Chris Matthews shook the proverbial fist at this detractors as he delivered the following praise of Barack Obama's acceptance speech on MSNBC's live coverage of the Democratic National Convention on Thursday night, earning loud applause from the audience gathered by the channel's outdoor location:
KEITH OLBERMANN: For 42 minutes not a sour note and spellbinding throughout in way usually reserved for the creations of fiction. An extraordinary political statement....I'd love to find something to criticize about it. You got anything?
CHRIS MATTHEWS: No. You know I've been criticized for saying he inspires me and to hell with my critics!
Click here for MP3 audio.
The following is a more extensive transcript of both Matthews and Olbermann's post-speech reaction from about 11 PM EDT:
KEITH OLBERMANN: And now at this hour Barack Obama is officially the Democratic Party nominee for President of the United States. Vote for him or do not but take pride that this nation can produce men and speakers such as that. For 42 minutes not a sour note and spellbinding throughout in way usually reserved for the creations of fiction. An extraordinary political statement. Almost a fully realized, tough, crisp, insistent speech in tone and in the sense of cutting through the clutter. Akin to the words that were given to the fictional title character in that Aaron Sorkin film, The American President, only this "cut the crap!" moment is not the stuff of fiction. This is the real thing out here. I'd love to find something to criticize about it. You got anything?
CHRIS MATTHEWS: No. You know I’ve been criticized for saying he inspires me and to hell with my critics!
(LOUD APPLAUSE)
MATTHEWS: I think what he said was about us and that's why we care about what he said. It was not about an ego, it was about a country. And when he said it at the end he rally challenged, I think the country to make a decision. He said, "Our strength is not in our money or our military or even in our culture," he said, "It's the American spirit. The American promise that pushes us forward even when the path is uncertain, that binds us together in spite of our differences. That makes us fix our eye not on what is seen but what is unseen. That better place around the bend. That is America!"
And I think, I think that is, that's a challenge and it's an open challenge through the hearts and minds of the country. What they do with that challenge. They can choose him or the other guy. It's an open choice, it's a free election. But what he was saying is, choosing the unknown is what we did when we picked Roosevelt. It's what the, what happened when the country chose Reagan. It's what they chose, when they chose Clinton. Often times you have to take the unknowable and move away from the unacceptable. And in this case he's saying place your bets on the 90 percent. Not the ten percent where McCain disagrees with Bush.
I thought it was an amazing but, I've written speeches all my life. Of course nothing like this. And let me tell you what was great about it. What he did was, and it's a military practice. It's called attacking from a defensive position. It's how Henry won at Agincourt. It's how Alexander won. It’s how Reagan kicked the butt of Jimmy Carter. And what you do is this, you take your opponent’s best shot and you throw it back at 'em! "Are we a nation of whiners?" "If this is an ownership society, you own your failure!" "Was my upbringing a celebrity’s upbringing?" "If your gonna follow Bin Laden to the gates of hell, how about going to his cave and getting him?!" "And how dare you say this election is a test of patriotism when we are all in this together." It was a great way of throwing back the other side's best shot and saying it's full of crap!
OLBERMANN: And there is one word from this, one word said more sharply and with more emotion than all the others, not to say the others did not contain emotion, but he took the last eight years of the Bush administration and shouted at America, "Enough!"
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
critics?
August 28, 2008 - 23:28 ET by sawing battaYour critics are criticizing you bc you've pissed on the journalistic code of ethics.
should we read 'to hell with' the journalistic code of ethics?
Yes
August 29, 2008 - 07:50 ET by 10ksnooker2008 is the year the drive by media went all in, no makeup, no camouflage, just DNC-TV all the time.
I wonder what it was that Obama said that was so inspiring? Saying nothing better than anyone has said nothing before? There was no substance in the speech, just the usual Democrat lies, and platitudes.
Did you see the economy grew by 3.3% last quarter? Why no, I didn't ... but it would have ruined my speech, so it didn't happen.
I think the news media should just become DNC commentary on the news.
Chris Matthews gets it, McSame doesn't
August 30, 2008 - 17:30 ET by allamericandudeChris Matthews is right on point. He is an American and he has all the right to feel inspired by Obama. To Hell with his critics for sure. Chris Matthews is an established journalist, his objectivity can not be questioned. After 8 years of utterly catastrophic rule under Bush, who can blame an ordinary American, whether that person is a journalist or not for feeling inspired by someone who promises great hope and change. Thank God for Chris and my other personal hero, you guessed it, Keith Olbermann (oh how I love him so much). They are the voice of the American public. This country is ready for a change. Get out our way or you'll be crushed.
We will see history made this year - Keith Olbermann.
WHO GIVES A CRAP...
August 30, 2008 - 18:41 ET by danybhoynonamericandude,
Mathews is an * in the news media, his ratings suck, he's been on the air with his show "Spitball w/Barny Rubble" for 10 + years, 7 of them in 3rd place in a 3 horse race. That says it all.
As for BathTubBoy, your hero Olby, I'm sure you love him, but not as much as he loves himself.
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
Crushed?
August 30, 2008 - 19:02 ET by general companyAre you president of his fan club to? If Oberdude is your hero, know wonder you cant think straight.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Oh ho ho.....
August 30, 2008 - 19:10 ET by BlondeThe comedic relief has arrived.
This is the "opposition".....sheesh.
It would be easier kicking a dog than a dumb bunny like this.
Crush what, Kos child? I am so laughing at your naivete and asshattery. Better call mom to change you before you get into it with the adults.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Chris Matthews is an
August 30, 2008 - 19:18 ET by motherbeltChris Matthews is an established journalist, his objectivity can not be questioned
HAHAHAHAHA.....hahaha....gulp....choke...hahahahaha......snort....
Hahahahaha....choke cough cough...hahaha...hic...cough...hahaha
OK, I'm all right now.
That's even funnier than Diane Sawyer saying in jury duty: "Of course I can be impartial; I'm a journalist!"
Is this a cave troll, or is
August 30, 2008 - 21:31 ET by lotrIs this a cave troll, or is this dude for real?
lotr
August 30, 2008 - 21:34 ET by MrShyYeah, I'm with you. I'm not totally buying this dude/dudette... meaning, a troll, indeed, but coming on and just throwing nonsense around to flame throw but not really meaning it. I mean, he picks the two most laughable characters to side with, and then disappears.
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
AAD
August 31, 2008 - 04:47 ET by DoktorFrankenYour post must be a joke because you said ''thank God''. Everyone knows only Godless knuckleheads actually like Olbermann and Matthews. If you were to believe in an afterlife there would be no way you could stomach more than 15 seconds of Olbermann viewing. Here's a test - Do you stand for the National Anthem? Do you cover your heart with your hand during the Pledge of Allegiance? Do you feel safer in spite of the traitorous rants of Olbermann?
You distort the teachings of Christ
August 31, 2008 - 09:27 ET by allamericandudeYou Rethugs think you own a monopoly on faith when in truth you are some of the most ungodly and unkind people on the face of the planet. Empty platitudes paid with lip service like saying "God Bless America" does not make you Christian. It's more the life that you live than the words that procedeth from your mouth. The Republican ideology is distinctly unchristian. You have distorted the teachings of the scriptures to suit your own selfish political agenda. You praise the rich and persecute the poor. You love wars and the shedding of human life. You'd rather spend Goverment money on weapons of mass destruction than on things that could improve lives like Health Care and Education. You are an extremely selfish set of people, a generation of vipers that the Heavenly father above does not recognize. You claim to be Christian but if Christ was on earth today, many of you would be calling for his crucifiction because you'd say he is way too liberal. Go and repent of your sins before you try to argue with me. I rebuke you in the name of Jesus.
Whoops!
August 31, 2008 - 09:36 ET by sarcasmoHere's that damned tax/tithe relative-size comment again!! I wonder if I'll get an actual, non-creative response by making it tough to ignore??
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
and yet
August 31, 2008 - 09:42 ET byyou bow to Molech??
"You can not support the Troops if you do not support their Mission"
Yes botg
August 31, 2008 - 09:52 ET by Cool ArrowHe bows to Molech. And his most pure sacrifices to his god involve watching the death throes of the least among us.
This tries to shame us with Jesus and feigns ignorance of the infanticide Obama lauds. Statistically that infanticide is also genocidal in its intent.
Torches & Pitchforks
CA
August 31, 2008 - 10:08 ET byplus he'd know the Biblical manner of providing for the poor is through gleaning. The poor are given the opportunity to work for food and not a government system of redistribution.
"You can not support the Troops if you do not support their Mission"
the troll reemerges
August 31, 2008 - 13:29 ET by lotrI see the troll has reemerged slobbering from its cave.
Or perhaps it's a bot programmed to spew standard-issue, leftist, anti-Christian prejudices.
Just trying make sense of nonsense here.
No
August 28, 2008 - 23:30 ET by DEVILDOCMOMyou have been criticized for your slavishly accepting anything bho said and NEVER questioning him…oh, and the thrill up your leg.
If???
August 28, 2008 - 23:32 ET by txcoIf Obama gave a speech in a stadium full of 84,000 people but I didn't watch or hear it; did he really give a speech?????
THAT REMINDS ME...
August 30, 2008 - 16:48 ET by danybhoyPeople went to hair metal concerts in the 80's, like say, Ratt. I saw them, I was there, it was an event of sorts, but the show itself was really not memerable. I think in time, that is what Obama's big speechs in Denver & Berlin will be remembered for. You were there, he gave a nice speech, but nothing stands out when you look back at it years later. Or in Barack's case, days later.
Just in case you did'nt go to hair metal concerts, but saw boys bands, or cheesy pop acts, use that as your example. Like New Kids On The Block, or a Club Mtv(remember that one?) gig.
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
danybhoy
August 31, 2008 - 13:32 ET by lotrSo, are you saying the DNC was like a DemocRatt Concert?
Could you see the wires when Obama flew? Guess not.
August 28, 2008 - 23:34 ET by TexndocKEITH OLBERMANN: I’d love to find something to criticize about it.
Tired Of It
August 28, 2008 - 23:47 ET by JoelCTCan we just post a banner at the top of the NewsBusters Home Page that says:
"MSNBC Is Now The Official Media Outlet For The Democrat National Committee"
and be done with it? Darn near every story is just another Olberwoman-screech or Chrissy-fit, and I am just plain tired of reading about that sorry channel. No one watches it, and no one cares. I'd like to see more attacks on the stations people actually watch, even if it is not as many people as used to: CBS, NBC, and ABC. Okay, CNN too. Maybe limit the MSNBC garbage to a round-up of MSNBCrap once a day or something. It is really getting old, and I fear you folks are just getting lazy and picking the low-hanging fruit in order to have "new" postings.
I love NewsBusters and I'd hate it to turn into "just another blog about TV on the Internet".
I know what you mean,
August 29, 2008 - 00:02 ET by Texndoc...but when there's a two ton elephant on fire in the middle of the room you don't talk about the curtains not matching the carpet. Chrissy-fit and Olberwoman-screech are finally being criticized by colleagues at MSNBC (Tom Brokaw) and others in the MSM and it's endless exposure of their ridiculousness that finally has gotten sources like the NYT discussing the possible demise of that cable network. I thank Newsbusters for exposing every festering sore. I do agree they merit their own section if possible.
Well, they already have a banner
August 29, 2008 - 00:45 ET by KC MulvilleIn it, it says the mission of the site is: "Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias.” Olbermann and Matthews are not only perpetrating liberal media bias ... they're openly admitting that they're doing it. Fighting that attitude is what the website is about.
Now you might say, enough already. We get the point, the media is biased. But that's what the media wants you to say, because it means that you're so tired fighting it, that you're willing to accept it. And then sooner or later, you just take in stride without thinking about it, which is what the viewing public had been forced to do for decades.
And the only way to resist that is constant vigiliance. "we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender." Is this St. Crispian's Day???!!!
OK, got a little carried away there ...
O-Kay
August 29, 2008 - 01:10 ET by JoelCTYou not only got a little carried away, but you even forgot what I wrote.
I love NewsBusters. I read it every day. I am 100% behind them in their fight against Liberal Bias in the media.
The trouble is, 112 people watch MSNBC. And 37 of those people watch it so they can post something about Chrissy or Olberwoman on NewsBusters. The other 75 people know darn well that MSNBC is the media outlet of the DNC, and that's why they watch it! So, what's the point?
The point I am making is that if you watch MSNBC for ten minutes, it is immediately obvious that they hate all things Republican. You don't need a web site to point it out.
CNN, CBS, NBC, and ABC, on the other hand, are professionals. They know how to trash conservatives without being obvious about it. You have to listen carefully to recognize the bias, and so most people don't even realize they are being brainwashed. My dad is a really smart guy, but he used to tell me "Charlie Gibson was the only unbiased one" until I watched it with him a few times and pointed out the bias. Now he considers Charlie the "sneakiest one" and doesn't watch him any more.
That's what NewsBusters should be devoting most of their time to doing. The village idiot can figure out what MSNBC is doing.
I agree Joel - but their over the top adulation
August 29, 2008 - 01:20 ET by Dee Bunkfor Obama is neccessary to point out. Obama is the candidate of the far left. They were just as over the top bias for him in the primary (agains Clinton) as they are now.
The far left needs to be exposed because the traditional media (Gibson etc..) don't do it and they have a huge influence on this country.
Understood
August 29, 2008 - 03:41 ET by KC MulvilleWasn't trying to cause a problem, JoelCT. But MSNBC does have an audience, and especially because they're a wing of NBC, I think NewsBusters has to cover them.
To some extent, the NewsBusters plan is to simply document the bias, over and over again, so that through the sheer volume of evidence, the argument wins. MSNBC is a like the wholesale version of bias, where the others are retail, but it's still worth paying attention to. Just my opinion.
Hmm.
August 29, 2008 - 00:04 ET by iamse7enAnd to hell with Matthews.
If THAT inspires you, you are shallow human being.
Two thoughts: 1. In a
August 29, 2008 - 00:16 ET by Mark FinkelsteinTwo thoughts:
1. In a convention filled with fibs, Olbermann's claim: "I'd love to find something to criticize about" the speech has to go down as the biggest.
2. Given the length and melodramatic tone of Olbermann's remarks, made almost immediately upon the conclusion of Obama's speech, I found myself wondering whether they were spontaneous, or prepared in advance. Was the praise loaded in the teleprompter, so that Olbermann would have given it even if Obama had chosen to read from the Denver telephone book?
Olbermann spewed gaaga adoration for Obama
August 29, 2008 - 01:34 ET by PopularTechThat was the largest amount of bullshit I have heard a commentator say about anything. This is beyond embarrassing for MSNBC.
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
Mark... I intentionally
August 29, 2008 - 01:34 ET by bigtimerMark...
I intentionally turned it to msnbc to hear what Olbie and Matthews would say.
I heard the words you are saying and I feel Keith had it well ready and plumbed to go...it was in the hopper.
It was sickening...
JMHO.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Mark
August 29, 2008 - 01:38 ET by Cool ArrowThey admitted to having the speech in advance, and even quoted it before it was given.
It's was as if they were two little boys taking a Playboy to the bathroom.
Torches & Pitchforks
Hey Chris!
August 29, 2008 - 00:28 ET by tbbaxterLet your candidate know that his speech tonight was seen in all 57 states.
In-Kind Contributions
August 29, 2008 - 00:31 ET by MCPO AirdaleSomeone should file a complaint with the FEC. MSNBC is nothing more than NBC's "In-Kind" contributions to the Democrat party!
Something surreal this way comes
August 29, 2008 - 00:38 ET by cest moiThe guys at NBC are seriously creeping me out. How soon before Matthews and Olbermann snap their fingers in a C formation while gushing over their man crush on Barry?
*ick*
To Hell with Matthews and
August 29, 2008 - 09:52 ET by mattmTo Hell with Matthews and the rest of the Volksaufklärung und Propaganda...
Wow, Matthews really nailed
August 29, 2008 - 10:33 ET by motherbeltWow, Matthews really nailed it when he said:
it was about a country. He said, "Our strength is not in our money or our military or even in our culture," ...[ ]...he said, "It's the American spirit. The American promise that pushes us forward even when the path is uncertain, that binds us together in spite of our differences. That makes us fix our eye not on what is seen but what is unseen. That better place around the bend. That is America!
As if no one ever said that before!
Sheesh.
That wasn't exceptional, that was boilerplate Presidential campaign
stuff.
Did Chris van Winkle just wake up from a 20-year nap?
I found that I can't
August 29, 2008 - 11:02 ET by marpelI found that I can't continuously watch MSNBC for any length of time. Maybe 2-3 minutes. I have to change it back to Fox. I have been saying for many months that I think KO is mentally ill. I still believe that. And if the suits at MSNBC love him so much, they need to get him some lithium or pay for shock treatments. As I said before in another post, this is a case of the patient running the mental hospital. It's pathetic.
Chris Matthews is a commentator, not a newsman. If he wants to have something going up or down his leg at the mention of Obama, so be it. But to have him squealing and KO foaming at the mouth, it's pathetic to watch.
It was a great way of
August 29, 2008 - 12:25 ET by fitzfongIt was a great way of throwing back the other side's best shot and saying it's full of crap!
Son, if you ever see our best shot, you won't know what hit you. You wrote speeches for losers, you work for a network of losers, you support a terrorist enabling loser. Let's face it, Chrissy, you are a loser.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
is Bush running for POTUS?
August 29, 2008 - 12:42 ET by LionKing"...he took the last eight years of the Bush administration and shouted at America, 'Enough!'"
Still campaigning against Bush...this LIBtards still have serious case of BDS. What will they do when McCain is POTUS?
But if asked, Matthews would
August 29, 2008 - 21:41 ET by GregEBut if asked, Matthews would still tell you he's not sure who he's going to vote for, or would act like he can't say because he wouldn't be objective. LOL
Dumb and Dumber
August 30, 2008 - 17:26 ET by lotrWow. Neither of these two liberal Democrats could find anything to criticize. I wonder if they will have the same glowing sentiments for the well-respected (prior to his nomination, that is) Mr. McCain.