Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 20, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Clay Waters's blog
  • MSNBC: Obama and Merkel Are the New 'Ronnie and Maggie'; Matthews Sees Conspiracy to Push Hillary 2016
  • NBC's Todd Excuses Obama's Poor Speech Performance: Crowd Too Small, 'It Was Hot'
  • Chris Matthews Whines About Sun Harming Obama's Berlin Speech
  • MSNBC's Hayes Slams 'Shameful Spectacle' of 'Anti-Food Stamp Jihad' by Republicans
  • The Inconvenient Suffering of China’s Laogai Prisoners
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons

NYT's Paul Krugman Bashes Rep. Paul Ryan's Budget, but Lays Off the 'Flim-Flam Sauce'

By Clay Waters | April 05, 2011 | 14:46

A  A

Respectable economist turned partisan New York Times columnist Paul Krugman weighed in at his nytimes.com blog Tuesday morning on the ambitious budget proposal for Fiscal Year '12, released by the chairman of the House Budget Committee, the formerly flim-flam-sauce-drenched Rep. Paul Ryan.

In his post, headlined “The Threat Within,” Krugman at least held off the childish insults this time, perhaps because it backfired in his face back in August 2010, when the source he used in his column to “prove” Ryan was a flim-flammer acting in bad faith actually wrote a defense of him in response.

Krugman feared Obama would not sufficiently demagogue the issue like brave Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi did when Bush tried to save Social Security through a partial privatization in 2005.

In 2005, the de facto Democratic leader was Nancy Pelosi. And she never bought into either the crisis-mongering or the Beltway desire to prove oneself “serious” by courageously agreeing to hurt ordinary Americans to make the nation safe for high-end tax cuts. She maintained a steely resolve: this privatization shall not pass.

Pelosi is still there. But Barack Obama is now the party’s leader. And let’s be frank: Obama still, after all that has happened, seems devoted to the dream of transcending partisanship, a dream he tries to serve by being nice to Republican ideas no matter how terrible those ideas are. (I did warn about this during the primaries -- just saying.)

About the Author

Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times. Click here to follow Clay Waters on Twitter.
  • Budget
  • Paul Ryan
  • New York Times
  • TimesWatch
  • Clay Waters's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

Barack Hussein Obama has run into a buzzsaw

Submitted by wedapeople on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 2:59pm.

Paul Ryan is gonna school Mssr President in economics and in doing so politics !

you had you're shot El Presidente..... You punted.

Pizza anyone !

  • Login to post comments

"PRESENT!"

Submitted by Wildcatter1980 on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 3:50pm.

"PRESENT!"

(LOL)

--

If you want to know what liberal secular progressives are really doing, just listen to what they are accusing others of.

Recommended reading: Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg

  • Login to post comments

How they Howl !!!

Submitted by ripper58 on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 3:43pm.

and Obambi hasn't submitted a budget since ....when was the last time they submitted one ? oh yeah 2008 was it?

"I got pie" ...BHO 2011
  • Login to post comments

On a different note:

Submitted by retrocon on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 5:00pm.

Respectable Economist?

So, is Obama a "respectable president" because he won a Nobel Peace prize? Won it without actually doing anything? And ultimately doing everything opposite of all the things they were sure he was going to do to earn it? And if he had done all the thing that they wanted him to do to earn it, the US would really be screwed? Do we really associate these foreign socialist awards ceremonies with "respectable" anymore?

Oops, sorry, ranting.

  • Login to post comments

"Won it without actually doing anything?"

Submitted by needle on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 11:14pm.

Perhaps the pathetic Nobel Peace Prize Committee suck-ups were anxious to award Obama the prize for his campaign promises, before reality spoiled their liquored-up stupor.

By now the Nobel Peace Prize is seriously besmirched. Sure, the Peace Prize Committee has themselves to blame. It takes people of great character to contribute to Peace; "great" people of negligible character contribute in proportion to their character. The nebbishes that make up the Peace Prize Committee apparently do not understand this. It's a shame.

- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.

  • Login to post comments

Obama is so nice…

Submitted by needle on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 10:54pm.

Wow! Obama tries to be “nice to Republican ideas”? Who knew?

I guess for Paul Krugman, Obama’s categorically ignoring the Republicans instead of siccing ACORN and SEIU thugs on them is being nice.

- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.

  • Login to post comments

So, needle, it would appear

Submitted by Jer on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 11:06pm.

OBAMA INVITES KEY CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS TO TALK BUDGET [link]

is your idea of "categorically ignoring the Republicans..."

That's an interesting concept.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

The White House did dismiss

Submitted by bkeyser on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 11:19pm.

The White House did dismiss another CR out of hand... So while the Chairman of the Appropriations Committee and the Speaker of the House were invited to the little get-together, I wouldn't categorize it as an olive branch either.

  • Login to post comments

It's difficult to compromise when the Repubs won't

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 12:03am.

take yes for an answer. Boehner had strongly hinted that 73 billion in cuts would clinch the deal. The White House acquiesced but Boehner under pressure from the Tea Party has now upped the ante.

That's the GOP version of give-and-take negotiations. Pretend to give up the olive branch and then take it and beat the hell out of the other guy.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

After the 111th Congress...

Submitted by MightyMouth on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 12:10am.

It's about time they took some of what they dished out!

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend, unless my friend is more evil than my enemy."
  • Login to post comments

MM...

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 12:45am.

We've been taking crap like that for as long as I can remember--and that's a long time. Now...it's payback time. :-)

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Obama got around to this so

Submitted by needle on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 11:21pm.

Obama got around to this so ridiculously late it hardly counts. And considering the outcome of the meeting, one can imagine “I won” pretty much dismissed them.

Obama has been ignoring Republican as much as possible even since the inauguration.

- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.

  • Login to post comments

Why do I get the feeling that anything short of inviting

Submitted by Jer on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 11:28pm.

every single GOP member of Congress to the White House and handing over the keys to the Oval Office would be regarded as simply further evidence of Obama ignoring Republicans.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

You get that feeling...

Submitted by MightyMouth on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 12:13am.

Because your reasoning is flawed, just like every other Liberal.

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend, unless my friend is more evil than my enemy."
  • Login to post comments

The current Oval Office occupant's dislike for ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 1:36am.

dealing with Republicans, "because he 'won', don't you know, has been thoroughly documented.

It has also been conveniently ignored,  vehemently denied, or disdainfully pooh-poohed, depending on the situation.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Krugman is a clueless poser.

Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 2:02am.

Krugman is a clueless poser. Thomas Sowell breaks it down in Intellectuals and Society.

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • The regulated states of America infringe on pursuit of happiness (Niall Ferguson)
  • The rationale for wind power won't fly (Jay Lehr @ WSJ)
  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • NewsBusters Interview: Amity Shlaes on Coolidge, Media, and Neo-Keynesianism
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use