Foreclosures and Housing Crisis Cause 'Tent City' -- Well, Not Really

By D. S. Hube | December 22, 2007 - 09:46 ET

Here is a textbook example of [mainstream] media bias: Reuters' Dana Ford laments the growth of a "tent city" in Ontario, CA, east of Los Angeles, blaming it on housing foreclosures and "wider economic downturn":

Between railroad tracks and beneath the roar of departing planes sits "tent city," a terminus for homeless people. It is not, as might be expected, in a blighted city center, but in the once-booming suburbia of Southern California.

The noisy, dusty camp sprang up in July with 20 residents and now numbers 200 people, including several children, growing as this region east of Los Angeles has been hit by the U.S. housing crisis.

The unraveling of the region known as the Inland Empire reads like a 21st century version of "The Grapes of Wrath," John Steinbeck's novel about families driven from their lands by the Great Depression.

As more families throw in the towel and head to foreclosure here and across the nation, the social costs of collapse are adding up in the form of higher rates of homelessness, crime and even disease.

There's just one problem with Reuter's thesis: No one in the tent city is a victim of any housing foreclosure ... as they admit themselves (but not until the fifth paragraph):

While no current residents claim to be victims of foreclosure, all agree that tent city is a symptom of the wider economic downturn. And it's just a matter of time before foreclosed families end up at tent city, local housing experts say.

Let's see -- now we have Reuters using "all" of the tent city residents as "proof" that, even though no current residents are there because of foreclosure, well, things are just bad! And, even though no current residents are in tent city because of foreclosure, well, it's only just matter of time!

No need to let one inconvenient fact ruin a nice hyperbolic article that invokes the Great Depression after all, right?

(Hat tip to NB readers T. Wilder and Steven Parker.)

—D. S. Hube is an educator and a member of the National Association of Scholars. He blogs regularly at The Colossus of Rhodey.

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Oh, nevermind!"

"Oh, nevermind!" (Emily Litella)

The point, I guess, is they could have been foreclosure victims.

It specifically says growing as this region east of Los Angeles has been hit by the U.S. housing crisis, implying that that is the cause of the growth, but then admits it isn't.

But it could be!!

Just another "fake but accurate" offering from the MSM.

same old stuff

 from the MSM.... too bad folks cant see thru them.. way too many folks think its a conspriacy against these poor folks who bit off more than they can chew.. I am all for giving someone a shot even if they arent the best risk... but dont blame the mortgage company when folks cant pay.. never the borrowers fault. they should feel like crap when they lose thier house but they can watch the MSM say its not thier fault just those money hungry lenders..

honesty is the best policy... unless your running for office.

Los Angeles has had ahousing Crisis for 20 yrs.

1200 Sq. Ft. Home @  $ 400,000 and up, is what I would call a Housing Crisis.  Only in L.A..   Two hundred homelss People in L.A. is not a Crisis, they just can't afford to live there, they need to move.

People in california are Two Job families, the Husband works to pay for the House payment, and the Wife works for food and Gas. It's a treadmill with serious consequences for pregnancy, no food for 2 months, until the mom can go back to work. 

So WHAT IS this inflated housing expense in California  ?  Are they charging you for the weather in California ?  Are they charging you for the Traffic ?   Are they charging you for the Clean Air ?.....uh..the promise of Clean Air ?

It's a Mystery, that supply and Demand doesn't quite explain.

I checked with some of the

I checked with some of the net appraisal sites when the Paw family came up at the beginning of the Norman Hsu issue.

That place they lived in which was basically almost like a single wide mobile home was tipping the scales at near 700k fair market value.

Somebody has totally speculated those prices to the point where they make no sense.

That is the reason wages are so much higher than the rest of the country to compensate.

I finally talked an old buddy of mine into selling the 2 bedroom San Diego cracker box he had which he dumped before the peak for a bit over a million and a quarter.

He moved here and is working in another shipyard now has a 200k house that move him from 1100 sq ft to 1950 sq ft on a 1/4 acre of property and he banked the balance.

Plus he is a whole lot more satisfied with the cost of living here and no state income tax.

 

The higher wage scales

The higher wage scales there only cram you into a higher fed tax bracket and state tax bracket plus the property tax load and insurance costs scale right along with the way inflated prices.

Day to day shooting themselves in the foot.

Exactly, they need to MOVE!

Exactly, they need to MOVE!  One of the major characteristics of being American is mobility.  The same goes for those people NOLA who are protesting for public housing.  If you can't afford the rent, you move, you get a better job or you double up with someone else. If there are insufficient jobs in an area, you move to an area where there are jobs. This is precisely why government housing is bad, it encourages the concentration of the poor into a single place, which puts them into competition with each other for limited low skilled jobs.   As we have seen with most lib/Dem inspired vote buying scams, government housing essentially creates a captive base of voting constituents.  It has nothing to do with the best interest of the poor.  Just look at NOLA, you have your example of what not to do in terms of social policy. We also need to address the issue of those 200 in the tent city, why are they not working?  Whose fault is that?  If the MSM was so concerned about them, then why aren't they complaining about CA being a sanctuary state for illegal immigration?  The fact is if those illegals weren't taking the low skilled jobs, the tent city people would have jobs and could afford rent.  In fact, if there were a low skilled worker shortage, wages would rise for that group.  So the fault starts with the CA state and local officials who shafted their own constituents twice over, once for the poor who are forced to compete with the illegals and the other for the rest who have to pay the high taxes to offset the costs of the illegals. Finally, there is the issue of a group in this country that chooses not to work because they know some misguided person is more than willing to pay them to be unemployed.  Why work when someone or government will support you in any event???? I've met people like this, I've talked with them, they come out an say they are free spirits and working takes away that freedom, they don't want to be part of our society, they want to do their own thing without being responsible for their own welfare.  Obviously, there is a difference between someone who has bad luck and find themselves on the street versus those who are chronically lazy.

Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.

OK, I have this figured

OK, I have this figured out. This is just like Rep. Moran referring to Hitler's victories in the 30's and Bush's victories now (for the wrong reasons) and then claiming he wasn't making a comparison.

So Reuters is just commenting on the growth of this "tent city" and mentioning the housing crisis. That doesn't mean they're connecting the two.

They're not responsible for what people infer from their juxtaposition.

<sarc off>

Social Services

My impression is that Los Angeles Country has a good Social Services Department and can provide housing to displaced families.

I added a couple of Holiday

I added a couple of Holiday chucklers at the bottom of the caption thread a couple of posts back

 

Recommended reading, but keep liquids away from the keyboard.

Well let's see.... interest

Well let's see.... interest rates are low, housing choices are plentiful, unemployment is low, inflation is neglible, the economy is strong and stable and yet these people couldn't make sensible housing choices under those conditions?  They would never have survived the carter years.

Tent city

Wow, I can't wait til Woody Guthrie shows up so we can all clap our hands and sing union songs. 

Come to think of it, if we push corn hard enough maybe we can have another dust bowl.

I ♣ My Seal

  Yep, Woody wrote a good

  Yep, Woody wrote a good one for this thread. 

 

I Ain't Got No Home

I ain't got no home, I'm just a-roamin' 'round,
Just a wandrin' worker, I go from town to town.
And the police make it hard wherever I may go
And I ain't got no home in this world anymore.

My brothers and my sisters are stranded on this road,
A hot and dusty road that a million feet have trod;
Rich man took my home and drove me from my door
And I ain't got no home in this world anymore.

Was a-farmin' on the shares, and always I was poor;
My crops I lay into the banker's store.
My wife took down and died upon the cabin floor,
And I ain't got no home in this world anymore.

I mined in your mines and I gathered in your corn
I been working, mister, since the day I was born
Now I worry all the time like I never did before
'Cause I ain't got no home in this world anymore

Now as I look around, it's mighty plain to see
This world is such a great and a funny place to be;
Oh, the gamblin' man is rich an' the workin' man is poor,
And I ain't got no home in this world anymore.

}}---> Thanks, MidAmerica

I honestly do like Woody Guthrie's stuff.  I just didn't want to get all highbrow with Steinbeck and Henry Fonda. 

I ♣ My Seal

Some new story ideas

Here are a couple more story ideas for Dana Ford and the folks at Reuters. (1) A Tale of Two Homes: One guy living in a cardboard box the other in a million dollar mansion. Now warn because of the worsening economy, the millionaire could one day find himself bunking next door to the guy in the cardboard box. (2) Two Homes – One dad: Household (a) has two parents (Mom and Dad). Household (b) have one parent. Again warn, because of the worsening economy, the dad in household (a) could loose his job, get depress and jump of a bridge.   

Ridiculous you say?  As ridiculous as Dana Ford’s attempt to blame the plight of those poor folks in that tent city on housing foreclosures?

 

}}---> RMR very touching story

In fact, I was on a bridge just last night contemplating that very action when suddenly Bert and Ernie got drunk and this really old guy showed me my life story and then a bell started ringing and suddenly the old guy grew wings and fell into the water and drowned. 

I guess he shoulda taken flying lessons, huh?

I ♣ My Seal

Popular culture

In one of the popoular culture books I read in the last few years it was noted that the "homeless" always seem to appear when a Republican is in the White House. When a Dem like Clinton is in, they magically disappear. It's a miracle!

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

DNC approved

The above campaign article approved by the DNC.

Ahhh, the demedia moves the doom and gloom to higher frequency and lower negativity.  Must be an election year.

The head line on Yahoo was

The head line on Yahoo was Tent city in suburbs is cost oh home crisis. I am sure this has been mentioned before but Yahoo's headlines tend to lean left often in contrast to what the story actually says.

 

What I do not see is how many resident of this place are illegals. But then it is California they probally qualify for taxpayer housing.

 

There are what? 7 million

There are what? 7 million people living in LA, more or less.

I live in a small, 75,000, Central Texas town. We don't have tent cities, but we do have a homeless shelter that I've voluteered at. Depending on the time of year, there will be between 50 and 80 men and women living there. And yes, it is a magnet for those in need county wide.

The point is, if LA only has 200 (according to Reuters) homeless, then there is no problem! And I'm sure there are many missions and other programs in LA that would help these tent dwellers out if they applied.

Thats Odd

Freedom is Never Free

I am not one to nit-pick,but i blogged this story this morning close to 6am PST. Compare my Post with this one.

http://thecriticalhour.blogspot.com/2007/12/nothing-is-new-when-everything-changes.html

I am not making any attempt to claim the higher ground.Just asking for credit where credit is due

tpasenelli