NYTimes Religion Reporter Spreads False "98%" Figure on Catholic Birth Control, Puts "Religious Freedom" in Scare Quotes
New York Times reporter Laurie Goodstein portrayed Obama’s “compromise” on his requirement that religion institutions provide contraception coverage as causing conflict within the Catholic church that could damage it politically, in Wednesday’s lead National section story, “Obama Shift On Providing Contraception Splits Critics.”
Goodstein, the paper’s religion reporter, hasn’t shown much patience with religious concerns in her coverage of Obama's contraceptive mandate; in her Saturday update she put “religious freedom” in quotation marks while writing dismissively on the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops rejection of Obama’s purported compromise.
And in a front-page story February 10 she passed on popular but bad statistic, without even citing a source, falsely claiming “Studies have shown that 98 percent of Catholic women have used artificial contraception at some time in their lives.”
Sarah Kliff at The Washington Post applied some actual journalistic skepticism and concluded the study, from the Guttmacher Insitute, “does not find that 98 percent of all Catholic women have used contraceptives.” Kliff quoted critic Lydia McGrew: “The survey was limited to women between 15-44....it excluded any women who were a) not sexually active, where that is defined as having had sexual intercourse in the past three months (there go all the nuns), b) postpartum, c) pregnant, or d) trying to get pregnant!”
Goodstein wrote Wednesday:
The near-unified front led by the nation’s Roman Catholic bishops to oppose a mandate for employers to cover birth control has now crumbled amid the compromise plan that the Obama administration offered last week to accommodate religious institutions.
The leaders of several large Catholic organizations that work directly on poverty, health care and education have welcomed the president’s plan as a workable compromise that has the potential to protect religious freedom while allowing employees who request it to have contraceptives covered by their insurance plans.
The bishops, however, have continued to voice strong objections to the White House plan. And they have taken it one step further, arguing that individual Catholics who own businesses should not have to provide birth control to their employees in their health insurance coverage.
The uproar threatens to embroil the Catholic church in a bitter election-year political battle while deepening internal rifts within the church. On the one side are traditionalists who believe in upholding Catholic doctrine to the letter, and on the other, modernists who believe the church must respond to changing times and a pluralistic society.
Goodstein concluded with two quotes from the Catholic left in support of Obama-care’s broader mission:
Sister Anne Curtis, a member of the leadership team of the Sisters of Mercy of the Americas, a religious order with 3,800 members based in Silver Spring, Md., said, “Our hope is to work out this one aspect of this health care legislation so that health care can be made available for all.”
Sister Carol Keehan, president of the Catholic Health Association, said: “My special interest is that in 2014, the 32 or so million people who do not now have health insurance will get access to health care. It’s a huge impact on the lives of many people in this country. I’ve been in health care for 40 years; I know they’re suffering.”
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
It's always "changing times"...........
Submitted by nanabanana on Wed, 02/15/2012 - 5:11pm.
What has changed is people - what they think they want or believe, what they'll accept or allow, etc. What hasn't changed is God.
The 98% compliance w/ contraception thingy
Submitted by Gary Hall on Wed, 02/15/2012 - 7:51pm.
Well, color me perplexed.
In the WaPost analysis which Clay linked, it states:
What it does, however, bear out is the claim that many have made with this statistic: that sexually-active, Catholic women do tend to use contraceptives at the same rate as their non-Catholic counterparts.
Ok. So if 98% of the sexually active women between the ages of 15-44 in the US are using contraceptives, then why have we experienced some 149,436 abortions in the US so far this year alone? And, 54.5 million abortions since Roe v Wade?
Source www.number of abortions.com (warning - do not sit there and watch the world clock tick off the killings)
(;~/ gary
As my wife says, "the fetus is not just a bunch of cells. If it were, it'd be called a tumor."
Good Point, indeed!
Submitted by jhandyman on Thu, 02/16/2012 - 8:12am.
It is interesting how "the media" is supposed to be so deep and thought provoking that they never report this side of the story. So many citizens have been trained to just believe the filtered story of the leftist media without doing any research or connecting the dots with real data. I also understand that liberal policy has gotten us to the point where heads of households are so busy trying to make ends meet and support their families that little time is left to check the liberal media's facts. Those that aren't so busy are probably on government assistance.
I wager a guess
Submitted by GW on Thu, 02/16/2012 - 4:16pm.
that Gary knows the answer to his own question.
The increased number of abortions with the increased availability of contraception is due to at least two factors:
1) No contraception is 100% effective. Dr. Janet Smith said in "Contraception: Why Not?", the only 100% effective means of birth control are abstinence and male castration.
2) Use of contraception alters sexual behavior, presumably making it more common.
Put those together and you get more unplanned pregnancies, and more opportunities for abortions.
Goodstein is doing what the
Submitted by celator on Wed, 02/15/2012 - 11:29pm.
Goodstein is doing what the NYT wants her to do: misrepresent the situation, leave out relevant facts and spin the story to the left. That's what she gets paid to do.
Use of birth control
Submitted by kiwikit on Thu, 02/16/2012 - 6:53am.
Almost fifty years ago I was having problems with an irregular period and was prescribed a month of birth control pills to straighten it out. I guess I'm an example of one who used contraceptives in the NYT pseudo poll. . . . or a child who goes to government schools and is taught in kinderschool how to put a condom on a banana, she also counts in the 99% of the NYT. What a stupid poll! I'd also like to be counted as one whose reproductive health was destroyed by using a dalkon shield to delay pregnancy. Contraception was NOT beneficial for me. . . or for thousands of other women.