Graphic Violence, Abuse and Sex: 'Horror Story' is Right
Billed by Entertainment Weekly as an 'over-the-top thrill ride about a haunted house,' free cable network FX's new drama 'American Horror Story' is painted as the latest fun and scary show to appear on free cable. 'Covering our eyes and screaming has never been this much fun!' But with the show's numerous depictions of graphic violence, explicit and inappropriate sexual encounters, along with the verbal abuse of a special needs child, you have to wonder at some people's idea of fun. [Ad for the show can be seen here.]
Much in the vein of 'Amityville Horror' and 'The Shining,' the premise for 'American Horror Story' is that of a family moving into a haunted Victorian house plagued with a twisted history of gruesome crimes committed within its walls. But 'American Horror Story' isn't just scary. A violent face-cutting scene, a 30 second masturbation scene, more than a dozen cusswords, and the verbal abuse of a mentally handicapped person, proves 'American Horror Story' is downright disgusting.
But this content isn't all that surprising when one considers who is behind this show.
When 'Glee' co-creator Ryan Murphy famously stated that it is his goal to 'remove every barrier to the depiction of explicit sex on TV,' it's safe to say his future audiences have been warned. But Murphy's goal is more specific; he told the Tampa Television Examiner, 'Hopefully I have made it possible for somebody on broadcast television to do a rear-entry scene.'
'American Horror Story,' just might be Murphy's perfect vehicle to accomplish this repulsive goal. 
Even the show's cast was shocked at the content Murphy was pushing. 'I cant' believe they can air that on television, actually,' actress Alexandra Breckenridge said during production.
And it's hard to believe Breckenridge would want it to air on television, given the raunchiness of two of her big scenes in the first episode. The first featured voyeurism and dual masturbation with Dylan McDermott playing the main character, psychiatrist Ben Harmon. In the second, she tried to seduce Harmon, including by explicitly referencing the first scene.
In another scene, Harmon's wife Vivien was preparing for bed when a man (presumably Ben) in a black, kinky masochist sex suit appeared in her doorway. She agreed to 'go for round two' and engage him in a minute and a half long sexual encounter.
Murphy's co-writer, raunchy 'Nip/Tuck' creator Brad Falchuk, is also well-known for pushing explicit content. 'Nip/Tuck,' another boundary-pushing show on FX, featured slutty surgeons obsessed with plastic surgery and graphic sex in which series premiere viewers were treated to a bloody scene involving implants placed into a naked rear end. In another episode, 'an incestuous mother-daughter threesome' occurred.
With Murphy and Falchuk on board, it's no wonder the opening credits of 'American Horror Story' are sure to make the average viewer shudder in horror. To set the stage, viewers see a dingy basement in which human body parts, including the heads of infants, are preserved in jars of liquid in what appears to be a sadistic experiment.
The violence in 'American Horror Story' isn't limited to flashbacks of heinous crimes or dead animals (as viewers see a blood-soaked dog in the dingy basement) but the show's younger characters are some of the most vicious.
Taking supernatural vengeance on a school bully, Harmon's daughter Violet and one of Harmon's psychiatric patients pinned her to the floor, repeatedly slashing her face for a graphic and gruesome 43 seconds.
The premiere of 'American Horror Story' wasn't just sexually and physically repulsive. Flashback scenes also featured a large dose of verbal and mental cruelty toward a girl with Down syndrome - including her mother, played by Jessica Lange, wishing she'd aborted her.
To add to the violence, sex and abuse, there were 13 versions of the word 's**t,' and such delightful terms as 'p***y' and 'c**ksucker.'
With all this objectionable content, Entertainment Weekly still named 'American Horror Story' one of its 'Top Ten Things We Love this Week' putting it on their famous 'Must List' in the October 7 issue. 'This show has a potential to literally be shattering to all of the things that we consider to be normal,' one of the actors said during production.
Oh goodie.
- Erin R. Brown's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Cable television continues to
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 9:32am.
Cable television continues to decline. Hopefully the curiosity factor will fade soon after it premiers and it will drop off into the footnotes of television history.
Of course when that happens, Bush and/or global warming will be blamed.
Simple - I won't watch it
Submitted by Tomorama on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 9:36am.
FX has done some great TV in regards to The Shield, Rescue me and Justified, good, but grown-up TV that doesn't need to insult or repulse in order to entertain.
This is just utter garbage to "push the agenda".
Not "push the envelope" - THE AGENDA.
I watched it.
Submitted by NeoKong on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 9:44am.
It was strange.
Apparently except for the new family everybody is dead....I think. Oh, and they all hate each other or something.
There was too much going on if you get my drift. Pick a plot and stick with it.
If this show was food it would be like someone mixed pizza with ice cream, then threw in some spaghetti and topped it with a piece of cantaloupe and some tuna fish.
It was a little much. Jessica Lange was a little strange.
Oh and another thing. Every time the new couple turned around somebody new was just walking through their house because apparently they knew the previous owners and the new people would just have to get used to it or something.
I give it six weeks
Submitted by HockeyKid on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 10:01am.
and that's only because they've already got that much in the can.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
My first re-action
Submitted by peteydee on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 10:07am.
was sheesh! I was hoping for an "American Gothic" and got instead a soft porn series.
Too violent and dark for me.I fell asleep anyway.
Your headline scared the hell out of me!
Submitted by Newsbubba on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 10:14am.
I thought it was going to be about the Wall Street protests by liberals.
I watched it with my wife. We
Submitted by poseA on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 10:38am.
I watched it with my wife. We are pretty wild and live by our own code.
Do nothing that causes physical or financial harm beyond scope of one's written or spoken consent.
I can handle the supernatural violence and the sex. This sort of violence can only occur on film and adultery is only my issue if it involves me.
With that aside, the show trivializing abortion is something that occurs on a regular basis in reality and was repulsive, and thus I'll not be watching it anymore.
So much for making people think...
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 10:40am.
We are reduced to people wanting to "push the envelope" by making things that should be private, public. Violence is glorified and desensitized.
Aren't there any actors that would read such a script and say, "wait a second, this is isn't art, it's garbage" and refuse to do it?
Garbage in, Garbage out!
Submitted by DumbCanuck on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:04am.
Considering the lifestyle these actors live in garbage-wood, highly unlikely. After all, to these idiots, it's just a paycheck.
"There... Are... Four... Lights!"
Yes radical
Submitted by Mister Orange on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:08am.
It's called passing on the script. You don't like it? Don't take the job. Actors are expendable.
MO
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:10am.
My question is, do any of them actually do it? Mary McDonnell almost passed on "Battlestar Galactica" because her character was seen as conservative and she's very progressive. Does that ever happen in reverse? We never hear about it.
Okay
Submitted by Mister Orange on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 5:41pm.
Have you ever interviewed for a job, and upon hearing about the position's duties you decided it was in your best interest not to take the job? Same thing.
It isn't "free"
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:36am.
I watched the show last night and I wasn't very impressed with it, far to jumbled for a plot to form. I understand that this is a series, and that, because of this, the plot development will take some time, but most of what little plot was formed occurred in the first 10 to 15 minutes. The rest was just "fluff," which doesn't make for very good horror, in my humble opinion.
I do have to say, those, that FX is hardly "free." It's no more "free" than any of the Encore movie channels. You can't just stick up an aerial and watch it. You have to pay your provider to access it.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Cobra
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:37am.
Thanks. It's different if you pay for it. I can choose to not have it in my house.
For us, it's "bundeled."
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:41am.
You're welcome. For us, using Dish Network, FX is part of a bundled "tier," just like most programming on cable and satellite these days. It's not available on the "basic" package.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Bundled
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:43am.
And I would imagine if someone was really offended, they could block the channel. I'm against these programs being on airwaves in such a way that kids can watch. It can't be good for kids/teens to see this stuff.
They see a lot worse!
Submitted by CobraMan on Fri, 10/07/2011 - 10:53am.
Ever seen CSI? Howe about NCIS? Death, destruction, mangled bodies, autopsies, the works. Yet a woman's nipples are off limits? What's more harmful to children? Violence or sexuality?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
I thought...
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:45am.
I thought it was just more about the United States under the Obamugabe administration. I had no intention of tuning in.
I think pushing the envelope
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:46am.
I think pushing the envelope is good and bad. Sometimes people go too far, but I think that also enables other shows to wind up producing something extraordinary.
growing pains
Submitted by Agnostic on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:47am.
I haven't watched it but I would like to comment on the quoted phrase, 'remove every barrier to the depiction of explicit sex on TV'. This is the voice of an adolescent pushing the boundaries and trying to find a voice in a world they don't understand. This has nothing to do with art, creation or entertainment; it has to do with the juvenile desire to explore his/her world without a chaperon and concentrating on those aspects which brings him/her pleasure without responsibility.
Agnostic
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:49am.
Very nicely stated.
Thanks Radical,
Submitted by Agnostic on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:55am.
I should have added that the Wall Street Occupiers voice their opinions in a very similar manner.
Huh?
Submitted by ThePickle on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 11:48am.
'American Horror Story' is painted as the latest fun and scary show to appear on "free cable."
Could someone let me know where I can get me some of this "free cable"?
Because despite the fact that I do not have to "pay extra" for this channel I can assure you that I do have to pay for it.
I believe that each of us not only has the right to make these viewing decisions for ourselves, they also have the right to "vote with their remote" when it comes to programming they don't care for or find "offensive". As I and many others have said on this site, we do NOT have the right to not be offended.
What they don't have a right to is their own set of facts and the facts are that "cable television" is not free. One way or another you will pay for it. So when a writer tries to confuse the issue between "paid" cable and "free" broadcast television I for one have to call BS.
As to the contents of this show....I have no idea what it contained as it only took me watching the previews to realize what this "entertainment" was going to entail and made a somewhat informed choice NOT to expose myself to more "mindless" garbage posing as quality television.
I tend to agree with this
Submitted by UncleDirtNap on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 1:48pm.
I tend to agree with this point and tend to diverge from groups like PTC and others who veer dangerously close to censorship with the policies they promote. If an adult wants to pay for this and watch it they're well within their rights to do so. However nobody has the right to expect others who don't want it to subsidize its production with their cable bills. Another example of why Congress needs to get off it's rear and pass the latest version of the Cable Choice Bill that mandates CATV/SATV offer an ala carte tier in in their offering and end forced bundling once and for all.
www.howcableshouldbe.com
Yes, that's just what we need....more government
Submitted by ckc1227 on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 2:45pm.
"However nobody has the right to expect others who don't want it to subsidize its production with their cable bills. Another example of why Congress needs to get off it's rear and pass the latest version of the Cable Choice Bill that mandates CATV/SATV offer an ala carte tier in in their offering and end forced bundling once and for all."
Actually, they DO and SHOULD have the right to expect that. Who are you to tell them how to package their product? If you want that kind of power, start your own cable company.
Cable TV isn't an entitlement. If you don't like the way they package their product, don't buy it. And stop demanding that government make them do it. That makes you just as bad as a liberal.
I seem to remember a push for
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 3:13pm.
I seem to remember a push for customers to be able to purchase their own cable packages where they pick and choose specific channels for viewing and were to be charged rates per channel. I wonder whatever happened to that.
I believe that most folks
Submitted by ThePickle on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 5:01pm.
I believe that most folks found out that this type of "a la carte" system would wind up being a great deal more expensive and when that was known the majority of interest evaporated.
A little too much man ass for my taste,,
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 12:13pm.
But thats what Ryan "Glee", "Nip/Tuck" likes to do. It would be nice if we had some woman ass,or nip slips, eh, Gay Ryan?
Sadly, that seems to be the
Submitted by ckc1227 on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 2:48pm.
Sadly, that seems to be the trend these days, even at the movie theater.
cancel cable.
Submitted by kata on Thu, 10/06/2011 - 3:17pm.
C'mon ya know ya wanna. Just do it! Cut the legs out from under production companies that cater to niche markets like this so they'll be relegated to marketing themselves like porn websites.
Doooo eeet... :)