Is foreign drug violence a reason to reinstate the ban on assault weapons in America? U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder thinks so. And judging by its relentless and one-sided coverage in the last month, CNN agrees.
Let's connect some dots: Remember that whole Obama "clinging to religion and guns" flap? Now, remember White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel saying never let a crisis go to waste? Good. Finally, remember how the media carried ... sorry, is carrying water for Obama?
It looks like Holder has internalized Emanuel's philosophy, and is looking at the bloody drug wars raging along Mexico's northern border as the crisis he needs to ratchet up gun control.
Last month, during a press conference in which he announced that more than 50 members of Sinaloa Cartel, a Mexican drug cartel, were captured, Holder revealed his intentions. "Well, as President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons. I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum," he said.
"That's your attorney general talking about selling out the second amendment and your rights for the benefit of the benefit of Mexico," Lou Dobbs said on his Feb. 25 program. But Dobbs must be a lonely man at CNN. The rest of the network took Holder's statement as its cue, began hammering the point that American weapons are being used in Mexico's increasingly violent drug wars.
A Nexis search revealed that out of 57 reports on the Mexican drug violence that have aired since February 16, half (29) of them have mentioned at least once that Mexican drug cartels are using American weapons.
CNN devoted an entire hour on March 14 to a panel discussion about the violence. CNN correspondent Michael Ware noted:
Their armaments include 50-caliber Barrett sniper rifles. Made in the U.S., weapons that are deadly effective over perhaps a mile and which I've only seen in the hands of U.S. Marine sniper teams or Army sniper teams. These guys also have U.S. made grenades, American-made AK-47s, you know, IR - 15s. America is very much fueling this fight not just in its taste for illicit drugs, but in the actual weapons that are being used to kill.
Nobody on the panel countered this claim. But it wouldn't have taken much research to find out that the Barrett rifles are extremely rare and extremely expensive, that hand grenades of any make are subject to nearly prohibitive ATF regulation, or that there is no such thing as an "American-made AK-47." (There are weapons that look like AK-47s and that fire the same 7.62 mm round, but they don't have an automatic mode.)
Mexico's Press Room
The Mexican government, which has clearly lost control of the situation, has taken to shifting blame to - where else - America. And CNN is buying it.
On March 2, in the lead in to an interview with National Rifle Association executive vice-president Wayne LaPierre, American Morning's John Roberts featured video of the mayor of Juarez, Mexico, saying, "A major part of the problem that we have is that all of the killings here are with arms from the United States and everybody in the United States knows those assault weapons are coming illegally to Mexico to fund the organized crime figures. And nobody is doing anything about it in the United States."
Turning to LaPierre, Roberts said, "You heard what the mayor of Juarez said. It's American guns that are fueling a lot of the violence. Mexico's drug violence is quickly becoming America's problem. Why not reinstate the assault weapons ban?"
On the March 9 Anderson Cooper 360, Cooper's report on the Mexican drug violence included an interview with Eduardo Medina Mora, Mexico's attorney general, on American gun laws:
ANDERSON COOPER: In some towns, they already are in control. Just last week in the city of Juarez, cartels threatened to kill a police officer every 48 hours until the police chief resigned. After two murders, he did. Juarez's mayor just moved his own family to Texas. Mexico's police are overwhelmed in part because drug traffickers have them outgunned. Mexico's attorney general, Eduardo Medina Mora, is helping to lead the effort to break up the cartels.
EDUARDO MEDINA MORA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MEXICO: Half of what we seize, 55 percent are assault rifles. And this is what gives these groups this intimidation power: 2,200 grenades; missile and rocket launchers; .50 caliber sniper rifles.
COOPER: It might surprise you to learn where all these guns are coming from. It turns out 90 percent of them are purchased in the U.S.
MEDINA MORA: The second amendment was never designed to arm criminal groups, especially not foreign criminal groups as it is today.
COOPER: Do you blame the U.S. for not doing more to stop this flood?
MEDINA MORA: We believe there's much more to be done. We need a much more committed effort from the U.S.
But in written Congressional testimony on March 12, the National Rifle Association's Chris W. Cox noted that the missile and rocket launchers Mora cited are "weapons that isn't available over the counter anywhere in the U.S., but is reportedly often smuggled from Guatemala." And, as with the "AK-47s" mentioned above, if the drug cartels have actual assault rifles, they're not getting them from the U.S. Automatic weapons (machine guns) have been heavily regulated since 1934 and the sale of new machine guns for private ownership ended in 1986.
Also in his testimony, Cox pointed out that the Mexican government itself has hindered the efforts of U.S. agents to attack the problem, refusing to share serial numbers of captured weapons and not allowing local authorities to cooperate with U.S. authorities.
Nevertheless, to CNN, Mexico is paying the price for America's sins. On March 10, CNN Newsroom's Rick Sanchez was upset with how "the mainstream media are having a field day with the Mexican drug war stories ... But how is it being covered? Generally by finger-pointing at Mexicans and by doing stories about how little Jimmy and little Susie's spring break plans are going to be interrupted. Or that it may be dangerous now for their spring break to be held in Mexico. The fact is, what we may need to ask is, who's buying the drugs that are being manufactured in Mexico? And why is the Mexican economy in the mess that it is in the first place?" Clearly, the answer to the first question is, Americans. The second?
Sanchez was just getting started. "Oh, here's another one," he said. "Where and how are the drug runners who are at war with the Mexican police getting their weapons? Where are they getting those guns? That is our focus today. And the answer is, in large measure, from the United States. From gun shows in the United States."
Sanchez quoted an estimate that "2,000 guns enter Mexico every day from this country. And 7,000 people have been killed in just the past couple of years. How are these gunmen doing it?"
He rolled video of Mexican president Felipe Calderon saying, "We need to stop the flow of guns and weapons towards Mexico. Let me express to you that we seized in these two years more than 25,000 weapons and guns, and more than 90 percent of them came from the United States."
Sanchez then turned to San Diego Union Tribune columnist Ruben Navarette, who repeated the statistics. Then, prompted by Sanchez to discuss American "hypocrisy," Navarette said:
Americans are concerned about drug violence in Mexico, and we have this view that somehow it's all contained in Mexico, it's emanating from Mexico. But the guns are emanating here. They're stamped made in the USA. So the funny thing about the violence is, it's sort of like immigrants leave Mexico and then they turn to go back. The violence leaves the U.S. soil it goes to Mexico and then bounces right back again.
Rapid Fire
Violent Americans with their guns. CNN hit that note again and again, and emphasized U.S. responsibility for the violence.
- International Correspondent Michael Ware on February 26: "But let's not forget, this whole war is fueled, first by America's demand for illicit drugs; and, secondly, it's being fought with American weapons that have been smuggled back over the border."
- John Roberts on Feb. 26 "You got a big complaint from the Mexican government is the traffic going the other way. That there's plenty of American money going down to Mexico, plenty of American weapons being bought by straw purchasers and border states are also being funneled south."
- Kiran Chetry on Feb. 27: "The U.S. is also a major source for powerful weapons being used by Mexican drug cartels. In fact, the ATF is estimating that 90 percent of weapons confiscated in Mexico are smuggled in from the U.S."
- Randi Kaye on Feb. 28: "And from what I understand, weapons purchased or stolen in the United States accounted for 95 percent of Mexico's drug-related deaths. Now this is a huge problem for both sides of the borders. Is anything being done about that?"
- Don Lemon on March 7: "So, obviously, we know there's a problem. How much -- how much does America bear responsibility for their problem when it comes to drugs going here and possibly weapons being used in Mexico for this violence?"
- Homeland Security Correspondent Jeanne Meserve on March 11: "Is the U.S. doing enough to stop the violence and drugs from coming north to the U.S.?"
- Michael Ware on March 14: "It's an insurgency that America is fueling with demand for drugs and with the guns with which that insurgency is being fought."
On CNN, only Lou Dobbs has been consistently skeptical of the Mexican and Obama Administration's claims.
CNN also left an important point out of all its reporting on the Mexican violence - a point that the NRA's Cox clearly made in his testimony. Gun control doesn't work to stop crime. Just look at places that have very strict gun regulation. Like ... Mexico.
Matt Philbin, managing editor of CMI, co-wrote this article.
—Colleen Raezler is a research assistant at the Culture and Media Institute




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Try it, Holder, and stand
March 18, 2009 - 14:14 ET by SickofLibsTry it, Holder, and stand back for the reaction from what you think is this nation of cowards.
SoL... Our sentiments
March 18, 2009 - 16:39 ET by bigtimerSoL...
Our sentiments exactly from this home...and much of the communities on both sides of us.
This isn't new news...I've posted about this exact thing on other sites also in the last month.
Like you say...try it Holder..just try it.
Some folks should have listened to his confirmation hearings if they had the chance, especially the second day of them, this issue and states rights came up...he hemmed and hawed when I think it was Vitter asked him about all of this regarding the 2nd Amendment....Leahy had to jump in and answer for him...it made me ill for various reasons, not just this one issue that the Senate confirmed this leftist enemy within.
Ahhh, at least CNN will feel better
March 18, 2009 - 14:15 ET by c5thenYeah, that's the ticket. Let's ban weapons that look like automatic military weapons, but are really only the same as semi-automatic hunting rifles. That makes it appear that something was done when it was totally useless. 'Cause we all know that if the Mexican Drug Cartels can't get their illegal smuggled guns from the US (because our import customs and inspection is so terrible) that they will throw up their hands and give up and go back to being jalapeno farmers.
Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!
www.loyaltoliberty.com
Could they be any more
March 18, 2009 - 14:43 ET by DCC1Could they be any more ignorant?This really really really make me mad, to just spout this crap out like this with NO basis in reality!!!!!
They should all be fired, I don't care who they are, this is not journalism, this is leftist propaganda!!!
NRA WHERE ARE YOU!?!?
vicis pro insurgo est propinquus
Okay, this reasoning is
March 18, 2009 - 14:44 ET by berthugginsOkay, this reasoning is retarded. I can't even come up with a decent argument against it, because no valid argument has been made to begin with. Gun control isn't the issue here - drug consumption is. Oh, and that whole pesky border control issue that no one can seem to make a dent in accomplishing.
On a side note, don't be surprised that your 2nd amendment rights are diminishing - we've already happily given up our 4th and 6th amendment rights.
Yeah, but nobody could
March 18, 2009 - 14:52 ET by DCC1Yeah, but nobody could fight back with the 4th or 6th amendments, well see how this goes, but I have a feeling my hands will be cold before they take away my rights...
vicis pro insurgo est propinquus
Pointy end first, one piece
March 19, 2009 - 09:29 ET by CaligulaPointy end first, one piece at a time, starting with the ammo. More than accomodating I think.
militus invictum
About time they talk about the border
March 18, 2009 - 14:54 ET by Franklins_LockeThis is not what we needed, though. The violence on the border needs to be revealed, but not to subvert the issue that is it OUR fault. The guns are not the problem. Illegal immigration, drug cartels, and a corrupt Mexican government is the problem.
Again, taking away guns from the people who are being attacked by these cartels will just leave them helpless against these terrorists. The terrorist will just find some other place to find the guns.
I say you give every citizen in NV, TX, and NM a firearm. I bet the violence plummets!
http://franklinslocke.blogspot.com/
THe simple fact is that
March 19, 2009 - 07:36 ET by BDTHe simple fact is that Mexico is due for another of its revolutions. The lack of legally owned guns in that nation has simply let the pot simmer for far too long.
If every Mexican citizen owned a firearm, the culture of graft that exists at the grassroots would be greatly alleviated. No longer would the local federale commander attempt to shake down the average citizen as they tried to travel the highways because he might get a 9mm slug in his chest for his efforts.
It might even stop being a dirty little thrid world nation.
Stupedio Culos
March 18, 2009 - 15:02 ET by SemperrightSure does sound like Mexico should build a big F'n wall to keep out all those illegal guns. wait that may hamper their largest export to the US.........poverty
Semper Fi
Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.
Ned Dolan
~Ooh ooh!!
March 18, 2009 - 15:04 ET by choselife3xObama: Hey guys, guys I've got an idea! Let's ban guns in the United States to help lower crime in Mexico!
Napolitano: SLUUURPOP! *lips now free* Oh yes sir, that's a stroke of genius!
Obama: And while we're at it, why don't we act like complete p****s and apologize for causing their gang crime!
Hillary: *crawls out from under desk* I can dodge sniper fire..
Everyone: SHUT UP Seldombinlaid!!!!!
Hope and Change= Despair and Socialism
My two Cents......
March 18, 2009 - 15:29 ET by jgarciaJust try to take my guns......... step into my house uninvited and try, just try!
"assault weapons" that's a
March 18, 2009 - 15:30 ET by notonmywatch"assault weapons"
that's a premise, to be weeded out. "assault" is a crime, hence an "assault weapon" is inherantly criminal. the definition is meaningless anyway.
What part of "the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" don't they understand?
Define "assault weapon"
March 18, 2009 - 15:46 ET by Indiana JoeTo Reginald Denny, a brick is an "assault weapon."
(There's a reference that will show your age!)
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..." - The Who
The obvious answer is Mexico
March 18, 2009 - 15:37 ET by SickofLibsThe obvious answer is Mexico needs to design and manufacture its own weapons.
Not too sure about how good a clay assault rifle would go over, tho.
SoL,
March 18, 2009 - 15:44 ET by Indiana JoeLMAO! I was thinking the same thing; if they made guns that were worth a damn, they wouldn't need to get them from us!
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..." - The Who
I hear they have a pistola
March 18, 2009 - 15:46 ET by SemperrightI hear they have a pistola that you can jam 6000 rounds into it.
It's the Bandito 6000 Hecho en Mexico
Semper Fi
Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.
Ned Dolan
Gee, Mexico blaming their
March 18, 2009 - 15:43 ET by Indiana JoeGee, Mexico blaming their problems on the "gringos." What a novel idea! <yawn>
Tell you what: let's complete that wall, mine the Rio Grande, and stop ALL crossing over the southern border. That will both keep American guns from heading south, and prevent Mexico from "unwittingly" (wink, wink) being a pipe-line for illicit drugs heading north.
Problem solved. In fact, two problems solved. CTTOI, THREE problems solved!
What? Too much?
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..." - The Who
The Ministry of Truth in action
March 18, 2009 - 15:55 ET by wizardjrAll I can say is point me to the studies and reports they keep quoting numbers from. I'll bet most of this is made up BS.
The only reason most of the seized weapons seem to be from America is that the only place with some sort of border control is on the US/Mexico city crossings. Thousands of weapons are coming in by sea from all over including China and Russia. Newsflash: the US does not manufacture AK series weapons. Duh! In addition most 9mm stuff is foreign made as well. Duh! M16/M4's are not civilian goods. They get them from the Mexican army. Duh!
Did you also notice the slam on "gun shows"? Show me the proof of that statement. I dare you. Bunch of butt biscuits if you ask me.
Today's Theme: Simple Logic
March 18, 2009 - 15:58 ET by BlueCat57Again simple logic steps in to solve the world's problems.
Which nations are the major weapons manufacturers and exporters? America, China, Russia, any others?
Which nation exports the most weapons to the Western Hemisphere? America
Where do Mexican drug lords purchase their weapons? The Western Hemisphere.
So what will be stamped on those weapons? Made in America
What is the non sequitor in the news story? That weapons stamped Made in America are purchased in America. I'm guessing the weapons are purchased just about anywhere but America from corrupt military officials in countries that have purchased weapons from America.
Just my simple logic solving the world's problems yet again. Is my logic flawed? Please correct me if it is.
BlueCat,
March 18, 2009 - 16:10 ET by Indiana JoeYour logic is flawless. But there's an even bigger, more obvious non sequitor in all these news stories, and, in fact, in the whole "gun-control" argument:
That people that purchase weapons illegally will be stopped by just... one... more... law!
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..." - The Who
Indiana Joe earns a big ole
March 19, 2009 - 07:39 ET by BDIndiana Joe earns a big ole SHACK!
you quote a "fact" there
March 18, 2009 - 17:32 ET by UndercoverConservativethat are not or have not been revealed to the rest of the world. There are no images or proof of thousands of weapons stamped with "made in America" on them. Only the assertion of a President of a foreign nation that has already shown hostile intent and the willingness to lie, dissemble, and whatever to maintian illegal immigration and the taxable money transfer it provides, as well as refusing to cooperate in drug interdiction because his administration was profiting from it, and even going so far as to reinterpret NAFTA for even more benefit for his powerbase.
If there are any weapons coming out of America, it's the same ones the Cartels (with Mexican Army backing) have brought in. The same ones setting up clandestine farms in the hills around California that are becoming such a danger to Fish and Game inspectors-who now need to carry real M4's (as opposed to AR's) to deal with the enhanced criminal threat.
Now you keep watch. if Mexico tries to claim they're getting those Barretts from California, then the lie becomes transparent. All .50 rifles, have been banned in this state for years. Barrett will not even do business with CA government officials because of this.
Let's not even get into the issue of how "hard" it would be to change manufacturing stamp or to stamp blank receivers. Like those "gun builders" in that Afghanistan video. They're not fabbing that hardware from scratch like the video pretends, they're taking weapons provided illegally and "laundering" them through-thinly disguised arms trafficking but even the worst blatant lie is enough for America's media and the "world court" of generalissimo's, dictators-for-life, and other nasty constant-revolution podunk territories who get "equal voice" with democracies, republics, and established stable cultures
"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is like calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same&quo
Amazing how the laws of supply and demand
March 18, 2009 - 16:07 ET by TeddyAmazing how the laws of supply and demand are a one-way street when it comes to the U.S. and MSM relative to this matter.
Btw Rick, there is a certain hypocrisy to the revelation that you just dug up.
You are part of the MainStream Media that's having a field day with this issue! Nice try though.
well, that settles it
March 18, 2009 - 16:11 ET by UndercoverConservativeif the Mexican president says it's so, then it must be true! No need to prove anything, just make international accusations-the type that if were made by America would demand UN apology and fines in World Court.
Nevermind Hugo Chavez bought a million AK's and a turnkey factory to produce more, but no way those would be used to support marxist causes...thankfully the non-corrupt Mexican President was able to determine that these weapons come from US America and not South America.
"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is like calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same&quo
In a county where large
March 18, 2009 - 17:55 ET by pgrossjrIn a county where large quantities of drugs are easily available and just about any "legal" document you need can be had for a price; do you really think they have to cross the border to get a gun? Our "journalists" are beyond stupid and lazy. They question nothing, which was the whole reason behind freedom of the press. the founders would be appalled to see what a bunch of tools run our media outlets today!
gives me an idea
March 18, 2009 - 18:15 ET by UndercoverConservativewhat say we all get together and head to Mexico to buy all these awesome high powered automatics that we aren't able to even find, much elss buy, here in America. That way, we help the Mexicans out by taking the guns back....
think that will fly with the legislators here? :)
"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is like calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same&quo
UC.... Marvelous
March 18, 2009 - 18:21 ET by bigtimerUC....
Marvelous idea!
AS far as the legislators back here go...lol...
I say, Don't ask, Don't Tell.
O at the Town Hall/anybody hearing him?
March 18, 2009 - 18:38 ET by bigtimerSpeaking of Mexico etc...
Is anybody listening to O at the town-hall meeting he is having that is on-going in Calif?
Color me beet red!!!
I am furious with his lying bull-shite coming from his mouth....not just this subject, which is what has me inflamed....about small banks etc.
I am furious...furious!!
I have never, ever seen anything like this for a so-called prez...
God help us all....and may his numbers keep tumbling...I now pray that a lot of people are listening to the leftist lying bull.
I cant watch
March 18, 2009 - 18:48 ET by general companyBut if he is that bad, then good. The folks need to see him for what he is, the sooner the better.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
so for years the mexican police /government/army
March 18, 2009 - 18:58 ET by tonemeisterturned a blind eye to smuggling both people and drugs.. they brought economic strain to our criminal, healthcare and educational insititutions.jobs lost to illegals who undercut legitimate bussiness people. young lives blownout due to the easy access to drugs... while billions of dollars flowed south from "remmitances". now, there experiencing the blowback. tough s#@t. there attitude is " if they don't buy from us they'll buy from someone else" ie. columbia, etc. now it's there officials and citizens are getting blown away. hey, shut off the flow of drugs and illegals ,the money stops...no money, no drugs, no weapons.
Build a wall to protect Mexicans from evil gun running Gringos
March 18, 2009 - 21:46 ET by jefflebowskiHolder is exactly right. How can we be so blind! We mus build a huge wall across the entire southern US border to protect those peace loving Mexicans from us evil, gun running Gringos! We cannot leave Mexicans to suffer from our evil culture! PLEASE, build the wall now. What kind of monsters are we??
Angry White Dude
www.angrywhitedude.c...
Jeff: Yes, and I am sure
March 19, 2009 - 07:41 ET by BDJeff:
Yes, and I am sure Mexico would be willing to defray our costs in its construction. I recommend they post a Federale at each border crossing point and shake down each Mexican citizen returning from working illegally in the US of all their cash to pay for its construction.
Ooops, I forgot, the Federale's already SHAKE them down......
True.
March 19, 2009 - 00:00 ET by someloudthunderHolder is so right on this one. I for one would also like to add the fact that all Americans that throw out left-overs after dinner contribute to global warming because my Liberal Think-tank that is using your tax dollars told me so.