Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 21, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Dan Gainor's blog
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About
  • WashPost 'Express' Tabloid Cover Laments: How Can Obama 'Break from the Storm' of Scandals?
  • It Gets Worse: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
  • Crowley to Obama Advisor: 'Why Didn't the President Just Say, Yeah, Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack?'
  • CBS's Sharyl Attkisson Says Team Obama 'Perfected' Delaying Info Release And Has 'Quit Talking to Me Altogether'
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled

Post/NYT: 182,000 Words on Occupy Wall Street and Counting

By Dan Gainor | October 28, 2011 | 08:30

A  A
Dan Gainor's picture

Occupy Wall Street isn’t just seizing city squares or the Brooklyn Bridge. The socialist/communist/anarchist revolutionary movement has also seized an incredible amount of coverage from the adoring media.

In the nation’s two most well-known liberal newspapers – The New York Times and Washington Post – the amount of space devoted to Occupy Wall Street has taken on epic proportions. In the nearly six weeks since the Sept. 17 launch of the left-wing movement, the two papers have written a book-load of stories mentioning OWS totalling more than 180,000 words. That comes to 224 stories and opinion pieces, not counting letters to the editor.

To put 180,000+ words in context, the U.S. Constitution has about 4,543 words. The Post and Times have already written more than 40 times that in just 40 days of coverage. The Bible’s Book of Genesis, which detailed how long it rained during Noah’s time on the ark of 40 days and 40 nights, contained only about 38,000 words.

For the numerically inclined, the Post and Times wrote more than three words per minute for 40 days. That’s in an in era where every newspaper complains about limited staff and space in the paper. Or, based on #OccupyArrests on Twitter, about 66 words for every one of the 2,750 arrestees.

But it’s not just how many words, it’s the fact that they are so positive. For example, the Oct. 23 Washington Post had at least five different news and feature stories highlighting Occupiers – including two stories that led the Arts section and a front page piece of propaganda pretending similarities between the Occupying revolutionaries and Tea Partiers. “Who knew? Tea partyers, Occupiers find kinship.”

Inside the paper, the Arts section led off with two front page stories under the huge headline “Revolutionaries.” A movie review of the flick “Margin Call” even invoked Occupy Wall Street.

Breaking it down, the Times published a remarkable near-90,000 words in the news sections on the revolutionary movement. It added about 24,000 in the opinion section. The Post had just 44,000 words in the news sections and another roughly 24,000 in opinion.

  • Stock Market
  • Wall Street protests
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Dan Gainor's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Not sure what your standard is ...

Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 8:46am.

... in determining whether an article in either of those two newspapers is about the Occupy protests. You say, "the two papers have written a book-load of stories mentioning [Occupy Wall Street]".

If we're going by articles that just mention something, we can type in "tea party" in NYTimes.com's search engine and get 10,000+ results.

  • Login to post comments

Wow, that was lame.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 8:58am.

224 stories on OWS in just over one month doesn't seem a little suspicious?

How long has the Tea Party been around?

  • Login to post comments

Okay, let's cut down our search of NYTimes.com's search engine

Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:09am.

When you search "tea party" in NYTimes.com's search engine for the time period of Feb. 1, 2010 to Mar. 1, 2010, I get ninety-six results. These are articles with titles such as:

"POLITICAL NOTEBOOK: At Tea Party Meeting, Looking to Forge a Full-Fledged Movement"

"A Young and Unlikely Activist Who Got to the Tea Party Early"

"Convention Is Trying to Harness Tea Party Spirit"

"Palin Assails Obama at Tea Party Meeting"

Or my personal favorite ...

"Stars and Gripes: Tea Party Protests Captain America Comic"

  • Login to post comments

Knock yourself out, Flyboy.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:12am.

We'll pretend that none of those TP stories were hit pieces.

  • Login to post comments

Dan Gainor wrote:

Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 8:58am.

"A movie review of the flick 'Margin Call' even invoked Occupy Wall Street." And here's a May 14, 2010, The New York Times review of "Robin Hood" that mentions the Tea Party.

 

http://movies.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/movies/14robin.html

  • Login to post comments

Oh yeah Icarus

Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:05am.

No sarcasm towards the TEA party in that review, none at all.

  • Login to post comments

I think it's been proven

Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:13am.

that there is nothing to see in this NewsBusters post in regards to the number of stories written about Occupy Wall Street. The New York Times and the Washington Post mentioned Occupy Wall Street in 224 articles. So what?

  • Login to post comments

Proven by whom?

Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:18am.

You? That's a laugh. Put your blinders back on and get back under your bridge, the sun is about up.

  • Login to post comments

Proven by me, of course.

Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:23am.

Using the exact same logic as Mr. Gainor's post here, I can say "The New York Times mentioned the Tea Party in ninety-six stories over an approximately thirty day period. See how conservatively biased in favor of the Tea Party they are".

  • Login to post comments

224>96

Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:24am.

Math and Logic fail?

  • Login to post comments

224 is the NYTimes and WaPo combined

Submitted by Icarus on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:28am.

Splitting them evenly would be 112 articles about Occupy Wall Street from The New York Times. I did a thirty day search instead of the biblical forty days that Mr. Gainor mentioned, so that's why Occupy Wall Street gets slightly more than the Tea Party.

  • Login to post comments

A 30 day NYtimes search comes up with??

Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 9:31am.

358 results. So I was wrong. 358>96.

  • Login to post comments

"Pressure from below (mobs) Pressure from Above

Submitted by lrgon on Fri, 10/28/2011 - 2:26pm.

the "above" pressure is the establishment press and education institutions which coordinate this force from above and below to force congress to do what the pressures groups want congress to do.

The objective is the complete destruction of the present system with a one world socialist system.

Jan Kosak, years ago wrote a book explaining this strategy of incorporating pressure groups to use as a political strategy. Alinski also used this formula in his street agitators books for radicals.

The idea was to force change in governments by combining street demonstrations with positive media coverage of the streets mobs. The book available on Amazon is titles "And not a Shot is Fired". But to be really successful the sympathy for mobs grows in the mind of the public if a few are killed (martyred for the cause) as was the case at Kent State or the Poor People's March.

http://www.amazon.com/Not-Shot-Fired-Jan-Kozak/dp/189264701X/ref=sr_1_sc...

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Leno: It’s Gotten So Bad for Obama Fox News Changed Its Slogan to ‘See, I Told You So!’
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • The Guardian Glamorizes New ‘Assault on Wall Street’ Movie as Justice
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use