Medved on 'Redacted': 'It Could Be the Worst Movie I've Ever Seen'

  • Bookmark and Share

"It could be the worst movie I've ever seen" ... "[T]he out and out worst, most disgusting, most hateful, most incompetent, most revolting, most loathsome, most reprehensible cinematic work I have ever encountered." ... "It portrays the members of our Marine Corps in the most disgusting way imaginable." ... "This film is an atrocity. It is zero stars." ... "I honestly was close to vomiting when I saw the film." ... "It is a slander on the United States of America." ... "Everyone associated with this film ought to be ashamed." ... "Will it inspire future terrorists? Of course it will!"

That's prominent movie critic Michael Medved on the new film "Redacted." Lest anyone think that Bill O'Reilly's recent outrage over the film is an overreaction, Medved tells Bill, "It's worse than you think."

Johnny Dollar's Place has the must-hear audio.

The following is a partial transcript:

MEDVED: ... I am actually one of the few people in the country who has seen the new movie. It is called "Redacted" ... And let me just tell you, before I go to actually reviewing it: It could be the worst movie I've ever seen. I mean, the out and out worst, most disgusting, most hateful, most incompetent, most revolting, most loathsome, most reprehensible cinematic work I have ever encountered. This is having reviewing movies for more than 25 years. [It] covers a lot of disgusting ground, but none more disgusting than 'Redacted,' which portrays the Marine Corps, one of the finest organizations ever assembled by human beings, portrays the U.S. Marine Corps, as corrupt, vicious, racist killers and rapists ... (snip) ...

It portrays the members of our Marine Corps in the most disgusting way imaginable. They hang out in barracks, drunk or stoned, with Confederate flags all over the place. And the head Marine, who is the leading rapist and murderer, is a big fat guy, I mean, hugely out of shape, right - just the typical Marine (sarcastic) - Marines tend not to look like that - big fat guy, overhanging belly, cigar-chomping, loud-mouthed, sort of fair-complexion. His name is Rush. Nothing in movies is an accident. They're clearly trying to indict and smear Rush Limbaugh by saying that secretly he wants to rape and abuse 14-year old girls and murder them and then burn their bodies ... (snip) ...

The film is atrociously acted. It's incredibly badly done ... (snip) ...

Look, I never say this. I don't believe in boycotts. I don't. But I actually think Bill O'Reilly, I know has been going on about this movie even though he hasn't seen it. O.K. I've now seen it. Bill, Bill - hey. It's worse than you think.

This film is an atrocity. It is zero stars as far as I'm concerned. It's very much Rated R. I honestly was close to vomiting when I saw the film. I have seen a lot of unspeakable garbage in years and years of reviewing movies. Nothing quite like this. It is a slander on the United States of America. It is a slander on the Marine Corps. It is a slander on our troops. Mark Cuban, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks, paid for this entirely. Now he elsewhere has given money to support the troops. I know he has. He ought to be ashamed. Everyone associated with this film ought to be ashamed. I will never see a Brian De Palma film in the same way again. This is a veteran Hollywood director. What is he trying to do with this kind of thing? Will it inspire future terrorists? Of course it will! Because it portrays the United States troops in Iraq as sick, murderous, deviant losers.

Ugh. Do yourself a favor. Avoid De Palma and Cuban's piece of filth and trash. This Thanksgiving, go see "Bella." It's a nice, sweet film, and it's great.

—Dave Pierre is the creator of TheMediaReport.com and a contributor to NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bad is Good

It could be the worst movie I've ever seen.

Well we all know what that means - Hate America? check.  Hate Bush? check.  Hate the military? check.  Helpful to terrorists? check. Vile, disgusting, loathsome, misleading, incompetent? check.

Yeppers, we've got ourselves an Oscar contender here.

I think you're right

I think you're right Acumen. The producer will probably be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize also.

When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

LOL acumen... I posted

LOL acumen...

I posted the same about an Oscar....

Obviously I didn't read the posts first...glad we agree here, we will know by March.

We always agree BT

I posted the same about an Oscar....

It's as natural as breathing BT.  We know how Hollywierd plays. (BTW - Hollywierd 'works' seemed oxymoronic).

The whole point of the movie is...

The whole point of DePalma's movie is to incite jihadist Muslims in the Middle East and get as many American military men and women killed as possible. That's why he made the movie.

Yes, look how well the

Yes, look how well the false rumor about flushing the Koran down the toilet did; might as well make a movie for the same purpose.

/sarcasm

Enemy Propaganda

It should be considered as enemy propaganda, and the people who produced it should be prosecuted as traitors or terrorists.

Boycott fur sur

pump up the terror.. It will be a big hit in iran.

iranian uranium; iranian uranium, iranian uranium..

So when ARE the Russians going to finish the iranian atoms for peace power plant?

Wow

Let those two go live in Iran. I will never knowingly watch a De Palma film.

You watch this POS DePalma

You watch this POS DePalma and others get nominated for an Oscar for this treasonous piece of tripe.

If there was anyway possible to be able to prove that one, just one of our soldiers die because of this film and the purposeful inciting that it will do overseas we should try Cuban and DePalma for treason....I know it will never happen but I have had my belly full of the behind the scenes intentional attempt for us to lose this war against the enemy...from Hollywood to the filthy leftist politicians starting with Harry Reid.

Beyond despicable....all of them. 

bt, I'm sure if radical

bt, I'm sure if radical Muslims murder any of our soldiers, because of this movie, they will let us know. They are not shy about it; they will probably issue a statement saying it's in retaliation for the brutality of our troops.

This is sort of OT, but Mark Cuban, who financed this atrocity, was a contestant on "Dancing With the Stars." He was always smiling and pleasant, jaunty and jovial, a real "good time Charlie." Of course, most people watching probably had no idea what he had done. I knew, and it almost made me ill every time I saw him. I couldn't even watch him dance. Every week I hoped he would get kicked off.

I was never so relieved as when came in last and left the show.

Hi mb... Glad I don't

Hi mb...

Glad I don't watch Dancing with the Stars, I couldn't of handled knowing what that POS did and not go through the roof...glad to hear he came in last, like I hope his movie does.

Btw...Please give my family's gratitude to your son, may he stay safe and return home soon.

Thanks very much; I will.

Thanks very much; I will. Am anxiously awaiting his (and his family's)  return to the States next summer.

 

I don't know you or him

I don't know you or him personally, but God bless him and all the others like him.

What a sacrifice for all of us!

TV shows

When producers of a show put on people like that, I stop watching the shows altogether. I won't even give the show my viewing contribution. Sure I know one person doesn't matter, but it's my little way of speaking my peace.

I'm at the point where I've almost stopped watching TV altogether. I'll watch the news for an hour or so and maybe a ball game if I'm interested, but I stopped watching network TV ages ago. 

 

card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy

You're not the only one, Candance

I used to enjoy Dancing With the Stars, until they put Mark Cuban on it this season. I refuse to watch it anymore, even though he's gone.

Most of my TV time is spent with HGTV these days: no BDS, no Reid/Pelosi dog-and-pony shows, no MSM, just people decorating their houses & landscaping their gardens.

When I want to know what's going on in the world, I turn to the internet.

Chai

In explaining any puzzling Washington phenomenon, always choose stupidity over conspiracy, incompetence over cunning. Anything else gives them too much credit. Charles Krauthammer

Oh......I get it.....

...And the head Marine, who is the leading rapist and murderer, is a big fat guy, I mean, hugely out of shape, right - just the typical Marine (sarcastic) - Marines tend not to look like that - big fat guy, overhanging belly, cigar-chomping, loud-mouthed, sort of fair-complexion. His name is Rush....

I think they're projecting their own feelings onto Rush Limbaugh, favorite American radio host programmer.  Just the sort of sublety that Lifetime Network made-for-TV movies have.

They're clearly trying to

No subtlety, Scout:


They're clearly trying to indict and smear Rush Limbaugh by saying that
secretly he wants to rape and abuse 14-year old girls and murder them
and then burn their bodies. -
Michael Medved

Of course they will deny that's what they've done. They may not be actually saying that's a secret desire of his, but they are definitely trying to make a connection between him and the violence. I think they want to imply that the soldiers who would perpetrate this kind of brutality are probably conservatives who regularly listen to Rush.

As if the whole point of the movie wasnt' already bad enough....

Anyone remember The Day After Tomorrow's villain...

Anyone remember The Day After Tomorrow's villain in the White House?  Dead ringer for Dick Cheney, down to the bald head and wire-rimmed glasses.They think they are being cute and witty and intellectual, when they are only showing the majority of the nation how out of touch with the mainstream of the country that they are supposed to be entertaining.  They've stopped selling their product (their performances) to us and begun trying to force some other unwanted product on the American public.  If you like Whole Milk and then the store starts putting Butter Milk in the Whole Milk bottles and tells you that it's Whole Milk and you'll get nothing else from the store, it's time to start shopping somewhere else.  Ticket sales from the last 20 years prove this out.  They are panicking and this is the extreme left's only remaining recourse - propaganda for the Left.  They've all but given up on simply entertaining us.  They started feeling they had some right to use their position as an entertainer to preach to the rest of the country what values to have.  Unfortunately they, like many shallow philosophy holders, have underestimated the depth of the values of most Americans.  Leftist, libertine-ism, and neo-Marxism aren't any of those American values.  And the money, or lack thereof, not flowing into Hollywood shows this.The argument you always hear is that they are only giving America what the box-office says they want.  That is a lie because the ticket sales of G and PG rated family movies has dwarfed most R rated movies and has all but erased the anti-war movies that have come out in the late several years.  If they keep making anti-war anti-American movies that bomb financially, then it can only mean one thing if they keep making them - they have an agenda that we fly-over bumpkins just haven't bought into yet.  So they'll just keep pounding them out until the attitudes begin to change in their direction.  Propaganda 101.The Hollywood-ite attitude is very close to the attitude that the nobility of old Europe had towards the peasants, in times past.  They know what's best for the "people" even if the people don't want it.  It's partly our own fault for elevating Hollywood actors to the level of "American nobility" in our culture.  How else could this have played out in any other way? A bunch of egocentric, shallow, insecure, millionaires, who have more adulation and money heaped on them than they warrant, with very little to distract themselves from their sycophantic groupies; have an entire information industry built up around their every action and word, who then turn their inordinate amount of leisure time coupled with large sums of money to indulge themselves to no end, acquire a messianic attitude toward whatever their personal charity or cause is, and then feel that they must make everyone else feel the same toward that particular charity or cause.  Couple that with the deterioration of the news media into nothing more than news tabloidism that blends with the Hollywood tabloidism and politics tapping into the misplaced affection by voters of these Hollywood-ites and you have a small segment of the American culture with a huge amount of power over what information gets to the people and in what form.Read the Communist Manifesto and the Communist Goals (1963) [Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35] if you want insight into the political philosophies being pushed by these groups.  Also if you want to get a refresher in the true American Ideals rooted in the founding of our country, check out The Twelve Basic American Principles.  I wonder if any politicians these days know any of this directly?

"The moment you give up your principles and your values, the moment you laugh at those principles and those values, you are dead, your culture is dead, your civilization is dead. Period." - Oriana Fallaci

Evening Scout.... I just

Evening Scout....

I just read your post and agree with all of it...but you have me roaring with laughter with this line of yours....

....Just the sort of sublety that Lifetime Network made-for-TV movies have.

Isn't that the truth!

Excellent...just excellent. 

Actually,

Lifetime Network is so five years ago.  This brand of subtlety is more like ABC's Boston Legal, Desperate Housewives, Brothers and Sisters, and Grey's Anatomy.  The loathsome, overbearing, uncaring lout is always a conservative or Republican.

Just last week, on Grey's Anatomy, a bratty teen girl "prayed to God" and found that He would want her to be PomPom captain while the other  PomPom girl captain lay injured.  Thanks, ABC.  I'd've never been able to see that Christians are always selfish, loutish people without your keen insight and witty writing.

Nickelodeon

Last year there was a popular children's show on Nickelodeon, and they had an episode that featured a villain named Hal E Burton. Guess they wanted to train the kids young before they had a chance to know better. 

 

card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy

candance, Well that

candance,

Well that certainly fits in with the news that Linda Elerbee (sp) does for kids on that network. Disgraceful!

A couple days ago Pat

A couple days ago Pat Dollard had the displeasure of viewing this "piece of work" ...

http://patdollard.com/2007/11/17/politico-interviews-pat-dollard-on-redacted/

I cite Pat occasionally here at NB.  He is my prime source of war/Middle East/terrorist news ... rightly so.

Anyhow, in case you don't know, Dollard used to be a Hollywood insider ... and agent.  Left the posh, took his camera, and rode along with Marines during the early stages of the war.  (Soon to release his documentary "Young Americans").  I know one or two of you visit Dollard's site as I do.  He, and site side-kick Bashman, have been following this "Redacted"/DePalma/Cuban FUBAR for the last month or so ... and really giving it to them.

As for Marines ... While I am sure there are those Marines built like John Cena ... or even Limbaugh ... all the Marines I know are skinny, scrawny guys years away from their first high school class reunion. 

As for Limbaugh, I wonder if he'll even dignify this pond scum by addressing it on his radio show.

 

Someone above said it correctly ... DePalma will get an Oscar nomination out of this butchery.

Scarface

I never have understood critics in they always thought DePalma was a great director, but his movies were all psychos.

It was critics who made all these dolts from Sean Penn to the most Obama of actors in Tom Hanks. They give awards to the most putrid of films.

After praising Bono and apologizing for calling him a simpleton, sure enough next week he was back to being a bonehead.......so in that light no praise for Medved as while I appreciate his family virtue in loving America........he helped create DePalma and this film.

Look for this film to show up in Zawahiri's educational releases and on al Jazeera.

It is past time that when DePalma crying fire in a theater called Iraq AND THE FIRST US SOLDIER IS MURDERED that he should be indicted on conspiracy to commit murder in the first degree and if found guilty, lethal injected.
No one has the right according to the FBI to be a white racist spewing hatred that gets people killed. The same precident is for film makers who incite murder.

 

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Other opinions

Wonder what other critics will think. Wonder how they'll justify the character assassination of the US Marine Corps.

Liberals read Marx. Conservatives understand Marx

Why? I just don't

Why? I just don't understand why anyone would make a film like this, even someone from Hollywood. What can it do besides embolden the enemy and crush our morale? And Cuban's involvement is truly baffling.

WHY?

Indulgence

Have you seen the movie 'Scarface' with Al Pacino (directed by DePalma)? You may remember the scene where, just before the other bad guys come to kill him, Tony buries his face into a small mountain of cocaine. He doesn't just snort a little, or even a lot. He buries his face in it. It's pure indulgence, diving into the vice.

All of DePalma's movies have that theme - indulgence. Most of us resist the evil and vice that we see. Some people slip down a slippery slope, unable to prevent the fall. But some people turn around and plunge into it. They don't just stop resisting - they run towards the vice. They indulge in vice. This movie is supposed to be about the vice of violence, and the military indulging in it. Then we cover it up, embarrassed and ashamed of our own vice. Yawn.

The irony is that this film reveals, instead, DePalma's own indulgence in liberal Derangement Syndrome. It glories in anti-Americanism. It revels in the blood of it. It indulges its vice with orgasmic glee. It's a liberal, anti-American, anti-military, anti-adult fantasy.

This is one of those movies where attendance proves idiocy.

KC, you may find it

KC, you may find it surprising, interesing, or perhaps dubious, but I am acquainted with several liberals--and I suppose, if the term is very broadly defined, the label may also be fairly attached to me--yet not a single one of them, nor I, harbor even the slightest sentiment inconsistent with an unwavering love of this country and a profound respect for its military.

As such, it's especially distressing...galling...that this [reportedly] repellent piece of celluloid trash, aside from all of its other malignant influences, may serve to fraudulently "authenticate" the conservative vision of the stereotypical liberal--an America-hating, military-hating force of evil.  That is a fiction.  That is a lie.  DePalma's movie is indeed a sick fantasy.  But it is not "liberal".

Jer

    

kc, the BDS and blame

kc, the BDS and blame America first positions may not be yours, but check the evidence at this site. It appears you are outnumbered.

Now, some will say that they are part of a silent majority and do not agree with these positions. However, if those folks do not speak out when these Blame-America-Firsters take these positions, they cannot distance themselves from the positions later. Silence denotes agreement.

I suggest that all such patriotic liberals band together and excommunicate such folk from their ranks.

jmt
http://www.jmichaelt.org

jmt, I assume you were

jmt, I assume you were addressing me and not KC.  If so, I would invite you to review some of my previous posts.  I think you will find that I have frequently distanced myself from those "positions".

In fact the point I wish to emphasize is that those who occupy such positions are no more true liberals than far right extremists are true conservatives. 

Jer

Knowing liberals

Jer, relax. You don't need to defend liberalism, certainly not to me. But let's be real. DePalma's fantasy here is an excess, but it's not a conservative excess. This is what liberals who lose their minds fantasize is the truth.

Granted, liberals (the majority of whom haven't lost their minds) wouldn't agree to a syllable within this script. It's disgusting, and almost everyone knows it. The only ones who don't think it's disgusting are sick ... but this is what sick liberals think about. Sick conservatives have different kinds of fantasies, the characteristics of which I don't think deserve mentioning right now.

And I hope you weren't insinuating that conservatives just don't know any liberals. We all know that the country is cut roughly into equal thirds: liberal, conservative, and independent. It's not like each ideology lives in isolation (except maybe liberal ghettos like Hollywood, Manhattan, etc.). In the vast majority of the country, we all know plenty of liberals, and we all live and work together quite nicely. That should go without saying. Just because the audience of this site is predominantly conservative doesn't mean that the audience only listens to fellow conservatives. After all, the premise of this site is that we're all watching the media ... we all get a hefty dose of liberalism every day!

OK, KC...I've calmed

OK, KC...I've calmed down.  It's just that the whole "liberal" equals "military bashing America hater" is a real button-pushing issue with me.  I think all too often the "other side" brings out the big broom and carelessly sweeps us all--including Democrats and mainstream liberals--into the same pile of trash.

For example, check out the legislative record of Hillary Clinton [who I wish would drop out of the race] and note all of the pro-military, pro-veteran measures she has promoted, supported, and voted for, and yet she is constantly charged with "loathing" the military.

I don't have any idea what dePalma's politics are, but I consider him a radical kook.  (However, I am shocked and disappointed that Cuban underwrote this garbage.)

Finally, I was in no way suggesting that conservatives don't know liberals or interact with them.  I haven't even reread my post, but I can't recall writing anything that would have conveyed that impression.  If I did, consider it "redacted".  [I even hate the word now]

Have a good Thanksgiving.

Jer

[BTW, here in Georgia, politically, I am in the distinct minority and am bombarded with hefty doses of conservatism every day.]

Not a problem

The essence of all political theory is how to reconcile differences. Well, that means we all start with the assumption that we have differences. That's why we discuss it in the first place. We shouldn't be ashamed of it.

As for the military-bashing, or America-hating, image of liberals, well that same rule applies, I think. The vast majority of liberals don't think that way, but the loony ones do. After all, there's no question that Bobby Kennedy was a liberal, but not many people think Kennedy hated America. Of course, the classic case is George McGovern. He may have been the most liberal candidate America ever saw, but he was war hero, flying dozens of dangerous combat missions. So most of us don't think normal liberals hate America. It's the loony ones that worry us.

KC

Over the years I have seen "Scarface" ... A couple times in full ... most times post-chain saw in the motel shower scene ... {UGH!}

I do believe DePalma is privately into S & M ...

Anyhow, I have always gotten the impression "Tony" really wanted his younger sister for himself in that movie ... And I think she figured it out too by the end ... just before getting gunned down.

Sick. Sick. Sick.

Recently Time ragazine had

Recently Time ragazine had an article (their film critic, R. Corliss??) where Corliss wonders why American audiences weren't packing the cineplex to see Hollywierd's take on the Iraq conflict; Redacted and Lion for Lambs apparently got really sucky attendence.  Good!

Corliss doesn't get that Americans already know, ad nauseum, Hollywood's take on the Iraq war (or any other time America is in a war) and that they've just had it with the contrived anti-America, anti-Bush, anti-military propaganda, often marketted as "we- just- wanna- show- the- horrors- of- war..." (especially to you knuckle-dragging conservatives who just DON'T understand...) 

I certainly would never rely on Hollywood! for my historical or current event information unless I wanted the usual and customary blame-America-always view.  And I certainly don't need Hollywood to ever tweak my awareness about just how much hell war can be!

And why doesn't Hollywood EVER make a film about just how much hell is inflicted by our present enemy, the Islamic fascists? Convert or die; isn't that enough material to make a great war film and cast America rightfully in a good light?

Corliss also describes Michael Moore as a "NON-fiction director".  No comment.

Two reasons Hollywood will never make a Islamofascist film

One: Sitting in their energy-wasting giant mansions, they feel guilty about being well-off Americans and don't know how to deal with it.

Two (more importantly): No marine is going to show up at their house or at a red-carpet event to frag them.  Abdul will.  (Or rather, he would if that marine weren't there preventing it.) 

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."  - Sir Winston Churchill

A few of the elitist

A few of the elitist critics will enjoy this cinematic excrement, but this flushable material will end up in the bargain bin at Wal-Mart - along with De Palma's other memorable forays into serious filmateering - such as Bonfire of the Vanities or Femme Fatale.

I think I'll go watch Plan 9 from Outer Space.

Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell

The sequel will be of

The sequel will be of "American's Men's Crimes in Other Countries".

Or how about "Crimes of American Men in America."  

Or "Christian (or Jewish) Atrocities in America."

And the best would be "God's Atrocities on Earth." 

Cuban's Fortune

How many people complaining about this film will continue to buy Mavs tickets and line Cuban's pockets? Whining means nothing if you hand over cash while doing it. 

 

card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy

" Whining means nothing if

" Whining means nothing if you hand over cash while doing it. "

 BINGO!   And conservatives are great at doing just than, and then hand over the money.  We are the whining, complaining, masters.  And is why we are losing America.

We whine while the continue to advance and gain ground.  

"Oh look" they are advancing again.  Those *&^%$#  as we hide or run, allowing them to advance more.  They will incrementally make prisoners of us all, and in our ow homes, while we can continue whining on our computers.

Killing the enemy is the only solution, but alas, we don't have the cahones.  And our time and monies are spent in how many hundreds of blogs, while the Daily Kos and Moveon.org continues to be the dominant factor in politics.  And it's the politics that advance their political, social, business, legal, and judicial agendas.

When a hunting cat appears, the rat hides instead of gatherng a small army to attack and kill the cat.   So who is the real coward.  "Ask not for whom the bell tolls, for it tolls for thee." 

Boycott Redacted

For those who want to take some action this is the place to get involved.

candance, Mark Cuban is a

candance,

Mark Cuban is a big Indiana University fan, there is talk about him financing a new basketball arena...I graduated from IU, I would be very disappointed if that comes to pass.

Did anyone here happen to

Did anyone here happen to catch Laura Ingraham a few weeks past when she had a movie critic on that stated that 'Redacted' was in fact a "pretty good movie"? (I can't remember who it was) Laura let that slide and I have to say I was shocked, especially after everything I have read about that movie.

..as more and more

..as more and more Americans learn to hate Hollywood more and more.

You in Hollywood, have no idea the depths of our hatred of you,

I have come to wonder who I despise more Hollywood or the terrorist. The only difference is, that the terrorist want to kill Americantroops, and Hollywood wants to...

Make money while getting troops killed..

Maybe there is no difference..

Just murder with a profit...

I wish my keyboard had, like a nuclear key or something like that to show how mad I am about this.

 I can’t typewords vile enough for these people.

We need to remember to boycott “each any one and every one” connected with this movie (Forever!) Never work again..

I renamed my toilet De Palma, (if you are wondering,) I renamed my toilet paper, (Cuban paper.) 

Its one thing to blab on like OB, but this is serious, our men and women will be killed by some idiot that has watched this crap.  

The dictionary does not have words to describe what I feel for these people, but I give it a shot..

I can’t go to movies any less then “0”?!?! 

 

 

 

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

I looked on Mark Cuban’s

I looked on Mark Cuban’s web site and he is giving tickets to troops that were in the Guard in Texas.

I wrote the site and told him that either he is insane or off his meds..?

Here is a movie to get you killed or crippled, now would you like a seat up there with the other men in wheel chairs??

Were you feeling a little guilty, or..  are you feeling the heat you POS!

Treason: trea·son n

1.       violation of the allegiance owed by a person to his or her own country, for example, by aiding an enemy.

See also high treason

2.       betrayal or disloyalty

3.       an act of betrayal or disloyalty

 

I have a feeling that they will not post that one on the website.

 

 

 

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

Rabbit ears only gets us cBS

Rabbit ears only gets us cBS and a fuzzy pBS. Is Cuban the Mavs owner? Fans there should start a boycott-go get 'em O'R. Spoiled rich kid that made his jillions on their blood.

 Boy, does this make me hot. What are some of dp's other movies, not that we would watch them anyway. It is "Miracle on 34th St." season for us even though some school has banned a school outing to watch a live performance of it.

On Mark Cubans web site

On Mark Cubans web site called..Blog Maverick:

Mark writes:

Update Nov 12

The comments have become so moronic, I wanted to proactively say many, if not most will be"redacted" if they are not on topic and substantiative. I guess I should have expected this.

 

This movie is so far from being anti troops. You can't watch this movie without it smacking you across the face that the battles that come with serving our country are as much mental and emotional as they are physical. That the weight and burden of survival they must carry every minute of every day is incomprehensible . You cant watchthis movie without your heart going out to each and every service person who is put in harms way.

 

I recognize what the Director Brian DePalma set out to do . He wanted to make a movie about the horrors of war. He did it. He wanted to send an anti war message. Whether or not he accomplished that, will probably depend on your perspective before you saw the movie.

 

After these and a few other lines he puts upcomments, almost all in support, the few that are not are put up there to look like lunatics. Only one is posted that is well written and against his view. I personally have written 4 all un posted..

I put the link in so he can feel the love..

 

http://www.blogmaverick.com/2007/11/11/bill-oreilly-just-a-wonderful-confused-guy/3#comments

 

 

 

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

He's nothing but a wuss.

He's nothing but a wuss. He isn't allowing anymore comments on that particular posting and there are only 45 comments. I'm sure he got a lot more and just deleted them and blocked comments after that.

He is definitely feeling the heat if he is blocking comments, which proves that he is just a whiny baby. I did contact him though.

If guess if you can't beat

If guess if you can't beat 'em (here "you" = Mark Cuban) dazzle them with BS! 

 <<He (DePalma) wanted to send an anti war message. Whether or not he accomplished that, will probably depend on your perspective before you saw the movie.>>

Yeah! No s**t! But it will depend on your (our) perspective before you saw the movie???

Ain't this right out of the liberal playbook and manual of double-speak!  Blame it on the viewer, the audience, if someone doesn't like it or has a problem with the rot-gut propaganda!  It's the viewer/audience who is screwed up if someone just can't stand what he/she is seeing!  And DePalma is just an average guy who cares about the soldiers, isn't he!

So, in other words, DePalma was simply being objective and completely neutral when he made this swill that he calls a film? 

I could possibly believe that if DePalma now made another "anti-war" film about Al Qeda, Islamic Jihad, organized Islamic terrorism, and the other Muslim maniacs, graphically illustrating how they treat our soldiers, their own people, and how they're plotting to destroy freedom as we know it around the world.....and will succeed if we don't stop them!

If you're truly neutral and objective, DePalma, why not make a film showing the other side, or are you really just a slob who's afraid of offending the enemy?

 

Kudos to O'Reilly and Medved!!

Michael Medved has hit the nail on the head with his accurate review of Redacted. I am starting to discover Michael Medved, and he is my Numero Uno film critic. Forget Roger Ebert, Richard Roeper and Kenneth Turan, Medved is the best!!! However, I do disagree with his view on boycotts. I don't believe in boycotting old films from the 70s, but I woul never buy a Brian De Palma movie. If I find out one theater near me is showing  that steaming pile of crap known as
Redacted, I would go to that theater and carry a large prominent "SUPPORT OUR TROOPS" sign. I agree with Bill O'Reilly here.

P.S. I cannot wait for the upcoming August 2008 release of the live-action adaptation of Akira Toriyama's manga and anime masterpiece, "Dragon Ball"

"Kame-Hame-HAAAA!!!!!" - Son Goku, destroying Usama Bin Laden.

}}---> OReilly

I just heard the movie made a whopping $26,000 in its opening weekend.  How can we stop this tidal wave of public support? LMAO

I think the rape scene will be clipped out as documentary evidence to show Muslims in the sticks.