Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Dave Pierre's blog
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'
  • Al Hunt On Rosen Outrage: Obama 'No Better Than Nixon'; Holder Should Take Hike
  • Bozell Column: Obama And 'Overreach'
  • Three Labor Unions, Including Teamsters, Want ObamaCare Repealed; When Will Media Report?

No Good Deed: NY Times Slaps Cardinal Dolan For Actually Getting Rid of Abusive Priests

By Dave Pierre | June 03, 2012 | 23:20

A  A
Dave Pierre's picture

One frequent demand from Catholic Church abuse victims is that abusive clerics be laicized or removed from the priesthood as expeditiously and quickly as possible.

So if the Archdiocese of Milwaukee discovered a fast and economical way to make that happen, wouldn't that be a good thing for both victims and the Church? Not according to the New York Times' Laurie Goodstein.

In her latest Catholic Church-obsessed piece, Goodstein takes issue with the fact that New York's Cardinal Timothy Dolan, when he was the Archbishop of Milwaukee a while back, approved a number of $20,000 settlements to rid the Church of abusive priests in a more time-efficient and expeditious manner – without long, drawn-out canonical or civil proceedings.


The agenda: Attack the Catholic Church

Goodstein characterizes these settlements as "payoffs to sexually abusive priests" in an attempt to somehow besmirch Cardinal Dolan. In fact, these were settlement payments designed to save the Church and everyone involved the legal expenses and distraction of engaging in the protracted proceedings necessary to rid the Church of abusive priests.

This isn't the first time that Goodstein, the Times' purported national religion reporter, has shilled for contingency lawyers and loud professional victims' groups, who wish to plant hit pieces on the Catholic Church in America's declining newspaper of record.

Just a couple months ago, Goodstein waxed sympathetic for the anti-Catholic group SNAP (Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests) after its national director, David Clohessy, griped that he simply had to obey a court order and finally come clean about his unseemly contacts with contingency lawyers in Missouri. Goodstein crafted a wobbly piece with the predictable premise that the big, bad Catholic Church was bullying an innocent, little victims group.


SNAP-fail

In her new article, Goodstein uncritically quotes a letter from SNAP to the Archdiocese of Milwaukee. After hysterically labelling the settlements as "cash bonuses," the letter asks:

"In what other occupation, especially one working with families and operating schools and youth programs, is an employee given a cash bonus for raping and sexually assaulting children?"

Well, SNAP could have easily answered its own question.

Just a few months ago, the Los Angeles Unified School District paid $40,000 to a third-grade teacher accused of committing numerous lewd acts on children in exchange for him not appealing his firing.

Then there was the teacher in New York City who was accused of ogling eighth-grade girls and collected a whopping $100,049-a-year salary without setting foot in a classroom for over a decade.

In fact, such settlements happen in the education profession all the time.

SNAP's venom against the Catholic Church is now beyond the realm of reason or logic. The group endlessly gripes about abusive priests not being removed quickly enough. Then when the Church actually does something to correct this, SNAP complains.


An ongoing obsession

Even when the Catholic Church does something good in the handling of abusive priests, Goodstein and the Times somehow find a way to portray it as something sinister and unseemly.

Meanwhile, the Times continues its obsession with sex abuse in the Catholic Church from decades ago. Why?

As the Times itself summarily reported recently, just in the first three months alone of 2012 in New York City public schools, there were "248 complaints of sexual misconduct involving school employees, a 35 percent increase over the same period last year."

How about the Times finally digging a little deeper into this shocking story happening today right in its own backyard rather than attacking Cardinal Dolan for what he wisely did in Milwaukee years ago?


-- Dave Pierre is the creator and author of TheMediaReport.com, which analyzes the media's coverage of the Catholic Church abuse narrative. Dave is also the author of two books and is a contributing writer to NewsBusters.

  • Anti-Religious Bias
  • Christianity
  • Laurie Goodstein
  • New York Times
  • Dave Pierre's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Let's be fair..

Submitted by zenman1661 on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 11:35pm.

If that was your child who was sexually abused by a priest and instead of facing any appropriate real consequences, he was just given some money and told to go away, how would you feel.

  • Login to post comments

Response ...

Submitted by Dave Pierre on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 12:05am.

You are correct that nothing can undo the unimaginable harm of child abuse. However, the most that the Church itself can do to a priest as punishment is remove him from the priesthood. Anything more/else has to be done by civil authorities. (It's the same for schools or any other organization. If a teacher abuses a kid, the most a school district can do is simply fire the teacher. Anything more/else has to be done by civil authorities.)

  • Login to post comments

It is still disgusting

Submitted by shawn. on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 12:59am.

...........that money was paid out to a piece of filth that takes advantage of little kids regardless if they are a priest or teacher.

Edit.

Mr Pierre I have read some of your other articles and most of the time you are right on when it comes to media bias against the Catholic Church. Today however i find your argument quite flimsy. In a nutshell you are saying that is okay to pay off child molestiing priests because it will save money in the long run? It Is okay to do this because teachers do the same thing?

  • Login to post comments

Well ...

Submitted by Dave Pierre on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 8:25am.

Unfortunately, the church had two options:
A. Pay the abusive cleric $20K to leave right the priesthood right away.
B. Have a long, costly, drawn-out process with canon lawyers and other personnel in which the priest continues to get paid and will eventually cost much, much more than $20K. All of this to get the same result as 'A.'

There is no other option.

So, yes, I think it is "okay" that the Church did what it did.

See also this and this.

  • Login to post comments

But were the priests turned over to the civil authorities

Submitted by zenman1661 on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 1:54am.

News Busters is correct that the NYT will never treat the Catholic Church fairly, but here they picked a bad example. It appears that the local Church gave the abusive priests money to leave in order to avoid bad publicity that would have occured by calling in the police.which would have been the moral legal responsible and right thing to do.

  • Login to post comments

No ...

Submitted by Dave Pierre on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 8:31am.

"The local Church gave the abusive priests money to leave in order to avoid bad publicity"

Uh-uh. This all occurred around 2003. The publicity was already really bad.

The issue is not about calling the police The issue was about priests who had abused several years earlier and needed to be removed from the priesthood. The police already know the names of all the priests and are only able to prosecute recent cases.

  • Login to post comments

Let’s deal with reality here.

Submitted by VB on Tue, 06/05/2012 - 1:22am.

Let’s deal with reality here. Child abuse is a problem in this country and it involves many organization such as schools, churches, synagogues. The abusers were a tiny minority of Catholic priests. Some 4 percent of Catholic priests in active ministry in the United States were accused of abuse between the 1950s and 2002. About three hundred priests were convicted. There is not a shred of evidence indicating that priests abuse young people at rates higher than do people in the rest of society.

On the contrary: Most sexual abuse takes place within families. The John Jay
study concludes that, in 2001, whereas five young people in 100,000 may have
been abused by a priest, the average rate of abuse throughout the United States
was 134 for every 100,000 young people.
(CATHOLIC Priests, Abuse, and the Meltdown of a Culture The lessons of an important new study. By George Weigel Posted: Thursday, May)

From the 1950s through the 1970s, the Catholic Church, following the then prevailing societal practice, sent suspected abusers to psychologists rather than calling the police.

In this respect, the Church was far from alone. When the Church was sending
accused priests to psychological treatment, "the criminal justice system was
doing the very same thing with convicted offenders – sending them to
treatment instead of prison."

As recently as 1994, it was the universal practice in New York
among school administrators not to call police to report abusers.
The 1994 study also reported that only 1 percent of those abusive educators lost
their license. In addition, most alarmingly, "25 percent received no consequence
or were reprimanded informally and off-the-record. Nearly 39 percent chose to
leave the district, most with positive recommendations or even retirement
packages intact."
(http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/misconductreview/report.pdf)

According to CARA, here are the numbers of accusations involving a current
minorthat were even deemed "credible" each year from 2005 to 2011:
(http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/child-and-youth-protection/upload...)
Year / # of accusations
2011 7
2010 8
2009 6
2008 10
2007 4
2006 14
2005 9
Meanwhile, according to government numbers, in 2010 alone, there were
some63,527 reported cases of child sexual abuse in the United States – an
alarming societal problem that has received scant media attention.
(http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm10/cm10.pdf#page=62

The best estimate is that 15% of students will be sexually abused by a
member of the school staff during their school career.
• Though, when the American Association of University Women
Foundation surveyed more than 1,600 students in eighth through 11th
grade, 25 percent of the girls and 10 percent of the boys who said they
had been harassed or abused said the harasser was a school employee.
• The number of K-12 public and private school students in 1996 who
have been or will be sexually abused by a member of the school staff is
nearly 7 million of 51,331,000.
• Between 1% and 5% of teachers sexually abuse or harass students.
http://www.cpiu.us/statistics-2/

A 2004 U.S. Department of Education report reported that "the most accurate data
available" reveals that "nearly 9.6 percent of [public school] students are targets
of educator sexual misconduct sometime during their school career."
This result prompted Hofstra University's Dr. Charol Shakeshaft, the author of the
study, to opine in 2006, "[T]hink the Catholic Church has a problem? The physical
sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by
priests."

A Meanwhile, that same 2004 report cited an important study from the mid-1990s:
"In an early [1994] study of 225 cases of educator sexual abuse in New
York, all of the accused had admitted to sexual abuse of a student but none
of the abusers was reported to authorities."
(http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/misconductreview/report.pdf)

The figures suggest “the physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100
times the abuse by priests,” said Shakeshaft, according to Education Week.
Indeed, more than 4.5 million students are subject to sexual misconduct by an employee of a
school sometime between kindergarten and 12th grade, says the report.

The UN considers creating “sexual rights” for children as young as
10, a court in Brazil shows what this would mean. Planned Parenthood and homosexual advocacy groups lobby to lower age of consent laws, and then feign indignation when they are lumped with pedophiles.
http://www.turtlebayandbeyond.org/2012/homosexuality/sex-rights-for-chil...
http://issuu.com/ippfresources/docs/universalperiodicreview_toolkit_2012

The Catholic Church is not dangerous for children. Paradoxically the Church has been criticized harshly because it has been far more open than other organisations and because people have higher expectations for it. “No other institution has undertaken a public study of sexual abuse and, as a result, there are no comparable data to those collected and reported by the Catholic Church,” say the researchers. “Other organizations should follow suit.”

Many Protestant denominations are too small or too decentralised to report abuse. Members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses have been expelled for speaking out about abuse. Orthodox Jews refuse to deal with sexual abuse in the criminal justice system and investigate instead in rabbinical courts. Vigilance will always be needed to prevent sexual abuse of children, but to say that Catholic priests are dangerous is as preposterous as it is malicious.

Despite all the lies, ad hominem, straw men attack and other logical fallacies sprout by the media or the comments on this forum, the fact is that the Catholic is far safer for children than any organizations and sadly even safer for children then some parents. Given the odd, as a father of two sons, I would trust the Catholic Church more than I trust the schools and many of the people on this forum.

  • Login to post comments

The "news" media is smearing the Catholic Church.

Submitted by Phryj1 on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 11:40pm.

Thee want to discredit the church in order to blunt the political impact of their lawsuit against the gov't and protect Obama. The media's Orwellian Ministry of Truth style behavior is completely disgusting. The collapse of the old left-wing media can't happen soon enough.

Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.

  • Login to post comments

Molesting children has always

Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 11:56pm.

Molesting children has always been part of the homo agenda, they haven't denounced NAMBLA or Savage , so why are they picking on priests? Homosexuality is a crime or it isn't, the left has to decide they can't have it both ways

Non, je ne regrette rien. "You aren't angry because I might be a racist, you're angry because you know I'm right".
  • Login to post comments

Dude that is out of line

Submitted by shawn. on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 12:08am.

"Molesting children has always been part of the homo agenda,"

Just because a person is gay does not mean they support child molestation. Also homosexuality is not a crime in our free country last I checked.

  • Login to post comments

Molesting children has always

Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 11:56pm.

Molesting children has always been part of the homo agenda, they haven't denounced NAMBLA or Savage , so why are they picking on priests? Homosexuality is a crime or it isn't, the left has to decide they can't have it both ways

Non, je ne regrette rien. "You aren't angry because I might be a racist, you're angry because you know I'm right".
  • Login to post comments

What is the NYT obsession with the Catholic Church?

Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 12:08am.

It's not like anyone on their published reporting staff can be said to be anything more than apathetic towards religion at best based on the overall tone of their reporting.

They keep trying to "democratize" the Catholic Church, but could they first please tell us exactly which church or religious organization runs its doctrine and theological foundations through a popularity contest like the one they would propose?

  • Login to post comments

More Vatican denial

Submitted by Ktulue on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 12:19am.

Removing a priest from the church does not wash away his crimes. He should be prosecuted like any criminal should.

  • Login to post comments

Denial?

Submitted by SamC on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 7:47am.

No, it doesn't wash away his crimes. However, it's certainly not up to the Catholic Church to prosecute anyone in a court of law.

  • Login to post comments

NYT not quite as deligent with the Teachers Union

Submitted by Kuso Jiji on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 12:44am.

The problem is even worse within our public school system and the NYT along with the rest of the Democrat's media machine turns a blind eye.

We know what this is about. The sooner the marxist utopiates weaken peoples religious institutions, the sooner the government becomes our God.

  • Login to post comments

To the gripers.

Submitted by LaVallette on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 2:44am.

What is stopping the guardians of the children and/or the civil authorities chasing the offenders? Oh I see; the Catholic chuch is not there to be milked.! The poor litigation class action lawyers. The humanity!!!!!

When are we going to chase the really endemic and most massive child abuse situation: i.e. the civil secular institutions!

  • Login to post comments

NYT

Submitted by lilium479 on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 5:33am.

How many of those priests are homosexuals?
Ask the NYT what they think of NAMBLA?

  • Login to post comments

The New York Times quit being

Submitted by John21 on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 7:51am.

The New York Times quit being a news organization a couple of decades ago, they now only fill the political needs of the Democratic Party.
The odds of you recieving factual or truthful reports from the NYT's is about the same as winning the "Powerball" lottery, possible but not likely. They specialist in the public relations opportunities of the DNC, they will twist and turn any fact or even idea to ensure that their client (the liberal agenda) is preceived to be correct.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It's not that liberals are stupid, it's just that they know so much that isn't true." Ronald Reagan

  • Login to post comments

Teachers who abuse children

Submitted by Frank Douglas on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 9:23am.

When you talk about payoffs to child predators by school officials you sound like Bill Donohue and Cardinal Dolan. Is this a coincidence?

Frank Douglas
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use