Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 20, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Clay Waters's blog
  • BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
  • Crowley to Obama Advisor: 'Why Didn't the President Just Say, Yeah, Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack?'
  • CBS's Sharyl Attkisson Says Team Obama 'Perfected' Delaying Info Release And Has 'Quit Talking to Me Altogether'
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'

Rising Gas Prices, Historic Deficits Spell Advantage Democrats? So Says NYT's Carl Hulse

By Clay Waters | May 09, 2011 | 16:52

A  A

New York Times congressional reporter Carl Hulse, whose reporting has been somewhat more balanced of late, reverted to old partisan habits in Monday’s story, "Democrats’ Plan Would Offset Deficit by Ending Big Oil’s Tax Breaks."

Hulse pushed Democratic enthusiasm over the party's latest talking points attempting to place Republicans on the defensive, this time managing to find Democratic optimism in a story about high gas prices and the deficit, without sparing a word of blame against President Obama for either problem.

Democrats are targeting "the five largest and most profitable oil companies: BP, Exxon Mobil, Shell, Chevron and Conoco Phillips."

Linking two of the politically volatile issues of the moment, Senate Democrats say they will move forward this week with a plan that would eliminate tax breaks for big oil companies and divert the savings to offset the deficit.

  With high gas prices and rising federal deficits in the political spotlight, senior Democrats believe that tying the two together will put pressure on Senate Republicans to support the measure or face a difficult time explaining their opposition to voters whose family budgets are being strained by fuel prices.
President Obama and some top Congressional Democrats have said they want to take some of an estimated $21 billion in savings from ending the tax breaks and steer it to clean energy projects. But the Senate’s Democratic leadership is calculating that using it to cut the deficit instead makes it a tougher issue politically for Republicans who are trying to burnish their conservative fiscal credentials.

"Big Oil certainly doesn’t need the collective money of taxpayers in this country," said Senator Robert Menendez, Democrat of New Jersey, one of the authors of the legislation that Democrats intend to showcase. "This is as good a time as any in terms of pain at the pump and in revenues needed for deficit reduction."

Hulse only got around to quoting a G.O.P. rebuttal in paragraph seven. And after quoting a spokesman for Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell pointing out Democrats have been criticizing oil company profits for decades, Hulse concluded by suggesting the Democrats had the superior strategy, including a rah-rah quote from a Democratic pol.

But Democrats said they see themselves as occupying the political and policy high ground in this case. They noted that top Republicans like Speaker John A. Boehner and Representative Paul D. Ryan, the Wisconsin Republican who is chairman of the House Budget Committee, have suggested that industry subsidies might have to be curbed.

Even talk of Republican delaying tactics does not seem to disturb Democrats who are eager to engage in a fight about oil.

"I am happy to have this debate on the floor for days," Mr. Menendez said.

About the Author

Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times. Click here to follow Clay Waters on Twitter.
  • Oil & Gas Prices
  • Taxes
  • New York Times
  • TimesWatch
  • Clay Waters's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

...and how

Submitted by johnsonl on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 5:04pm.

would this lower gas prices?

  • Login to post comments

It wont

Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 5:12pm.

Nor will the double talk that goes along with it. Frauds,,,,, forget about reality the dimwit says,, just trust me.

This guy, and many like him are so full of crap, they have no idea what fresh air smells like anymore.

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

End the breaks, let them find our what their policies cause

Submitted by Funbowhunter on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 5:15pm.

We should not be funding research and development anyway. While they are at it, we can end the state/oil company collusion on price fixing at the pump. We can also require gas companies to separate the taxes to the end of the receipt so we can see how much is going for taxes, AND the oil companies can't claim that they are paying BILLIONS out of their profits in taxes, when in fact it is taken from us at the pump and THEY send it into the government. Nice slight of hand there in their latest bellyaching about how much they pay in taxes. Not buying the hype from either side any more.

www.livingfortruth.wordpress.com
  • Login to post comments

Another simple mind

Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 5:22pm.

So when the oil companies buy materials for drilling, transportation, or production or development, they do so tax free eh?

Did you know the fed makes more off of a gallon of gas then the oil company, more off of a pack of smokes, off of a automobile, off of a airline ticket, and just about anything else you purchase.

Tell us how much more the Fed should tax them, because I would like to know just how much, is enough for the simple mind.

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

Funbow

Submitted by Franksam on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 4:34am.

If we ended tax considerations for oil companies, we'd have to stop them for car companies and farmers, windfarms,etc, You're against those big tax breaks too, right? I know I am, but I might accept the trade-off. Tax Exxon just like GM, and get the Volt into extinction ASAP,

  • Login to post comments

I bet Carl Hulse gave himself a migraine coming up with this

Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 5:31pm.

Mental gymnastics of this sort must really be painful.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

IF this was a convo about

Submitted by amyshulk on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 5:33pm.

IF this was a convo about ridding ourselves of ALL crony capitalism, I'd march in that parade! But it's not - it's a dagger held at the throats of our economy "for our own good" for POLITICAL GAIN!!!

I'm ill..

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

defict

Submitted by ferv888 on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 5:57pm.

What the hell is wrong with these guys. We are talking 4.5B in tax relief. Maybe we should go after that paragon of virtue to the tax man, GE with no taxes paid, or how about GM which received a 45B tax break for their BK which was most unusual. Or how about the electric car company in California that promised all those jobs for stimulus money, not!!!!!!!!!!

Take away the subsidy and guess what, cost goes up, price is reflected and Chu's wish comes more than ever close to Europe's pricing model.

GET THEM ALL THE HELL OUT OF WASHINGTON

  • Login to post comments

British Petroleum

Submitted by Superpower on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 6:59pm.

Didn't BP drop a ton a cash on the 2008 obama campaign? ...and then coughed up a twenty billion dollar slush fund for the administration to disperse to Americans effected by the Gulf oil leak of which only a few million has been spent?

"The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it." - Flannery O'Connor
  • Login to post comments

A couple of weeks ago, Mark

Submitted by stratman on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 7:02pm.

A couple of weeks ago, Mark Levin talked about big oil tax breaks.  Levin said something about big oil company tax breaks ended years ago and these tax breaks were for little oil companies currently.  The gist I got from it was the Left was demagoguing a situation that doesn't exist anymore, at least not to the extant implied. 

Does anyone recall the discussion or know what Levin was referring to?

  • Login to post comments

Yep, I do

Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 7:14pm.

The tax breaks for the small producers, are similar to what any other small business can apply for.

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

Levin made a point that most

Submitted by stratman on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 7:37pm.

Levin made a point that most in the government do not know this.  He mentioned Speaker Boehner as one of the clueless on this manner.

If so, it is no wonder the Right has made little effort in combating the Left on this matter.

  • Login to post comments

Or in any manor,

Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 7:52pm.

My guy aint sleeping on it! He is all over this BS, as well as Bobby

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

Good!

Submitted by stratman on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 9:09pm.

Good!  Keep the heat on these rapacious demagogues.

  • Login to post comments

So, my bet is once the

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 9:01pm.

price of gas breaks $5.00, the GOP could win with a pile of turds.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Their Gas Tank is Empty...

Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 05/09/2011 - 9:40pm.

Out of ideas, at least any ideas that actually work, Democrats are now left with just hatred of Republicans and punishing anything and anyone they think people may dislike to get some votes from the bitter and envious.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Leno: It’s Gotten So Bad for Obama Fox News Changed Its Slogan to ‘See, I Told You So!’
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • The Guardian Glamorizes New ‘Assault on Wall Street’ Movie as Justice
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use