During the 7pm edition of Thursday’s "Hardball," Chris Matthews repeatedly asked his guests if Sarah Palin's "brain" was up to the task for tonight's vice presidential debate. Matthews even managed to go where a Democratic Congresswoman wouldn't, when he asked Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz: "Is this about her brain power?" To which, even the Florida Democrat balked: "It’s really not nice to suggest that there's something wrong with her brain power."
However Matthews didn't let Schultz's hesitancy stop him from questioning the Republican vice presidential nominee's intelligence as he asked these series of questions about Palin to Schultz: Mp3 Here
Well do you think cute will beat brains?
Do you think she'd do better on the questions on "Jeopardy" or the interview they do during a halftime?
Congressman how much would you, how much would you like to be debating her tonight?
Then a little later on in the program, during a segment with the Politico's Mike Allen and New York magazine's John Heilemann, Matthews worried Palin's perceived lack of intellectual curiosity was "scary."
I think John McCain, his judgment is on trial tonight. And she may well win it tonight with charm and smarts and political perspicacity and know how to work around the questions. But I still, I'm stunned with her inability to answer these general knowledge questions, that most people who read the paper can answer. I don't know why she's afraid to answer them. Maybe it's her bad training. My suspicion is that she has the same lack of intellectual curiosity that the President of the United States has right now and that is scary!
The following exchanges occurred on the October 2, edition of "Hardball":
MATTHEWS: Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is an Obama supporter. Congresswoman let me ask you tonight. You're a politician and you're on this show a lot so let me ask you the same question I've asked everybody. What's the test for Sarah Palin tonight? Is it brains? Is it knowledge? Is it personality? Is it politics? Is it credibility? Is it ideology or is it simply composure in a difficult night? Try to pick one of these: brains, knowledge, personality, politics, credibility, ideology or composure? What's it about tonight?
[REP. DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ]
MATTHEWS: Is this about her brain power?
SCHULTZ: No I mean, you know, it's, it's really not nice to suggest that there's something wrong with her brain power. This is about some, whether or not she is ready to be President of the United States. That's the only responsibility of a vice presidential candidate Chris. Are you ready? I mean you're one, one heartbeat away from the presidency. Ready means does she have the knowledge? Does she have a grasp of the depth of the job? Does she have the, the, the information that, that she can draw from? All of those things are gonna be incredibly important criteria to judge whether or not this is a person that should be one heartbeat away from the presidency and thus far Sarah Palin has not demonstrated she has any of those things, not even very much of a command of the, of the facts or the issues that are necessary for someone who is going to be the Vice President of the United States, potentially. So I think she's really got a tall order tonight. But she's demonstrated in previous debates that she rises to the challenge and like I said the bar is kind of low. So it's, this is gonna be a test of wills and because of the format she's gonna have an opportunity to really kind of get in those short answers that she seems to be good at and use a lot of quips and, and cute, cute remarks that might endear her to an audience. So this is not gonna be a cakewalk for Joe Biden, at all.
MATTHEWS: Well do you think cute will beat brains?
[SCHULTZ]
MATTHEWS: Do you think she'd do better on the questions on "Jeopardy" or the interview they do during a halftime?
[AUDIBLE GROANS FROM CROWD]
[SCHULTZ]
MATTHEWS: Congressman how much would you, how much would you like to be debating her tonight?
SCHULTZ: You know I, I, I, it's extremely tempting. It would be, it would be an exciting opportunity but Joe Biden-
MATTHEWS: I think you're right.
SCHULTZ: -is gonna be ready and I think he'll do just fine. But I'm chomping at the bit, I have to admit.
MATTHEWS: I think I got you blushing. I think I got you to blush Congresswoman, because you know you'd be dying to be in there.
Segment with Politico's Mike Allen and New York's John Heilemann:
MATTHEWS: Let me, let me ask you this. I know this is so uncool to ask this question, that's why I keep asking it. It seems to me if you show all the responses to Katie Couric's questions, especially, some of them Charlie Gibson's, what has grabbed people is not the answer she gave but where she seemed to not have answer. That long pause and that difficult use of words without thoughts, where you just started, like we did in a test in school.
MIKE ALLEN, POLITICO: Just fill up the blue book.
MATTHEWS: Is it, tonight, about brains? Is that what people are worried about? That the judgment of John McCain was to pick someone just for cultural reasons, geographic, gender reasons, but wasn't really a person who knew what they were talking about? Is that what it's about tonight? Yes or no?
...
MATTHEWS: She had no familiarity with the role of the vice presidency in the Katie Couric interview tonight. She couldn't name one vice president and what they'd done well as vice president. She wasn't able to talk about any Supreme Court decision. Not able to talk about what newspaper she reads. What question is an easy one for her! Tell me what the easy question is, and then they can ask it!
...
MATTHEWS: Let me get back to this. What should a Vice President of the United States know? What should a person who's up for the job, what is the minimal intellectual requirement? Give me a sense of it. It is some sense of American history? Some sense of the history of the job of vice president? Some sense of the Constitution of the United States? Those are the questions Katie Couric put to her. These are citizenship questions! These are questions you ask somebody just applying to become a U.S. citizen! Tell me what, what the, what the courts do in this country! Tell me, you know, these are basics!
...
MATTHEWS: I think John McCain, his judgment is on trial tonight. And she may well win it tonight with charm and smarts and political perspicacity and know how to work around the questions. But I still, I'm stunned with her inability to answer these general knowledge questions, that most people who read the paper can answer. I don't know why she's afraid to answer them. Maybe it's her bad training. My suspicion is that she has the same lack of intellectual curiosity that the President of the United States has right now and that is scary!
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Sarah Palin proved she is the intellectual superior of Biden
October 2, 2008 - 22:12 ET by Lame CherrySarah Palin proved by standing on stage and separating Joe Biden from Barack Obama and Biden allowing her to do this means Gov. Palin is superior to Joe Biden.
Joe Biden proved tonight he is 5 times the man Barack Obama is, so this means that Sarah Palin is 500 times the intellect of Barack Obama and the Sarahcuda is beyond Biden by a league.
The Gov. was dominating in a very tough debate. She was impressive and as Matthews gets tingles down his leg for Obama, it is a fact that Gov. Palin is 700 billion times the more intellect than peewee brain Matthews.
Matthews you really screwed yourself over this and all your liberal smearmongers in picking on Sarah Palin's intellect. You have all been trounced.
agtG
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
If that was the question
October 2, 2008 - 22:19 ET by 10ksnookerThen the answer should be, poor Joe, he came up short on brains and made up for it with lies.
The debate result might well confirm that
October 3, 2008 - 00:49 ET by wdhorning: McCain Obama Palin Biden
CNN 30317 73250 39130 107527
FoxNews 73800 15300 899343 123178
TOTALS 104117 88550 884864 230705
% 54 46 79 21
poll time: 12:30 12:30 11:30 11:30
observations:
-------------------
McCain wins debate over Obama by 8% between both networks.
Palin wins debate over Biden by 58% between both networks.
---
Palin did a "heck of a lot" better than McCain in debating.
---
It looks CNN had an increase for Palin-Biden debate over McCain-Obama, but it looks like FoxNews had a huge jump! There is no way to say why this jump occured without more data. If it is due to larger increase in women viewers to watch Sarah Pain, then could it be that women prefer FoxNews over CNN? But if the Biden number is larger too, then more Democrats must have watched too.
Matthews Should Just Shut Up
October 2, 2008 - 22:30 ET by rammingspeedChris Matthews has a lot of guts talking about brain power. He blabbers with his goony grin, is nothing more than a silly, feces flinging twit. Even his democratic sympathizing audience groaned him out. Debbie Wasserman Schultz upbraided him for being rude toward Sarah Palin. But that's what he is; a rude, boorish stooge who has no shame.
MATTHEWS=MORONIC
October 2, 2008 - 22:59 ET by FC DOBBSCHRIS; I'VE BEEN WATCHING YOU ON CABLE ON AND
OFF FOR TOO MANY YEARS. YOU SHOULD CHECK IN
WITH YOUR PHYSICIAN AS I THINK SLOWLY BUT
SURELY DEMENTIA IS CREEPING UP ON YOU.
IF I'M WRONG, AND I HOPE I AM, I WOULD LOVE
TO SEE YOU DEBATE GOV.PALIN. BUT NO
INTERRUPTIONS ALLOWED. THAT WOULD ALMOST
BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU,SO I GUESS YOU WOULD DECLINE.
JUST AS WELL SINCE SARAH WOULD WIPE THE FLOOR WITH
DYED BLONDISH HAIR. GET A HOLD OF KEITH AND GET ON
LINE FOR AIR AMERICA, CAUSE I DON'T THINK MSNBC CAN
TAKE YOUR LOW RATINGS MUCH LONGER.
"NOBODY PUTS ONE OVER ON FRED C DOBBS" B.TRAVEN
The Tingler...
October 2, 2008 - 23:47 ET by cest moiHey Chris - why don't you stand up and take a load (and I mean a load) off your brains?
WHAT THE EFF...
October 2, 2008 - 23:50 ET by danybhoyI am amazed by the ability of Chris Mathews & his BSNBC playmates, as well as most of the MSM, to come up with such moronic talking points/thoughts. Mathews is 1 of the LAST people who should be talking about "brain power". Mathews, along with BathTubBoy & Jack Catastrophe, say more stupid things, day after day, week after week, month after month, & year after year. They all spew hatefull, bitter, partisan talking points constantly. If they could'nt, they would be unemployed.
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
Journalistic Joke
October 3, 2008 - 00:03 ET by TexndocHe realized he killed his career with "a thrill going down my leg." He'll never recover. He was once on a roll sand-bagging both Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter, now they have the last laugh. To appeal to kooks in tin-foil hats, one must BECOME a kook in a tin-foil hat.
The MSM is going to go NUTS...
October 3, 2008 - 01:47 ET by TheSterGov. Palin HAD THE GAUL to go over the FILTER of the MSM!!! How dare she!!! MSNBC and CNN post-debate spinners are going NUCLEAR!!!
I can not wait for Friday and the Sun. Shows!!!
Seriously...Crissy, Olby, and MOOCOW were speechless...nitpicking...why??? BECAUSE THEY DID NOT GET THEIR TALKING POINTS BEFORE MEDIA MATTERS COULD GET IT TO THEM!!! Just wait...I'll be checking MM and other sites before these CLOWNS air on Friday...
LET'S ALL CHECK THE TALKING POINTS TOGETHER...SHALL WE???
Ster.
“Brain Power” BS
October 3, 2008 - 07:38 ET by needleSomething needs to be said about this “brain power” shtick.
Whenever and wherever liberals need to take somebody down, whoever it is they want to differentiate themselves from, they say that their target is stupid, dumb, not the brightest bulb, etc. George Bush, Dick Chaney, Karl Rove, John McCain, Sarah Palin, Condoleezza Rice, Clarence Thomas, etc. For the Liberal they simply cannot help fixating on how stupid these people are, regardless of how smart they really are. What the liberals are really doing is displaying their elitism. And this is the way they try to do it, as if they were as smart as they like to think they are.
It is long past due that the liberal are called on their elitism when they do this.
Bush was not and is not dumber than Kerry. And he is certainly smarter than Al Gore. However, with conservatives dependence upon “brain power” is not the issue; generally it is character and integrity. These are matters that liberal don’t care about and usually run away from desperately. With liberals ethical issues only matter when they can be used to bludgeon conservatives. It is hard to think of an ethical infraction either Bill or Hillary or both did not commit while they were in the White House; but who cares? After all that the Democrats came within a hair of nominating them for a cynical end run around the 22 Amendment.
Liberals at least condone and generally encourage essentially any sexually activity so as one can get away with it. And when there are consequences, well that is what abortions for, among other things. Being responsible for their actions? Whoa! That sounds way too much like character and integrity; stay away from that.
Even when John Edwards, a Presidential candidate, was suspected to be involved in adultery, it did not matter in the least to the liberals, and they studiously ignored the problem until the National Enquirer essentially forced them to acknowledge it. And then at that point they were embarrassed not so much by the adultery itself as by the fact that Edwards didn’t do a thorough job of hiding it. With Bill Clinton there was and is nothing that liberals did not and do not excuse: rape, whoring, philandering, adultery, groping, oral sex with interns while transacting Presidential affairs. What’s left? I can imagine if he laid five prostitutes on the White House lawn in the noonday sun, the liberals would comment mostly on his style.
So what is left? “Intelligence,” “brain power,” etc. The liberals just gotta have it.
Going back to Bush and Kerry: After all the liberal talk about how stupid Bush is and how smart Kerry is, somebody exhumed an intelligence test that both had to take for the military. And what do you know? It turns out that Bush scored higher on the test than Kerry. Liberal reaction: Kerry was not at his peak performance because he had been drinking the night before the test. Yeah, right. As if we are supposed to believe that he remembered whatever the heck he was doing the night before that test he apparently took. Can he remember taking the test? Can he remember the questions? Which questions were the hard ones? Which questions did he ace? Blah, blah, blah. At least that put the kibosh on the liberals’ hypocritical slandering Bush about substance abuse.
Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.
Sexual harassment
October 3, 2008 - 07:58 ET by redherkeyMATTHEWS: Well do you think cute will beat brains?
Simply remarkable. How many of you other men here will go into work today and make that comment about an attractive female executive and survive the week? That's an immediate suspension and likely termination in our world if the woman were to complain.
Every day shows us the alleged principles the left stands for are nothing but marketing fluff. Free speech? We'll shout you off the stage and throw you off of the radio stations. Women's rights? Barry pays you way less while McCain pays more. Make me a sammich, honey. And so on...
CHRIS THE UNCOUTH
October 3, 2008 - 20:03 ET by FC DOBBSONE OF THE THINGS ABOUT CHRIS THAT REALLY
BOTHERS ME IS THAT; I BELIEVE EVERYONE IS
ENTITLED TO HAVE HIS OR HER NAME PRONOUNCED
AS THEY WANT IT TO BE.CHRIS ALWAYS PRONOUNCES
OUR VP'S NAME AS CHEENEY,USUALLY WITH A SNEER
ON HIS FACE.
I PROPOSE THAT WE HENCEFORTH CALL CHRIS
BY THE NAME MUTTHUES UNTIL HE LEARNS HIS
PS & QS. GROW UP CHRIS,THE WRINKLES ARE
SHOWING.
"NOBODY PUTS ONE OVER ON FRED C DOBBS."
B.TRAVEN