A seemingly worried Matt Lauer hit Barack Obama from the left as the "Today" co-host warned the Democratic presidential nominee, on Wednesday's "Today," that "people" were "nervous" about any perceived shift to the center on his part.
First up Lauer recited, to Obama, liberal New York Times columnist Bob Herbert's fears that the Illinois Senator was, "lurching to the right."
LAUER: Let me read you what Bob Herbert said or wrote in the New York Times, on Tuesday. He said this, quote, "Senator Obama is not just tacking gently toward the center. He's lurching right when it suits him, he's zigging with the kind of reckless abandon that's guaranteed to cause disillusion, if not whiplash."
Then Lauer pushed Obama, from the left, on Iraq:
LAUER: And on Iraq when, when throughout the primaries you did talk about this, this idea of getting U.S. troops out within 16 months of being elected and now you say, "Look I'll talk to commanders and generals on the ground and my, my ideas are being refined." People do get nervous about that Senator, you understand that?
The following is the full interview as it occurred on the July 9, "Today" show:
MATT LAUER: Senator Barack Obama is on Capitol Hill this morning, Senator good morning to you.
BARACK OBAMA: Good morning, Matt.
LAUER: So let me start right off with if you were President of the United States this morning what would your immediate be, your immediate response be to these missile tests by Iran?
OBAMA: Well I think we've got to gather up all the intelligence necessary with the situation. But there's no doubt that we're seeing rising tensions in the area and it's part of the reason why it's so important for us to have a coherent policy with respect to Iran. It has to combine much tougher threats of economic sanctions with direct diplomacy, opening up channels of communication so that we avoid provocation but we give the strong incentives for the Iranians to change their behavior. We've got to have the kind of aggressive diplomacy that unfortunately has been absent over the last several years. If we don't then we're gonna continue to see rising tensions that could lead into real problems.
LAUER: The state run media in Iran went out of its way this morning to say that one of these long or medium range missiles could reach all of Israel and U.S. bases in that region. So what would your message to Israel be this morning both publicly and privately?
OBAMA: Well as you heard from your own commentator they've had this kind of long-range capability for some time. And I think it's part of the reason we got to proceed aggressively with the kinds of diplomacy in region as a whole. Part of the problem that we've got right now is that we've been basically farming out diplomatic activity to the Europeans. We've got to be actively engaged. I've called, for example, here in the United States the application of potential divestment of Iranian companies. We just found out that during the Bush years U.S. exports to Iran have actually increased. That's a mistake. That sends mixed messages to them.
LAUER: Well let me ask you this though. At the G8 meeting, in being held in Japan right now, the, the world leaders that gathered there, of the eight countries gathered there, announced that they want to send a European foreign policy adviser or official to Tehran to discuss this incentive package that's been offered to the Iranians if they dismantle the uranium-enrichment program. Do you still like that incentive package? Should it be taken off the table? Might it be seen now, in light of these missile tests, as a reward for bad behavior?
OBAMA: No I think it is in, it's a step in the right direction but the United States has to be actively engaged in that process. Part of what we have to do is get the Europeans, the Chinese, the Russians, all to recognize that it's in nobody's interests, including Iran's I believe, to have a nuclear weapon that could trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. And that's something that I intend to make a number one priority when I'm in the White House.
LAUER: Okay.
OBAMA: Making sure they don't have that nuclear capability.
LAUER: I got about four other subjects I want to get to, so let me move on. I know you're unveiling a new economic agenda this morning that's targeted toward women. And I'm, I'm just curious why you feel that, that, that women's economic straits right now may be different than men's?
OBAMA: Well it's not that women's are unique in feeling pressure under this economy, it's the fact that they get paid 78 cents to the dollar when it comes to, compared to men. And you've got 62 percent of families rely on women for at least half and maybe more than half of their total income. So if we can raise wages and incomes for women, if we can make sure that they've got paid family leave, if they've got more support for child care, if we are overturning the Supreme Court decision that made it harder for women to sue for discrimination when their employer's not giving them equal pay for equal work, that just doesn't benefit women, it benefits all American families. And, and it's gotta be one of our top priorities. It will be when I'm President.
LAUER: Let me ask you about the criticism you've come under recently, Senator, from not only critics but also some of your supporters who think you've moved to the center after the primary races and, so that you're more electable in November. Let me read you what Bob Herbert said or wrote in the New York Times, on Tuesday. He said this, quote, "Senator Obama is not just tacking gently toward the center. He's lurching right when it suits him, he's zigging with the kind of reckless abandon that's guaranteed to cause disillusion, if not whiplash." Your response has been that you don't think people have been listening to you all along. Give me an example.
OBAMA: Well let's take some of the examples that Mr. Herbert cited. My support of faith-based initiatives, that's something I've been talking about for two years. When it comes to my belief, for example, that it is appropriate to apply the death penalty in narrow circumstances when there have been heinous crimes like the rape of a child. That is not something that is new. My-
LAUER: And on Iraq when, when throughout the primaries you did talk about this, this idea of getting U.S. troops out within 16 months of being elected and now you say, "Look I'll talk to commanders and generals on the ground and my, my ideas are being refined." People do get nervous about that Senator, you understand that?
OBAMA: Well then, actually I don't Matt because that's what I've been saying all along. That I would obviously listen to commanders but as commander-in-chief I would be setting strategy. And I have not changed from my position that we can have our troops out at a pace of one to two brigades per month, which adds up to 16 months. So-
LAUER: Well if when you visit Iraq, in, in the not too distant future, if commanders on the ground say to you, "Senator I think, you know, in, in all due respect we should stay the course right now," would you refine your position to that extent?
OBAMA: Well Matt what, what I also, what I'm also going to be taking into account is the Prime Minister of Iraq, Prime Minister Maliki saying that we should have a timetable for withdrawal. The American people believe we need a timetable. The Iraqi government believes that it's ready to stand up and take on these responsibilities. We are seeing a declining security situation in Afghanistan that has to be shorn up. We've got enormous burdens on our military families and we're spending $10 to $12 billion a month in Iraq that could be used to put people back to work here in the United States and to create a, a energy policy that frees ourselves from dependence on foreign oil. So my job, as commander-in-chief, is to listen to the commanders but to shape a strategy based on all the factors that go, go into American security. That's not what's being done right now.
LAUER: Let, let me end on something that I was a little surprised by the attention this got this week, Senator. You, you conducted or you allowed an interview to be carried out with you and Michelle and your two daughters age 10 and 7. Maria Menounos did it for "Access Hollywood," and we actually aired part of it here on our, on our program. And some people said, "Wait a minute it seems like the Senator is trying to have it both ways. On one hand you want to protect your private life. On the other hand here you sitting with your two daughters and allowing them to answer questions." Did you make the right call on that?
OBAMA: You know what? I think that we got carried away in the moment. We were having a birthday party and everybody was laughing and, and suddenly this thing cropped up and I didn't catch it quickly enough. And I was surprised by the attention it received as well. So-
LAUER: So if you had to do it over again?
OBAMA: Yeah, we wouldn't do it again and, and we won't be doing it again.
LAUER: Senator Barack Obama. Senator, thanks very much for your time this morning, I appreciate it.
OBAMA: Thanks so much.
LAUER: Alright.
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.





MATT LAUER: Senator Barack Obama is on Capitol Hill this morning, Senator good morning to you. 









Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Note the subtle change in his words
July 9, 2008 - 12:30 ET by buzzbeeDuring the primary he said he "would" have all combat brigades out within 16 months. Now he says he will talk to the Generals on the ground and now we "can" withdraw our troops.
You know that it is not going to happen. They will not accept defeat on their watch. Their only goal was to get Bush to loose the war. You know if Obama gets his pullout it is because they "Won" the war.
Drill here, Drill Now!
I am gald he at least
July 9, 2008 - 12:36 ET by seaniepI am gald he at least admitted that he cannot have it both ways with his personal life
"Part of the problem that
July 9, 2008 - 12:48 ET by Hunter12"Part of the problem that we've got right now is that we've been basically farming out diplomatic activity to the Europeans."
Wait a minute! Back in 2001 through 2003, the cry was to listen to Germany and France's takes on how diplomacy in the region should be handled. We discovered after the fact that these two European "powers" were in bed with Saddam and making a large fortune by selling embargoed goods and services. The bulk of the oil-for-food profiteers were from these countries.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
a follow up question that is
July 9, 2008 - 13:01 ET by athoughtor2a follow up question that is never asked of Obama. What if the commanders on the ground tell you we can not withdraw troops at the pace you have proposed? what do you do then?
But honey
July 9, 2008 - 13:03 ET by KC MulvilleThere are two angles here.
Remember all those times when we warned Democrats that you can't let Obama skate all those policy details? Remember we warned the Democrats that when Obama waved off questions about policy as being "old politics" or "those are just things that tear us apart," they should get worried? Remember when we warned the Democrats that their worship of this guy, based on vaporous appeals to hope, was seriously misguided puppy love?
The man served barely one year in the senate before he decided to run for president. And the fact that he can deliver a great speech when it's written for him, but stumbles and stutters when he's in a debate (showing that he's lousy when thinking on his feet) ... that should have been a signal flare.
But, Democrat friends -- this is your own fault. We warned you.
Uh huh...
July 9, 2008 - 13:08 ET by TheDeuceLAUER: I got about four other subjects I want to get to, so let me move on.
Matt certainly did a 'move on' interview, didn't he?
Plausible deniability
July 10, 2008 - 01:00 ET by nwahsIts not strange, Obama is setting up plausible deniability. He's counting on 80% of his supporters to be too dumb to recognize that and he's probably right. Obama is in the tying up loose ends mode. I still think he wreaks of incompetence, but he is following a plan. Now there's a whole lot of nonsenses he has to rationalize, including the ridiculous claim he could withdraw from Iraq in 16 months. Why not Korea in 16 months?