Essay: The Media Aren't Talking About Health Care's Lost Jobs and Crushing Taxes

  • Bookmark and Share

What’s hidden in health care reform that you haven’t heard about? Plenty. Without a news media interested in questioning the contents of the legislation, how could you know about the punitive taxes and job-killing provisions lurking in it?

My clients in the restaurant industry alerted me to the House bill’s mandate that all restaurants and retail establishments that are part of chains, franchise groups or multi-brand groups of more than 20 outlets be required to prominently post accurate calorie counts for most food items sold – including items on salad bars and buffets or self-serve counters.

Maybe this seems “healthy” on its face, until you consider the costs, the legal liability incurred in getting inaccurate information and posting it, the competitive disadvantage foisted on businesses with 20+ outlets vs. those with 19 or fewer, and the broader point of health care reform being used as means of creating new and expansive regulatory activity and interference in our lives.

(Incidentally, should you happen to own 20 restaurants, I advise shuttering the least productive one or ones and putting the staff on the unemployment rolls immediately. If you were thinking of investing in opening another restaurant and creating jobs, don’t.)

The Senate bill includes a tax on elective cosmetic surgery procedures. Does it on elective cosmetic dentistry procedures? Or on massage therapy chosen for general “feel good” stress relief vs. injury rehabilitation? Of course, it’s intended to only “tax the rich,” as are most of the new taxes created by the Senate bill.

But women might note how much revealed in past week is aimed at their gender: a tax on cosmetic surgery; the panel recommendation that that life-saving diagnostic tests could best be postponed by a decade and then done less frequently. Democrats appeared hither and thon blathering about too much testing causing unnecessary anxiety and unnecessary, costly surgeries. It reminded me of the head of Health and Human Services’ fairly recent opining about seniors getting scooter-chairs at Medicare’s expense, when they could just walk.

These are just two examples, one targeting restaurants, bakeries, cookie stores, popcorn stores, convenience stores, coffee shops, movie theater snack counters, etc.; the other targeting cosmetic surgeons and the hoity-toity, rich women who waste money on wrinkle removal, when that cash could go to feed starving urchins or fight global warming. These are not the only two, in those 2,000 pages or so in each bill – 4,000 total; and climbing. Countless special interests are favored. Countless specific businesses, products and services and consumer choices are singled out for discriminatory, punitive taxation or costly, burdensome regulation.

Never mind that the government demonstrates daily its incompetence at administering the regulations already in place, or the responsibilities it already has – evidenced by the hundreds of millions of dollars of fraud pervading the present government health care program, Medicare. Forget about the rats and filthy conditions found in the veterans’ hospital right there in Washington, D.C., under their noses, which most have already forgotten. It was a big news story, briefly. Ignore the fact that Bernie Madoff pulled off his scam in a heavily regulated industry. Don’t give a thought to the government’s inability to control the U.S. border … Need I go on?

Regrettably, mainstream media has not made dissecting these bills its mission, to itemize each and every individual target, tax, created power.  

Here then, in general, is what is hidden in the House and Senate’s versions of health care reform:

1. An impossibly complex collection of new rules, regulations, and entirely new bureaucratic boards and committees empowered to make up more rules and regulations after the fact – creating a crushing avalanche of unfunded mandates to state governments and untold new costs to hospitals and doctors’ offices, and other affected employers, thus killing jobs. My admittedly unscientific, common sense, K-Mart calculator deduced estimate of the jobs slaughter is at least 5 percent to 15 percent of all in the private health care sector.

2.  Myriad attempts to suppress the consumption of health care, now that the government and not the private sector will be paying for it. President Obama himself has accused doctors of unneeded operations, of taking out Tommy’s tonsils when a cough drop might do, and said that Americans get too much health care, that more is not necessarily best. Translation: you’re going to get less. Starting with seniors and women.

3. More direct and concealed new taxes than you could read off a teleprompter in a month. For example, there will be the equivalent of a value-added tax (VAT) on medical devices, with a bureaucrat at liberty to decide what might be a medical device.

They have made this clear: they are determined to get a bill passed (and their media friends are determined to help them). Any bill. No matter how poorly constructed, how incomprehensible, how expensive, how destructive, how laden with unknowns. They so desperately want a win, they’ll sacrifice anything for it. Integrity. Sanity. The economy. Your life.

Dan Kennedy, a contributor to the Business & Media Institute, is a serial entrepreneur, adviser to business owners, sought-after speaker and author of 13 books. More information about Dan can be found at www.NoBSBooks.com, and a free collection of his business resources including newsletters and webinars at www.DanKennedy.com.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This bill indeed creates way

This bill indeed creates way too much new government.  But I ask what else do we do to get health insurance companies to stop ripping us off, forming monopolies, and denying people coverage based on bs? 

we need the republicans to address those issues while opposing obama care, not just opposing it.  

and about the "taxing the rich" part  we as a country need to start paying some taxes. we need to cut spending and raise taxes to start paying off our outrageous debt. we cannot continue to leave these debts on our childrens childrens children and put things on our credit card. 

the founders said that taxes are necessary  to make sure one generation pays off its debts and does not pass them on. How are we going to do that if we keep cutting taxes on the rich and everybody and letting huge corporations exploit loopholes in the tax system and hide profits off shore?  i run a small business, i don't have that luxury.

You don't understand

You don't understand anything about taxes, do you? An example -- my taxes increased. So I quit buying things. When I don't buy things, people are out of work. But when my taxes were lower, I felt empowered to make purchases -- of things I wanted. Stores were glad to have my business. I left tips, and paid extra for exceptional work -- because I could afford it.

Taxes aren't the problem. We already pay too much. It's the spending. It needs to be slashed. Not cut -- slashed.

__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song

so how do we get out of

so how do we get out of debt? borrow our way out? print more money and further destroy the dollars value? 

I understand taxes fine, i don't like them at all, but republicans act as if taxes are evil when our founders thought the opposite, especially when your country is at war and massively in debt. 

what's a fair amount of taxes that every body should pay? i don't know myself, but I do know cutting taxes and increasing spending like Bush did is as irresponsible as anything the lib obama is doing.  

You're almost sorta half

You're almost sorta half right.  Increasing spending on frivolous stuff is not a good idea, but it's interesting you fret about Bush's spending when Obama and his minions spend twice as quickly.
Do you not understand that tax revenues are increased by lower taxes? When taxes go up, business slows down and the government doesn't generate as much tax revenue with entrepreneurs sitting on their money. With lower taxes, business booms, and the government makes more money.

edit: due to own unresearched hyperbole.

i DO have a problem with

i DO have a problem with obama's spending, i was just asking you the reverse. 

I've seen data both ways on that. cutting taxes is good, but only on the people who spend the money. ie the middle class and small business.

I think when we give the rich a cut too they sit on it and i think thats why dems support a death tax, which is essentially a double tax. and the big corporations have already enjoyed tax shelter in complex loopholes for years.

I do not have a phony address in the caimans  for my business. 

It's the whole "I know

It's the whole "I know what's best for you" attitude of today's communist/liberal/progressive. Why be surprised? Communism and socialism is also just like that -- only the common man has any rights; everyone else must be punished, lest some unequal outcomes sneak into the system. The people who put this bill together are indistinguishable from communists. Their goals are the same, down to the last letter.

BTW, my wife tells me of a typical result in guv-run nutritian programs. The guv gives out vouchers for poor people to use to feed their kids. Vouchers for cans of fruit, beans, etc. One of the new vouchers was for loaves of bread. But only 18-ounce loaves. They're not good for any other size. The problem? No one makes 18-ounce loaves of bread. They're all 16-ounce. So the coupons are worthless. Stores can't honor them. The kids go hungry.

What caused this? Some guv beaurocrat made a decision without first checking the facts. And his decision is final. No appeal. No recourse. The way around this was, in this case, to get the stores to re-tool their bakerys to make special 18-oz loaves of bread. Which costs more. That the guv now has to pay for. But this is very, very typical. What the guv touches, becomes instantly inefficient and costly.

__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song

Chicken production

That reminds me of a story I heard many years ago about how the Chinese communists wanted more chickens to feed their people. A bureaucrat decided the way to increase the production of chickens was to raise the temperature for hatching eggs. This would reduce the time for producing new chickens.

You can guess what the result was.

 

Conservatives outnumber Liberals 2 to 1 per Gallup

further evidence

the utter lack of commentary in the MSM about Obamacare is just further evidence that they are ignoring their journalistic imperative and looking the other way, for just plain selfish purposes-- some don't necessarily have a hidden agenda-- some of them simply want to keep certain perks-- such as White House press passes!

<sound of duct tape ripping off roll>

the House bill’s mandate that all restaurants and retail establishments
that are part of chains, franchise groups or multi-brand groups of more
than 20 outlets be required to prominently post accurate calorie counts
for most food items sold – including items on salad bars and buffets or
self-serve counters.

But....but...but.... if it keeps just ONE PERSON from becoming obese and having health problems, it's worth it!!!

Isn't that their line when they want to force things down our throats?

Of course, that all goes by the wayside when they talk about  Americans getting "too much health care."

THEY will decide how much is too much!

They have made this clear: they are determined to get a bill passed
(and their media friends are determined to help them). Any bill. No
matter how poorly constructed, how incomprehensible, how expensive, how
destructive, how laden with unknowns. They so desperately want a win,
they’ll sacrifice anything for it. Integrity. Sanity. The economy. Your
life.

And THAT is the money graf!

How about this study?

http://www.warroom.com/article.php?artID=10442

Doesn't ANYONE ever look at past studies before they legislate this do-gooder junk?

"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."


G. W. F. Hegel

I did not read the bill

I did not read the bill, but then I did not need to. Any Bill that is over 20 to 100 pages long by default contains too much wordage to be understood and is also a bad bill. More words do not make a good bill they only make more government. I leave it to experts in deciphering the doublespeak contained in these bills to keep me informed to the details. I just communicate my outrage to Sen MAry Landrieu that she could even vote for cloture on this outrage of a bill which I am certain she has never read herself and does not understand the implications of it.

The "RESET" button needs to be pressed on healthcare and then a smaller stepped approach needs to be taken and not a general overhaul which I would not support no matter which party supported it.

Rich, I read the bill --

Rich, I read the bill -- both bills (Senate and House). You're right about the words. I had a difficult time understanding all of it. But I can tell you this -- there is just enough confusion that it will lead to multiple interpretations. I think they did this on purpose to leave the barn doors open.

For example, there is one section in the House bill that mandates every child born in the U.S. will either have health insurance, or be put on Medicaid. This allows all children born of illegal aliens to automatically, and permamently, be placed on the public dole. Then there's another, more confusing section in the Senate bill that says that adults can't be placed onto Medicaid unless their children are on it. To me, both sections combined allows the illegal alien parents of all children born in the U.S. to get health insurance. This is what I call "the back door", even though there is explicit language in the Senate bill to prevent health insurance from being offered to illegal aliens.

And I'll bet that this interpretation is exactly what the authors of the bills intended.

__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song

They want accurate calorie and nutrition info?

If that is what they want, then let them post it at HHS or some other Federal Nanny Office.  As far as accurate info, it will be as accurate as "Cash for Clunkers" in saving energy or the "Stimulus" is in creating jobs in non-existent Congressional districts.

Or maybe we should get a health bill that either costs what it does or all Congressional members (and President Obama) who vote for it will resign and refuse to take their retirement or their health care?  You can bet that this will never happen.

"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."


G. W. F. Hegel

Why should they talk about

Why should they talk about it?  They know we'll just lie down and pay whatever they tell us to.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.

The media doesn't care about lost jobs and crushing taxes

All they care about is doing everything possible to aid Obama in carrying out his coup.

-Dave

Our elected representatives have failed us.  

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.