If the increasingly conventional wisdom that the Netroots movement is now the driving force behind today's Democrat Party is true, than a look into their actual agenda for America is something voters considering supporting Democrat politicians in 2008 might want to take a very close look at. It's posted by Chris Bowers at Open Left and looked at in plain terms, is substantial and should give conservatives and Libertarians cause for concern.
Below are just some bullet points from the larger plan.
You think the "Fairness Doctrine" is bad, you haven't seen anything yet:
Reversing Corporate Media Consolidation. Using improved ownership regulation of American media to help destabilize the impact of the Republican Noise Machine, and create a more diverse, responsive national media, is another key progressive feedback loop.
It includes a neo-colonialist movement to expand Liberal political clout in Congress and goes well beyond simple voting rights for DC:
Colonial Reform. Perhaps I am using overly provocative language to describe this one, but granting full congressional representation to those areas of America not current represented by full voting members in Congress would be a big step forward for progressives. - anti-Republican strongholds in D.C. and Puerto Rico, but should also include territories like Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa. These are not places that are particularly friendly to the values of the conservative movement, and granting them equal representation within their own country would expand progressive and Democratic power long-term.
An attempt to shift as much money as possible out of the private business sector into the hands of politicians who could then dole out those monies in the form of entitlements to enlist an ever growing amount of support:
Re-locating government spending....De-funding the conservative economy, and re-locating spending in programs Americans won't want to give up, such as universal health care or cheaper, clean energy investment, would to at least some extent shift the economic balance of power away from conservatives and toward progressives.
How about opening the gates to voter fraud, illegal aliens and criminals, is that really in the best interest of most hard-working, law-abiding Americans?
Voting Reform. Same day voter registration, the end of felony disenfranchisement, and secure voting mechanisms will all help increase voter turnout in ways that favor progressives.
Providing union organizers with the ability to circumvent elections, all but mandating unions in work places that might not otherwise accept them?
increase union density and collective bargaining power in America. Union members are much more likely to support progressive economic policies, and to vote Democratic, than other non-union workers
If the above isn't enough to concern you, read it all. Take a look at the real Democrat vision for America. If you're a freedom loving conservative, or Libertarian, it might be even more frightening than you imagined. And they'll look for their pals in the media to implement it for them.
—Dan Riehl is a blogger and journalist. Read more of his work at Riehl World View.














Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Hmm, nothing about real
October 11, 2007 - 20:47 ET by GregEHmm, nothing about real solutions. All about handing out goodies and altering population representations. Typical liberal strategies.
"Using improved ownership
October 11, 2007 - 20:57 ET by Nortonalec"Using improved ownership regulation of American media to help destabilize the impact of the Republican Noise Machine, and create a more diverse, responsive national media, is another key progressive feedback loop." CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC...did I leave something out?
Nortonalec
Fascist or Socialist?
October 11, 2007 - 21:02 ET by philhoeyMakes no difference - the result is the same - centralization of power to a few self-appointed elites. Everything that Thomas Jefferson feared. People really need to read Pres. Jefferson's writings.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
"If the above isn't enough
October 11, 2007 - 21:12 ET by well99"If the above isn't enough to concern you, read it all. Take a look at the real Democrat vision for America. If you're a freedom loving conservative, or Libertarian, it might be even more frightening than you imagined."
It isnt just about conservative or libertarian.I dont care any dem/rep,lib/con seeing that has to be outraged.It is about some communist yutts trying to control people's lives.It is about power and those yutts are trying to take it.Those people are out of their collective minds.It is amazing that they would actual put that up on a website.
Man, that's one scary
October 11, 2007 - 22:59 ET by Gary P JacksonMan, that's one scary manifesto. Turning our Congess into something equivalent to the British House of Lords, really takes the cake.
They also want to do away with the Electorial College! This comes up ever election season. I think the Founders were brilliant by creating our system of election a President.
It has to be all hands on deck this time. This will be the toughest fight we have ever faced. We have to elect a President, and fight back the entire left wing machine!
I still cant believe they
October 12, 2007 - 00:00 ET by well99I still cant believe they posted this.The hubris just trips me out.I hope Fox puts this out.It really give Americans a look at these so called progressives.Good job Newsbusters and Dan on shining the light on these cockroaches..
I noticed the
October 12, 2007 - 12:53 ET by misterbee241I noticed the socialist/progressives/liberals had no problem with the Electoral College when Slick Willy won twice after only getting something like 43% of the popular vote.
If you truly want to see the end of this great republic, just vote democrat.
well... Reading that
October 12, 2007 - 12:36 ET by Clear thinkerwell...
Reading that reminds me of the "45 Communist goals for America".
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
Listen Up!
October 11, 2007 - 21:45 ET by BarkerIt makes one wonder why Democrats are now supporting the terrorist surveillance program, which they have been falsely describing as "spying on Americans". Imagine the Leftists gaining complete power, and using the program against their "enemies", ie anyone who disagrees with their socialist agenda.
I went and read some of the
October 11, 2007 - 21:48 ET by alamojbI went and read some of the comment to that article. These people are truly scary- social engineering. It reminds me of the Bulgarian Tour Guide I had a few years ago who described how the Communist moved most people from the country to the cities in Bulgaria when they took over.
boo
October 11, 2007 - 21:56 ET by the mad poleJust in time for Holloween. When they get to my door, I'll pull a Cushing/Price move on them. We cut more than taxes mmhahhahahaha
progressive
October 12, 2007 - 09:07 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsSo this (look at this gem):
"Article 5 is the amendment that addresses how future amendments are to
be made. Inexplicably, they specifically singled out this one issue as
something that cannot be amended. So until we discard the
constitution, we are stuck with a fundamentally unequal legislative
body."
is what the progressive Hillary believes in. Please shout it from the rooftops.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
I thought we are
October 12, 2007 - 11:16 ET by MivvisA constitutional republic not a direct democracy. That would be chaos. The comments on that site are what really scares me.
Mivv... Say
October 12, 2007 - 12:39 ET by bigtimerMivv...
Say What?!
ROFL...surely you jest?
B T
October 12, 2007 - 14:27 ET by MivvisGot this from Wiki, not the best source I know. The user comments on that open left site seemed like they wanted a mob rules democracy. Just my layman's .02
Constitutional Republics are a deliberate attempt to diminish the threat of mobocracy thereby protecting dissenting individuals and minority groups from the tyranny of the majority by placing checks on the power of the majority of the population.[1] The power of the majority of the people is checked by limiting that power to electing representatives who govern within limits of overarching constitutional law rather than the popular vote having legislative power itself. John Adams defined a constitutional republic as "a government of laws, and not of men."[2] Also, the power of government officials is checked by allowing no single individual to hold executive, legislative and judicial powers. Instead these powers are separated into distinct branches that serve as a check and balance on each other. A constitutional republic is designed so that "no person or group [can] rise to absolute power
Mivv... I have to run,
October 12, 2007 - 14:33 ET by bigtimerMivv...
I have to run, but I took it by your above post that you were against a Constitutional Republic...which is what we are or supposed to be anyway, not if the leftist have their way they have done adn are doing everything they can to destroy our country and have complete socialism.
I may have taken how you posted or I read it wrong.
I'll check back later.
B T
October 12, 2007 - 14:44 ET by MivvisI'm all for a constitutional republic. I sometimes not so good.....in...writing....stuff.
Cheers :-)
scarey thing ...
October 12, 2007 - 12:29 ET by pmohbuckthis is the type of thinking that gets people thinking like ... timothy mcveigh. peddling extremism (right or left) always breeds more from the opposition ... a vicious cycle.
Back door to the Fairness Doctrine
October 12, 2007 - 16:03 ET by Number20HomeDepotChevySay what you will about the Lefty nutroots, but they're organized and their slimey. They're sneaky, too.
I've done some work with the NAB, and we've gaurded them from trying to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine. But they know that is dead. So, they're trying to reinstate it through backdoor channels like "media reform." They say they're fighting agaisnt "media consolidation," but we know what they're up to.
Just keep an eye out when you hear them mentioning these words. Before we know it, CNN will have to officially change it's name to Clinton News Network.
#20homedepotChevy... Have
October 12, 2007 - 16:09 ET by Clear thinker#20homedepotChevy...
Have you gotten your shots yet?
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html