Vieira Hammers Bill Bennett on Palin's 'Trustworthiness'

Photo of Geoffrey Dickens.
  • Bookmark and Share

Meredith Vieira, apparently believing "NBC News" caught Sarah Palin in some credibility-destroying gaffes, questioned Bill Bennett, about Palin's "trustworthiness," on Thursday's "Today" show.

Vieira, reciting charges made on last night's "NBC Nightly News," hit Bennett on relatively trivial matters about Palin's record, such as whether or not she had crossed the Iraqi/Kuwaiti border or if her plane had stopped in Ireland.

MEREDITH VIEIRA: Hey, listen, you have referred to Sarah Palin as an extremely strong candidate, even electrifying. You've called her electrifying. But what about her credibility? You just heard this report, she claimed her state produced 20 percent of the energy in this country. Not true. Her campaign aides say she had visited Iraq. Not true. And then there's that Bridge to Nowhere that she did support before, she said she was against it. McCain has come out against Obama in terms of his trustworthiness, but what about her trustworthiness?

BILL BENNETT: I think this is pretty small beer, really, pretty small stuff. She was in Kuwait, did she step foot in Iraq? Maybe, maybe not. Was she in Ireland? Yeah because the plane landed in Ireland. This is not big stuff. But look-

VIEIRA: How is that small stuff? How, how is that small stuff because she's-

BENNETT: Well 'cause, 'cause, 'cause it is small stuff.

VIEIRA: -defending her foreign policy credentials. She said, "Look I've been there, I've been in Iraq."

BENNETT: Because it, because it is, because it is small stuff.

The following is a complete transcript of the September 18, "Today" show interview, as it was aired after a recycled Savannah Guthrie report from last night's "NBC Nightly News," that questioned Palin's veracity:

MEREDITH VIEIRA: Bill Bennett is a nationally syndicated radio talk show host and a McCain supporter, he was also Secretary of Education under President Reagan. Mr. Bennett, good morning to you, sir.

BILL BENNETT: Hey Meredith.

VIEIRA: Hey, listen, you have referred to Sarah Palin as an extremely strong candidate, even electrifying. You've called her electrifying. But what about her credibility? You just heard this report, she claimed her state produced 20 percent of the energy in this country. Not true. Her campaign aides say she had visited Iraq. Not true. And then there's that Bridge to Nowhere that she did support before, she said she was against it. McCain has come out against Obama in terms of his trustworthiness, but what about her trustworthiness?

BENNETT: I think this is pretty small beer, really, pretty small stuff. She was in Kuwait, did she step foot in Iraq? Maybe, maybe not. Was she in Ireland? Yeah because the plane landed in Ireland. This is not big stuff. But look-

VIEIRA: How is that small stuff? How, how is that small stuff because she's-

BENNETT: Well 'cause, 'cause, 'cause it is small stuff.

VIEIRA: -defending her foreign policy credentials. She said, "Look I've been there, I've been in Iraq."

BENNETT: Because it, because it is, because it is small stuff. These are, these are very tiny things compared to decisions made in office. This is a woman who has taken on the Republican establishment, taken on the Republican governor. She is extremely popular in the state of Alaska. That matters, too. Let's just compare her record and look at everything, that's perfectly fine, with Joe Biden's record. When you talk about Joe Biden, he was opposed to the first Gulf War, was that a good decision? He was opposed to the surge. He said it would be a catastrophe and a total failure. Those are much more consequential issues than what we are talking about in the [inaudible] report.

VIEIRA: When you hear from several of the, when you hear from several of the conservative voices, David Brooks and George Will among them, they are questioning her credentials. They wonder if she is really qualified to be Vice President. What are you hearing from other people within the Republican Party?

BENNETT: Well, they are intellectuals and, you know, sometimes people listen to intellectuals and sometimes they don't. She remains extremely popular, Meredith. I saw an interview with her last night. She was very persuasive. We will have the debate between the all-experienced Joe Biden and the supposedly inexperienced, but not true, Sarah Palin. And we will sort, we will sort a lot of this out. I will tell you-

VIEIRA: Why do you use the word-

BENNETT: -20 years experience can mean learning and growing and really figuring things out or it can mean making the same mistakes over and over-

VIEIRA: Mr. Bennett, why do you use the word "intellectual" it almost sounds like you are using it as a buzz word for elite?

BENNETT: Well, they are elites. I mean there, George, George Will, I don't think would balk at being called an intellectual nor would David Brooks. And they have had-

VIEIRA: Does that make their concerns less valid?

BENNETT: Sorry?

VIEIRA: Does make their concerns-

BENNETT: No it, no, hey, I'm one myself. I got a PhD. But what it doesn't mean is that everybody has to, has to fall in line. And most Americans, most people call my radio show, most conservatives, I should say, and most Republicans are thrilled with Sarah Palin. And the more we see, such as in this interview last night, the more pleased people are. I know that she has a higher approval rating than Joe Biden in the latest CBS/New York Times poll. That's pretty interesting.

VIEIRA: Mr. Bennett, let's talk about the economy, I want to switch gears here. Voters want to know obviously where the candidates stand, that is the number one issue right now, which is why Senator McCain's comments over the past few days have a lot of people scratching their heads. First he says the fundamentals of the economy are essentially strong then he says, he modifies that, says that we are in a crisis. Talks about beefing up Wall Street regulation, when last March he told the Wall Street Journal that he's always for less regulation. And yesterday he changed his mind about bailing out AIG. First he said he was opposed to it, then he said, "No I am not." So where does he stand? Can you find a clear economic message in what he's saying?

BENNETT: I think one is best not being ideological in these circumstances. By the way, let me explain. I'm not a surrogate for the McCain campaign. I'm an independent intellectual Meredith. It's best, as Larry Summers said, to be pragmatic. In general, I think, John McCain certainly has been a deregulator, as I, as I would be, but in this circumstance, we're gonna look at AIG. I think what Summers said is right, and I think what Paulson did was right. And notice the caution that a lot of people on all sides are, are exercising here. This, we've had an earthquake, we've had an explosion, we don't know where all the rubble is gonna settle. And so I think one needs to be very cautious in terms of making judgments. But the argument that AIG had such tentacles, such reach to so many places, so many operations so, many parts of the world, that you couldn't allow it to fail would cause, I think, even a principled, generally principled deregulator to take, to take a second look.

VIEIRA: So on, so on-

BENNETT: What I find, what I, yeah? Sorry.

VIEIRA: So on that one you scratched your head.

BENNETT: I'm sorry?

VIEIRA: So on that one, you scratched your head about Senator McCain's approach to AIG?

BENNETT: No I, no, no. I think it's the exactly right decision because this is not an ideological commitment to deregulation. In general you say, "You know let these companies operate on their own, but you step in when necessary." And I think the AIG, the AIG case is one of the cases where it is necessary. The amazing thing to me is that-

VIEIRA: Alright Bill we, I gotta, I gotta wrap it up here.

BENNETT: Yeah okay, sure.

VIEIRA: I apologize. So much to talk about and I'm sure we'll have you on again.

BENNETT: You bet!

VIEIRA: Always generous with your time Bill Bennett.

BENNETT: Thank you.

VIEIRA: Thanks very much.

—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

VIEIRA: -defending her

VIEIRA: -defending her foreign policy credentials. She said, "Look I've been there, I've been in Iraq."

Did she? Did she?: no she didn't

If not it was a mis-statement

She was over in the middle east in a war theatre. Could easily misstate Iraq vs. middle east/Kuwait.

Uhh 56 states anyone?

Where is spell check prior to posting???

I believe

I believe they are in full panic mode. This can't be happening they are saying.  How?  He had a huge lead?  He is the chosen one.  How can anyone dare not understand us MSM'rs.  Sorry Meredith, democrats are for kids!

they are screwed if they do

they are screwed if they do slander Palin every day, all day long and screwed if they don't - and we get to watch - all the way to the White House

Journalism is the opium of the liberals

Use the enemy fire gaffe, Sarah

If only Sarah said she was ducking enemy fire, like Hillary said, then the MSM would get bored and forget the whole thingy.

That's how it works, right?

Hillary was CLEARLY lying on that, LOL.

She was big time telling a "big fish" story on that one. It was clear, deliberate, and in no way true. Democrat and you get the "media pass" issued to you!

Vieira and Bennett

You can tell that she has absolutely no clue of where Bennett is coming from. When she asked whether Bennett was scratching his head about McCain, Bennett answered that you have to be pragmatic. To which she replied:

VIEIRA: So on that one you scratched your head.

BENNETT: I'm sorry?

VIEIRA: So on that one, you scratched your head about Senator McCain's approach to AIG?

BENNETT: No I, no, no.  ...

Republicans are from Venus, Democrats are from Mars, and the media is from Pluto.

Obama is the Banker's whore

Obama’s Economic and Moral Bankruptcy

At some point the truth police must show up and arrest Barack Obama for reckless endangerment of the truth for his role in the Wall Street meltdown. Barack wants to portray the chaos in the financial markets as the fruits of letting irresponsible capitalists run amuck when the reality is that he has been part of the symbiotic incest that has helped feed and abet the activities that now have the Federal government scrambling to contain a global financial meltdown.  

Although Barack is not responsible for the poor decision making of the executives at Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, AIG, and Fannie Mae, he is to blame for surrounding himself with those folks as his advisors and for taking more of their money than most members of Congress.

Where is the media in focusing attention on his duplicity?

Let’s start with the money. Compare the money Barack has raised from lobbyists with that McCain has snagged.

Obama received a grand total (per Open Secrets) of $1,223,737.00 from Fannie Mae, Freddic Mac, Lehman Brothers, AIG, and Bear Stearns while John McCain received only $258,075.00.

John McCain $6,550 (Fannie Mae) $9,100 (Freddie Mac) $117,500 (Lehman Bros.) $36,875 (AIG) and $88,050 (Bear Stearns)

Barack Obama $137,950 (Fannie Mae) $68,750 (Freddie Mac) $370,524 (Lehman Bros.) $75,899 (AIG) and $570,614 (Bear Stearns)

So, why does Barack Obama, a first term Senator, get more money from financial institutions who have helped produce the worse financial crisis in a century than the crusty old so-called Washington insider John McCain?

Because Barack played ball with these folks. If you start with his longtime fund raiser, Tony Rezko, you find a direct road to Nadhmi Auchi, a British-Iraqi billionaire who loaned Tony Rezko $3.5 million shortly before Rezko helped Obama buy a house he could not then afford. Auchi is one of the largest shareholders in the bank that stands the most to lose from Lehman Brothers’ woes.

Is it likely that one of the reasons Obama got so much dough in the first place from the Lehman folks was because of the Auchi ties? When it comes to getting favorable loans that the average American cannot obtain, Barack hangs with the right folks. Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson both got sweetheart deals fromfrom Countrywide. Both Raines and Johnson ran Fannie Mae and Raines paid almost $25 million dollars for his role in a Fannie Mae accounting scandal. Obama initially named Johnson to head up his VP search team.

Penny Pritzker. In a nutshell, “one of the first subprime lenders to stick it to borrowers and have her bank seized is a woman named Penny Pritzker, who just happens to be Barack Obama’s campaign Finance Chair (as confirmed on April 3, 2008) and a potential Secretary of the Treasury in an Obama administration.”

What does this say about Barack’s “judgment?” When it comes to losers and thieves he sure knows how to pick them.

It is one thing to get yourself a sweetheart home loan with the help of a guy being investigated on federal corruption charges (and subsequently convicted). An isolated bad choice? Then what about Raines, Johnson, and Pritzker?

Why is it that the major financial institutions in the toliet or heading there all wanted to give this first term kid a whole bunch of money? They were not tossing him dollars just because he cleans up well, flashes a nice smile, and speaks proper English. They wanted something.

I find it fascinating that John McCain has a clear record of opposing these financial special interests (he learned his lesson the hard way with the Keating five scandal) and it is Barack, who is up to his eyeballs in this sleazy money, and who for now is being given a pass.

One final point. Take a look at this piece of investigative journalism documenting chapter and verse about Obama’s ties with the slumlords of Chicago. The meltdown on Wall Street started with these slumlords. It is all part of the same activity–an insiders club that pays those who go along while inflicting pain on the poor. That was Barack’s game, not McCain’s.

Links @ www.noquarterusa.net

McCAIN-PALIN 2008 and HILLARY-ANYBODY 2012

Thanks for the numbers

Hope this gets traction. Talk radio has been talking about the financial crisis but I haven't heard anything about Barak's money link to Freddie and Fanne. Hope that happens.

MUST read post "Obama is the Banker's whore"

So true, there IS a reason they gave him this money! Everyone should read this and pass on! Guess his backers will be let down when Obama looses in the election. I HOPE and pray government IS cleaned up and becomes a government of and for the PEOPLE!

And with Obamassiah yelling

And with Obamassiah yelling loud enough that it's McCain who caused the downfall of these companies as he doesn't know anything about the economy, then the far left LSM(lame stream media) report on that and forget to look(turn the other way) at the Obamassiah's dealings with corrupt criminals.

Infuriating

I was so infuriated by Viera's battle approach I wished I could reach through the TV and throttle her.  I don't mind getting at the facts but these folks are so liberal they just want to force their agendas.  Take the same tactics and use them on Obama and Biden and maybe they would have some "trustworthiness".  Otherwise they just drivel.