NY Times's Ashley Parker Takes Another Snipe at Mitt Romney, 'Out-of-Touch Millionaire'
In the latest in a series of snipes from reporter Ashley Parker directed at Republican candidate Mitt Romney, a brief “Caucus” item in Thursday’s New York Times, “Romney Stands By Corporations Remarks,” suggested Romney’s remark to a heckler that “corporations are people, my friend” made him look like “an out-of-touch millionaire.” But isn't Romney right? (Parker’s article first appeared in a different form online Wednesday afternoon.) The print version opened:
Former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts stirred a bit of a tempest when he said on the campaign trail in Iowa that “corporations are people, my friend.” Some called the remark tone deaf, saying it fed into the perception of him as an out-of-touch millionaire.
But on the campaign trail in Keene, N.H., Mr. Romney showed no signs of distancing himself from the remarks.
“I made the point the other day,” he said at a town-hall-style meeting, voluntarily alluding to his earlier remarks in response to a question about what he would do to fix the economy. “Corporations, they’re made up of people. They’re just groups of people who come together for work.”
He explained: “And when you say tax corporations, the steel and the vinyl and the concrete, those things don’t pay taxes. Only people do. So high taxes on corporations is high taxes on people, and people are going to go places where taxes aren’t too high.”
Why would Romney be obliged to “distance himself from the remarks”? His economic argument is sound, and as a philosophical matter, the Supreme Court agrees with Romney.
Last year the court ruled in the Citizens United case (a decision reviled by liberals) that corporations can spend money on political ads. Washington Post blogger Brad Plumer admitted: “For a long time, the courts have treated corporations like people in many respects. They can sue and be sued. They can enter contracts. They can own property. They have some free speech rights.”
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Er, I don't think Ashley got Ditzy Wassername Shytehead's memo
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 12:23pm.
The MSM attacks on Romney the RINO aren't supposed to kick in until 10 seconds after he secures the GOP nomination.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Ashley's just a little more than thick, isn't she?
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 12:26pm.
Corporations are people in the legal sense, and in the literal sense. Corporations are owned by people who are shareholders either directly or through other investments in mutual funds, life insurance policies, annuities, etc. By the doctrine of the first amendment (you know, the one she hides behind whenever she shoots off her mouth like a badly maintained howitzer), a corporation would therefore have freedom of speech just like a flesh and blood person.
If she's too dumb to recognize the legal doctrine behind incorporation, maybe she could stop pretending to play objective reporter and just go sell shoes.
It May Take an Out-of-Touch Millionare
Submitted by Comrade Jim on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 12:40pm.
To undo the damage done by an in-touch Marxist and out-of-touch brown-nose reporters such as Parker.
They're just confused
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 1:06pm.
These liberals are just confused over the definition of a "corporation." You have to understand that, to a liberal, only a government created monopoly is a "real" corporation. Like the "corporations" that the FDR administration created to build things like dams and other "public works projects." Six Companies, for example, the corporation that built the Hoover dam, was a government-created corporation. After that construction was completed, the government dissolved that corporation.
To a liberal, a non-government created corporation is an evil entity, divorced from "people" in any way other than to manipulate and enslave the "little people." It doesn't matter than every corporation is actually a group of living, breathing people working together for a common goal, if the government didn't create that corporation, people can't be involved at all. Therefor, they, those private corporations, become the "evil corporations," some type of demonic being unto itself, unless something goes "bad," of course, then who gets the blame? The people "running:" that evil, demonic private corporation, of course. Then, and ONLY then, do private corporations become "people." For example: the people who worked for Enron and who suffered after the CEO, and other, did dastardly deeds. Enron itself wasn't to blame, people were.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
"Some called the remark tone
Submitted by celator on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 2:05pm.
"Some called the remark tone deaf....."
Ah, the infamous Some Clan offers its opinion on Republicans once again. Those Some people are experts in everything, aren't they? Lucky us dummies have them around to form our opinions.
celator---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 6:20pm.
the infamous "Some Clan".
Perfecto !
MD
Mitt Romney's an out-of-touch millionaire, and Obama's . .
Submitted by Gary Hall on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 3:52pm.
Mitt Romney's an out-of-touch millionaire, and Obama's not?
(;~> gary
I wonder, did the NY Times
Submitted by deerjerkydave on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 8:07pm.
I wonder, did the NY Times make this same statement about John F'n Kerry?
------------------------
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. -James MadisonHow about this one... Barack
Submitted by Barack Must Go on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 5:09pm.
How about this one... Barack Obama, ' Out-of-His-Element-Community-Organizer '.
~How long is this 3x retread going to be allowed to post?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 5:11pm.
.