Appearing on Thursday's "Today" show Newsweek editor Jon Meacham suggested Sarah Palin needed a "Berlitz" course in foreign policy and even snidely implied John McCain, like President Andrew Jackson before him, may have wanted to shoot his vice president. Meacham, who was also plugging his book on Jackson, noted to "Today" co-host Matt Lauer that Jackson once threatened the life his own vice president, and postulated that maybe McCain may have considered that as an option.
MATT LAUER: He's also a guy who threatened to kill his own vice president, isn't he?
MEACHAM: He did. Which a McCain/Palin thing-
LAUER: But we don't hold that, it doesn't make him a bad guy.
MEACHAM: I don't know if Senator McCain has thought that, along the way.
Before the Jackson discussion Lauer, set up Meacham about Palin's readiness, "She didn't impress a lot of people with her knowledge of domestic affairs or foreign affairs." To which Meacham sarcastically agreed: "Ya think? Ya think?" and added the Alaska governor should "be going into a kind of policy Berlitz course, which one would think would be a relatively sound thing to do."
The following is a complete transcript of the segment as it occurred on the November 13, "Today" show:
MATT LAUER: Jon Meacham is the editor of Newsweek magazine and the author of a new book, American Lion: Andrew Jackson in the White House. Hey Jon, good morning to you.
JON MEACHAM: How are you sir?
LAUER: I'm fine, thanks. Your magazine ran a poll of conservatives it came out with 50-50, as the shot that Sarah Palin will be the Republican nominee in 2012. What do you see as her future?
MEACHAM: Well, politics is about ideas. So she needs, it's, it's about the apostle but it's also about the creed. And right now she's the most interesting apostle on the Republican side. But what, what is her argument gonna be? And comeback politics is about a critique of the incumbent crowd. So the Republicans have to find a way to criticize Obama without looking as though they are simply relentlessly negative and whether she can find that tone or not I'm not sure.
LAUER: But isn't "comeback politics" also about improving some resume items that seemed weak the first time around? And she didn't impress a lot of people with her knowledge of domestic affairs or foreign affairs? How does she go about improving that?
MEACHAM: Ya think? Ya think?
LAUER: I don't want, I don't want to state the case here.
MEACHAM: No.
LAUER: But how does she go about improving that?
MEACHAM: It is interesting that she spent this time talking to a lot of folks about the campaign and does not seem, at this point, to be going into a kind of a policy Berlitz course, which one would think would be a relatively sound thing to do. She's got some time. She's clearly someone who understands star power. And politics is often about celebrity. But the celebrity only gets you so far. And I think we saw that in the campaign. She can bring in the crowds, but that follow-up question was very hard.
LAUER: Real quickly, transition time, Barack Obama looking at his cabinet and his staff. A lot of people speculating as to whether Hillary Clinton might be part of the team. What do you think?
MEACHAM: I don't know, obviously, but I think that probably Senator Clinton is gonna be Senator Clinton.
LAUER: Stay there.
MEACHAM: I would think so. And there is a great noble tradition here. Daniel Webster, Henry Clay. There are great senators. Daniel Patrick Moynihan. And I think that you got to have strong people there in the Senate.
LAUER: Andrew Jackson, which is the subject you've written about, going back to my high school history and maybe middle school history, seventh President of the United States, hero in the War of 1812. You also say there are parallels though, between Andrew Jackson and what we're about to see in Washington. What are they?
MEACHAM: Well imagine a candidate of change coming to rule after the unpopular son of another president, at a time of economic uncertainty, with a powerful democratic lower case "d" connection to a core of very motivated supporters. And it sounds kind of familiar.
LAUER: Right.
MEACHAM: That's exactly what happened to Andrew Jackson in 1829. He's, he was a democratic leader. He was the President who really made our politics what they are, a kind of popular leader, someone who communicated with his base. And who wanted to give the people a central voice in the politics of the country as long as he was always at center stage articulating that voice.
LAUER: He's also a guy who threatened to kill his own vice president, isn't he?
MEACHAM: He did. Which a McCain/Palin thing-
LAUER: But we don't hold that, it doesn't make him a bad guy.
MEACHAM: I don't know if Senator McCain has thought that, along the way.
LAUER: Alright.
MEACHAM: But he was also the only President who to ever try to attack his own assassin.
LAUER: Okay. But, but as always we can learn about the future by delving into the past. And, and your book is a good example of that. John, good to have you here.
MEACHAM: Thank you sir.
LAUER: And the book is American Lion and you can check out probably an excerpt on our Web site.
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The latest in the "some say" line of smearing.
November 13, 2008 - 14:41 ET by motherbeltI don't know if Senator McCain has thought that, along the way.
The latest in the "some say" line of smearing.
"I don't know if" Barack Obama ever cheated on his wife.
"I don't know if" Joe Biden plagiarized his acceptance speech.
"I don't know if" Michelle Obama has a filthy mouth and regularly used the "F" word and the "N" word when the Obamas argue.
Ya think anyone could get away with those?
Hey John Meecham
November 13, 2008 - 17:40 ET by allanfI can say it in a three letter word J - O - B - S
What the "H"....
November 14, 2008 - 06:36 ET by old croI don't trust no one who leaves the "H" out of John.
The above is an example of the insipid comments being offered by todays MSM.
Another textbook case of
November 13, 2008 - 14:41 ET by islero47Another textbook case of psychological projection.
Sarah Palin/Jason Lewis 2012
Obama, pathological nacissist: http://www.faithfree...
Biden with figurative "target" on his back
November 13, 2008 - 14:48 ET by nkviking75I think it's more likely that Obama wanted to "off" Joe Biden. When the statisticians get a chance to study this election, I suspect Palin boosted McCain's numbers and Biden's lowered Obama's.
Welcome to the era of unity, you racist!
Meacham providing good cover
November 13, 2008 - 14:54 ET by winston smithMeacham providing good cover for Democrats focusing on Palin's faults when it was plain to see, even for the average voter, that all through the election Obama and Biden demonstrated a stunning lack of articulation and knowledge on a variety of subjects.
Distort
November 13, 2008 - 14:55 ET by littlemissmuffinDistort, destroy, smear, attack, and invent. All this because Sarah Palin has the dems shaking in their boots.
Littlemiss
November 13, 2008 - 15:57 ET by iveseenitallRight on. Little Sarah has the "big boys" in the MSM scared s%$*less. They know how popular she is, and when Barry falls flat on his ugly face, she'll be there saying, "I told you so".
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
LIberal blowhards
November 13, 2008 - 15:20 ET by Mr. TerryThey gloat now and show their elitist arrogance for all the world to see. Its amazing how they can say such outrageous things. They can read the minds of Republicans. I guess Brak (Space Ghost) Hussein Obama really must be the messiah.
Hmmm. This is akin to
November 13, 2008 - 15:23 ET by Chris NormanHmmm. This is akin to Woodward "channeling" William Casey...
Liberals are psychos
November 13, 2008 - 15:38 ET by 10ksnookerIn more ways than one.
So tell me, how is Zero doing so far?
Who is the Empty Headed One?
November 13, 2008 - 16:02 ET by allanfI wonder if Jon Meacham's insight into Jackson is as tissue thin as his grasp of Palin?
I understand Mr. Meacham that does not like Sarah Palin's accent and non Ebonics colloquialisms. So quit your nattering Mr. Meacham and let's talk substance
I could go on and on. But "intellectuals" seem to only want to remark on style and engage in ad homnym attacks. Mr. Meacham, Katie Couric and Garrison Keillor, Peggy Noonan seem more concerned with Palin's speech patterns than her thoughts.
And she is the empty headed one?
Meacham…. affectations
November 13, 2008 - 18:43 ET by maggieqpublicMeacham…. affectations straight out of a Jane Austen novel.
Take a survey on how many
November 13, 2008 - 18:48 ET by Roger the ShrubberTake a survey on how many people know what a "Berlitz" course actually is, and we will see just how "in touch" this elite snob actually is.
Wonk, wonk, wonk.
November 13, 2008 - 18:52 ET by Mike BrattonHere's the deal.
Having a wonk as President isn't a good idea. Apparently, as if it's a rule of some game, being a wonk means trading off something--like a moral grounding.
The last wonk we had was Bill Clinton, and I think the White House cleaning crew is still trying to get some stains out of the Oval Office carpeting. He may have been able to rattle off the names of all manner of foreign dignitaries (and pronounce their names correctly), but Clinton's moral compass was long ago smashed into tiny little pieces.
While President Bush hasn't exactly been everything a conservative could've hoped for, he wasn't a wonk. His morality has been solid, and though people may disagree with his conclusions, it cannot be argued that he has arrived at them without a strong moral influence on his decision-making process.
Now, the nation is back to a wonk--two, if you include Biden. Oh, yes, Obama can rattle off all sorts of foreign-policy goodies, even though he's only spent hours more in Iraq than Gov. Palin. People like Jon Meacham can perhaps get Chris-esque tingles at the mention of the Lightworker, but even before the election we understood that Obama has no moral rudder.
At the end of the day, the Office of the Presidency is one where decisions must be made. Good decisions are made by people with good moral character.
With the announcement of planned executive orders from Obama to allow the harvesting of yet-to-be-born children for experimentation, as well as the prohibition of crude-oil exploration, we see that the bad decisions from the latest Wonk-In-Chief have already begun.
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport...
Mike... Exactly...you hit
November 13, 2008 - 18:56 ET by bigtimerMike...
Exactly...you hit the nail right on the head.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
So threatened by Palin.....STILL
November 13, 2008 - 20:31 ET by MNotaroWow, anyone else here think that maybe the left wing illuminati are obviously feeling very threatened by Gov Palin if they have nothing else better to do then continuing on with the media attack of her?!
PDS...
November 13, 2008 - 21:08 ET by BiasedGirlIt's nice to know that Liberals have found a new target of their aggression. I had thought that the Palin Derangement Syndrome a mutation of the Bush Derangment Syndrome, would end after the election. As I've written many times Sarah Palin must be doing something right, if the Liberals are still frothing at the mouth trying to destroy her.
http://www.withbias.net