So much for that Code of Ethics promoted by the Society of Professional Journalists. The group undermined its own code by holding an entirely eco-friendly session on climate change.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told a group at the 2007 Washington, D.C., conference on October 4 one of the things that made the SPJ great is its Code of Ethics. But the code didn't come into play during the hour-long October 5 program at the convention entitled "Climate Change Affects Every Beat."
The event had three panelists: Larry Evans, managing editor of Daily Environmental Report; Judi Greenwald, director of innovative solutions at the Pew Center on Climate Change; and Michelle Moore, vice president for policy and public affairs at the U.S. Green Building Council.
"We need help from journalists to explain to the public what is at stake and how we are going to be able to move forward," Greenwald said. "And I guess finally is to where I could use some help is on cap and trade because cap and trade is what we're talking about doing as the centerpiece ... Unless the public really understands how it works and why we need it, we're going to be in trouble, so I could use some help from people who do communication with normal people for a living to explain this and explain why this is the way forward."
However, when the panel was confronted with the question of maintaining the balance between reporting the news and playing the role of advocacy journalist, Greenwald offered the standard talking points.
"I think the facts are actually quite compelling," Greenwald said. "We advocate one thing, but a lot of what we do is just report the facts ... A lot of scientists worked on that question [if global warming was just natural] and did very sophisticated analysis that are sort of hard to explain because a lot of it is about pattern analysis and if you look at the pattern of global warming and try to find some sort of explanation, the only explanation that actually works for it is the greenhouse gases."
SPJ's Code of Ethics, already scarce in the media's climate coverage, includes among its stated principles:
- Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting.
- Support the open exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.
- Examine their own cultural values and avoid imposing those values on others.
The Code was published on page 24 of the SPJ program guide.
—Dan Gainor is director of the Business and Media Institute.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Nice to see them admit it.
October 5, 2007 - 15:15 ET by danboThough I've realized for a long time. Most members of the media aren't really journalist. Rather they're advocates. But it's nice to see them admit it.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Anthropogenic warming the Democrats path to Socialism
October 5, 2007 - 15:30 ET by TheTruth“. . .A lot of scientists worked on that question [if global warming was just natural] and did very sophisticated analysis that are sort of hard to explain because a lot of it is about pattern analysis and if you look at the pattern of global warming and try to find some sort of explanation, the only explanation that actually works for it is the greenhouse gases."
Oh really? How about the relation between the sun and temperature. . .
SUNSPOT LENGTH TO TEMPERATURE GRAPH
Al Gore and the anthropogenic global warming worshipers claim temperature follows C02. The truth ice samples show that C02 follows temperature by about 800 years which completely blows out of the water all claims by Al Gore’s con job that global warming is man made. This is also the same reason that Scientists are leaving the IPCC.
Is global warming caused by the buildup of greenhouse gases or by solar activity?
Anthropogenic global warming the Democrats path to Socialism
I like this part "A lot of
October 5, 2007 - 15:34 ET by Dan The Man 2I like this part "A lot of scientists worked on that question [if global warming was just natural] and did very sophisticated analysis that are sort of hard to explain because a lot of it is about pattern analysis and if you look at the pattern of global warming and try to find some sort of explanation, the only explanation that actually works for it is the greenhouse gases." because it sound like BS and smells like BS and I bet it goes down like BS. These are journalists and should be in the business of explanations and the person trying to explain it is in the business of promoting it so there should be a more comprehensive explanation.
I think she just stepped in it.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Code of ethics?
October 5, 2007 - 15:26 ET by zoro7957..............we don't need no stinkin ethics...............
They claim they can't wear
October 5, 2007 - 15:43 ET by danboThey claim they can't wear a flag pin on a lapel. Because they have to be unbiased.
They have to be critical of the war and America.
Global Warming however.....
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
When she asks for help in
October 5, 2007 - 15:26 ET by bassndudeWhen she asks for help in speaking to "norman people", is she saying she cant talk to us because she is to smart, to good, or just to stupid?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Lotsa open-mindedness there....
October 5, 2007 - 15:47 ET by mattmIt used to be that to the MSM balance equaled 3 Libs versus 1 Conservative. Now it's 3 to 0.