Surprise! Perez Hilton's Kids Book is Veiled Gay Propaganda
Parents: When shopping for a new book to read to your kids, be sure to avoid the recent children's book written by famously trashy, foul-mouthed celebrity blogger Perez Hilton. "The Boy with Pink Hair" is a cute, uplifting children's book and a slick piece of gay rights propaganda.
The self-declared "Queen of All Media," (more than 3.8 million Twitter followers and perezhilton.com, one of the most visited websites in the world) jumped into the spotlight in 2009, when he famously called Miss USA contestant Carrie Prejean a "dumb b***h" possessing "half a brain" for her statement that she believes marriage "should be between a man and a woman."
Now, Hilton is on a book tour, hawking his "story of a boy whose difference makes a difference." On the outset, this cute fairytale is a about a boy with pink hair who grows up with loving parents, pursues his favorite hobbies, encounters a bully, and overcomes his insecurities to save the day.
"He was born that way - the Boy with Pink Hair." That's the first line of the children's book, and it sets the tone for a story littered with adult phrases referring to the cultural battle over homosexuality.
Gay rights activist use the exact phrase "born that way" when defending homosexuality. Not surprisingly, Lady Gaga, whose recent chart-topping gay anthem was titled "Born This Way," reviewed the book, praising it as "beautiful … a journey of self-acceptance" a phrase which appears on the book's back cover.
Elsewhere, he dreams of "a school where everyone had different colored hair. All together, it looked like a rainbow." Gays, of course, have appropriated the rainbow as a symbol.
The Boy with Pink Hair's loving parents are accepting of his girly locks, and encourage his love of cooking by building him a tree house equipped with a kitchen. "They encouraged his hobby and didn't pester him to play games that he didn't like." This is reminiscent of recent stories on network news in which parents have debated whether or not to encourage children into particular gender identity roles.
As the story progresses, readers learn that the Boy with Pink Hair saves the day at his elementary school by leading his classmates in cooking a pink-themed meal for the parent-teacher lunch, which had become ruined when the cafeteria stove broke. The boy concludes that his mother was right in that he could make a difference with his difference - but the difference wasn't his hair, it was that he "followed his own special dream and was happy tobe just who he was."
It's a happy-go-lucky story with a nice ending, and its effective gay propaganda, attempting to make kids pre-disposed to embrace homosexuality before they can understand what it is, or even know it exists.
Hilton ends the book, "One boy, with shockingly bright, beautiful pink hair made the world a little happier and a little more pink. And that's a great thing!" The gayer the better, kids!
An adult conversation about sexuality has no place in an innocent "children's" book, but Hilton sees no qualms with it.
- Erin R. Brown's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Pedophile.....
Submitted by liberalsarefunny on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 12:23pm.
The fudgepacker speaks...
I guess
Submitted by Bob K on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 12:23pm.
he was thinking "I'm getting older. It never hurts to expand the pool of potential victims.....errrrr.......consensual partners for aging, unattractive queens like me."
Pathetic
Submitted by Beukeboom on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 12:25pm.
Pathetic
Don't laugh, it'll be in your elementary school's library soon.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 12:30pm.
"Hey, I'd hit that in a heartbeat!" – Andrew Sullivan
Ah, the innocence of
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 12:40pm.
the gay agenda; after all, they just want to be accepted as being just like the rest of us.
Huh?
Submitted by pcnav on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:54pm.
They are just like the rest of us... minus the gay behavior. That is why gay is not a civil right... it is behavior that can be quit at any time. ask Anne Heche, former playmate of Ellen DeGeneres.
Correct.
Submitted by Bob K on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 3:30pm.
It is behavior. That is why they need to dispense instruction manuals like this so they can get fresh recruits. I did look up Ellen's former partner. The fact that she seems to be bat-shit crazy may have had something to do with her brief "sojuorn on the isle of sapphos" as well. LOL!
Apparently
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 3:33pm.
the sarcasm was lost in my comment.
Correct ... it's all about ...
Submitted by Bodini on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 8:42pm.
CHOICE!
That's sweet.
Submitted by BTW Biological ... on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 12:55pm.
Nothing wrong with an uplifting book for gay kids. still the target audience won't know of his bullying antics in his blog. You know the one which forced him to apologize. So sure cute, but I'll be waiting for the second one which tells of a different lesson.
WTF?
Submitted by pcnav on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:49pm.
Maybe I'm old fashioned but I cannot remember anyone from my school days that attempted sexual activity until in their teens let alone this Perez Hilton clown's version of fine faggotry. How many hetero sex books are there out there for kids?
Perez Hilton
Submitted by Phryj1 on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:04pm.
Why does anyone even pay attention to him? Why is he famous at all? He's an obnoxious, vicious, hateful troll. The fact that he has a fairly large fanbase makes me wonder about where humanity is headed.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
"Why does anyone even pay
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 09/13/2011 - 9:41am.
"Why does anyone even pay attention to him? Why is he famous at all?"
Same reason as that other Hilton...Paris...
brazen self-promotion.
Ahhhh shucks..............and
Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:09pm.
Ahhhh shucks..............and I was just going to look for some new reading material for my grandson, who is so sure of his own maleness that he'd wonder why the hell some kid would have pink hair!!!
It's been done before.
Submitted by lgeubank on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:12pm.
It's been done: "The Boy With Green Hair," starring Dean Stockwell as the eponymous boy, 1948.
But I'm sure that louse-ridden guttersnipe "Perez" can find ways to filth the story up a lot.
Hilton plagiarized?
Submitted by Beukeboom on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:14pm.
Hilton plagiarized?
The difference, though,
Submitted by Chaitealover on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 5:10pm.
is that "The Boy With Green Hair" is essentially an anti-war film, not a lifestyle propaganda tome.
"The Boy With Green Hair," Dean Stockwell
Submitted by lgeubank on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 6:37pm.
It's not really an anti-war film. War just happens to be the backdrop of the narrative. The movie is about public pressure, which the kid's neighbors and classmates put on him -- they ask if he's contagious, etc.
I saw the movie on TCM just a few months ago, and it's about hysteria and peer pressure. As IMDb says, "The absurd over-reactions of stupid people overturn his life as the story becomes a parable." And also, "his hair turns green on the next morning and Peter is rejected by his community." That's the real subject -- should he give in to public opinion and shave his head, or defy them and continue life as a green-head? War is a very minor character in this movie.
Born Gay?
Submitted by pepperoniprince on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:19pm.
That should be the title to his/her next raggedy publication. If I can find( that's rhetorical) one person who has switched teams, then the "born gay" argument flounders.
I know, let's indoctrinate our kids before they get to college!
A Fairy Tale
Submitted by Bodini on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:29pm.
by a Fairy Tail ... very interesting!
Curious
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:38pm.
Do the words gay, sex, or homosexual appear anywhere in the book?
♡ Einstein
Point
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:49pm.
being?
You seem to miss the point rather often
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:52pm.
Rainbows, man. Rainbows.
♡ Einstein
Okay
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:58pm.
Are you unable to answer the question I asked? I was hoping you could explain it to me; given my apparent lack of perception and all. Rainbows, aside.
What are you afraid of?
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:17pm.
Where's the "adult phrases referring to the cultural battle over homosexuality?" "Born that way?" Oh dear. "Rainbows?" Red alert. "Gender Identity?" Mass hysteria! Can you even imagine a boy who wants to cook? It's not like he wanted nipple rings.
♡ Einstein
I'm not afraid of anything
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:33pm.
You asked if the words "homosexuality" et.al. were explicitly in the text of the book. I asked essentially two questions -though admittedly, they weren't explicit- regarding your comment. You have subsequently danced around those questions, but, maybe that's due to the translucent nature in which I asked. So I'll try again. Maybe you can try and concentrate...
Number One: Why did you ask if the words "homosexuality" et.al. were in the book? And,
Number Two: Do those words need to be in the book to promote a radical gay message toward children?
Read the article again
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:54pm.
The book is reeking with adult homosexual references...like rainbows and...and...and...boys cooking! Now what kind of message do you think this conveys that makes the book so troublesome? Why did I ask if those words were mentioned? In order to dismiss the suggestive notion that it's a piece of American gay propaganda. But I'm sure you knew that. I think the only problem with the book is that it was written by a hated gay man. Thoughts?
♡ Einstein
Well, it seems to me
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 3:24pm.
the entire storyline is a metaphor for the gay victimhood agenda; does it not? And by the appearance of the cover, this book seems to be targeted for very young children, certainly too young to understand sexuality. So, how then would it NOT be a piece of gay propaganda? Add to that the fact that the guy who wrote the book is a strong proponent of the gay victimhood meme, and logic would surely lead one to believe that the purpose of this book is to indoctrinate young children to tolerate and consider homosexuality as normal -when it clearly is not.
No, it does not. Not to me.
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 4:14pm.
Then again neither you nor I, and more than likely neither Brown, have read the book. Taking Brown's review at face value on a conservatism website seems to validate her position, but no. I do not feel this is a book about gay victimhood, but for any kid who grew up being different. I was. But I had friends who were different too making my childhood much happier than it might've been. The book doesn't bring up sexuality, but the message of tolerance and self-assuredness. If I had a young child I'd be happy to read him or her the book, but alas, I think The Judge is a far superior piece of children's literature.
A horrible creature is coming this way, creeping closer day by day.
♡ Einstein
Maybe you're right
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 5:19pm.
but only in an illogical world does this story not try to replicate homosexuality. It may also replicate other differences among young children, but coming from this author, it clearly is meant as Erin Brown described it: veiled gay propaganda. From Perez's own website, there are a dozen gratuitous links to Amazon where we find that "customers who bought this item also bought": My Princess Boy, The Sissy Duckling, The Boy Who Cried Fabulous, and It's Okay to be Different. Well, isn't that special. No theme running through those titles...
What is surpising is that in this day and age, with so much attention being paid to the gay agenda, that Perez, or you -for that matter- would pretend that this book is about something else. Don't you find it odd that homosexuals, who just long to be accepted by the rest of society as normal, must go about acheiving that acceptance through clandestine methods? You'd think he, and you -for that matter- would be proud that this flamboyant homosexual celebrity has penned a book that is designed to help gay 3 year-olds better understand who they are, even if they're incapable at that age to develop those fellings on their own.
You know, I would think it counter-intuitive to want acceptance among a group that you loathe in virtualy every way possible; horrible creatures that they are...
No
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 5:24pm.
It's about teaching the next generation that they don't need to be scared little d***s like their parents. You'd rather believe that this book, with not a single gay reference, is about being gay. Fine. Ain't gonna settle this one today.
♡ Einstein
I guess you got that from reading the book
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 5:32pm.
Oh, wait...
Then again neither you nor I, and more than likely neither Brown, have read the book.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/erin-r-brown/2011/09/12/surprise-perez-hilt...
Not sure where the "scared" line is coming from again, but for what it's worth, I pity your obvious fear. Hopefully someday you'll find the strength to overcome that which you try so hard to project upon others. Good luck with your sexuality conflicts.
Was that from the conservative playbook?
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 5:54pm.
I tried downloading the book to my iPad but it isn't available. I'll let you know once I do find it.
And oh yeah, I'm totally straight, and totally not afraid of gays, bisexuals, transgenders, hermaphrodites, or anyone else whose bedroom preferences I do not participate in.
♡ Einstein
Yeah maybe
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 6:06pm.
But, who knows, maybe after reading the book (it's for sale you know) you'll have the courage to participate. Also, if you can find that conservative playbook, I'd be interested in knowing where I could get a copy. Please, let me know how all of this works out for you. And don't forget, it's all about inclusion; jump on in there! Don't be afraid...
Well played, sir!
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 6:12pm.
I keep a copy of the Conservative Playbook on the shelf right next to the Communist Manifesto, Mein Kampf, and the Anarchist Cookbook. Philosophically each publication has much to offer, though the Conservative Playbook lacks imagination. Hence, your claim that I must be gay because I don't despise gays as the book has instructed.
Amazon can't provide the book to me at this moment which is why I said I tried to download it. Instant gratification. So yeah, I do know it's for sale.
♡ Einstein
Yes Einstein, there is a playbook*
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 6:26pm.
The Conservative playbook is easy to read. It has 3 major chapters. The first is the Declaration of Independence, the second is totally devoted to the Bill of Rights. The third is The Constitution of the United States of America.
Dont generalize and say all conservatives hate homosexuals. That is a typical liberal talking point. The truth is that many conservatives have gays in our own families. The problem is pushing an abnormal behavior represented by only 2% of the population, demanding special treatment, that is divisive, discriminatory to the other 98% of the populace.
Read the book Einstein.
Yeah, I don't 'despise gays'
Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 6:35pm.
Yeah, I don't 'despise gays' either.............but this dope, and his cousin Satchelmouth, as well as Jack'n'Jill (or whoever the hell that other troll is) could get me headed in that direction.........it's people like them, along with Perez Hilton (jeeeez, what an idiotic name!!) and the 'in-your-face' gay rights crowd that give the rest of the gay population a bad name.
I didn't say you were gay
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 7:30pm.
I implied you have sexual conflicts based on your apparent fear to participate in the bedroom manners of... whomever. I think maybe you're reading more into my comments than was meant.
But then, that couldn't be...
Weirdo
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 7:38pm.
Weird-o.
♡ Einstein
That's it?
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 7:42pm.
After all of this, all I get is "weirdo"? Where's the fun in that? You pink-haired guys give up too easily.
I haven't had pink hair since college
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 7:51pm.
And it was fuchsia. Fudge. Maybe I'm the weirdo.
♡ Einstein
LOL
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 8:26pm.
So long as we're finally on the same page. ;-p
You bet
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 8:28pm.
Take it easy, my conservative pal.
♡ Einstein
Einstein?
Submitted by Trix Rabbit on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 3:26pm.
You besmirch a name in order to make yourself look intelligent?
Nobody is afraid of anything. All I want is a separation of crotch and state.
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
Don't besmirch my name
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 4:17pm.
I'm a genius. Ask anyone.
♡ Einstein
Back to your bridge!
Submitted by Free Stinker on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 4:27pm.
And don't go away angry. Just go away.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
"Einstein"
Submitted by Trix Rabbit on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 7:51pm.
Why should I have to ask "anyone"? Why can't you just make it self-evident?
Although from the looks of your previous posts, your'e not fairing too well.
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
I thought I had
Submitted by Einstein on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 7:59pm.
But give it time. You'll come around. Genius isn't always easy to recognize. Just look at Galileo.
♡ Einstein
Einstein?
Submitted by Trix Rabbit on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 10:26pm.
Do you know why the Almighty gave us Jews such big noses? It was so that we could know when the bullshit is being spread before us.
So far, the only thing I have come around to in regard to you is that you are a poor schmuck who is trying to grub some self-esteem by making irrelevant diatribes.
It's getting late. Back to bed with you little trooper.
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
Why don't you read it....
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:17pm.
...and get back to us.
It seems to be right up your alley.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
a book about acceptance
Submitted by kata on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:29pm.
written by a bully. Ironic.
The epitome, katainkent, of---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 6:06pm.
an oxymoron, indeed.
Perez Hilton.
The Bully in Pink.
While he is truly a bully in the sense of being nasty while hiding behind vituperative and trashy statements and articles; the thought of a flamer in pink being a bully just cracks me up.
MD
There's at least one
Submitted by Bodini on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 7:31pm.
... "almost beauty queen" who knows full well how "Perez the Judge" feels about ACCEPTANCE. Just another "Pinko" group thinker who is totally intolerant of those whose moral and mental makeup differ from his/hers/its/whatever!
If they
Submitted by Bob K on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 3:32pm.
ever do a remake of the movie "Tommy" he can certainly get the part of "Wicked Uncle Ernie".
Sorry, no one can replace
Submitted by Beukeboom on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 5:06pm.
Sorry, no one can replace Keith Moon in that role.
Although for Perez to pen a
Submitted by BTW Biological ... on Tue, 09/13/2011 - 12:22am.
Although for Perez to pen a morality kids book smells of irony, that doesn't give license to make rude comments about gays.
True, BTW---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 09/13/2011 - 2:32am.
but Hilton himself is fair game because of his nastiness.
MD