As unrestricted first-trimester abortions were being made legal in Mexico City for the first time this past April, the Los Angeles Times reported claims that "up to 1 million Mexican women seek abortions every year" and "thousands of poor women die every year" from illegal abortions. However, recent reporting reveals that the capital's public hospitals are now on pace to perform less than one percent of one million abortions in the first year of legalization.
By grossly inflating the number of illegal abortions and the deaths they caused, the Times has propagated abortion falsehoods yet again.
Staffer Hector Tobar has been covering the developments in Mexico for the Times. Back in March of this year, before the legalization, Tobar reported a claim from abortion activists that "about 1 million [largely illegal] abortions are performed in Mexico each year." In April, a Times editorial echoed the line: "It's estimated that up to 1 million Mexican women seek abortions every year."
Yet on Saturday (11/3/07), Tobar reported that in the first six months since abortion was legalized, "more than 3,400 women have received abortions at 14 of the capital's public hospitals."
Let's do some math. The 3,400 number covers the first six months since legalization. At this pace, Mexico City's public hospitals will perform about 7,000 abortions in one year's time.
Seven thousand is 0.7% of one million. Tobar and the Times apparently want us to believe that one million women a year used to seek out dangerous, costly, and (almost entirely) illegal abortions, yet now less than one percent of that number will have a "safe," legal, and free abortion over the same period of time in the capital's public hospitals? (Abortions from private clinics in the city are not factored here. But let's postulate that an equal number of abortions are performed there. That would raise the percentage only to 1.4%.) (Greater Mexico City is home to over 19.2 million people (2006 figure, source), and according to Tobar, 40 percent of the population of Mexico (total population: 108.7 million) is within a day's drive of the capital.)
The Times and Tobar have some explaining to do.
In his recent story, Tobar even acknowledged that many of the illegal clinics have closed. "[L]egalization is bringing a profound, if quiet, change to the way thousands of women lead their lives," beamed the gleeful Tobar.
In addition, the Times also appears to have flagrantly exaggerated the deaths from illegal abortions in Mexico. The April editorial from the Times stated, "Thousands of poor women die every year because of black-remedies and back-alley operations." In March, before the legalization, Tobar reported, "According to studies here, about 2,000 to 3,000 Mexican women die every year of complications from illegal abortions." In Saturday's article, Tobar pumped up this figure: "According to one estimate, more than 3,500 women died from botched abortions each year." Tobar did not bother to tell us where his "one estimate" came from.
Yet the Times's and Tobar's claims seemed to be debunked by the Mexico's Health Ministry. According to a March 2007 article in the New York Times, "At least 88 women died in 2006 from botched abortions, the Health Ministry says, though it is far from clear that all cases were reported." So we have an official number of 88 ... versus ... an unidentified "one estimate" of 3,500. (To be fair, in the March article, the same one in which he used the "2,000 to 3,000," figure, Tobar also cited a pro-life activist later in the piece who "said the number of women who die in botched abortions nationwide each year is less than 100." But Tobar has omitted this figure in a number of articles since then.)
Not cool, LAT. We've reported in the past on the LA Times's problems in reporting the abortion issue here, here, here, here, here, and here.
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+
**NOTE: In the interest of brevity, I have posted only a portion of this criticism of the Times's coverage. For the full article, go to my personal site, TheMediaReport.com. Cheers.**
—Dave Pierre is the creator of TheMediaReport.com and a contributor to NewsBusters.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Botched Aborticide
November 6, 2007 - 11:33 ET by Lame CherryAmazing how the LA Times NEVER NOTICED 88 CHILDREN CERTAINLY WERE MURDERED and their trusted mothers simply passed away for making the choice of dispatching a child instead of being a mother IN THEIR SEXUAL CHOICE.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
the left is absolutely
November 6, 2007 - 11:59 ET by TruthMongerthe left is absolutely passionate about killing babies - i just don't get it...
Partner with Islam and the NB respect police:)
They are thoroughgoing
November 6, 2007 - 12:15 ET by mattmThey are thoroughgoing hedonists. Having a baby gets in the way of their good time. They believe they should be able to have sex without consequence or responsibility - and still retain their right to reproduce, if they see fit.
To them, fetus is not a highly complex, unique and fully human organism, it's just a blob of random proteins. They are self-absorbed, self-centered, self-indulgent reprobates "whose god is their belly..."
We're all sinners, but some of us aren't pleased about that, others indulge in it.
Human Sacrifice
November 6, 2007 - 12:44 ET by deerjerkydaveFrequently abortion is just human sacrifice to the gods of convenience.
"abortion is just human sacrifice to the gods of convenience"
November 6, 2007 - 12:52 ET by vrwc13Reasons for abortions
In 2000, cases of rape or incest accounted for 1% of abortions. Another study, in 1998, revealed that women reported the following reasons for choosing an abortion:
92% = convenience...sad very sad indeed...
v
That 1%...
November 6, 2007 - 13:04 ET by Clear thinkerWhy is it that the baby has to suffer the punishment in the cases of rape and incest? The baby had nothing to do with the crime!
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
the baby is ALWAYS
November 6, 2007 - 13:12 ET by TruthMongerthe baby is ALWAYS innocent:)
Partner with Islam and the NB respect police:)
This is how they further
November 6, 2007 - 11:55 ET by mattmThis is how they further their agenda - falsehood, which is what media bias actually is.
Dont Let Facts
November 6, 2007 - 12:56 ET by deerjerkydaveDon't let facts get in the way of a good liberal story. Do you remember the article written by Bill Press last year based upon a completely fabricated story on Presidents and their IQs. It was truly a laugh fest because it exposed liberals in the information industry. They will print articles based on false information as long as it supports their liberal view of the world. They don't even bother to check their facts because the information has to be true since it coincides with they already "know" to be true in their bleeding hearts! Where is objectivity? Tony Snow got it right the other day, big media journalists need to learn to question their own opinions, and not just those outside of their framework.
Liberals used to be known for their ability to question authority. Today they have shifted so far to the left that they even disgrace the word liberal. Lately people have been coming up with new names for liberals. Progressives is one. I have a suggestion, how about "Cool Aid Drinkers". When Matt Lauer starts to even ponder the possibility that global warming might not be man made will be a great day in journalism. This will likely happen when the equator freezes over.
That's similar to when
November 6, 2007 - 14:45 ET by motherbeltThat's similar to when feminists went around saying that 150,000 women die every year from anorexia; when the actual number is less than 100. But what the heck, what does accuracy matter when you're trying to make a point?