During June 30th's "Larry King Live," Robert F. Kennedy Jr., senior attorney at the National Resource Defense Counsel, made a head-turning statement regarding subsidies to the oil and coal industry, and not a single panelist challenged him on it. Not that one would expect King himself to do it; however, the other panelists included Chevron's David O'Reilly and ABC's John Stossel. Relevant portion of the transcript follows:
JOHN STOSSEL, ABC'S "20-20": I think a lot of it is silly. I think we have an energy policy in America and the world and it's called the free market. When oil is above 100 dollars a barrel, coal, as he's saying, becomes viable. We don't need Washington to do it. It's a fatal conceit to say the politicians can lead this. Higher prices will lead to alternatives.
Story Continues Below Ad ↓KING: How do I put coal in my gas tank?
STOSSEL: You won't have to. They'll refine it and make it into oil.
KING: They'll do that?
STOSSEL: Yes. Governor Schweitzer can tell you all about that.
KING: You're not troubled then by five dollars a gallon?
STOSSEL: Of course I'm troubled. It seems a little excessive when it costs twice that in some countries. I think these oil companies are heroes. Think what it takes to bring this stuff to us, across an ocean, refine it into three types of gasoline, put it in trucks that cost 100,000 dollars each, ship that to gasoline stations that have to have this expensive equipment so we don't blow ourselves up pumping our own gas. It still costs less per ounce than the bottled water they sell at some of these gas stations.
KING: David, makes you feel good?
O'REILLY: That's nice to hear someone on our side.
KING: Robert, would you elaborate a little what you said a little earlier about offshore drilling and going over seas with it?
KENNEDY: One of the points Mr. O'Reilly made and Mr. Stossel has made a lot is that it's safe for us to drill offshore. Chevron is the biggest producer of oil in Cook Inlet in Alaska and it dumps billions and billions of gallons of highly toxic production waste every year into Cook Inlet. It has contaminated the salmon stocks. It has contaminated the beluga whales. We have the technology to reinject those wastes, but they're not doing it. Now, they're saying we should open up Florida and we should open up California and the offshore places there, and we're going to do it right.
The other point I would make is what John Stossel is saying, a free market would be good. We don't have a free market in the energy industry. Everybody knows that. We give a trillion a year in subsidies, direct and indirect subsidies, to oil, and somewhere near a trillion dollars to coal. We also -- nuclear energy is also highly subsidized. If we had a real free market that does what a market is supposed to do, which is to reward good behavior and punish bad behavior and inefficiency, wind, solar, geothermal and tidal would easily triumph in the marketplace. You would see them immediately taking over the marketplace. The biggest impediment is these huge subsidies we're pouring into incumbents.
Two trillion in subsidies to oil and coal ... out of a total federal budget of $2.9 trillion? Obviously, his figure is highly suspect; Kennedy, as one would expect, must be invoking the most liberal of "interpretations" regarding the term "subsidy." For instance, in this report from the International Center for Technology Assessment, we see the only possible avenue for Kennedy to get close to a one trillion dollar figure -- and that is by including the [very nebulous] "environmental, health and social costs" of U.S. gasoline reliance.
It takes a lot of verbal stretching to label such costs even an "indirect subsidy," and the study itself notes that "the total dollar value is rather difficult to quantify." But hey -- it's RFK Jr. Let's just take his word for it.
(h/t to NB reader Steve S.)
—D. S. Hube is an educator and a member of the National Association of Scholars. He blogs regularly at The Colossus of Rhodey.














Editor at Large

Comments Policy
is that report for real?
July 1, 2008 - 18:36 ET by mbuel"these external costs total $558.7 billion to $1.69 trillion per year"
So "oil" costs half of the US budget? These numbers seem _highly_ suspect.
especially with nebulous statements like this:
"Approximately $39 billion per year is the lowest minimum estimate made
by researchers in the field of transportation cost analysis, although
the actual total is surely much higher and may exceed $600 billion."
so an environmentalists said it costs that much in damage so that's included in Gasoline's "real cost"?
Ted Kennedy's number is even more ridiculous, but this report is completely hilarious.
Liberals' numbers don't
July 1, 2008 - 21:15 ET by motherbeltLiberals' numbers don't have to add up, or make sense. They just throw them out there for shock effect, and by the time you realize they don't make any sense, they are long gone.
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
Drive By
July 2, 2008 - 00:56 ET by River CityHence the reason for Rush's use of the term "Drive By Media". Kennedy just lobbed a drive-by attack and the media went along for the ride.
"Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality--the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind." Ayn Rand
"Obviously, his figure is
July 1, 2008 - 18:44 ET by ckc1227"Obviously, his figure is highly suspect;"
Everything he says is highly suspect.
Silence From Chevron Deafening
July 1, 2008 - 18:45 ET by CaringwhiteguyThat little Bobby made an outrageous claim regarding subsidies to the oil industry is to be expected. It's been his MO for years.
However the silence from Chevron's David O'Reilly is puzzling at best and troubling at worst. Maybe I'm too much of a cynic, but it may be that O'Reilly did not want to be dragged into a debate about exactly what subsidies Chevron DOES receive. Perhaps silence was better than telling Bobby and King's dinky listening audience an actual number (direct or indirect).
Cook Inlet?
July 1, 2008 - 19:06 ET by i b squidlyThe Exxon Valdez dumped 53 million gallons. How does Jr amoritize billions a year from that? How does such a bitter, mendacious creep get air-time? Oh, it most be the Kennedy mystique.
First, kill all the lawyers.
-Wlm Shakespear
"Chevron... dumps billions
July 1, 2008 - 19:08 ET by Republic1"Chevron... dumps billions and billions of gallons of highly toxic production waste every year into Cook Inlet."
Really? Several BILLION gallons of highly toxic waste would turn the area into an environmental wasteland, devoid of life. Kennedy is pulling figures from his own methane outlet. But then he is a liberal, so facts aren't important.
"Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him." -Muhammad
"Methane outlet"
July 1, 2008 - 19:39 ET by nkviking75"Methane outlet". LOL! I love that line. Mind if I use it?
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
nk, I do believe everyone
July 2, 2008 - 00:36 ET by Republic1nk, I do believe everyone uses it at some point ;-)
"Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him." -Muhammad
To give an example the
July 1, 2008 - 19:59 ET by Dave DTo give an example the entire US beer industry produces about 5-10 billion gallons of beer a year. (So billions and billons of waste is in the same neighborhood.)
Of course he's the guy that had that "supur seecrit" report about evil pharmceutical complex poisoning people with vaccines.
Speaking of Beer
July 1, 2008 - 20:54 ET by bigpapaI watched some show on the history channel about spirits and beer production...
I can't remember the actual amount (maybe one of you can) but just one distillery produced like 200 million tons of CO2 from fermentation a year or month etc...
Why aren't the enviroidiots all over them?????
A kENNEDY AND THE tRUTH?
July 1, 2008 - 19:14 ET by ChasvsOnly by mistake would the TRUTH ever cross the lips of a Kennedy!
externalities yada yada yada
July 1, 2008 - 19:19 ET by PaarlEvery Bloody word that a Kennedy says has direct externaliities that aren't covered by the taxes those losers/liars/theives pay......the policies advocated by the methane bloated Teddy has cost this country plenty...anyone care to add up the direct and indirect costs of the Great Society and his Inmmigration Act of 1965???
Also..I have never heard a comment about the Kennedy Bothers "Two Step"..One, Dumb Robert, is advocating shutting down all oil..coal and gas production while the other ..Ugly Joe .. is in the oil biz with the Fart Chavez in Venezuela....this coming winter the hoi polloi are going to freeze in New England with heating oil at 5.00 per gallon and the Kennedys will be selling heating oil at a big mark up from Chavez's discoubnts that the Kennedys get from old Fart Face...What a scam....the Kennedy's always find new ways to screw the country while making out like the bandits they are....
Paarl of Rhodesia
I think a lot of it is
July 1, 2008 - 19:19 ET by dscottI think a lot of it is silly. I think we have an energy policy in America and the world and it's called the free market. When oil is above 100 dollars a barrel, coal, as he's saying, becomes viable. We don't need Washington to do it. It's a fatal conceit to say the politicians can lead this. Higher prices will lead to alternatives.
LOL, this is why I like John, he get's to the point.
Uhmmm John, the politicians don't like the alternatives that industry would cost effectively give us like coal oil. Yes, the conceit is that politicians believe they are smarter than the rest of us and exercise the power of government to meddle in business. The results of that conceit is shown in the price of gas and the rising cost of food due to their supreme stupidity of ethanol. So how many people are being hurt by their helpful meddling?
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
coal becomes viable
July 1, 2008 - 19:30 ET by Paarlanyone care to comment on why coal liquification a la SASOL in South Africa has not come to market with such expensive oil
Anyone care to comment?? BTW South Africa supplies 50%
of its liquid fuel needs from coal liquification.
Paarl
I believe the answer to that
July 1, 2008 - 21:22 ET by dscottI believe the answer to that question is oil at $70/barrel,
http://www.post-gaze...
Someone else says it's lower.
At capital costs of $700 million for capacity of 10,000 barrels/day and a 30-year life, operating costs of $15/barrel and current coal costs, breakeven for a coal-to-liquids plant in the US would be in the range $39-44 a barrel, assuming no tax incentives.
http://www.moneyweek...
The reason why liberals hate coal to oil and will block it at every opportunity:
Liquefied coal emits twice as much carbon dioxide as burning oil, so countries looking to limit greenhouse gas emissions may have to find alternative carbon trading mechanisms to offset the damage caused by CTL technology.
http://www.mediaclub...
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Race to brazillion
July 1, 2008 - 19:22 ET by Cool ArrowI'm waiting for the first mention of a quadrillion dollars. Now that's real money.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE
lotto
July 1, 2008 - 20:41 ET by ort777Once the lotto gets that high, I'll buy a ticket!
Gov. Palin on the condition of Cook Inlet
July 1, 2008 - 20:08 ET by nkviking75Here's what Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said about the condition of Cook Inlet last August when the federal government was considering adding the Cook Inlet beluga whale to the endangered species list:
I am especially concerned that an unnecessary federal listing and
designation of critical habitat would do serious long-term damage to
the vibrant economy of the Cook Inlet area. Hundreds of
thousands of people who live in this area know that we are taking
excellent care of the environment and habitat there. For example,
annual salmon runs in recent years are higher than they were when the
beluga population was larger, in the 1970s. This wouldn’t be possible
without effective conservation efforts.
Somebody is lying about Cook Inlet. I doubt it's Gov. Palin.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
The New style
July 1, 2008 - 20:12 ET by americaneagleThis must be "the new math" that everyone talks about! We have a budget of nearly 3 trillion dollars and we spend 2 trillion of that on oil and coal subsidies? If that were the case, where is all the money for Medicare, Medicaid, and the welfare system (stamps, checks, etc.) coming from?
Lord it must be good to be a Kennedy: no pesky anchoring in reality is a requirement!
Other Segment
July 1, 2008 - 20:34 ET by Gat New YorkThere was another segment to that panel discussion when they spoke about offshore drilling. Once again Kennedy made up talking points but the Chevron CEO ws clearly frustrated and countered Kennedy and made him out to be a ignorant fool (which he is).
RFK Jr. cannot be taken seriously. He acts psychotic and presents false facts to get his point across.
The gall
July 1, 2008 - 21:10 ET by Eileen Right"wind, solar, geothermal and tidal would easily triumph in the marketplace." As long it's not within ANY Kennedy's view or their personal sailing area (you know the Atlantic).
Side Trip
July 1, 2008 - 21:21 ET by Agrarian-DecentralistThe article begins, "During June 30th's "Larry King Live," Robert F. Kennedy Jr., senior attorney at the National Resource Defense Counsel...."
That would be Natural Resources Defense Council.
And rather than taking a sidetrip to talk about where Kennedy got his figures, why not grapple with the point he is making---that the American energy industry is hardly a sterling example of a free market?
I look forward to the day
July 1, 2008 - 21:31 ET by jefflebowskithat I never have to see another Kennedy politician...if it ever comes. What is it with that family? What is it with Massachusetts?
Jeff Lebowski
www.angrywhitedude.c...
You're right A-D, but not
July 1, 2008 - 22:01 ET by jdhawkYou're right A-D, but not for the reasons that you or Kennedy state.
The facts are that the oil and gas industries are one of the most highly regulated industries in the United States. They answer to the lowliest burgh all the way up to the federal government in every aspect of their operations.
They spend billions complying with the red tape that is involved in these over exercised government entities and agencies.
Additionally, they contribute more to the tax base at almost every level where they operate than any other industry.
Exxon alone sends 30 billion dollars + each quarter in corporate taxes to the federal government. When you add up the local, county, and state taxes this industry pays and that of its employees and all the companies that contribute to making it possible for you to "fil'er up" you can see that they must contribute a huge percentage of the total taxes collected in the United States.
The oil and gas companies of the United States make it possible for Americans to have and maintain the luxury and ease that is the envy of the world.
Wasn't Pol Pot and Agrarian
July 2, 2008 - 01:25 ET by NL207Wasn't Pol Pot an Agrarian Decentralist? Stick around and defend some of your pablum some time. It might be more fun than you think.
I used exactly what was...
July 2, 2008 - 10:42 ET by D. S. Hube... stated on the CNN transcript. FYI.
Bobby Kennedy is so much like his dad ...
July 1, 2008 - 21:41 ET by left wing escapee... the way his dad was before Dallas
I agree with Stossel that
July 1, 2008 - 21:47 ET by jdhawkI agree with Stossel that the oil and gas companies should be given hero status for the job they do in bringing supply in from the four corners of the globe.
Kennedy, on the other hand, is a damn liar. The facts are plain that without massive subsidies, not to oil and gas, but to wind, solar, and synthetic fuels, they would not be viable in the market place. They are just too inefficient.
If one knows a little bit about the Cook Inlet area they would easily disprove Kennedy's assertion that Chevron is dumping billions of gallons of waste in the Cook Inlet. Cook Inlet, like few places on earth, exhibits what is known as a Tidal Bore. This is a wave like action of the sea moving toward land and in this locale up river when there is a huge tidal difference. In this case, the Tida Bore can reach a height of 30 feet and travel up to 15 mph approximately twice a day. The point is that this tide, if it was highly contaminated, as Kennedy claims, would pollute the entire basin and the rivers that empty into the Inlet, the Susitna and Matanuska Rivers, for miles and miles up river. This is plainly not happening as the river supports some of the best king, silver, chum, red and pink salmon fishing in Alaska not to mention the Dolly Varden and Rainbow trout.
My guess is that Kennedy is rattling the cage of the envirowackos with his lies. The question is why? Well, there may be two reasons. One, Agrium, the largest producer of fertilizer in the United States, wants to build a coal gasification plant near the site of its fertilizer plant because natural gas is both expensive and running out in the immediate area. The other is that the largest known reserves of coal in the United States are in the area and both the state government and several coal companies have expressed an interest in beginning mining operations there.
So, of all the areas that Kennedy might have targeted in his diatribe. He choose this location because it is my bet that his organization and that of the entire envirowacko orgs in the United States will be out to shut these two initiatives down.
Kennedy Good Night and Good Luck
July 1, 2008 - 22:03 ET by GoodieEnd it!! No Why, just when will this guy go away...It is OJ all over again..
Turnagain Arm
July 2, 2008 - 01:12 ET by mom_roxjd - minor correction: The tidal bore is on the Turnagain Arm (which flows into the Cook Inlet), not in the entire inlet itself. I don't know the tide measurements of Cook Inlet, but at least one woman perished on the mudflats of Turnagain Arm because she could not escape when the incoming tide rushed in and the mud essentially became quicksand.
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944
Robert
July 1, 2008 - 22:03 ET by okiehawk44Nothing wrong with Kennedy that a good job wouldn't solve -- not a family funded job either -- just a good day's pay for a good day's work -- no trust fund either.
You up for that son? Didn't think so.
Are the
July 2, 2008 - 02:28 ET by ahusserAre the Kennedy's still beneficiaries of the Scotch subsidy?
Annoying Is As Annoying Does
July 1, 2008 - 22:10 ET by Intellectual HonestyEverything he says is highly suspect.
RFK Jr. is the poster child for the enviromental movement's propensity for garage sale tactics. "We need this much." "We'll give you this much." "OK we'll take it this time." (snickers under breath that the amount they got was more than they think they need or hoped for)
RFK Jr. is not only a complete and unadulterated hypocrite for vigorously opposing wind power in his precious Nantucket environ but he easily has the most annoying voice EVER!!!!!!!! He always sounds like he is on the verge of a nevous breakdown. Thus his "success" is purely predicated on his lineage.
I was watching and he made
July 1, 2008 - 23:08 ET by acadia1755I was watching and he made up most of the numbers as he spoke .. he was also not called on the Completely out of this world comment about "covering 3 states with wind mills would supply electricity for the entire US." The report I read said.. We would have to cover 3 states with wind mills to supply New york city with electricity. This guy has done way to much SNOW. Snif!
http://www.friendsof...
Maybe they meant we had to
July 1, 2008 - 23:11 ET by Free StinkerMaybe they meant we had to cover ALASKA, TEXAS, and CALIFORNIA with windmills? ;-)
About that "report"
July 2, 2008 - 00:20 ET by tnculpReading that report about the "Evironmental, health and other bull-$41t related subsidies", I can come to only one conclusion:
They're making crap up! No one could read that and take it serious.
Such stats as $39-$942 billion...now that's approaching government skill in statistics!
Believe nothing from Kennedy.
July 2, 2008 - 03:53 ET by JWFResearch everything this man says.
State of Alaska, Division of Oil and Gas, Department of Natural Resources.
Cook Inlet Areawide 1999 Oil and Gas Lease Sale
Final Findings of the Director
Chapter 5 *
"Discharge of untreated oil-based muds into any water column violates federal and state pollution laws."
"Most oilfield wastes are considered non-hazardous and waste fluids are recycled, filtered and treated before reinjection or disposal."
"Produced water is treated using heat, gravity settling and gas flotation devices to remove hydrocarbons. After treatment, produced water is reinjected into either the oil-bearing formation to maintain pressure and enhance recovery or into an approved disposal well. Cuttings disposal is done through grinding and injecting on-site or cuttings are transported to an approved disposal site. Cuttings disposal can cost more than the total cost to drill a well (Powell, 1996). "
That is a direct quote.
*
http://www.dog.dnr.state.ak.us/oil/products/publications/cookinlet/cia1999_final_finding/cifinding_contents.htm
Bobby Jr.
July 2, 2008 - 05:38 ET by Cool ArrowWe've watched this family of bluebloods deteriorate before our eyes for 60 years. Longer than I've been on this earth.
Ever since I saw RFK Jr. sitting on that bridge picking a banjo in "Deliverance", I've wondered why he didn't parlay that role into something bigger.
Somehing like Robert Duval after he played Boo Radley in "Kill a Mockingbird"
LYDSEXICS UNTIE
Okay, let's make it easier
July 3, 2008 - 11:27 ET by athoughtor2Okay, let's make it easier on all Americans. Let's set up some windfarms, for energy, off the coast of Taxachusetts. Oh that's right that was proposed already. The Kennedy's led the opposition to that idea. Hmmmmmmmmmm