Kyra Phillips of ‘Newsroom’ and Christine Romans discuss ‘discouraging’ lack of women in Obama’s cabinet, job package that ‘favors’ men.
Liberal feminists claim that President Obama’s administration will not have enough female representation and that the job creation part of his stimulus plan will favor men.
But on CNN’s Newsroom, lack of the feminist perspective certainly wasn’t an issue Jan. 23. In fact, it was the only voice viewers heard.
Newsroom host Kyra Phillips introduced Christine Romans’ estrogen-dominated segment which included feminists complaining about Obama. Romans mentioned that six cabinet positions out of 21 have gone to women, yet liberal feminist groups like National Organization for Women (NOW) and The New Agenda were “disappointed.”
“We had high hopes for president-elect Obama going into this, and uh, it’s been very discouraging,” Amy Siskind, co-founder of The New Agenda.
The New Agenda promotes liberal policies including what amounts to an affirmative action policy for women. Its Web site states that the group is “working towards parity [for women] in the government and in the workplace.” The New Agenda also aims to “increase the number of women in high-level appointments” because there is a “grave imbalance,” citing the “reduction in female Supreme Court justices.”
Romans chimed in with statistics that only fueled Siskind’s fire: “Women are 52 percent of the population, and 54 percent of voters. And 56 percent of women, voted for this president.”
“We’re clearly not getting the, uh respect or the amount of power that the women in this country deserve and it just shows you that Obama does not take this constituency very seriously,” Siskind said.
Romans also brought up worries that Obama’s jobs creation efforts will focus on men without mentioning that the unemployment rate for men is much higher than for women: “[T]here is also a nagging concern that men will be favored in the 3.7 million jobs Obama wants to create,” Romans said. “Jobs building bridges and roads, alternative energy, and health care technology, fields dominated by men.”
Feminist author Naomi Wolf responded critically saying, “What he [Obama] could certainly do is make sure that his policy advisors, um invest as much in hospitals and schools and um, the kinds of sectors where women predominate.” Wolf is an Obama supporter and the co-founder of the American Freedom Campaign.
But according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate for adult women stands at 5.9 percent much lower than the 7.2 percent rate for adult men as of December 2008.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Lack of women in Obama’s cabinet
January 26, 2009 - 13:59 ET by GothampcI always suspected Hillary Clinton was a man.
OK
January 26, 2009 - 14:07 ET by 10ksnookerThat was funny ....
Women like these,
January 26, 2009 - 14:02 ET by thebutlerdiditmake me wish I had a time machine to go back in time, and prevent women from ever getting voting rights. If women had no voting rights, Republicans would have WON every election except for 1964, in the last 50 years. Thanks, gals, you ruin it for the rest of us. To get rid of these abortion-loving, men-hating, ignorant, Gloria Steinem wannabe harpies voting rights, I would GLADLY surrender mine, today. Go suck an egg, Naomi Wolf.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
Has anybody taken a good
January 26, 2009 - 14:05 ET by flyingmonkeyHas anybody taken a good look at Democrat women? Why would the Affirmative Action Hero want to surround himself with a bunch of ugly women?
The fact that Monica Lewinski was a step up for Slick Willy should say it all.
The exception to the rule....
January 26, 2009 - 14:09 ET by Prester John...is Kirsten Powers on Fox.
Good looking and not a blithering idiot.
Intelligent Libs
January 26, 2009 - 14:39 ET by JDWHow much time has Obama spent with her?
JDW
DAILY WAVE
Whatever else you think, your mother and my mother are both mothers
Oh, given her looks and.....
January 26, 2009 - 14:54 ET by Prester John...intellectual honesty, probably none, zero, zip, nada.
Seriously?
January 26, 2009 - 14:21 ET by StarAZOnly women you consider good looking should get work? Bleh. Also--women are 52% of the population...
Where were these women when he was campaigning?
January 26, 2009 - 14:21 ET by mizflame98Everyone with at least 2 brain cells to bounce together knew Obama didn't really support equality.
Perfect Demotivator for the Obama Administration
http://www.despair.com/government.html
Who's Next?
January 26, 2009 - 14:26 ET by slickwillie2001I'm waiting for the GLBTSMCDLLLLFF crowd to show up and demand greater representation in the cabinet of The One. That'll be a circus event.
StarAZ
January 26, 2009 - 14:36 ET by flyingmonkeyI never said that only good looking women should get work. I said why would the Affirmative Action Hero want to surround himself with ugly women the likes of Janet Reno or Madeline Halfbright.
Hillary surrounded Bill with dogs to make herself look better and it still didn't work.
Sorry--didn't get it that way
January 26, 2009 - 15:14 ET by StarAZYou do sort of seem to be wanting bureaucrats and pols to be babes, though...even in this explanation.
Politics
January 26, 2009 - 14:42 ET by JDWI no longer have the link but last week congress passed equal pay for each gender. Considering all of the people who need jobs, who cares?
JDW
DAILY WAVE
Whatever else you think, your mother and my mother are both mothers
Yeah, that was the Lilly
January 26, 2009 - 14:57 ET by motherbeltYeah, that was the Lilly Ledbetter Act.
Lilly was working side-by-side with men on an assembly line doing the same job at Goodyear and being paid less. That was patently unfair and I don't think anyone would support that.
These days it's mostly a function of women wanting to work less and take more time off, and then complaining that they don't get the promotions and pay raises that men do.
Exactly right mb... Plus
January 26, 2009 - 15:48 ET by bigtimerExactly right mb...
Plus file a law-suit...discrimination of some kind, one way or the other.
I wished the NAGS would just shut the heck up...whine and complain constantly....yak, yak, yak.
It has been way too many years now, past tiring....yet they still carry on...and on...and on.
Enough already!
This will be another case
January 26, 2009 - 14:52 ET by motherbeltThis will be another case of "Do as say, not as I do."
He has to have the "flexibility" you know, to pick the "best person" for the job.
\sarc
Yeah, really...just put
January 26, 2009 - 16:49 ET by RR GOPYeah, really...just put Liberal women in charge of everything and our problems will be over!
What planet do these people live on in their warped minds?
Besides, I thought that according to feminists that there are no such things as traditional male or female roles/jobs? Why not expect women to go out there and build highways for Dear Leader?
One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
Barry
January 26, 2009 - 20:54 ET by doug1950is going to have problems GWB never dreamed of due simply to fact his "base" are whiners and complainers. His life is going to be a suck pile. Now these nags are complaining over crap, the blacks are ragging on Michelle, my belle, that she should be wearing more black designers clothes, it is going to be so rich. That is what happens when you give others the impression you can solve ALL of their problems. There are people in this world who will bring you every single, simple little problem for you to solve for them so they don't have to think or do anything about it. Usher in the Nanny State. He put himself in this position and it is going to give him ulcers. He already does not like the press of the Press and unfielded questions. He ain't seen nothing yet. Micro Managers burn out early and its just getting started. I swear he is already showing some gray hairs.