CNN Projects Bachmann as GOP 'Star'...Who 'Doesn't Stand a Chance' Vs. Obama
Tuesday’s CNN Newsroom acknowledged Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann as a “rising star” in the GOP, but moved quickly to write her off as a far-right extremist. “As far as the general election goes, [CNN analyst John] Avlon says Bachmann doesn’t stand a chance. She needs independents to win and despite her charm last night, Bachmann’s views are too conservative to many Americans.” said CNN’s Carol Costello.
Among these views that make Bachmann an unelectable radical is her belief in the Constitution. “She has said God encouraged her to run for higher office, and that government should be limited only to what is in the Constitution.” said Costello.. Who but the media, after all, would construe the Constitution as being optional. To reporters, it appears, the rule of law is now a quaint and outmoded notion entertained only by those who believe in accountable government.
(video after the break)
If the media’s view of Republicans and conservatives were not already painfully obvious, Costello again decided to remind us. “The other thing interesting out of the debate, she is a female candidate in the Republican Party running for the president and nobody is making a big deal of that. That’s amazing. Isn't that amazing?” Only a bona fide leftist would assume sexism in the GOP, and then be shocked by its absence.
Were it not for their obsessive fixation on all things Palin, one would almost suspect they were completely unaware that this supposedly sexist party had put a woman on their ticket in the last presidential election. Costello is also likely unaware that the first woman to run for a major party nomination was Senator Margaret Chase Smith, a Republican, who ran for president in 1964, eight years before the first female Democrat, Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm, ran in 1972. The only rampant sexism in Republican politics is that which roams free in the overactive imagination of the left wing press.
To CNN’s credit, Costello and Newsroom anchor Kyra Phillips did call attention to Bachmann’s history of raising a total of twenty-three foster children in addition to her own, note her status as a rising star in the GOP, and all but praised her debate performance. They can afford to be generous, however, because they have already determined that is unelectable, and their shock that nobody has called attention to Bachmann’s gender says more about the media than it does about the Republican primary electorate.
A transcript of the broadcast, which aired on the June 14 edition of CNN's Newsroom at 9:26 am EDT, follows below.
KYRA PHILLIPS: You're going to hear a lot more from Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann in the coming months. She went in last night's debate a Congresswoman from Minnesota, and some analysts think she came out a rising star.
MICHELE BACHMANN: I just want to make an announcement for you, John, on CNN. I filed my paperwork to seek the office of the presidency of the United States today and I'll very soon be making my formal announcement, so I wanted you to be the first to know.
JOHN KING Appreciate that. Welcome.
PHILIPS: Her performance had some of our analysts declaring her the debate winner. Carol Costello is here. So, tell us more about her. We were talking about her this morning, Carol, and all of these children. It's amazing that she is doing both!
CAROL COSTELLO: She is doing both. Five children of her own and 23 foster children, we’ll get into that in a minute, but let's talk about the political pundits, because they are saying more than they won the debate, Kyra. Political pundits have a crush on Michelle Bachmann. The adjectives they are using you would not believe it. She gave a star performance and top tier and called her pithy, and if you don’t know what pithy means, I’ll tell you. It means having substance and to the point. Seriously, though, Michelle Bachmann found her footing last night with one zinger after another.
BACHMANN: As President of the United States, I will not rest until I repeal Obamacare. It's a promise. Take it to bank. Cash the check. I'll make sure that that happens. We need everybody to come together because we're going to win. Just make no mistake about it. I want to announce tonight, President Obama is a one-term president! We’ll win!
COSTELLO: And the crowd went wild. She made Herman Cain fade into the woodwork, bu tthe bigger questions are, number one, can she win the primary and, number two, can very win the general election. Independent CNN analyst John Avlon says the Republican establishment doesn't exactly love Michelle Bachmann. And despite a large campaign warchest, she needs the Republican establishment to win the nomination. As far as the general election goes, Avlon says Bachmann doesn’t stand a chance. She needs independents to win and despite her charm last night, Bachmann’s views are too conservative to many Americans. She has said god encouraged her to run for higher office, and that government should be limited only to what is in the Constitution, and I know, Kyra, you are intrigued by her foster children. I know you are.
PHILLIPS: I know that everybody is talking about, you know, how she came out, this fascinating star last night. But I’m telling you, what caught my attention, I had no idea, we knew she had five kids, but 23 foster kids. And it's all of this that actually inspired her to get into politics.
COSTELLO: That's right. She actually mentioned that fact three times during the debate last night and those 23 foster kids did inspire her to get into politics. She sent them to public schools, wasn't satisfied with the quality of that I that education. She then ran for the school board. She failed, but that inspired her to run for other offices. And she became, you know, a congressperson in the state of Minnesota. Now look at her. The other thing interesting out of the debate, she is a female candidate in the Republican Party running for the president and nobody is making a big deal of that. That’s amazing. Isn't that amazing?
- Eric Ames's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
historic
Submitted by MidAmerica on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 5:09pm.
Yeah, to the Lefties only democrats can do anything historic. Such as their success in electing the first failed Black President.
First black president....
Submitted by retrocon on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 5:31pm.
yes, but they found one without American slave history. His African half is an import, so to speak. Doesn't that seem fishy to anyone? He has admitted slave OWNERSHIP lineage. Maybe the democrats are still living back in good ol' days of their party, bigoted against African Americans with "roots."
Retro
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 5:45pm.
And they found one whose lineage included slave owners. What else would he be but a Democrat.
Since the Republican party didn't even exist
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 6:06pm.
until just a few years before almost all of the slaves were freed, I think we can stipulate a slave-owning Republican was extraordinarily rare.
Jer
How many years before, Jer?---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 6:57pm.
Whattya mean "almost all" of the slaves were freed?
Which ones weren't?
Hope you are not including die hard conservatives with that "--I think we can stipulate--" business.
Not that I disagree with the phrase; I just prefer to do my own stipulating. :o)
MD
Matthew, I was using the Emancipation Proclamation as
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 7:37pm.
the benchmark, which, as you will note, was limited in reach:
"President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, as the nation approached its third year of bloody civil war. The proclamation declared "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are, and henceforward shall be free."
Despite this expansive wording, the Emancipation Proclamation was limited in many ways. It applied only to states that had seceded from the Union, leaving slavery untouched in the loyal border states. It also expressly exempted parts of the Confederacy that had already come under Northern control. Most important, the freedom it promised depended upon Union military victory".
source.
However, since it was only a few years later that all slaves were granted full citizenship rights via Constitutional amendment, it would probably have been better had I used the latter for the historical time stamp.
Jer
All well and good, Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 9:32pm.
Just so long as I ain't stipulated by outside forces.
I am not stimulated by being stipulated.
By libs, anyway. ;O)
MD
"Most important, the freedom
Submitted by NL207 on Wed, 06/15/2011 - 12:29am.
"Most important, the freedom it promised depended upon Union military victory"
Duh! And do you suppose Lincoln's Proclamation would have had any effect on Slavery if the Confederacy had achieved a military victory?
Highly unlikely, NL...
Submitted by Jer on Wed, 06/15/2011 - 12:52am.
So why don't you email the National Archives and Records Administration and lodge a complaint regarding the author's ineptitude.
Jer
Looks like I will have to ...
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/18/2011 - 12:45am.
since you seem unable to recognize what a fool he is.
Or do you suppose the Confederacy, had it achieved sovereignty, would have honored the proclamations of a foreign head of state within its borders? The South was well known for its chivalry but I seriously doubt it would have extended to this.
No, NL...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/18/2011 - 3:44pm.
of course the Confederacy would not have honored the EP.
Why are you even making an issue of this? In describing to Matthew the limited effects of the Proclamation, I merely copied and pasted the information as it appears verbatim at the NARA website.
You and I are not at odds on this.
Jer
I recognize that WE do not disagree about
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 06/18/2011 - 10:58pm.
the scope of effect of Lincoln's EP.
Where we do not see eye-to-eye is the apparent lack of acumen demonstrated by the bureaucrat at NARA who penned those remarks. He was stating the obvious. His / her comments added nothing to the subject matter. But then again, this is the norm for bureaucrats. The taxpayers pay them a great deal and they add no value. Drones.
Okay, NL...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/18/2011 - 11:48pm.
It was indeed a statement of the obvious. But I suspect there are quite a few to whom the obvious (regrettably) isn't so obvious. The ignorant, too, must be served. Or maybe doing so only perpetuates their ignorance. Ah...another debate for another day.
Jer
Hmmmm...
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 9:17pm.
Considering that the Republican Party was founded in 1856, AND that it was reviled in the South as an anti-slavery party, AND that indeed the election of a Republican as President triggered the secessions of Southern states...yeah, I can't see there being slaveholding Republicans then either.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Yeah, Carol. totally amazing!
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 5:47pm.
A mother cares enough about her kids' education that she finds better means of schooling them?
That's so amazing I think she might replace David Copperfield in Vegas.
Flabbergasted, that's what I am.
*
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 6:02pm.
delete
"Too Conservative" for CNN, yes.
Submitted by Tenebrous on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 6:07pm.
Note that "too" and "conservative" are descriptors that reflect the viewpoint of the speaker. If CNN really wanted to be "fair" and "balanced", they would state Bachmann's positions and the trump up some lying polls that showed people didn't support her positions. Instead, it's assassination by adjective. Wow, CNN. Your analysis is so amazingly third-grade. So you're telling us that Bachmann's not popular because you don't like her and because of that, we shouldn't either? My geez. Someone give these children in-school suspension or something.
Visions and Principles blog
Bachmann....
Submitted by Forbus on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 6:23pm.
has been universally reviled by the MSM...so all these new-found compliments looks awfully suspicious. It's seems like an orchestrated campaign to find another way to get Palin out of the race and to insure a beatable GOP candidate (THEIR thinking) for Obama. When even Chris Matthews sings her praises it raises a red flag.
But they better watch out...they may get more than they bargained for.
what
Submitted by boozy on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 6:33pm.
my brain dead Baby Sophie the afghan hound could beat this usurper.....Obama is a complete and total left wing socialist, marxist JOKE...he has driven this country into a great divide....even happened to me...I guess the one good thing he has done is smoke out the socialists and communists in your our network..sure worked for me...got one hanging on by a thread right now...would expect that person to flip any day now...
Making Up Stuff Again....
Submitted by Nightfly on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 10:48pm.
I don't know how they can truthfully say this. With the economy on the verge of collapse, time quickly running out on the legaility of the Libya War, and laughing about the lack of shovel ready jobs how can anyone project that Obama will be polling better than 30% by the fall of 2012. Must be they're expecting a miracle or they just think they can defeat Bachmann regardless of what Obama does. They assume they'll control the dialogue. They're drinking Obama's bath water again. IMHO, Obama would have trouble beating Mickey Mouse at the rate he's going.
"Birther" Bonanza
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 06/14/2011 - 11:24pm.
I'm waiting for Andrew Sullivan to claim that the birth mother of all Bachmann's twenty three foster children was actually Bristol Palin....
And, in the very unlikely event she ran and was the nominee, CNN would label Olympia Snowe as a "conservative extremist"
If she was Democrat she would have been given a Chance
Submitted by merr4402 on Wed, 06/15/2011 - 8:26am.
If Bachmann were a Democrat she would have been given a chance to say her views on the DAY SHE ANNOUNCED HER CANDIDACY. But because she is a Tea Party Republican, the liberal press has to SHUT HER OUT.
PURE BIAS ALERT
A 'generic' GOP candidate is
Submitted by Cowboy on Wed, 06/15/2011 - 9:35am.
A 'generic' GOP candidate is beating Obama in the polls.