Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 21, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Dave Pierre's blog
  • ABC and CBS Ignore Obama Administration Investigating FNC's James Rosen
  • NBC's Gregory Scolds GOP for Comparing Obama to Nixon
  • CBS Highlights Ex-IRS Staffer Who Declares There Were No Politics at Cincinnati Office
  • Monday's Amnesia: CNN Covers Powerball Jackpot Winner as Much as IRS, AP, Benghazi Scandals
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About
  • WashPost 'Express' Tabloid Cover Laments: How Can Obama 'Break from the Storm' of Scandals?
  • It Gets Worse: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
  • Crowley to Obama Advisor: 'Why Didn't the President Just Say, Yeah, Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack?'

NYT Frets About Catholic Nuns in America

By Dave Pierre | April 20, 2012 | 21:29

A  A
Dave Pierre's picture

The New York Times' obsession with the Catholic Church reached a new level of hysteria on Friday when an editorial bemoaned that the Vatican is now criticizing American nuns who publicly contradict Church doctrine.

The Times' editorial prompts a number of questions: What concern is it to the Times how the Catholic Church conducts its business? Since when has the Times been worried about Catholic nuns in America?

It has been no secret that many Catholic women religious (nuns) in recent years have been in open dissent of several components of Church teaching, such those regarding the all-male priesthood and celibacy requirements.

Because of this open disagreement, the Vatican has now taken efforts to review the leadership of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), an organization which represents about 80 percent of nuns in the United States. These efforts seek to fully align the conference with the teachings of the Church and with Church law.

The Times frets that the move by the Vatican is "a misreading of the very fine work in schools, charities, prisons and impoverished neighborhoods being done by about 60,000 nuns across the nation." Really?

The Vatican itself debunks this alleged "misreading" on the very first page of a report it issued on the matter:

"The Holy See acknowledges with gratitude the great contribution of women Religious to the Church in the United States as seen particularly in the many schools, hospitals, and institutions of support for the poor which have been founded and staffed by Religious over the years."

Good grief. Did the Times even read the very document that it cited?

The Times’ motivation is pretty clear. The paper intensely dislikes the Catholic Church and what it represents. And it does not like the fact that the Vatican is finally pushing back against dissenting individuals who have opposed the Church by speaking favorably on "progressive" issues with which the Times aligns itself.

Unfortunately for the Times, the ranks of "liberal" and "progressive" Catholic women religious are shrinking and increasingly geriatric. "Traditional Catholicism is Winning," despite what the Grey Lady wants you to believe. 

The Times can get as huffy as it wants to, but it will simply get even more frustrated if it continues to think it will somehow influence the 2,000-year teachings of the Catholic Church.


-- Dave Pierre is the creator and author of TheMediaReport.com, which analyzes the media's coverage of the Catholic Church abuse narrative. Dave is also the author of two books and is a contributing writer to NewsBusters.

  • Anti-Religious Bias
  • Christianity
  • New York Times
  • Dave Pierre's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

they only want to help

Submitted by MidAmerica on Fri, 04/20/2012 - 9:41pm.

When the Times wants to give helpful advice to the Catholic Church it's like when the Times wants to give helpful advice to Republicans, Israel, and Conservative Blacks and women.

  • Login to post comments

I think I understand the connection between the NY Times and . .

Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 04/20/2012 - 9:53pm.

. . . the Catholic nuns.

It's the old joke: "What's black and white and red (read) all over?"

  • Login to post comments

Yeah, we get it...

Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 04/20/2012 - 10:35pm.

If the Catholic Church really appreciated these women, they'd let them "do their own thing" and not be so dogmatic.  You know, let everyone do what they want; it keeps the numbers up.

As Fr. Hollowell says in this video, the Catholic Church's seminaries and convents (the traditional ones) are bursting at the seams. With young people!  People who are hungry for the real thing, not some watered-down feel-good "theology."

Gosh, if only the NYT had the same sympathy for those who "dissent" from the teachings of the Church of Socialism....

  • Login to post comments

How ridiculous

Submitted by HockeyKid on Fri, 04/20/2012 - 10:57pm.

The Times has been repeatedly exposed as a haven for fraudulent journalists. Does anyone take their brand of reportage seriously anymore?

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

  • Login to post comments

No, butt it's

Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 04/20/2012 - 11:03pm.

No, butt it's entertaining.....

  • Login to post comments

The NYT

Submitted by grammajane on Fri, 04/20/2012 - 11:31pm.

is consumed with the Catholic's because it is the latest agenda of obama. When their hero makes a statement, the NTY runs with it. Anything to print/report except the stories about fast and furious, sylondra's failures, electric cars failure, obamacare failure, spending out of control, scandels, vacations, golf, czars, Bill Ayres and Jerimiah Wright.

  • Login to post comments

The NYT will never believe that

Submitted by richflanj on Sat, 04/21/2012 - 2:01am.

The Church does not answer to them, and does not care what they think. No sane person could possibly see the Pope fretting over an editorial in the NYT. He has to answer to a much higher authority.

Liberals are greedy. -- Me
  • Login to post comments

The NYT claims the Vatican would limit the nuns' charity work...

Submitted by ctyankee on Sat, 04/21/2012 - 9:27am.

Quote from the article above:

The Times frets that the move by the Vatican is "a misreading of the very fine work in schools, charities, prisons and impoverished neighborhoods being done by about 60,000 nuns across the nation." Really?

The real problem is when the State or Federal government dictates how the charities should be run. The State of Massachusetts passed a law that required all adoption agencies to place children with gay, as well as straight parents. That law would make it illegal to discriminate against adoptive parents based on their marital status or sexual preference. As a consequence of this law, Catholic adoption agencies would choose to close all operations in Massachusetts, rather than violate the moral teachings of the Church. Perhaps the radical nuns would favor placing children with gay adoptive parents, regardless of what the bishops rule.

A similar issue of government mandates could cause Catholic hospitals to close, rather than violate their Right to Life doctrine.

  • Login to post comments

When liberalism is your religion

Submitted by ohio granny on Sat, 04/21/2012 - 11:46am.

When liberalism is your religion you attack anything or anyone who openly disagrees with you. That is what the NY Slimes does, that is what democrats do. THAT IS WHAT LIBERALS DO.

  • Login to post comments

New York Times, typical hypocrites.

Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 04/21/2012 - 3:48pm.

Hay, New York Times, what happens to one of your "journalists" who violate the newspaper's "doctrine," also know as policies, like the policies regarding plagiarism? That's right: THEY GET FIRED!

Times, why is it that organizations such as yourself pride yourself for enforcing your own policies, yet seem to take great offense when a different organization tries to enforce it's own policies? Do you like being hypocrites or something?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
  • The folly of 'do something' liberalism (Patriot Update)
  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Oops! CNN Commentator Falsely Accuses Okla. State Rep While Trying to Score Liberal Points on Tornado
  • Sen. Whitehouse Blames GOP For Okla. Tornado, Storms, Rising Seas, Etc.
  • On Leno: Kids Ask Obama the Darndest Questions
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use