Anti-Catholicism still thrives at the Los Angeles Times, even though readers of the paper continue to call them on it. Last week, the Times published a smarmy op-ed by "humor" writer Barry Gottlieb ("That 'thou shalt not' list just got longer," 3/17/08). In addition to propagating the false story that the Vatican had composed a list of "new sins" (it didn't), Gottlieb mocked Catholic belief, ridiculed the sacraments, and derided the Church. In other words, it was just another episode of Catholic bashing at the Times.
Today (Thu. 3/20/08) - to its credit - the Times published three letters to the editor from readers who objected to the column's blatant bigotry. (I couldn't help but embolden some of the right-on points.)
This screed [Gottlieb's piece] insulting the Catholic religion is inexcusable. To publish this in a daily paper is an insult to every Catholic reader.
I dare Barry Gottlieb to write in this vein about the Muslim religion. He would be apologizing forever, and the Muslims would put a price on his head.
RAYMOND G. BOYD
Somis, Calif.+_+_+_+
I have a great idea for an Op-Ed article satirizing Judaism, making puerile fun of its history, traditions, beliefs and ceremonies. I think it's perfect for your editorial pages. What's that? You would never publish such a patently anti-Semitic screed? You would consider it unworthy of a major daily newspaper?
Then why did you give Gottlieb the space to make exactly such an attack on Roman Catholicism?
JIM MORAN
Alhambra+_+_+_+
If an article about the Anti-Defamation League, or the merits of the Israeli wall, contained a tenth of the smart-alecky vitriol of Gottlieb's, it would be decried as anti-Semitic.
MARIA ELENA DE LAS CARRERAS
Northridge
Bravo, readers. But this entire episode begs the question: Why was Gottlieb's article published in the first place?
This is not the first time readers have objected to such blatant anti-Catholicism at the Times (see "Reader Nails LAT Columnist for 'Ignorance,' 'Naiveté,' and 'Anti-Catholicism'" (NB, 8/13/06)).
We've also cited the Times for its anti-Catholic tilt several times before. (See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this.)
The words of Distinguished Penn State Professor Philip Jenkins continue to be ring loud and true: Catholic bashing is "America's last acceptable prejudice."
—Dave Pierre is the creator of TheMediaReport.com and a contributor to NewsBusters.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I *do* laugh at some jokes about Catholics
March 21, 2008 - 05:37 ET by sarcasmoBut none of this guy's stuff was funny. Dud after dud. The column seemed like a written, lefty-version of "NewsBusted."
JMR
A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.
More evidence that the only
March 21, 2008 - 06:31 ET by motherbeltMore evidence that the only groups in this country one can offend with impunity are Christians in general and Catholics in particular.
I suppose the Times thinks they've made it all better now, by publishing critical letters.
You're right, Mr. Pierre, they haven't learned, and they won't.
I ditto what you said, sarc
March 21, 2008 - 08:53 ET by motherbeltI ditto what you said, sarc (including the laughing at Catholic jokes). Thought I included that in my comment...guess I dropped it, in editing.
If gottlieb wasn't such a coward
March 21, 2008 - 07:25 ET by FastEdhe wouldn't hide the fact that he has a cartoon of the prophet on his backside - wonder why he doesn't tell anyone about that??
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Lefty (humorless) version of NB......
March 21, 2008 - 08:18 ET by connmanis a good way to describe that op-ed piece. Nothing new here, make fun of Catholics 'cause you can. I agree with the response letters from readers but, I wouln't expect the birdcage lining LAT to care about it. Gottlieb doesn't have the gonads to go after a real HATE religion, he'd have to constantly check for IED's as he drove his prius around town.
This town needs an enema! - The Joker
What a sad human being
March 21, 2008 - 11:05 ET by Tito of Custos FideiHe thinks he funny and popular because of the notoriety he is getting. He doesn't understand that he is doing harm to himself by continuing down this path by staining his soul with sin of hate and pride.
This tears down the soul by diminishing others through their genuine love of Jesus. Through their apostolic traditions of receiving the Eucharist, the actual body and blood of our Savior.
How does what he does make him a better human being? Does it draw him closer to our Lord and Protector? Does it contribute to the welfare of society?
He has absolutely no idea that what he is doing is bringing his soul one step further away from Christ. "Do unto others as they would have done unto you", Jesus said that what you do to the least of our brothers you do unto Me (Jesus).
Fortunate for him that Jesus is a forgiving God.
Let's pray he figures this out and repents.
I don't read that rag
March 21, 2008 - 12:45 ET by rbosqueI don't read that rag anymore. As this is Holy Week, I call on Catholics to pray for those who persecute us.