mean success for America. People can try to equate the two, by a quick question..."do you want the president to be successful?".....but that question, to me, is unanswerable if that's all that is presented, unless you know what the president's plans are. If you say yes, the liberals are fine and you don't have to say why, but if you say no, you better quickly explain why you're saying no.
Rush knows what the plans are, and because of that, he wants Obama to fail at those plans, because Rush believes that it will take America down the road I described earlier. Plain and simple.
But liberals are going to latch onto things like this and equate it to America. The same liberals who wanted Bush to fail at every turn will now try to use that on conservatives, without as much as asking what one would want Obama to fail at.
As usual, with liberals its not about the substance or the ideas. It's always personal.
RUSH LOVES THIS COUNTRY
January 21, 2009 - 20:04 ET by attorneygirlHOW COULD MATTHEWS SAY THAT?
Is Rush the new target for the left to hate? I don't get it.
ag.... Think Fairness
January 21, 2009 - 20:12 ET by bigtimerag....
Think Fairness Doctrine.
Atty girl
January 21, 2009 - 20:23 ET by thebutlerdidit1) How could matthews say that? To stir up the base of rabid loonies, and keep them tuning in. He specializes in fomenting hate. Matthews is a disingeuous over-bearing pig.
2) Is Rush the new target for the left to hate? Yes, because they will have to lay off of W, to a degree, because he is no longer a player. So, they will have to mix it up a little, rotate through people like Coulter, Rush, Palin, and whomever pokes their head up, dares to question duh1, they will put them in their cross-hairs.
Sad, huh? This is their example of how they are unifying. They want us to all be together! But, their together is we will agree with them. I see that Jay-Z and Young Jeezy were not playing the Hopeand Changey game, last night.
I can't believe it, but I am actually kind of enjoying BOR, tonight! He is not ticking me off near as much as usual. Rush on with Hannity show at 9.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
I also want Obama's policies to fail.
January 21, 2009 - 20:07 ET by attorneygirlI too hope Obama's policies fail. I do.
Cuz he's a socialist. He wants to tax us to death. And he sees the government as the answer to all problems. This is wrong!
I now see Obama trying to control the banks. Not good. All bad.
Yes, I agree with Rush. I want Obama to fail.
Dick Morris had a great
January 21, 2009 - 20:37 ET by motherbeltDick Morris had a great column today at Townhall about Obama's plans....Here Comes Socialism
I too hope he fails at implementing them.
Chris Matthews, Moron at large
January 21, 2009 - 20:11 ET by StumpieMatthews is an idiot, apparently a blatant one at that! He is a liar, deciever and mouth piece for the propaganda of socialist/communist that have wanted America to fail from the beginning.
So, Chris Matthews, post my comment and see if it is taken out of context as you do with EVERYONE ELSE.
P.S. My apologies, calling Matthews a moron is out of line and gives morons a bad name.
Who's your daddy, Chris?
January 21, 2009 - 20:41 ET by BennyI did I hear correct: "I just tried to imagine my daddy as president." First a thrill up his leg, now Barack's his daddy! OMG LMAO!
THANK GOD FOR CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT! GOD BLESS THE FORMER PRESIDENT! AND GOD BLESS AMERICA!
Chris Matthews is
January 21, 2009 - 20:51 ET by MoosebusterChris Matthews is a sick, infantile little man.
you're kidding
January 21, 2009 - 21:04 ET by ronso matthews wants to take on rush. is he that stupid or what?
Stupid...
January 21, 2009 - 21:42 ET by Red Jeep...but he makes 5 mill a year for being stupid...so...
2012
January 21, 2009 - 21:09 ET by rick007Palin/Malkin
Ha, ha, ha! I heard on
January 21, 2009 - 21:21 ET by HockeyKidHa, ha, ha! I heard on the radio today that MSNBC now considers itself to be the single most historically accurate network, since their guy won. What a hoot! To think the Dems actually WANT Mr. Tinglepants and Edward Rn't Murrow as their public face.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
I believe that obama is and
January 21, 2009 - 21:42 ET by pitter43I believe that obama is and always be a failure in spite of the coronation. I do want his administration to succeed in two areas. Keeping Americans safe, which I don't think obama wants to do, and getting the economy back on track. I want them to fail in everything else they try to push through.
Rush Loves Capitalism and So Do I
January 21, 2009 - 21:45 ET by The Smokin FrogTypical liberal defending a typical politician. Matthews has lied repeatedly about Conservatives, especially Rush. Unfortunately we are in a mindless era, thanks to our stellar school systems. It is vogue to 'feel' not to 'think' and read all of what a person says in context rather than isolate and demagogue. On the other hand Matthews gets the commendation of his supreme leader, the one that sends chills up his leg, the Demagoguer-in-Chief.
Rush is obviously against socialism and hopes Obama is not bringing it in any further. So do I. And if he is, as it appears, I hope it fails. I love Capitalism.
Communistic Speak Of Obama
Rush is speaking for many Americans
January 21, 2009 - 22:13 ET by Worriedbut the twit Matthews is trying to convince his audience that Rush hates America. His audience of 10 consists of morons who think Obama is the second coming.
Rush Limbaugh is a true American and doesn't suffer from idol worship.
This shows you one
January 21, 2009 - 22:35 ET by SvenThis shows you one thing...the Libs are relentless in their efforts to smear conservatives and the GOP. Sadly, I blame a good deal of this on the GOP!
-President Bush: He let the Dems crap on him every chance he could. Sorry, this didn't show a "New Tone", but rather weakness
-The GOP Senate: "The Gang of Seven." Need I say more?
The RNC: Thank you for helping to serve us Senator McRINO as our nominee!
I expect this lack of respect and meaness from the Left...they're just miserable nasty folks, but I'm furious that our party (where the conservative movement is supposed to live), have allowed conservatives to be regularly crapped on!
It's sad that Rush really is the last man standing when it comes to celebrating our conservatism!
I pray to God that all of these wishy-washy, RINO, dinosaurs that have infected our party like parasites are ALL VOTED out of OFFICE! Senator Hatch, I can't wait to vote you out of office!
Sven...I'm with you and your
January 21, 2009 - 22:38 ET by bigtimerSven...I'm with you and your sentiments all the way friend....all the way.
Liberalism is a disease of . . .
January 22, 2009 - 07:47 ET by CKA in Red State USA. . . soul and mind.
We can write quadrillions of keystrokes, saying whatever, but it boils down to this, IMO: Liberals such as Matthews and those who refused to say anything positive about former President Bush have tiny minds, mean spirits and dull wits.
And they constitute the enemy within, given their malicious, adolescent attitude toward anyone that disagrees or challenges them.
It would be insulting to children to call them so.
Matthews was rooting for
January 21, 2009 - 23:26 ET by TN MomMatthews was rooting for Bush to fail since day one. Loudly. LOUDLY. OUT LOUD....and while spitting. Jerk.
Maybe so, TN Mom... But as
January 22, 2009 - 01:01 ET by JerMaybe so, TN Mom...
But as I've previously noted, Matthews claims he voted for Bush in one of the two presidential elections. [He didn't specify which one.]
Do you believe Matthews is lying? What would be his motivation for doing so? And, if he is telling the truth, why would he be "rooting for Bush to fail since day one?"
Jer
jer
January 22, 2009 - 01:22 ET by TN MomI wasn't aware of Matthews' claim to vote for Pres Bush.
I am certain that I've never heard him state he 'has a tingle up his leg' regarding Pres Bush. Or, 'I will do everything I can to help Pres Bush Admin succeed'.
Motivation? I'm not sure what motivates an aging Liberal news commentator. He'll have to talk to his therapist about those issues. Surely NBC pays him well and offers medical coverage? If not, they could hype the Global Warming thingy or sell more G.E. lightbulbs!
Tn Mom...
January 22, 2009 - 01:43 ET by Jer"I am certain that I've never heard him state he 'has a tingle up his leg' regarding Pres Bush."
Can't argue with that, Tn Mom. At one time Matthews was a fairly centrist Democrat who took potshots at many on the Left and frequently praised various Rebublicans.
But, he has gone completely ga-ga over Obama, regrettably and embarrassingly so, and seriously undermined whatever journalistic credibility he still retained.
Jer
jer
January 22, 2009 - 02:01 ET by TN MomThe hard road is the road less traveled?
It's probably easier to attack conservatives then to do fair, honest reporting. He reminds me of an aging pit bull; wants to attack but lacks teeth.
sad.
TN Mom
January 22, 2009 - 02:27 ET by JerCertainly easier when Matthews is actuated by a self-defined
sense of duty to protect 'his' guy. Very disappointing.
Jer
BTW...Are you a long-time Tennessean?
Hello! He is failing already! I will say it. I hope he fails.
January 22, 2009 - 00:45 ET by JWFThe conduct of war along with it's morals and ethics and principles goes back nearly to the beginnings of the human race. There are rules and they have been refined over dozens and dozens of centuries. You meet your enemy on the battlefield. You wear uniforms. You do not target civilians. You treat your prisoners honorably.
And when the war is over, you release your prisoners to resume their normal lives either as professional soldiers or civilians. With the presumptian that they had fought for their country, and will FIGHT NO MORE.
The men we have in Guantanamo have no particular compunction to follow any of the rules of war. They do not fight for a country, they fight for an ideology. They do not wear uniforms. They do not engage our military on a battlefield. They specifically TARGET CIVILIANS. And as has been proven OVER and OVER again, when released, they rejoin the fight.
These are some of the nastiest, most vicious little cowards the planet has produced. They rightly should have been shot where they stood on the battlefield. But we DO follow the rules, rules we did not write but follow on general principle.
What is our illustrious leader's VERY FIRST ACT? The COMMANDER IN CHIEF of all of our military?
"Let's hold off on giving some of these cowards their just due for 4 months. Let's take a second look here. Maybe we are being too mean to men that try to kill unarmed civilians. Hmmmm. Hold off there."
HIS VERY FIRST ACT!
No. I hope he fails too.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
JWF... I heard about this
January 22, 2009 - 00:47 ET by bigtimerJWF...
I heard about this earlier today.
Furious is a mild way of putting how I felt, feel about all of this.
I'm with you all the way, all of your sentiments here, I'm just so glad you posted this....more than you know.
The Commander of the USS
January 22, 2009 - 00:56 ET by TN MomThe Commander of the USS Cole that was bombed in 2000, was very upset at the closing of gitmo. He said his 17 brave sailors will have no justice!
What about justice for all those killed on 9/11???
More people went to the Inauguration...
January 22, 2009 - 05:19 ET by Red Jeep...than watch Matthew's show. So when you see photo's of the crowds in DC (800,000 + 1,200,000 Acorn ghosts) for the Inauguration just think, Matthews doesn't have even that many viewers.
Matthews and Olbermann should be an embarrasment to the MSM and to the Democrats those two...(you fill in the blank(s))
§Red...I can't wait to see MSNBC in 2 weeks!!!
January 22, 2009 - 05:27 ET by TheSterWhat will the programming be??
They will vent for WAR CRIMES for a MONTH...
...MSNBC will not get it....
...then what....
Ster.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
In the tank for O(s)bama? Ratings will tank.
January 22, 2009 - 07:49 ET by jsteve2xMatthews et al cater to the victim crowd and thusly those who want unbiased news will go somewhere else. PMSNBC's ratings will continue to tank. He will be left with a handfull of "zombied-out bong-suckers" watching and saying "right-on dude".
Here is an idea, why doesn't
January 22, 2009 - 08:28 ET by athoughtor2Here is an idea, why doesn't The Thrill play "Hardball" with Rush. Invite him on for an hour and discuss it with him face to face. It could make a great pay-per-view speical. How many ways to Sunday would Rush pick Chrissy apart?
Note to all: do not hold your breath waiting for Chrissy to invite Rush on. I doubt Rush would go on any way, but it's fun to imagine.
Athoughtor2
January 22, 2009 - 10:23 ET by SeashellBelieve it or not, a long time ago (before Chris went crazy) he was a guest host for Rush's radio show.
I know,,,
January 22, 2009 - 14:40 ET by jawebster1I heard the show. I used to watch Matthews on Televison before there was a Fox Network. (or MSNBC) Matthews was critical of Clinton's lack of morals and until he signed off on Rush's show (see my other comment) I watched him regularly. I also used to watch Letterman when he started his new (at the time) show. Then he had Rush as a guest and proceeded to needlessly insult him. Needless to say, I have not watched Letterman since. Jim Webster
I know,,,
January 22, 2009 - 14:42 ET by jawebster1I heard the show. I used to watch Matthews on Televison before there was a Fox Network. (or MSNBC) Matthews was critical of Clinton's lack of morals and until he signed off on Rush's show (see my other comment) I watched him regularly. I also used to watch Letterman when he started his new (at the time) show. Then he had Rush as a guest and proceeded to needlessly insult him. Needless to say, I have not watched Letterman since. Jim Webster
I know,,,
January 22, 2009 - 14:42 ET by jawebster1I heard the show. I used to watch Matthews on Televison before there was a Fox Network. (or MSNBC) Matthews was critical of Clinton's lack of morals and until he signed off on Rush's show (see my other comment) I watched him regularly. I also used to watch Letterman when he started his new (at the time) show. Then he had Rush as a guest and proceeded to needlessly insult him. Needless to say, I have not watched Letterman since. Jim Webster
I know,,,
January 22, 2009 - 14:43 ET by jawebster1I heard the show. I used to watch Matthews on Televison before there was a Fox Network. (or MSNBC) Matthews was critical of Clinton's lack of morals and until he signed off on Rush's show (see my other comment) I watched him regularly. I also used to watch Letterman when he started his new (at the time) show. Then he had Rush as a guest and proceeded to needlessly insult him. Needless to say, I have not watched Letterman since. Jim Webster
I know,,,
January 22, 2009 - 14:43 ET by jawebster1I heard the show. I used to watch Matthews on Televison before there was a Fox Network. (or MSNBC) Matthews was critical of Clinton's lack of morals and until he signed off on Rush's show (see my other comment) I watched him regularly. I also used to watch Letterman when he started his new (at the time) show. Then he had Rush as a guest and proceeded to needlessly insult him. Needless to say, I have not watched Letterman since. Jim Webster
Jim
January 22, 2009 - 16:57 ET by RukusYou been hangin' with sheryl haven't ya?
Gary
"Mom's ROCK!!!" -Me
Fantasy Political Debates
January 22, 2009 - 10:51 ET by Tom in NCWhy not have Fantasy Political Debates patterned after Fantasy Football, Basketball, etc. Might be hard to do though since most of the MSM idiots have never been in a debate before so they don't have any stats to form a baseline.
Nobody genuinely loves this country more than Rush, except for the GI's that have worn the uniform and have fought and died to protect it.
Matthews, you are nothing more than a maggot feeding on the pile of excrement known as liberalism
SMERCONISH: You know
January 22, 2009 - 10:22 ET by fitzfongSMERCONISH: You know unfortunately there’s a part of my industry that’s sort of predicated on stirring the pot and being the opposition. I want this guy to succeed. I looked at those images yesterday and, and I feel wonderful. Look at that First Family. Look at those daughters. You want to talk about the politics of this. Imagine the political capital that the two daughters are gonna bring to the table on behalf of the First Family. No, I want them to succeed. Absolutely!
What the hell kind of mealy-mouthed, empty platitude was that? What do "images" of the First Family, and more specifically, his daughters, have to do with anything? I'm so sick of these Beltway pseudo-conservatives like Smerconish, Noonan, Brooks, Graham, McCain, Gergen, Kristol, Barnes and Medved wagging their fingers at real conservatives about abstract nonsense like "feelings" and "tone". We have real, concrete, important policy differences with the President and with the Democrats, and those differences need to be addressed. We can't afford to surrender to damaging policies just to appease the new Administration and to make a bunch of spineless talking heads feel morally superior.
As for Matthews' pathetic attempt to frame Limbaugh's words as exhibiting a hatred for this country, I'll simply say this: Rush Limbaugh loves America. He may not like Washington, DC that much, but why should he? Limbaugh lives away from the Beltway, as the vast majority of Americans do. He doesn't have the reverence for the Beltway that Matthews has, nor should he. Beltway types like Matthews think that they're the center of the universe...that only they have the intellectual capacity to grasp how the world works. But Matthews has no practical understanding, he lives in a Beltway fantasy world, constantly dropping tired Hollywood cliches about the people of Scranton, Dayton and Flint (as if he has a clue) and James Stewart on the Senate Floor. Matthews is the living, breathing standard empty suit.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
"Well Rush must have a
January 22, 2009 - 10:27 ET by Ruths husband Ben"Well Rush must have a lot of acorns squirreled away not to share everyone else's hopes that the economy does come back."
Well Chris, at least Rush has nuts. Bet you are jealous.
I have never...
January 22, 2009 - 11:24 ET by danhat...seen or heard the MSM quote Rush accurately or correctly. It is always out of context.
Just incredible how they can be so wrong, so often.
Even a blind squirrel...
Dan
http://www.reasonand...
...thought matters
++++++++++++++++
Normally I don't root for the disease. But in your case I am willing to make and exception.
First off here's what Rush
January 22, 2009 - 13:46 ET by TexasteacherFirst off here's what Rush actually said (from the Hannity transcript):
"So I shamelessly say, no, I want him to fail, if
his agenda is a far- left collectivism, some people say socialism, as a
conservative heartfelt, deeply, why would I want socialism to succeed?"
chris matthews, open your beady little eyes someday, when you can tear them away from the shirtless obama picture you have your bed, and ACTUALLY READ SOMETHING IN FREAKING CONTEXT!
[edit] And what kind of a**hole of a father would use his kids for "political capital"? What does his kids have to do with his socialist agenda?
I remember...
January 22, 2009 - 14:28 ET by jawebster1when Rush was nice enough to allow Matthews to host his radio show. Matthews ungratefully signed off by saying he disagrees with just about everything Rush believes. Happily, Rush has never allowed him do his show again. I could never be a Liberal because it is not in my nature to lie or to knowingly take people out of context. I realize there are a few honest Liberals like Lanny Davis or Juan Williams but that explains why they were hired by Fox and not by MSNBC. Jim Webster
Juan Williams
January 23, 2009 - 13:10 ET by 1611LilacLadyHonest liberal? He is one of the many reasons why I no longer watch FOX. A couple of years ago, during Special Report, they were discussing the then alive Yassar Arafat. You remember him I'm sure. Head of the PLO, wealthy from living off the money that was supposed to go to the poor Palestinians? And considered a fallen martyr (by natural causes) to Arab-lover Carter.
Well, Mr. Juan 'honest' Williams starting defending Arafat. That he was the nicest person and really cared about his people. When Brit Humes questioned how he could say that with the history of the terror of the PLO, Juan kept defending him and the PLO . .
Brit could take no more . . And for the only time I ever saw, on that show, he lost his self-control and was out of his chair and ready to go across the table to have a 'hands-on' confrontation with Juan. I was thinking "GO BRIT!" Juan suddenly backed down and admitted maybe Arafat wasn't a spotless terrorist leader (my words, his implication).
I would have loved to have a listening device planted there to hear the conversation during a break!
As for Lanny Davis . . is he on Special Report now? I haven't watch FOX for quite a while (couple of years) for their news. I only recently caught their coverage of the miraculous landing of that plane on the Hudson River.
Isaiah 5:20a Woe unto them who call evil good, and good evil. . . KJV
Chris Matthews is an idiot
January 22, 2009 - 17:08 ET by kevinm13Matthews doesn't have much of an audience so he says stupid stuff to get attention.
Ironic
January 22, 2009 - 21:25 ET by ChesterBogusI just think it's so ironic that for eight years, fundies like all of y'all were saying the same thing to anyone that questioned Bush. It's kind of sad that the irony is lost on you.
I can't tell you how many times I heard phrases like, "Why do you hate our troops?" whenever someone questioned the Iraq conflict. Any discussion on terrorism was decided by some wingnut telling me, "You hate America, don't you?" It wasn't Bush himself that suppressed free speech and quashed dissent - it was the common Republican on the street shouting down any real discussion. It was people like y'all throwing around stereotypes, false dilemmas and plain old ignorance.
What I'm saying, guys, is that you're all just getting a taste of your own medicine. Rush is being accused of hating America for making a somewhat valid point. Do you know how many left-wingers, progressives and dissenters got the same treatment by people like you during the Bush Regime?
What's unfortunate is that you aren't taking the time to stop and think, "So this is how it feels. This is what we did to them." I don't think Republicans have any idea what kind of damage they themselves have done to polite, calm political discourse in this country.
You see...when I was a child, any time I hit or hurt someone, my father would slap me in the back of the head and say, "Hurts doesn't it?" I learned not to be cruel to people because I reflected on the pain my father inflicted on me.
That's what's happening to all of you now. Get used to it - but more importantly, get over it. You are reaping what you have all sewn.
Why do you hate the troops anyway?
January 23, 2009 - 02:09 ET by JWFHi. My name is chestybogus and I am a typical liberal. My dad used to discipline me as a child and now I have daddy issues.
Instead of confronting my father for what I wrongly perceived as physical abuse, I lash out at the world. I lash out at those I see as authority figures. You know, people that are sure of themselves, rational and are aware of what is going on in the world around them.
Like a typical liberal, I must over simplifly the world in order to try to understand it. I see Republicans as daddy figures and Democrats as mommy figures. Since I am angry at my father, I lash out angrily at Republicans and the people that fill the republican ranks, conservatives.
I call them wingnuts and try to apply logic that only should be applied to a child. "See how that feels? Hurts donut?" because I am still have the emotions of a child. again, see my daddy issues above.
I never learned the adult lessons that our government is composed of 3 different branches and dozens of huge bureaucracies and hundreds of smaller bureaucracies in addition to state and municipal governments. I can understand little of this. I only see the big daddy guy at the top and heap scorn upon him. So everything must be his fault. Because daddy, I mean Bush is just like Hitler, really.
And yes, deep down, I do hate the troops because basically I am a coward and could never serve.
Sincerely,
A proud citizen now that mommy, er I mean democrats are in charge
No Chrissy...
March 10, 2009 - 12:15 ET by Bighead227He, like the rest of us, hates you.