'CosmoGirl's' Pot Calls the Kettle Black

Photo of Colleen Raezler.
  • Bookmark and Share

 Editors at CosmoGirl would do well to remember that when they point at somebody else, three fingers are pointing back at them.   

The popular teen magazine tackled the question "What is Sexy?" in the March 2008 issue, bemoaning the increased amount of sexual imagery being thrown at young girls but failing to acknowledge its own contribution to the problem. 

Writer Marina Khidekel pointed out that girls are exposed to sexual imagery at younger ages than ever before, citing the popular Bratz dolls and the fact that "stores such as Limited Too sell lingerie like push-up bras and skimpy low-rise underwear for pre-teens." 

Khidekel also rightly lamented that TV shows "with smart female lead characters (like "Gilmore Girls" and "Veronica Mars") are being cancelled, while shows that survive (like "America's Top Model" and "The Hills") focus mainly on girls' appearance and hookups."   When girls are bombarded with the message that appearance is the only thing that matters, Khidekel notes, they start to feel that it's their "sexual power - not [their] talent, brains or ambition - that counts most." 

Really, it's not sexual power that counts the most?  Because that's the opposite message portrayed by the rest of the issue.   One-third of the March issue of CosmoGirl focuses on either fashion or beauty.  Twenty-six percent focuses on celebrities.  This means more than half of the content of the magazine (not including advertisements) is devoted to looks and celebrity worship, both of which sell the idea that to be attractive is to be accomplished. 

While editors only devoted 26 percent of CosmoGirl's content to personality development or career goals, they still managed to make room for a column that corrects myths about masturbation (under the guise of "sex health, of course). 

Khidekel ultimately defined "sexy" as "much more than just your looks or your sexuality - it's your confidence in what you have to offer the world."

If Khidekel is correct in her definition of "sexy," shouldn't these teen magazines place more emphasis on encouraging girls to develop other areas of life - school, sports, art, music, theater - and less on the right beauty techniques and the latest fashions?

 

—Colleen Raezler is a research assistant at the Culture and Media Institute


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

That's pretty funny.

That's pretty funny. Magazines contribute A LOT to this issue.

Veronica Mars...that was a great show. Stupid network executives...

Nahh the biggest downfall

Nahh the biggest downfall for Gilmore Girls and Veronica Mars is that they were on the WB/UPN/CW network.

VM was a good show.

 

Do you realize how much it costs to run for office? More than any honest man could afford. -Montgomery Burns

Smart female lead characters?

Gilmore Girls featured a woman who had an illegimate child & still bed-hopped [oops, sorry, she was in love with each and every one of them] and a daughter that moved in with a guy that had mistreated her, after he had gotten her in trouble with the police.

Worst of all - the daughter dreamed of being the next Christaine Amapour!

Chai

“The question of what kind of President each candidate would make is infinitely more important than all the ‘horse race’ handicapping that dominates the media.” —Thomas Sowell

Yeah, because we know in

Yeah, because we know in real life women don't make any stupid mistakes at all when it comes to relationships...sheesh.

Both were strong women who fought to lead independent lives.

Bal

The article calls them "smart female characters," the storyline shows that they weren't. I didn't say real life women don't make mistakes, but these characters, especially the mother, were far from smart.

Chai

“...Bury me on my face,” said Diogenes; and when he was asked why, he replied, “Because in a little while everything will be turned upside down.”

Did you watch the show?

Did you watch the show? They were smart cookies. Fallible, sure, but smart.

The daughter went to Yale on the show. The mother managed an inn and eventually bought her own inn and ran it successfully.

Yup

Got hooked on it in reruns [on Family channel] just before it concluded it's first run, so I've seen every episode [I'm a of Edward Hermann]. Going to Yale only proves she had book-learning, not common sense. The mother did manage the inn and, indeed started her own successful one. But I was talking about how she wasn't smart in her personal life.

My original point was that I don't think they are the examples of "smart women" that the original article held them out to be. But, come to think of it, that's pretty much the norm in episodic tv. Lead character[s] do all sorts of intelligent things, but can't tie their shoes without help.

Chai

“...Bury me on my face,” said Diogenes; and when he was asked why, he replied, “Because in a little while everything will be turned upside down.”

Part of the media machinery

The mag is a projection of Hollywood/Madison Avenue values which does indeed place a (young) female's sexuality above everything else.

My daughters are in their

My daughters are in their early teens, it is almost impossible to find undergarments that aren't fit for a stripper. I have had more arguments in Dept. stores than I care to remember.

I hear ya.

Is it too much to ask for clothing that covers everything?


What doesn’t kill you, only makes you pissed off. -Children of Bodom  

This reminds me of Bill

This reminds me of Bill O'Reilly showing clips of "girls gone wild" to say that he doesn't approve of it - but, oh, let's see that clip again and again...

Boy Chris have you got that

Boy Chris have you got that exactly right!

ROFL! 

I was thinking the same

I was thinking the same thing. But Bill's not the only one. You can't go to FoxNews.com anymore without a story relating to sex being thrown in front of your face. And the more you scroll down, the worse it gets. It's like they have no shame in how they go about attracting viewers.

Gilmore Girls vs. Cosmo Girls

As one who has been flamed ten-ways come Sunday for the misconstrued context of the (now infamous) Target ad objectification (see this post on your own blog here) http://www.newsbuste...

I've gotta say, the Gilmore Girls' alternative lifestyle accusations don't hold a drop of water with me...

Gilmore Girls has been and always will be a fave in this house for its
sharp-tongued wit and rapid-fire delivery of two smart women baring
their souls, with an intimacy most mothers and daughters long
for...Sure, it dared to tackle some tough subjects sans judgment and
brava to that, depicting vulnerability, brain cells and consequences in
an existential framework of being.

I miss the banter, but its spirit still lives on, for we created our own 'Gilmore
Girls getaway' to give the gift of 'gal pal' time together this holiday season: http://www.shapingyo...

As for the CosmoGirl article, agree there's clearly a whiplash of irony in media messaging...Much like the junk food trollops sinking their sexy smiles into oozing cheeseburgers and fattening fries with the false juxtaposition of "eat this! but still look like THIS!" CosmoGirl is part of the problem as much as the article is part of the solution.

p.s. hey, Colleen...you can write for us any time at Shaping Youth. ;-) You nailed this one!

not for my daughter

I recognized right away that CosmoGirl is as smutty as it's parent and don't allow it for my daughter (16), not that she would want it anyway. Her favorite magazine is Pointe, for ballet dancers. And she's way to busy with dance, music and school to watch garbage TV, I don't watch it either. We may be the only two women in the country who haven't seen an episode of Sex in the City.

As for sexing up little girls, we've both noticed that all of the girls bras are padded now. Since when does an 11 year old need a padded bra? And thongs! And try finding an A or B cup in adult bras that isn't padded.