Post/NYT: 182,000 Words on Occupy Wall Street and Counting
Occupy Wall Street isn’t just seizing city squares or the Brooklyn Bridge. The socialist/communist/anarchist revolutionary movement has also seized an incredible amount of coverage from the adoring media.
In the nation’s two most well-known liberal newspapers – The New York Times and Washington Post – the amount of space devoted to Occupy Wall Street has taken on epic proportions. In the nearly six weeks since the Sept. 17 launch of the left-wing movement, the two papers have written a book-load of stories mentioning OWS totalling more than 180,000 words. That comes to 224 stories and opinion pieces, not counting letters to the editor.
To put 180,000+ words in context, the U.S. Constitution has about 4,543 words. The Post and Times have already written more than 40 times that in just 40 days of coverage. The Bible’s Book of Genesis, which detailed how long it rained during Noah’s time on the ark of 40 days and 40 nights, contained only about 38,000 words.
For the numerically inclined, the Post and Times wrote more than three words per minute for 40 days. That’s in an in era where every newspaper complains about limited staff and space in the paper. Or, based on #OccupyArrests on Twitter, about 66 words for every one of the 2,750 arrestees.
But it’s not just how many words, it’s the fact that they are so positive. For example, the Oct. 23 Washington Post had at least five different news and feature stories highlighting Occupiers – including two stories that led the Arts section and a front page piece of propaganda pretending similarities between the Occupying revolutionaries and Tea Partiers. “Who knew? Tea partyers, Occupiers find kinship.”
Inside the paper, the Arts section led off with two front page stories under the huge headline “Revolutionaries.” A movie review of the flick “Margin Call” even invoked Occupy Wall Street.
Breaking it down, the Times published a remarkable near-90,000 words in the news sections on the revolutionary movement. It added about 24,000 in the opinion section. The Post had just 44,000 words in the news sections and another roughly 24,000 in opinion.
- Dan Gainor's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Not sure what your standard is ...
Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 8:46am.
... in determining whether an article in either of those two newspapers is about the Occupy protests. You say, "the two papers have written a book-load of stories mentioning [Occupy Wall Street]".
If we're going by articles that just mention something, we can type in "tea party" in NYTimes.com's search engine and get 10,000+ results.
Wow, that was lame.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 8:58am.
224 stories on OWS in just over one month doesn't seem a little suspicious?
How long has the Tea Party been around?
Okay, let's cut down our search of NYTimes.com's search engine
Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:09am.
When you search "tea party" in NYTimes.com's search engine for the time period of Feb. 1, 2010 to Mar. 1, 2010, I get ninety-six results. These are articles with titles such as:
"POLITICAL NOTEBOOK: At Tea Party Meeting, Looking to Forge a Full-Fledged Movement"
"A Young and Unlikely Activist Who Got to the Tea Party Early"
"Convention Is Trying to Harness Tea Party Spirit"
"Palin Assails Obama at Tea Party Meeting"
Or my personal favorite ...
"Stars and Gripes: Tea Party Protests Captain America Comic"
Knock yourself out, Flyboy.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:12am.
We'll pretend that none of those TP stories were hit pieces.
Dan Gainor wrote:
Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 8:58am.
"A movie review of the flick 'Margin Call' even invoked Occupy Wall Street." And here's a May 14, 2010, The New York Times review of "Robin Hood" that mentions the Tea Party.
http://movies.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/movies/14robin.html
Oh yeah Icarus
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:05am.
No sarcasm towards the TEA party in that review, none at all.
I think it's been proven
Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:13am.
that there is nothing to see in this NewsBusters post in regards to the number of stories written about Occupy Wall Street. The New York Times and the Washington Post mentioned Occupy Wall Street in 224 articles. So what?
Proven by whom?
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:18am.
You? That's a laugh. Put your blinders back on and get back under your bridge, the sun is about up.
Proven by me, of course.
Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:23am.
Using the exact same logic as Mr. Gainor's post here, I can say "The New York Times mentioned the Tea Party in ninety-six stories over an approximately thirty day period. See how conservatively biased in favor of the Tea Party they are".
224>96
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:24am.
Math and Logic fail?
224 is the NYTimes and WaPo combined
Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:28am.
Splitting them evenly would be 112 articles about Occupy Wall Street from The New York Times. I did a thirty day search instead of the biblical forty days that Mr. Gainor mentioned, so that's why Occupy Wall Street gets slightly more than the Tea Party.
A 30 day NYtimes search comes up with??
Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:31am.
358 results. So I was wrong. 358>96.
"Pressure from below (mobs) Pressure from Above
Submitted by lrgon on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 2:26pm.
the "above" pressure is the establishment press and education institutions which coordinate this force from above and below to force congress to do what the pressures groups want congress to do.
The objective is the complete destruction of the present system with a one world socialist system.
Jan Kosak, years ago wrote a book explaining this strategy of incorporating pressure groups to use as a political strategy. Alinski also used this formula in his street agitators books for radicals.
The idea was to force change in governments by combining street demonstrations with positive media coverage of the streets mobs. The book available on Amazon is titles "And not a Shot is Fired". But to be really successful the sympathy for mobs grows in the mind of the public if a few are killed (martyred for the cause) as was the case at Kent State or the Poor People's March.
http://www.amazon.com/Not-Shot-Fired-Jan-Kozak/dp/189264701X/ref=sr_1_sc...