In an article that is otherwise fairly balanced, Delaware's biggest daily, the Wilmington News Journal, proclaims in a headline today that senior Senator Joe Biden has a "Tangled tongue, but a civil record," with the sub-header "Biden's bloopers don't jibe with his votes."
Sen. Joe Biden sees black supporters as his base and maintains a stellar voting record with the NAACP.
But he's also gotten in trouble for comments involving race or ethnicity.
Biden's supporters say the apparent gaffes are merely examples of his unscripted style, which they admire. Others say he should be more aware of how his words come across.
Most recently, Biden drew a comparison between the nation's capital and Iowa that suggested to some he was blaming Washington's large minority population for its low-performing schools.
Of course, before that there was Biden referring to fellow Democrat presidential candidate Barack Obama as "clean," "articulate" and "nice-looking," not to mention his reference about Indians and Indian-Americans in that "you can't go into a Dunkin' Donuts or a 7-Eleven in Delaware 'unless you have a slight Indian accent.'" Oh, and how can one forget Joe's classic "Delaware was a former slave state" comment as a reason why he could compete for president against a Southern Democrat.
[Biden] communications director, Larry Rasky, added that only "a brick" would have failed to see, during the [Washington Post] editorial board meeting, that Biden was discussing socioeconomic factors that disproportionately affect minorities.
And that's just the point. The media frequently "fail to see" what GOPers actually said/meant in instances of their [racial] gaffes. A perfect example: Republicans get hammered for using a term like "tar baby," to describe "a debacle." If Biden were a Republican, would the News Journal -- or other media outlets -- be as forgiving in their headlines and corresponding articles? I think we all know the answer to that one. After all, as the first quote above states, Biden has a "stellar voting record with the NAACP." Besides one's party affiliation, such a voting record must be a close second for racial "forgiveness" and in that, the GOP doesn't stand a chance of having any apologies accepted. After all, every Senate Republican has received a grade of "F" by the NAACP for their "civil rights" voting records. A closer examination of how these "grades" are determined, however, shows that things like "extending unemployment benefits to aviation workers and increasing global AIDS financing" are examples of the factors considered. If you're wondering just what the heck extending unemployment benefits to aviation workers and global AIDS funding have to do wth American civil rights (especially in the historical context of the NAACP), you're not alone.
Furthermore, it's acceptable for Democrats to use the "black friends" rationale as well as the "old way of talking" excuse for their gaffes:
Some of Biden's black friends see no harm in his comments and concede they may have said similar things. Biden may let his mouth run away with him, but his friends say his heart is consistently in the right place -- fiercely defending civil rights.
"That's why it's so hard to understand some of these things being taken out of context," said Sam Latham, the first black president of the AFL-CIO in Delaware. "I don't think Joe would intentionally offend anyone."
And:
When Biden came of age, politicians identified constituents by ethnicity -- they knew which voters were German and which were Italian, for example -- because neighborhoods were still organized that way, said Richard Ben Cramer, whose book, "What it takes," looked at the 1988 presidential race and Biden's first White House bid.
Cramer said he doesn't find Biden's comments surprising or intentionally hurtful but merely "an old way of talking."
"He doesn't lawyer his own comments, and it happens to him not just in reference to African-Americans -- it happens on all kinds of things," Cramer said. "That willingness to just speak is one of the things that I love about him. I can see him getting in trouble 50 times before this campaign is over."
Indeed. A "willingness to speak" is a lovable trait. Unfortunately, if you're a member of the "wrong" political party, that adjective is easily dropped.
—D. S. Hube is an educator and a member of the National Association of Scholars. He blogs regularly at The Colossus of Rhodey.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Ah, the old "some of my
November 4, 2007 - 09:16 ET by sublight68Ah, the old "some of my best friends are black" defense.
The larger point is well taken -- Liberals get the benefit of the doubt by the MSM, Conservatives are assumed guilty regardless of how benign or easily placed in context their comments are.
We all say stupid things from time to time. I'm more than willing accept a Liberal's explanation when it makes sense and not get hung up on it. Unforunately it doesn't seem to work the other way.
The ol' double standard on misstatements
November 4, 2007 - 09:17 ET by nkviking75The conventional MSM wisdom is that Bush is an idiot because his words sometimes get mangled when he's unscripted. But when the President messes up, it's usually a case of his mouth getting a little ahead of his brain. With Biden, it seems to expose attitudes he's trying to hide. I'm not aware of any gaffe by Bush that makes him seem racist.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Aside from being responsible
November 4, 2007 - 09:25 ET by sublight68Aside from being responsible for dragging a black man to his death and murdering thousands of Iraqis for kicks. </sarc>
Racism
November 4, 2007 - 09:27 ET by nkviking75That's right, Bush is a republican, so he's inherently racist. </sarcasm off>
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Joe, "the plagiarist"
November 4, 2007 - 09:39 ET by iveseenitallJoe "the plagiarist" Biden is the personification of O'Reilly's "popinjay" and "Pecksniffian" , a slim version of Falstaff. He's the kid or the professor we all remember from college--- a walking, talking jackass who either doesn't realize or simply doesn't care what a fool he is.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
But in his mind is smarter
November 4, 2007 - 09:40 ET by sublight68But in his mind is smarter than everyone else, and smugly tries to make that point to anyone who doesn't recognize his intellectual superiority.
Joe Biden?
November 4, 2007 - 10:06 ET by BlondeMust be the daylight savings thingy...weren't you talking about Hillary?
Ohhh....riiiiight....the dem contenders. Got it.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Yeah, I was talking about
November 4, 2007 - 10:09 ET by sublight68Yeah, I was talking about <fill in name of any Liberal>. My mistake.
That's okay.
November 4, 2007 - 10:19 ET by BlondeI'm still not sure what time it is.
Seriously, tho, the media double standard for these (obviously) unintended gaffes is staggering.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
And the double standard is
November 4, 2007 - 10:26 ET by sublight68And the double standard is two-fold.
First there's a double standard concerning the meaning and importance of the comment itself. If it's made by a Liberal, it's contextualized, rationalized and quickly euthanized.
But secondly, and maybe more importantly, is the actual reporting of the comment to begin with.
A Conservative makes a harmless statement in front of a handful of people in the context of the moment (Strom Thurmond's birthday, a stump speech, etc.) and it's suddenly a national news story.
A Liberal makes a questionable-at-best comment and it barely sees the light of day.
Got it
November 4, 2007 - 10:34 ET by Blondeit's contextualized, rationalized and quickly euthanized.
We need a new term for that....and the oppo overblown reaction when a non-lib has a little troublesome tongue gaffe.
Macacaized might do. What do you think?
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Love it. I still have no
November 4, 2007 - 10:39 ET by sublight68Love it. I still have no idea what, if anything, Macaca really means, so we might as well define it ourselves.
I humbly offer alternate
November 4, 2007 - 19:23 ET by motherbeltI humbly offer alternate criteria:
Liberals can't be racist, even if they say "racist" things, because everyone "knows" they are friends to minorities.
Even if a conservative praises minorities to the heavens, he only does it to hide the fact that he hates them.
Shoe on the other foot.....
November 4, 2007 - 10:04 ET by motherbeltCramer said he doesn't find Biden's comments surprising or intentionally hurtful but merely "an old way of talking"?
Let's see now, what Republican could possibly get away with that "old way of talking"?
Anyone? Anyone? Beuller???
"Biden's bloopers don't jibe with his votes."
You know, "some might say" that Biden is smart enough to know how he needs to vote, to keep minorities on his side; but when he shoots from the lip, his true feelings come out.
And that probably would be said, if he were a Republican.
It's part of Biden's
November 4, 2007 - 10:02 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsIt's part of Biden's culture to make stupid, offensive remarks.
His family has a history of stupidity.
He was brought up that way, and since you weren't, you can't.
D
P.S. That t-shirt girl's eyes follow me everywhere I go!
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
P.S. That t-shirt girl's
November 4, 2007 - 10:05 ET by motherbeltP.S. That t-shirt girl's eyes follow me everywhere I go!
Why do I think the reverse is also true......? LOL
Dems have been doing this for years.
November 4, 2007 - 10:40 ET by pbthinkerI remember watching Cokie Roberts justifying her father's vote against the Civil Rights Bill and saying that Black leaders, in Louisiana, had told him they understood that his vote wasn't against them. They have a knack for dragging out someone, anyone, who can put a good face on a bad comment. In most cases, the media does it for them. Isn't that special.
Democrats: Specializing in "high tech lynching" since 1987.
So if Biden used the N-Word
November 4, 2007 - 10:41 ET by mlongSo if Biden used the N-Word it would be ok because of his record?..well I guess thats how it works if your a liberal Dem you can say and do pretty much anything you want and not get nailed for it...hell Robert Byrd was a Grand Wizard in the KKK and actually used the N-word a few years ago and he's welcomed with open arms by the NAACP and other Liberal groups.
"If we implement HillaryCare, Canadians will have no place to come for their health care." Rudy Guiliani
Yep, only a "brick" would
November 4, 2007 - 12:07 ET by GregEYep, only a "brick" would fail to see......
...that Rush Limbaugh was talking about real "phony soldiers," and understand that his record on military support is stellar.
...that Don Imus is a "shock jock" and a dumb comment is very often simply a dumb comment.
...that when Hillary Clinton says "we're going to take those profits" from oil companies that she's speaking from her Socialist mindset.
...that when O'Reilly speaks of a Harlem restaurant as a nice place, that he's having conversation about the restaurant inside the context of a conversation regarding perceptions that come about due to the nature of gangsta rap.
...that Ann Coulter was simply saying that Christians consider themselves perfected Jews based on a belief of Jesus as Messiah has come and belief in Him as Savior is just that, a saving grace.
...that when Hillary Clinton says "I have a million ideas but the country can't afford them all" she's talking about billions or perhaps trillions of dollars in Socialist entitlements that will never go away and will require massive tax hikes, aka burdens on American people.
....etc.....etc.....etc.
Yea, only a "brick" would misinterpret all that. I guess the Left, Mr. Rasky, has a fired oven capable of churning out enough bricks to rebuild the Great Wall of China......or perhaps a complete wall on our porous borders. But we know the Left would never use those bricks to protect our borders....but I digress.