NYT's Rampell Wonders Where the Left-Wing Outrage Is Among Unemployed
With 14 million Americans out of work, New York Times economics reporter Catherine Rampell is wondering where the left-wing mobs are in the front-page story for Sunday Business, “Somehow, the Unemployed Became Invisible.” The text box imagined a better time: “In the 1930s, Americans did not endure unemployment so quietly.”
(Back on June 18, Rampell agonized over how “one little word” was depriving jobless Arizonans of additional weeks of federal benefits.)
Grim number of the week: 14,087,000.
Fourteen million, in round numbers -- that is how many Americans are now officially out of work.
Word came Friday from the Labor Department that, despite all the optimistic talk of an economic recovery, unemployment is going up, not down. The jobless rate rose to 9.2 percent in June.
What gives? And where, if anywhere, is the outrage?
The United States is in the grips of its gravest jobs crisis since Franklin D. Roosevelt was in the White House. Lose your job, and it will take roughly nine months to find a new one. That is off the charts. Many Americans have simply given up.
But unless you’re one of those unhappy 14 million, you might not even notice the problem. The budget deficit, not jobs, has been dominating the conversation in Washington. Unlike the hard-pressed in, say, Greece or Spain, the jobless in America seem, well, subdued. The old fire has gone out.
....
It wasn’t always so. During the Great Depression, riots erupted on the bread lines. Even in the 1980s and 1990s, angry workers descended on Washington by the busload.
After noting that long lines around unemployment offices were potent for recruits for protests:
Today, though, many unemployment offices have closed. Jobless benefits are often handled by phone or online rather than in person. An unemployment call center near Mr. Oursler, for instance, now sits behind two sets of locked doors and frosted windows.
In other countries, workers have mobilized online. Unions here, too, have reached out on the Web. They include groups like Working America (the community affiliate of the A.F.L.-C.I.O.) and UCubed (created by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers).
After questioning why Americans aren’t using Facebook to organize “economic protests" as in Britain and Greece, she wondered why Americans weren't blaming conservatives for the problem. She didn't consider the possibility that people were blaming the failed policies of Democrats for their joblessness, merely that Democrats are in charge of the White House and the Senate.
Why populist anger over the poor economy is leaning right, rather than left, this time around is a bit of a mystery. Perhaps it is because Democrats, traditional friends of labor, control the White House and the Senate.
She concluded with more left-wing wishful thinking.
For the moment, jobless Americans are waiting on President Obama. If unemployment stays as high as many expect, and millions exhaust their benefits, they may just find their voice in 2012.
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Lack of outrage
Submitted by JamesPhilip on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 4:17pm.
Could it be because around 40% of the population does not pay any Federal taxes and is living off the top 5%?
What is this goofball trying to say?
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 4:32pm.
That only LEFT-WINGERS are allowed to be upset at the high unemployment numbers? Alot of us right-wingers dont like it either, genius!
Why didn't she question the 'Obama's Stash' women?
Submitted by Slyrr on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 4:52pm.
This 'reporter' should have gone to Michigan and tracked down the two women who were among thousands that were waiting outside a government office, for scraps and crumbs to be doled out from their overlord slave masters. Remember them? They were the women who were questioned by a reporter, asking what money they were waiting for. 'Obama money!' they screamed. The reporter asked where Obama was getting this money. The women spluttered and dithered for a moment, then said, 'I donno - his personal stash!' The reporter continued to question them, but the Obama babes had had enough of being proved ignorant. They picked up their voodoo juju sticks with Obama's head mounted on them and started dancing in a raindance circle, screaming 'O-Ba-Ma! O-Ba-Ma! O-Ba-Ma!' until the reporter had to give up and move on.
That's the true outrage in all this. An entire political movement, lied to by their crowned king. Obama told them he'd buy them houses, and new kitchens, new cars, that he'd pay their rent, pay their college tuition, buy their food, change their diapers and powder their bottoms.
Obama LIED.
The outrage is revving up, believen' you me. I bet in 2012, the outraged are going to be making their voices heard loud and clear. And even Obama's voodoo raindancers won't be able to chant loudly enough, or mindlessly enough, to drown out the cries of over 14 million Americans that Obama has robbed of their livelihood.
I am outraged. . .
Submitted by rickbren on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 4:58pm.
. . .at BARRY!
In the 1930's there was no
Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 4:59pm.
In the 1930's there was no unemployment insurance, people had
to do whatever was necessary. For that reason we don't have the anger that will prompt protests or worse, yet. Who knows at what level it will take to cause protests or worse. But I am sure there ar plenty of angry unemployed and they do vote. The msm avoid blaming Obama for the economy as they would if the president where a republican. If they did blame Obama openly and honestly you would see open anger on the news.
They don't even try to hide their bias anymore..
Submitted by Mark81150 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 5:19pm.
I have a clue for lil Miss dunderhead,.. the unemployed are angry as Hell,.. but the fact bis, as long as democrats enjoy power in the WH and Senate the MSM will effectively nueter their voice, and every unemployed person knows it. Folks like her are the worst kind of hack. The unaware that they spin every word kind.
If the unemployed granted her wish, and marched in mass on Washington...
Does she really think, really? in her deluded mind that they would not direct their rage at the one face of government they see the most. The one which has just as much as said,.. oops about the shovel ready thing.. ha ha... just blame the GOP for me like good little sheep, and mind your own business when it's about me..
It isn't just Obama himself that is completely tone deaf,.. his media fanclub leads that chorus..
She might start at home and
Submitted by Reaver on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 6:36pm.
She might start at home and ask how many stories the NYT has done on the unemployed. Speaking of invisible, we’re in the middle of one of the biggest housing slumps in history but where are the stories about all the homeless people? It isn’t just the unemployed that are invisible to the MSM.
The homeless ALWAYS disappear when a Dems in office..
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 2:50am.
So are the sad segments of the unemployed, BUT when a Republican gets in next year, wait til you see what they print and air-they would have had 4 years built up to spew on us, in a hail of sh*tstorm proportions!
14 million?
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 4:58am.
I'm thinking the real number is closer to 30 million.
Dang those capitalists!
Submitted by JLin on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 11:52am.
Where are they hiding all those jobs? And the pot-o-gold, where have they hidden that? FDR would not have put up with this!