Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Clay Waters's blog
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away
  • No Mention of IRS Scandal on NBC's 'Today,' But Plenty of Time for Obama Prom Photo
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Lisa Myers: 'For a Year the IRS Essentially Knowingly Lied to Congress and No One Came Forward'
  • Network Evening Shows Don’t Name Islam in London Terror Attack
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’

NYT Econ Writer David Leonhardt's Simple Budgetary Solutions: Ration Health Care, Raise Taxes

By Clay Waters | April 06, 2011 | 19:04

A  A

New York Times chief economics writer David Leonhardt argued against the deficit-reducing House Republican budget written by Rep. Paul Ryan in his Wednesday front-page Business Day column “A Lopsided Proposal for Medicare.” Instead, Leonhardt called for higher taxes on "affluent Americans"(his reasoning: All wealthy countries do it). It’s one of his favorite arguments for redistributing the wealth.

While admitting the Republican budget was “a daring one in many ways” he faulted it for not reforming Medicare, which he interestingly admits is a “welfare program,” since people generally get more out of it in care than what they paid into the program in taxes. Leonhardt again called for rationing health care in the name of cost control.

A fairer, more fiscally conservative plan would not postpone dealing with Medicare. It would leave in place the cost control measures in the health reform bill and go even further to reward the quality of care rather than the volume. Obviously, these steps would run some risk of restricting good treatments, too. But, remember, we’re facing “an existential threat.” We can’t limit ourselves to solutions without risks.

Next, the federal government would raise taxes. As countries have grown richer over time, they have historically paid higher taxes -- to cover the costs of a strong military, good schools, comfortable retirements and other luxuries that the free market doesn’t provide.

Affluent Americans, in particular, can afford higher taxes. They have received far larger raises in recent decades than any other income group, and their tax rates have fallen far more. Yet Mr. Ryan would reduce them further.

About the Author

Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times. Click here to follow Clay Waters on Twitter.
  • Budget
  • David Leonhardt
  • Paul Ryan
  • New York Times
  • ObamaCare
  • TimesWatch
  • Clay Waters's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Leonhardt: ration healtcare?? oh, death panels..

Submitted by Gary Hall on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 7:09pm.

So Leonhardt believes that we should ration healthcare. Hmm. I'd imagine that that would be done by something akin to a "death panel?"

 

(;~/ gary

  • Login to post comments

"death panel?"

Submitted by Bob K on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 7:32pm.

No.....why, that's crazy right wing talk. Or so we have been told that since the Obamacare discussion started. And have been reassured on a nearly basis ever since. ***sarcasm, off***

Bob K
  • Login to post comments

Hello 'death panels'. How

Submitted by Slyrr on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 7:34pm.

Hello 'death panels'.

How does the Left feel, knowing that every word they speak proves that Sarah Palin was right?

If a Liberal/Democrat politician/media figure wants to put their arms around you, or pat you on the back, all they're doing is looking for a good place to stick a knife.
  • Login to post comments

They lefts gets even crazier

Submitted by Free Stinker on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 7:41pm.

They lefts gets even crazier every time Palin is proven correct. This would explain why they are foaming-at-the-mouth crazy these days.

 

   /// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 ///    خال

  • Login to post comments

Government Finances and Services are in Shambles

Submitted by Comrade Jim on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 7:57pm.

And this guy's advice is to turn ever more money over to the government. Sir, the existential threat is big government. Get the government off our back and out of our lives and we'll do just fine.

  • Login to post comments

Albert Camus was a medical expert?

Submitted by drsamherman on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 9:04pm.

Who in the hell else would refer to medical rationing and an "existential threat" other than some detached, reality-challenged NYT writer?

  • Login to post comments

What????

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 11:05pm.

...to cover the costs of a strong military, good schools, comfortable retirements and other luxuries that the free market doesn’t provide.

Really??? Seems to me that if the private sector ran the military, then our fine soldiers would be better taken care of than they are now. As for military equipment, correct me if I'm wrong, but much of this is engineered and produced by private companies.

Also, private schools seem to outperform public schools.

As for retirement, yeah, public unions enjoy some nice bennies in this area, but the opportunity for even better retirements rests in the private sphere. Not all are guaranteed a life of luxury in retirement, but if you educate yourself, work hard, and produce, chances are good that you'll have one hell of a retirement.

Besides, those cushy retirements of the public unions are paid for on the backs of private workers.

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

Not all of the

Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 11:19pm.

retirements of public employees are paid for by citizens, or private workers,  Restless. 

My pension comes from a police-fire pension fund, wholly funded by members.  The board makes the investments, and darn good ones too.  For the last quarter of 2010, their return on the investment was $23M. 

The city didn't match our contribution for the last 21 or more years of my working time, because the pension fund was "over funded", according to them.  So, the tax payers are, and have been off the hook for the cost of our retirements. 

However, now some "activists" and city leaders are moaning because, Horrors, they may have to make contributions in the future.  Because, for the years they got a free ride, they didn't put a penny aside, looking down the road to when the gravy train might derail.  However, they would like to get their hands on our pension, and raid it, much like the feds did with SS.

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

You're right Up

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 11:43pm.

And I should have exempted fire/police in my rant. There are many pension funds for fire and police that are member paid, and run really well.

I was really railing against the idea that govt. can set up retirements better than the private sector. The private sector is paying for a lot of public retirements.

And, come to think of it, even in your case, the govt. had little to nothing with funding your pension. Your union members did it on their own, and the board made good use of the contributions. Sort of proves my point.

My wording was bad though, and I appreciate the heads up.

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

And then they collapse, completely, forever.

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 04/07/2011 - 12:09pm.

"As countries have grown richer over time, they have historically paid higher taxes."

And then they collapse, completely, forever, as anyone who actually LOOKS at history can tell you. Just ask the Romans, or the Greeks, about that.  You know, the "rich" countries that raised taxes so high that the "barbarians" finally had enough and said: you're outta here!

I don't know about how the "chief economics writer" of the NYT's feels about it, but I don't think that causing the extinction of your own society is a wise idea for ANY government to try.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
  • Robert Redford Blasts America's Belief System, Tech Advancements
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use