The Britney Effect: Oops, The Media Did It Again -- GDP Up 1.9%

Photo of Dan Gainor.

Keeping with the tone of the political campaign, the media are in full Britney Spears mode. To quote the pop tart, "Oops, they did it again." It, this time, is the economy. The mainstream media continue to be wrong about the U.S. economy.

The 2nd Quarter Gross Domestic Product numbers came out Thursday morning and the economy continued to grow, this time at a stronger pace than last quarter - 1.9 percent.

As many pundits point out, the economy has to actually recess for there to be a recession. That hasn't stopped the media, who have in many ways never stopped talking recession since we escaped the last one.

This year it has been worse, with regular references to "recession" or even "depression." These days, "depression" may be how journalists feel about their own industry. But they continue to be wrong about the economy.

Let's see how Marketwatch.com described things this morning:

"Boosted by stimulus checks from Uncle Sam and a big drop in imports, real growth in the U.S. economy accelerated in the second quarter to a 1.9% annual rate, the Commerce Department reported Thursday."

Note the word "accelerated." Now try finding that attitude in the network broadcasts.

The broadcast networks reported that America's finances were "like a house of cards" earlier this year. ABC, CBS and NBC even hyped similarities to the Great Depression more than 70 times in the first six months of 2008.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

To all the non-economists

To all the non-economists out here....GDP of +1.9 is not negative. Unless they changed the definition and the rules this is not recessionary contray to the MSM and the dems.....

Will not say that it's not tough out here, but....a far cry from armageddon and shanty towns

Recession is their story,

Recession is their story, and they're stickin' to it!

Tomorrow's NYT headline: GDP Rises, Despite Recession

 

Obama's theme song

That's f'ing awesome!!!!!!!

That's f'ing awesome!!!!!!!

but ya see "real people"

but ya see "real people" don't care about these GDP numbers or whatever

alls they see is only 2 cars in the garage instead of 3, only 4 TV's instead of 6 (maybe only 2 or 3 big screen digital!), having to keep the pool temperature down to 65 instead of 85, having to get their brand new clothes at Target instead of Macy's...

PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING OUT THERE:(! 

it's worse than the great depression, it's worse than cave man days 

I know TM, it's awful. I

I know TM, it's awful. I wanted to get another Tivo for the guest bathroom next month but I simply can't afford it now. They're stuck with extended satellite for now.

[/sarc]

Sometimes it's just too

Sometimes it's just too easy....

I predicted that for tomorrow...before I saw today's headline:

G.D.P. Grows at Tepid 1.9% Pace Despite Stimulus

They are sooooo predictable!

Obama's theme song

 

Boosted by a nice big shot of heroin

The addict felt quite a bit better for a while...Sorry, I'm not buying it.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

It's Worth Noting That...

It's worth noting that we have finally had a quarter of negative growth.

Revised estimates of Q4 2007 show a contraction of 0.2%.

GDP contracted by 0.2 percent, on an annualized basis, in the last
three months of 2007, according to annual revisions released by the
government.

Of course, since we had two quarters after that of positive growth, we never entered a recession. Unless Q1 2008 is revised downward later. Even if that happens, the relatively strong growth of Q2 2008 seems unlikely to be revised downward enough to be a contraction (frankly that's true of Q1 as well), so either the recession never happened, or it's most likely over.

Defining Recession Downward

It's possible that Q1 GDP could be revised downward, thus showing two negative quarters in a row.

However, the unemployment rate in Q4 (2007) and Q1 (2008) never exceeded 5.5%, so that would have to rank as possibly the most shallow recession in history. 

Recession redefined

Here's how Rex Nutting of Marketwatch described his glee this morning regarding the revision (emphasis mine): "It's a common (but mistaken) belief that a recession is defined by two consecutive quarters of negative GDP.

The actual working definition is "a significant decline in economic activity lasting more than a few months," usually seen in GDP as well as monthly data on job growth, income growth, industrial output and business sales. All four of the monthly indicators are flashing recession signs".

Rex Nutting is a liberal of the worst sort -- I think's he's been (like Obama) inserting prayer messages into the wall for years praying for a depression. Anyway, how can this man suddenly re-define recession without sourcing his definition? He just throws something out there that suits his purpose, and expects everyone to bow down and agree to it. What an arrogant snob.

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

Geez, isn't it obvious already?

The media will emphasize and/or ignore whatever is necessary to help democrats/liberals and/or hurt republicans/conservatives. This pattern has been going on for decades.

When the right is in power, it makes no difference what economists or statistics say, they will harp on the negatives. If nothing else, when by all objective criteria, the economic numbers are flying high, they can always locate some extreme anecdotal case, where a single mom of 12, living on welfare can claim to have been hurt by something the right supposedly has done.

By contrast, when the demo are in power, everything economic is light and beauty, regardless of what the facts are. Remember the real recession at the end of the Clinton era? The left is still claiming it didn't happen, and twisting everything they possibly can to prove it.

This will continue as long as the left maintains an iron grip on the Main Stream Media. It will get worse if an Obama administration manages to pass the so-called "Fairness Doctrine".

Exactly, Geo...

I loved the juxtaposition of the AP's headlines on Exxon and the GDP.   In both instances, there was a record high number that was a bit lower than expectations.  Exxon Mobil:  "Biggest Profit Ever"; GDP Growth:  "Misses the Mark."

Ooops... Now the AP will

Ooops... Now the AP will have to refer to growth as a Reverse Recession!

That way they can still get recession into the headline.

As in: "Democrats attack Bush for presiding over worst reverse recession since 1990s!

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

You mean negative recession.

That way they can get two negative words into the title.

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

cf -- ha ha. Good

cf -- ha ha. Good point.

Women and minorities hardest hit.

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

Not the point, but...

You *paraphrased* Britney, not quoted her. :)

Courics Lead Tonight

"Americans were shocked today to learn that births of Bassett hounds in the U. S by Ceasarian section have soared during the Bush adminstration. This dangerous procedure is up an alarming 8% since the Clintons left the White House. Dog lovers everywhere are calling for change!"

Difference of Opinion is what makes a Horse Race

Current AP headline on Yahoo...

Economic rebound not as energetic as hoped for

But I think that was a typo and was supposed to read --

Economic rebound more energetic than hoped for

Inlflation and Purchasing Power

The average working person doesn't judge the economy's health by GDP stats but by his or her purchasing power.

Judging by purchasing power, the economy is down. Material prices are up by 70% and the costs are beginning to be passed on.

We are technically correct to say we are not in recession, but if you want your candidates to win, you have to address the real issue.

And the real issue is inflation, and it is growing at a very unhealthy rate.

and how does a canidate tame

and how does a canidate tame or control inflation? with monetary policy? wrong, that's the Fed that does that? with fiscal policy? wrong that's congresses job. the pres can indicate which and what policies he/she wants but  can not just snap their fingers and it's gone. i do now that raising taxes is not the way to go.

it's up to congress,

it's up to congress, currently in control of the....

.....ummmm, what's the name of that political party again?

starts with a d...

dunce-o-tards?

demon-rats...?

the one with that "historic" lady....Nina? Natasha...?

and that land swindler from nevada...henry? hagar...? someone help me out here

No Boooosh recession...

One more quarter of growth and a recession/depression cannot be named after Boooosh, it'll belong to whomever is elected in Nov. if it comes.  Like the old country song says:  'Ain't that a shame' .  Give it the MMalkin  BWAHAHAHAHA

 New cure for high fuel prices, "put some air in your tires". B Hussein O. It works for him, but he uses hot air to blow his snow jobs.

 

 

Old, Retired and glad of it.

If you look on the next

If you look on the next page of Obama's script, that's where he tells us to take off the sweater Jimminey Carter told us to put on when we were fed the tripe that absolutely, positively, "the science is done", Global Cooling hysteria/energy crisis has doomed us all. ;+}.

I'm going to save my sweater, though, for the next Global Cooling/energy crisis the eco-Marxists are hatching this very moment in some maggot-infested faculty lunchroom. Should be due real soon. Maybe next Tuesday.

The major media report only half the news. Why are they surprised they have only half the potential audience?