NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job
New York Times reporter Erik Eckholm (pictured), whose previous reporting betrays no conservative sympathies, listened to former presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Thursday afternoon and winced at her attacks on President Obama. Thursday’s post for the paper’s “Caucus” blog, “Bachmann Assails Obama Before Conservatives.”
The Times is particularly sensitive to people accusing Obama of “apologizing for America” overseas. Public Editor Arthur Brisbane got huffy and pedantic in defense of the president back in January:
...on the campaign trail, Mitt Romney often says President Obama has made speeches “apologizing for America,”....perhaps the next time Mr. Romney says the president has a habit of apologizing for his country, the reporter should insert a paragraph saying, more or less:
“The president has never used the word ‘apologize’ in a speech about U.S. policy or history. Any assertion that he has apologized for U.S. actions rests on a misleading interpretation of the president’s words.”
News flash: One can apologize without actually using the word “apologize.” (Example: “I am sorry.”) More important, of all the “facts” Brisbane could have used as an example, isn’t that one (whether or not Obama has ever "apologized for America") particularly amorphous and open to partisan interpretation?
Eckholm trod similar defensive ground in his post, rushing to Obama's defense like it was his job:
Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, who dropped out of the presidential race last month, was known as a candidate of the Tea Party and religious conservatives. But speaking to the Conservative Political Action Conference on Thursday, she spent her time excoriating President Obama’s foreign policy.
....
“Before President Obama was elected, no one had ever heard of a United States president saying to the world that the United States is not a Judeo-Christian nation.”
“Before Obama was elected, no one had ever heard a United States president say to the world that we are anything but an exceptional nation.”
“And before President Obama was elected, we never had a president go around apologizing to the world,” she said.
Mrs. Bachmann was taking several liberties with the facts in her remarks about Mr. Obama. He has not apologized to the world, for instance. And on whether or not the United States is a Judeo-Christian nation, the president actually said: “And we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values.”
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Like it's their job
Submitted by NC Boy on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 2:41pm.
And, so it is. There is a big push for the Ombudsmen at NY Times, NPR, and other places to get their publications to "tell the truth", which means immediately challenging and refuting anything negative said about Obama or liberal issues.
It IS their job.
Submitted by drsamherman on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 3:25pm.
It is their job to be brainless automatons, stooges repeating whatever they are told and reacting in a Pavlovian fashion to any words that disagree with the official propaganda line that comes out of Jay Carney's office that morning. It is their groupthink mentality which severely questions interpretations that are not advanced by the head of their mob. It is an alpha-dog/subordinate world, where originality, creativity and truth are antithetic concepts.
Witness what happens when one of them goes off the plantation and the others suddenly disown them. Certainly has happened to more journalists who came to Fox News than anywhere else.
It is
Submitted by John21 on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 3:52pm.
Its is their job, the master speaks and the dog obeys.
With the NYT it is Obama/Liberal propaganda 24/7. They don’t even bother to change the talking points that the master has given them. They don’t even try and hide the bias anymore. The Obamabot will deny reality, science and common sense to protect and serve the liberal agenda.
You could make a good case that they are cultist and will to sacrifice everything and everybody to get to their goal of protecting Obama and the liberal agenda.
It is there job
Submitted by Ruths husband Ben on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 4:35pm.
Might as well make it four for four. It is indeed the Main Stream Media's job to prop up their candidate. The unfortunate thing for the republic is that they adopted and then pushed this candidate onto the world stage without any vetting whatsoever.
it will be a glorious day
Submitted by jkwtrading on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 4:54pm.
it will be a glorious day when the New York Times is gone into bankruptcy.. their propaganda will be gone.
that is their only job
Submitted by ohio granny on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 4:58pm.
Not to report the news,, but to protect and defend, even lie, cheat or steal if that is what it takes to get their messiah reelected. To the rest of us peons, just shut up and go away. Don't we know what is best for us?
The mainstream
Submitted by nolefan2 on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 7:42pm.
media makes no effort anymore to even pretend to be impartial. They slobber and grovel before Obama's feet 24 hours a day. When he succeeds in becoming our dictator, I wonder which of them will be selected to the real State Media? If they had done their job and vetted him thoroughly during the 2008 campaign, he would not even be here now.