While some in the media have been dusting off their love beads, bell-bottoms and broomstick skirts in an effort to wax nostalgic about Woodstock, the VFW has reminded its members that the world did not stop for those four days in August 1969.
In fact, for 109 American soldiers, the world ended that weekend.
VFW Magazine honored those soldiers in the August 2009 cover story, "While Woodstock Rocked, GIs Died."
Much has been made over the "half a million strong" that flocked to a dairy farm in rural New York to celebrate music and peace. Richard K. Kolb instead compared the coverage Newsweek and Time gave to the festival while shortchanging American efforts in Vietnam.
"Newsweek described them as ‘a youthful, long-haired army, almost as large as the U.S. force in Vietnam," wrote Kolb. Time claimed Woodstock "may well rank as one of the significant political and sociological events of the age." The same article referred to the Vietnam as the "meaningless war in the jungles of Southeast Asia" and cited sociologist Amitai Etzoni, who stated that "the young need opportunities for authentic service."
As for those that gave the ultimate sacrifice in the name of "authentic service" Kolb reported, "The casualties they sustained over those four days were genuine, yet none of the elite media outlets were praising their selflessness.
But unlike Woodstock's audience, labeled by Newsweek as "the nation's affluent white young," Kolb wrote that the soldiers killed that weekend "mirrored the population of the time."
Kolb offered statistics to prove his case:
A full 92 percent were white (seven of whom had Spanish surnames) and 8 percent black. Some 67 percent were Protestants; 28 percent Catholic. A disproportionate number - more than one-third - hailed from the South. More than two-thirds were single; nearly one-third married. Not surprisingly, the vast majority (91 percent) were under the age of 30, with 78 percent between the ages of 18 and 22.
Kolb also poignantly noted, "Of the four days, Aug. 18 - the last day of "peace and love" in the Catskills when the 50,000 diehards departed after the final act - was the worst for the men in Vietnam. Thirty-five of them died on that one miserable day."
Thirty-five died. Hundreds more were wounded. On August 9, 2009, The Washington Post ran a story about a man who figured prominently if briefly in the legend of Woodstock. As Post staff writer Neely Tucker described it:
It was like the second day of the festival and Rodgers, 6-foot-5 and about 120 pounds, all of 19 years old, staggered out of the Port-O-San portable toilet, marijuana pipe in hand, and wow, there were guys with cameras, making what became the iconic film "Woodstock." Rodgers's blue shirt was open, he was unwashed and unkempt, his brown hair was an unruly wad on top of his head, and he was about 17 tokes over the line.
"Want some? Want some?" he says to the filming crew, offering hits. He's got this goofy grin. He says "Far out!" and "Out of sight!" For lo these many years, the lovable pothead scene has been a fan favorite.
Tucker's article caught up with Rodgers, forty years on, using nearly 1,500 words to sketch the unremarkable life of an unreconstructed hippie. It is perhaps too much to ask that the Post spill even a fraction of that ink to chronicle the life of one of the hundreds of Americans who were wounded that weekend on the other side of the world. It doesn't fit the self-congratulatory nostalgia.
The sacrifice and service that ultimately changed and, in the case of 109, ended the lives of many young Americans is not the defining notion of that summer weekend in 1969. They are overshadowed by the 500,000 people that crowded onto a farm for three days of self indulgence and ... entertainment.
—Colleen Raezler is a research assistant at the Culture and Media Institute




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The media
August 12, 2009 - 12:54 ET by iveseenitallThis is the real story of the MSM in America. They got away with their crap in the 60's and it's been downhill since. Modern "liberalism"--how sad for this country.
P.S. Thank God for our troops. God bless them all.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Meanwhile, no MSM headlines mentioning...
August 12, 2009 - 13:16 ET by Prester John....the approaching "grim milestone" of 700 US dead in Afghanistan.
"The Truth is Treason in the Empire of Lies"
www.campaignforliber...
My bell bottoms
August 12, 2009 - 13:32 ET by Jackrvwere issued to me by the US Navy and I was proud to wear them.
Jack - former shipfitter 1st.
Sir, thank you for your
August 12, 2009 - 13:59 ET by black47211Sir, thank you for your sacrifice and service to our nation.
From one vet to another, with great admiration and appreciation.
De Opresso Liber
www.pelicanmarsh68.blogspot.com
As one who was at
August 12, 2009 - 13:32 ET by robert108As one who was at Woodstock, I can tell you that nobody there had anything resembling an accurate picture of what was really going on in Vietnam. In addition, some attendees had already done their tour or tours and were trying to enjoy the lifestyle that they had risked their lives to defend. Once Walter Cronkite had lied to America about the outcome of Tet, and since the media was uniformly against our mission in Vietnam, many just tuned out.
Don't blame those who went there for responding to the information with which they had been programmed by the totalitarian media of that time.
Re Woodstock
August 12, 2009 - 13:35 ET by slickwillie2001Have you folks ever noticed that the number of people that claimed to be at Woodstock numbers about twenty times the very highest estimates of attendance?
Inflated Numbers
August 12, 2009 - 14:07 ET by easygoerThey thought they were creating a new nation. It all crashed down on them theree months later at Altamont.
About the inflated number of supposed attendees. Wilt Chamberlain used to say he thought he scored 100 points against the NY Knicks in Hershey, PA in front of a crowd of 4,500. But apparently he did it against the Knicks at Madison Square Garden in front of 200,000 or so spectators. That's the approximately number of people who approached him and swear they were there for his feat. Same with JFK. In a poll taken after his assassination, 80% of respondents said they voted for him. Which would have made it, by far, the biggest landslide in American history. Instead, Kennedy beat Nixon by a whisker in the popular vote. The closest election of the 20th century.
What the msm fail to recognize is the fact that most of us were
August 12, 2009 - 13:52 ET by Cape Conservativefar too busy raising our families to pay much attention to the Bill Ayers/Bernadine Dohrn trash. I was raising my children while their father served two separate tours in Vietnam...and, can you imagine, I did so WITHOUT the poor me mentality or followup PBS documentary.
I have never identified with these protesters then or now - and THEY are NOT representative of the hardworking young people I knew who were busy getting their lives in order. I believe the lifestyle of these protesters begat the 'old teenagers' (people in their thirties still living off mom and dad) syndrome. These young people should be off making or breaking on their own, not living the cush life at the expense of mom and dad. We weren't concerned with the latest cars or electronic gadgets...we were intent on living the American dream...working toward success in business, a home and family you could be proud of. And then along came the flower children...what a misnomer that is!
This comment comes from a proud Tea Party attendee, otherwise designated by Homeland Security as a Domestic Right Wing Terrorist! It is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue ~ Sam Adams
Right on
August 12, 2009 - 14:01 ET by iveseenitallCape:
You are right on about the "flower children"--- self-centered, immature hypocrites. Many of them are still around today. "Liberals"-- another misnomer; nothing "liberal" about them.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
CC, please thank your
August 12, 2009 - 14:01 ET by black47211CC, please thank your husband for his service and also a thanks to you for being a military wife during such difficult times. Women like you are treasures.
With respect and admiration, honestly, thank you.
www.pelicanmarsh68.blogspot.com
1969
August 12, 2009 - 16:04 ET by justbob223I was 17 in 1969. Two of my brothers served with the Marines in Viet Nam. I despised the left then and despise it still today. Woodstock revealed the moral bankruptcy of American liberals, a bankruptcy that has only deepened over the past four decades and continues unabated today. My entire lifetime has seen the left actively engaging in the destruction of the American republic. Republicans have been impotent as a party in stopping it, slowing it, or even resisting it. We have been spiraling down for decades and I confess I have little hope that this decline will end, for I see no statesmen in Washington, no leaders with real principles or courage. People say, "God bless America." I pray, "God save the United States."
jb223... Amen to your
August 12, 2009 - 16:16 ET by bigtimerjb223...
Amen to your prayer...I'm with ya.
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
Jb & bt - I'll throw in my 'AMEN' too - I keep telling myself
August 12, 2009 - 20:34 ET by Cape Conservativethat the Lord never gives us more than we can bear...but sometimes I get a little wobbly wondering when the load will lighten!
This comment comes from a proud Tea Party attendee, otherwise designated by Homeland Security as a Domestic Right Wing Terrorist! It is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue ~ Sam Adams
say what?
August 13, 2009 - 07:24 ET by skypilott2"...and I confess I have little hope that this decline will end, for I see no statesmen in Washington, no leaders with real principles or courage."
Open your eyes and see Sarah Palin. She IS the real deal, if ever there was one. A non-politician politician, an American who not only 'talks the talk', she actually 'walks the walk!' She is brave beyond compare, in ways that you should become aware.
This grand lady is a real conservative with an independent streak that scares the beejesus out of the opposition, whether that be democrat or republican.
If you can't see that Palin has real principles and the courage of her convictions, on display for all to see, well, maybe you're just not looking closely enough!
Thanks for posting this
August 12, 2009 - 22:40 ET by Carl KolchakThanks for posting this Colleen. I have no idea what college professors who wear Che shirts teach about Vietnam, but it probably isn't good. Was it a good war or a just war? People will have to make up their own minds on that. It's been debated many times, but what isn't debatable is the way Vietnam Vets have been stereotyped and how they were treated when they returned. We're supposed to believe that the fighting they experienced was the worst thing ever. In WWI people were using poison gas, in WWII soldiers were using flame throwers in the S. Pacific to root out Japanese soldiers. At Antietam the bloodiest day in American history fighting both the South and North faced an incredible number of casulaties. But somehow since the Americans were fighting "precious" Communists, the left wing college professors who wear Che shirts would have us believe that these soldiers were horrible and rotten and don't have the skills to succeed in life. False, in fact most Vietnam Vets returned and have become very valuable members of society, and helped raise families, and were good fathers. I know because my father is a Vietnam Vet, and was in the military. I grew up on military posts, and most of my friend's dads were also Vietnam Vets. They were good fathers and very valuable members of society. They weren't drug addicts or having flashbacks every 10 minutes and they didn't turn into Rambo. Now did PSTD happen? Sure, but soldiers coming back from WWII also had very tramautic experiences too, but since we were fighting "precious" Communists in Vietnam, everything has to be taught that the S. Vietnamese were bad and that the VC/NVA were all good. It was the Communist NVA that broke the truce and invaded S. Vietnam in 1975, not the other way around. There were never large numbers of S. Vietnamese going to Communist N. Vietnam either. If the Communists had the utopian society Fonda and friends made it out to be, why did so many S. Vietnamse flee after the Communists took over? The answer is that the Communists aren't the swell and awesome people that so called human rights acitivists who like to badmouth the United States make them out to be. Is it just me or do the Che shirt wearers who build themselves up as human rights activist have little concern for the S. Vietnamese who fled?
http://www.searac.org/vietref.html
I don't blame those hippies
August 12, 2009 - 22:58 ET by RR GOPI don't blame those hippies for not wanting to have to go to Vietnam and being out there in the rain, the mud, the heat, sleeping on the ground and being generally miserable...hey, wait a second here...!
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.