After years of mainstreaming and idealizing antiwar protesters and marches supporting illegal immigrants as "grandmothers with canes, parents with children in strollers," dissent against a president's policies is no longer cool at the New York Times.
The Times finds the newest batch of protesters against Obama health care to be "angry," "irritable" crowds of whites taking marching orders from conservative talk radio and web sites.
Wednesday's front-page story by Ian Urbina and Katharine Seelye on protests at Democratic Sen. Arlen Specter's town hall meeting in Lebanon, Pa., "Senator Goes Face to Face With Dissent." The front page of the Times showed a confrontation between a stiff-faced Specter and a shouting protester.
They got up before dawn in large numbers with angry signs and American flag T-shirts, and many were seething with frustration at issues that went far beyond overhauling health care.
More than 1,000 people showed up here Tuesday morning in this largely Republican town in central Pennsylvania for a town-hall-style meeting with Senator Arlen Specter, though the auditorium could seat only 250. Like many of the dozens of such meetings held by members of Congress over the last few weeks, this one was punctuated with rowdy moments, and interviews with many of those who showed up made it clear just how much underlying dissent motivated them.
....
Ms. Abram described herself as a stay-at-home mother from Lebanon, and in many ways she was representative of the almost entirely white and irritable crowd, most of whom were from the area.
For once, unions like the Service Employees International Union didn't hold sway at a town hall meeting, apparently not sufficiently motivated to arrive in time to get in. The Times spun that embarrassment as just another result of inchoate right-wing anger: "It was the angriest people who got in line first."
Many of the union members who showed up to support health care reform did not arrive early enough to get into the auditorium at the Harrisburg Area Community College, and thus were largely not represented among the 30 questioners called on by Mr. Specter. It was the angriest people who got in line first.
You might remember leftists protested Bush's attempt at Social Security reform back in 2005 -- or perhaps not. The Times didn't exactly focus hard on the rowdy protests that greeted another Pennsylvania senator -- conservative Republican Sen. Rick Santorum, who backed Bush's Social Security reform. (Santorum was defeated by Democrat Robert Casey in 2006).
The Times was much milder and less obsessive in its description of left-wing Social Security protesters. Here's reporter Robin Toner's description, from a February 23, 2005 article from Chester, Pa., where Santorum was holding a meeting on Social Security:
Almost no one is a more outspoken advocate of President Bush's Social Security plan than Senator Rick Santorum, the third-ranking Republican in the Senate leadership, who is campaigning across his state this week, trying to get young people to focus on their retirement.
Toner described the hecklers in non-judgmental fashion as providing a "freewheeling atmosphere." The word "angry" was nowhere to be found:
But Mr. Santorum, who is chairman of the Senate Republican Conference and a favorite of conservatives nationally, was plowing ahead this week with 10 public forums, 7 of them on college campuses. That translates into a far more freewheeling atmospherethan, say, one of Mr. Bush's tightly controlled forums on Social Security.
At Drexel University, for example, Mr. Santorum was greeted by protesters, was heckled during his speech by people declaring their loyalty to Lyndon LaRouche, and was asked several questions by young people on issues that had little to do with Social Security, including same-sex marriage and the global fight against AIDS.
Unlike the two front-page Times stories on the angry health-care protesters, the 2005 article on the Social Security protests appeared on page 16. The protests also weren't the focus of the Santorum article, which was more about how young people weren't paying attention to the debate in Washington.
And speaking of liberal accusations of conservative protesters being not genuine grassroots, check out Andrea Stone's write-up of similar anti-Santorum protests in the March 16, 2005 edition of USA Today:
Santorum was among dozens of members of Congress who ran gantlets of demonstrators and shouted over hecklers at Social Security events last month. Many who showed up to protest were alerted by e-mails and bused in by anti-Bush organizations such as MoveOn.org and USAction, a liberal advocacy group. They came with prepared questions and instructions on how to confront lawmakers.
Those details didn't make the Times.
Back to Specter's raucous town meeting. The senator made an effort to control things, with the Times citing "concerns about a potentially unruly crowd."
But for all his efforts, tempers boiled over 15 minutes into the meeting. Standing two feet from the senator, Craig Anthony Miller, 59, shouted, "You are trampling on our Constitution!" A half-dozen security people quickly swarmed but refrained from touching him as Mr. Specter, raising his voice, said sternly, "Wait a minute! Wait a minute!" He said the man had the right to leave....But most of those who spoke Tuesday seemed unlikely to vote in the Democratic primary. Many seemed concerned about issues that are either not in the health care legislation or are peripheral to the debate in Washington -- abortion, euthanasia, coverage of immigrants, privacy.
The Times doesn't consider abortion rights, euthanasia, or illegal immigration important? Could have fooled us. Yet when conservative protesters bring those same issues up (and there are valid concerns about abortion and end-of-life care) they suddenly become "peripheral."
As my MRC colleague Matthew Balan pointed out:
The Associated Press, which is no right-wing press outlet, reported on August 5 that "health care legislation before Congress would allow a new government-sponsored insurance plan to cover abortions, a decision that would affect millions of women and recast federal policy on the divisive issue." That detail is the main reason why the abortion issue has been thrust into the health care debate.
—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"...dissent against a president's policies is no longer cool...
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:05 ET by PrairieSkyat the New York Times."
Apparently...It's only cool if the president is a Republican...Then it is not only cool, but required, according to the NYT.
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
Sounds more like they dislike white people. Racist bastards.
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:26 ET by jazbo"Democrats; Breeding voters like farm animals since 1962"
Pushing on the Plunger
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 14:40 ET by allanfThe Times and other leftists can't help but dig a deeper and deeper hole for themselves. Their barely contained seething xenophobic contempt for different ideas has now boiled to the surface.
The "racers" are at it
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:08 ET by mattmThe "racers" are at it again.
The racist media should realize...
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:41 ET by kgThe demographic of any crowd would be "almost entirely white"!
"DumbAssity of Dope"
kg... Bingo! Guess we
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 14:33 ET by bigtimerkg...
Bingo!
Guess we can no longer have any of that now can we?
These people really take us for fools...such fools they are.
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
Angry White and Damn Right!
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:09 ET by GeneralAlI don't doubt that most of the protesters are angry whites! After all, we are the ones working and paying most of the taxes. We are not clones of the Democrat/Communist party. Most blacks are Democrats and swallow the party line completely. Therefore, its no surprise that they won't be found protesting a government power grab!
X
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:24 ET by serfer62Just keep adding photos to the articles & pictures are worth a 1K opposition...
Republican Town?
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:33 ET by slickwillie2001Re "More than 1,000 people showed up here Tuesday morning in this largely Republican town in central Pennsylvania," –in 2006, Lebanon County (which Lebanon is in) went 59/41 democratic; in 2004 went 49/47 Republican. In both cases the democratic won the entire district, PA-17. The holder of PA-17 is Tim Holden, now in his 9th term as a congressman.
So the description as "largely Republican" is bogus. The liberal media will spin any contentious townhall meeting as due to Republicans, but many of those causing a ruckus at the townhall meetings are democratics, in fact democratic senior citizens. Just for once let's have someone at the door tally the party membership, discounting the paid SEIU thugs.
"...largely Republican town..."
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:43 ET by PrairieSkyBogus is right...With the MSM, why let a little thing like the truth or the facts get in the way when you're spinning a lie???
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
Ditto to both posts
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 14:35 ET by bigtimerDitto to both posts above.
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
bt...Yep...The NYT left...
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 19:19 ET by PrairieSkythe truth behind a long, long time ago...
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
That the did Sky...that
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 19:22 ET by bigtimerThat the did Sky...that they did, if they ever had any to begin with.
Great seeing ya again...have missed you here.
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
Howdy bt! Good...
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 19:44 ET by PrairieSkyto be back! My family and I just got back from vacation...We went to see family in Florida, and on the way stopped in Springfield, Illinois, to visit the President Lincoln Museum, Library, and home. What an experience...If you haven't been, try to go sometime...It is wonderful, and well worth the trip. Lincoln is a personal hero of mine (and my family's), and this museum is an extremely well done tribute to him and his presidency. The Lincoln library (and museum) is the most visited presidential library, followed by President Reagan's library, and we are so glad that we went.
A lot of news happened recently, huh? I followed all the sturm and drang while I was gone...Obama and the Dems are in a real mess with their Obamacare garbage, and I'm loving every minute of it. It's about time "the people" are finally standing up and making themselves heard! Hopefully it will be enough to shut this healthcare reform insanity down...
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
Sky...stayed in Springfield
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 19:55 ET by bigtimerSky...stayed in Springfield for about 4 months one year as a young girl, my great grandparents home in fact, my grandmother was raised there, my grandfather from the area also...anyway, we visited what they had for Lincoln back then, many years ago now, would love to go back someday...
I'm happy as heck people are fighting back, people have reached a tipping point...and this seems to be the start along with the Tea Parties ahead of that.
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
bt...If you ever get the chance...
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 20:01 ET by PrairieSkytry to go back...The library and museum were both opened in 2006, and are both real gems, particularly the museum. What an amazing man and president Lincoln was, and how lucky we were to have had him...What a contrast he is to the idiotic, socialistic charlatan we are stuck with now...
It is wondeful to see the people fighting back and making themselves heard. I hope you're right about the tipping point, and I hope it works.
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
NYT acting stupidly, again
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:34 ET by BKeyserWell who'd they expect would be out there in opposition? Angry mobs of network news anchors? Maybe print reporters? The cast and crew of Hardball?
Liberal protesters are
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:36 ET by motherbeltLiberal protesters are never "irritable" or "angry."
They are righteous, dontcha know!
I don't recall the media describing any of these protest signs as "angry" or even, heaven forbid...unpatriotic!
Link Link Link
And that doesn't even touch on the horrendously hateful anti-Bush garbage we've had posted and linked to here over the past few days....
Did anyone in the MSM ever suggest that any of it crossed the line?
The truly angry one at the
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:37 ET by HockeyKidThe truly angry one at the Specter meeting was Snarlin' Arlen himself, who was really ticked off at having to actually respond to his constituents: "I don't have to be here...". What an arrogant bastard.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Too far, NYT, too far.
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:46 ET by black47211Too far, NYT, too far. You had to go and print this vitriolic article, didn't ya? I am still surprised and awed at such hatred, but I really should know better.
So much for hoping for common-sense to prevail given the blatantly horrid direction this administration is taking our nation.
www.pelicanmarsh68.blogspot.com
why are crowds mostly white??
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:50 ET by philipjamesto be blunt, why aren't more blacks out at these...
could it be because 97% of black voters had voted for Obama and do not want to show any dissent for "their guy"??
I bet when the SEIU and Soros hire people for the liberal side through craigslist at $11 - $16 per hour, there will a lot of blacks lining up for that one.
90% of NYTimes staff are ANGRY whites
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 14:01 ET by Jack BauerI did a little checking on the Opinion writers and Editorial writers at the New York Times.
It seems that the Gray Lady is staffed and managed by an...
And boy, are they getting ANGRIER and SHOUTIER by the day, as the working stiffs of America IGNORE their sage advice to shut up.
Who the %@*% do these rubes THINK they are?
The hypocrisy is stunning.
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 14:06 ET by RubiconThe hypocrisy is stunning. The vitriol spewed against anyone who opposes policies of Democrats, represents real & actual incitement.
Lebanon, PA is a mostly white town. However, it is also a town & county full of people who believe in & practice, "plain talk." In this neck of the woods, that means, the straight & uncomplicated truth! The mix of races is a non-issue to these people. All they want is, the truth.
Arlen has been ignoring his constituency for years. However, Democrats in Philly have been re-electing him for years. Rick Santorum campaigned for Arlen. But when Santorum was running, Arlen was suspiciously silent & mostly invisible. Santorum & Bush rescued Specter & he paid them back by voting & acting against them on numerous issues. Specter did not push Bush court nominees, yet he could have been instrumental & getting judges nominated. There were many who never got confirmed despite having been nominated at the beginning of Bush's term.
Bush screwed up, a lot. But, when protesters came out against him, he took it like a man. He did not set up emails for snitches.
Democrats, including Specter, are attacking Town Hall protesters. Their reactions & comments are as despicable as I have ever heard. These people were the ones attacking Social Security reform, used thug tactics, & now, they accuse average Americans of being racists.
The use of racism has now become the excuse de jour of those who plan to force their insane plans on everyone. Perhaps we should remember this come November 2010 & also start making plans to totally repeal this effort to socialize this nation?
Specter Was Bush's Biggest Mistake
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 14:17 ET by JustAlBut remember, these libs are "uniters" they are united in their hatred of American self reliance, individual liberty and responsibility, because these concepts scare the hell out of them. They need the predictability of a mind numbingly complex government bureaucracy to re-assure them that, "they belong to something larger than themselves."
They and their media minions are the enemies of all the good things this country has ever stood for or aspired to be, and they have declared war on the rest of us. I have said before that the so called "War on Drugs" was actually a war on the citizens by the government, but it will not hold a candle to what the left is trying to do to us now.
Ah
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 14:25 ET by jessieHAh, Specter. The man flip-flops so much, he doesn't know who he is. Get elected as a GOP, & flip to democrat to apease the big "O". The man needs to be impeached.
jesse... He will be in
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 14:38 ET by bigtimerjesse...
He will be in '10...be glad to be rid of Specter...the GOP made me furious back when they supported the piece of work instead of Toomey...I still am...I sure hope he prevails this time!
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
During the NAACP convention,
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 17:24 ET by mostlymoderateDuring the NAACP convention, would they dare say "this is an entirely black and irrational crowd". L.A. Riots? New Orleans?
Laugh out loud
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 19:59 ET by desertphreakLaugh out loud funny!
Man is not free unless government is limited. There's a clear cause and effect here that is a neat and predictable as a law of physics: As government expands, liberty contracts. -Ronald Regan
Those Pathetic Conservatives
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 18:11 ET by Young JamesThe problem isn't that the protesters at the Town Hall meetings are white and conservative. The problem is that they don't know what the **** they're talking about. All they do is scream, shout and try to stifle the whole debate, armed with no facts and no knowledge - such as the moron who screamed "Keep the government out of my medicare!" They have listened to Beck, Hannity and Limbaugh, done no actual research of their own, and are expressing their rage at losing the election the usual way conservatives do it - through intimidation and threats of violence (like the "Death to Obama" sign at one Senator's rally).
These people don't deserve health care. Suit them up and send them to Afghanistan, if they care so bleeding much about their country.
~Oh lordy....a Loobie
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 18:18 ET by choselife3xLiberal newbie making his first poo..post. Quick someone, get a camera, we need to capture this for posterity. Lookit the liddle feller....ain't he darlin?! Oops, someone get the babywipes...
Dissent: It's not just for liberals anymore.-kudzupolitics, USA Today
YJ... You're not going to
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 18:31 ET by bigtimerYJ...
You're not going to last long around here with posts like that...that's for sure.
By the way you twit, the people that are against OCare are people who don't need or want any part of this take over...the majority are people who already have Health Care, it's your side of the aisle are the whiners who want to be cared for from cradle to grave...in every way, shape and form.
Have you read everything in the bill, there is a lot there that has nothing to do with health care....all of his bills have been nothing but more federal intervention/or take-overs....the O-Team wants total control, total power.
Not going to happen...people have had it.
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
So, Young James, are you lost?
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 18:41 ET by acaiguanaI'm at a loss as to where I should start with you, Young James.
The people at the Town Hall meeting aren't protesters, to start. They actually are there in response to various issues.
1. The outright arrogance and complete dismissal of their concerns and their role in American Politics by the likes of Nanny Pelosi and her gang.
2. The total and outrageous misleading (some would say lying) statements by the Democrats regarding their own past statements; their attitude toward spending; their attitude toward the BIG government role they advocate; Tax and Cap; Bailouts; Pork (should I say it again?) Pork; ah well the list is just too tedious to go on.
3. Idiots who come out and say they don't know what the **** they are talking about.
It's enough to make one SCREAM and adopt the Liberal, Communist and Socialist LEFT's tactic of STIFLING DEBATE.
So, if you don't like anti-Obama rallies, why you just must have loved the Death to Bush rallies that were held ad nausium over the previous eight years.
Since you obviously have no idea of fact based history and no concept of what the Left did to Bush and absolutely no clue as to what the **** you are talking about...
Maybe you should take your vacuous brain back where ever it came from and let the ADULTS on this site continue with their rather reasoned discussion.
Get it?
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
Point Proven
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 20:27 ET by Young JamesThe responses above completely prove my point. The conservatives here scream about stifling debate - but they don't engage in actual debate. They just scream, insult and try to intimidate. There's no DEBATE here. They can't stand any dissenting opinion posted here, for instance. Saying a threatening thing like "You won't last long around here with posts like that" could not be more proof that I am correct. Conservatives are violent, intimidating, hate filled, and dangerous. They show up at rallies with guns and signs advocating violence. They kill abortion doctors. They attack gay people. They say charming things like "Ah don't want no nigger in the White House" and "That monkey is gonna kill my grandma!" Adorable.
By the way, anyone said "Death to Bush" was just as guilty as the Obama haters. However, it doesn't change the fact that Bush deserved every single thing "done to him from by the left," that he is an international criminal, and belongs in Leavenworth, preferably with the very legal and just death penalty.
Buh bye Young James
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 20:33 ET by BKeyserSomeone please discard this foul-mouthed racist.
Only point proven is
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 20:34 ET by general companyYour not here to debate, just name call like other liberals that have come before you. Not very origanal either.
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
gc... Good ol' trollsters
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 20:42 ET by bigtimergc...
Good ol' trollsters just can't help themselves, this one is really lacking brain cells that work.
Dkos type of material at work.
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
Young James - get a grip - ACA
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 20:49 ET by acaiguanaOK, you want debate? You talkin' to me? You talkin' to me??
Here it is.
You say: "By the way, anyone said "Death to Bush" was just as guilty as the Obama haters."
Then you brilliantly follow this with:
"However, it doesn't change the fact that Bush deserved every single thing "done to him from by the left," that he is an international criminal, and belongs in Leavenworth, preferably with the very legal and just death penalty."
This is akin to saying:
"I hate stupid people. The world is flat."
Go figure.
Get some life and take your toys to some other site.
You are wasting your brilliance here and this site is read by a lot of people so you are also showing your brilliance to the world.
A debate with you is like attacking intellectually an unarmed man. Further, it is like explaining the magic of electricity to a savage.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
Uh, No
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 00:57 ET by Young JamesNo, dick brain, "Death to Bush" and "Death to Obama" imply political assassination. Saying that someone deserves the death penalty for crimes is different.
More people have died because of the actions of George Bush than all the terrorist attacks of the last 50 years. Do the math. The man is guilty of mass murder. He probably killed more Iraqis than Saddam.
You guys are great at sarcastic putdowns and insults, just like the usual hollow threats of conservatives, but you have no facts. At least, you haven't shown them here. Waah, waah, waah. You lost the f****** election because conservatives proved to the majority over the last 8 years that they cannot govern, they cannot rule, they cannot debate, they cannot legislate anything that improves our lives - they cannot do much of anything. They can only hate, and lust for power, and beat up on those less fortunate. Sometimes literally. Conservatives love violence. Hurting people is really all they know how to do.
This site is great at pointing out supposed "liberal" bias. I guess having conservative bias is no problem.
First of all Young James, you lose. Big Time.
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 07:05 ET by acaiguanaConservatives did not rule nor have they 'lost' any elections.
McCain has never been nor ever will be a Conservative. Get it?
The Republicans in Name Only (RINO) in Congress did not govern; they tried to appease and imitate Democrats and obviously didn't do well.
Calling me a name only shows how really shallow you are and exposing your lack of logic in your earlier post only shows how far to the left of the Bell Curve on IQ stats you fit.
And blandly accusing Conservatives of violence with no factual examples is further indication of your inability to gather information and present it in a choherent manner.
So, using such language on this site as you started the *** game only shows that you cannot compose a decent argument with normal English.
So, we have established that you have no argument worthwhile, no ideas except spewing hate toward both Conservatives and Bush and no contributions to make in the arena of ideas.
I'll listen to Liberal dolts who come on this site and bring assertions backed by reference, facts and knowledge; but you my friend don't have an arsenal. When you look inside your bag for ammunition; it is not only empty, but also imaginary.
It must be hard to pretend intelligence to hide your deficiencies.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
My final thoughts
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 17:01 ET by Young James"Conservatives did not rule nor have they 'lost' any elections."
What about the last 8 years? Were those liberals? I'm confused.
"And blandly accusing Conservatives of violence with no factual examples is further indication of your inability to gather information and present it in a choherent manner."
A right winger shot Dr. George Tiller, abortion doctor. Members of the "Army of God" called it justified.
A right winger shot a guard at the Holocaust museum in DC, trying to shoot others.
Right winger Jim David Atkisson shot and killed several people in a church in Tennessee because of a "hatred for liberals and gays." In his home were books by Savage, O'Reilly and Hannity.
Throughout history, right wingers have beaten gay people, bombed gay bars and abortion clinics, hung black people from trees, dragged black people from pickup trucks, bombed synagogues, bombed the Oklahoma City Feberal Building, and on and on. If you really think that conservatives aren't prone to being violent and dangerous, then we really have nothing more to say to each other.
"So, using such language on this site as you started the *** game only shows that you cannot compose a decent argument with normal English."
I'm doin' my best to speak da English gooder. I don't wanna be a big dummy doo-doo.
~"Throughout history"
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 17:14 ET by choselife3xWow. Wow. Wow.
Nothing like making up crap to make a liberal feel good about himself.
Please show me a link that backs up any of those claims.
Dissent: It's not just for liberals anymore.-kudzupolitics, USA Today
Aside from the fact that you cannot seem to read, try this.
Fri, 08/14/2009 - 13:40 ET by acaiguanaIn a report perepared for the Department of Enegy, IRISE said the following about you kum bye a Lefties.
Prepared by
Karl A. Seger, Ph.D.
Center for Human Reliability Studies
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Oak Ridge, TN
April 2001
Although the threat from leftist extremists has decreased in the past decade, it should not be ignored. From 1980 to 1985, a five-year period when leftist domestic terrorists were most active in the United States, 173 terrorist incidents were recorded by the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation, 1995). During the next 10 years, when left wing extremists were most active, only 83 incidents were recorded (Federal Bureau of Investigation, 1995). Because leftist extremists are better educated than members of right-wing groups, they have the ability to organize more effectively, and once committed to a militant revolution, they are more of a threat. In addition to the Soviet Union and other state sponsors including China and Cuba, leftist revolutionaries in the United States have gained inspiration, if not support, from members of the Communist Party of the U.S.A. The Communist Party of the U.S.A. operated a brother-son network in the United States that assisted Soviet intelligence agents operating in the country and was heavily subsidized by Moscow during its early years (Beichman, 1995).
The Communist Party of the U.S.A. continues to invite others to help in the “fight for a Socialist U.S.A.” (Communist Party of the U.S.A, 1999). The organization outlines six program basics to create a socialist nation in the United States and is supported by 27 district offices across the country. In addition, its Web site offers links to communist parties in 27 other countries and to a number of groups including the Basque solidarity site, Farabundo Marti para le Liberacion Nacional or FMLN (an El Salvador leftist guerrilla group), National Democratic Front of the Philippines, and the Zapatistas of Mexico.
THE THREAT
Extremism runs in cycles. Leftist extremists are very active for a decade or more, and as they fade, right-wing extremists become active. During the late 1960s to the middle 1980s, leftist extremism was the greatest threat in the United States. From the mid-1980s to the present, the major threat of domestic terrorism has been primarily from right-wing extremists. If the cycle theory is correct, then left-wing terrorism will increase within the next few years.
Leftist extremism presents two threats. The first threat is terrorism. Left-wing terrorists have been responsible for bombings, assassinations, robberies, and planned attacks on infrastructure targets. The second threat is their potential support of espionage conducted against the United States by supporting countries such as Cuba.
While it is important to counter the current domestic threat from right-wing groups, it would be a mistake to ignore the leftist threat. If the threat from left-wing extremism does increase, responding to it early will help to prevent similar problems the United States experienced during the 1970s and 1980s.
II. LEFTIST MOVEMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES
THE CUBAN CONNECTION
The government of Cuba has provided support and sanctuary to Marxist revolutionary groups and leftist terrorists since Fidel Castro came into power. This support has included systematic training and materials (National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, 1976). Support has declined dramatically since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, but Cuba still maintains close ties to Latin American revolutionaries, including both of the major groups in Columbia (U.S. Department of State, 1999).
The last fugitive from the 1981 Brinks robbery, which left two police officers and a guard dead, is living in Havana as a political fugitive, where she continues to call for black separatism in the United States. Cheri Laverne Dalton, who now calls herself Nehanda Obiodun, is a special guest of the Cuban government and receives a monthly stipend
from them equal to the amount paid a Cuban professional. She recently acknowledged that she also receives financial help from the Republic of New Afrika, a U.S.-based group that believes that black Americans should form a separate nation out of five southern states. Obiodun joined the group after graduating from Columbia University with a degree in English and Journalism in the mid-1970s. Obiodun’s job in Cuba is to speak to local citizens and foreign visitors about the plight of what she refers to as political prisoners in the United States, prisoners serving time for crimes committed to fund and support a leftist revolution (Howell, 1994).
On May 2, 1973, Joanne Chesimard, a member of the Black Liberation Army, and two of her friends were stopped on the New Jersey Turnpike by State Troopers James Harper and Werner Foerster. While being questioned, Chesimard and the driver opened fire on the troopers with automatic pistols, hitting both of them. Chesimard then took Foerster’s weapon and fired execution style into the officer’s head, killing him. She was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. She escaped in 1979 and fled to Cuba where she was granted political asylum (McCaslin, 1998).
In 1998 on the twenty-fifth anniversary of the murders, the governor of New Jersey announced that she was increasing the reward to $100,000 for the return of Joanne Chesimard (Kalb, 1998). Speaking from Havana, Chesimard claims the call for her return is a character assassination and says she is innocent of the murder charge.
According to her, she is a political activist and a victim of a U.S. government counterintelligence program set up by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to neutralize political activists (Fletcher, 1998).
William Morales, a bomb maker and member of the Puerto Rican separatist group FALN, lost eight fingers when a bomb he was building exploded in his face. In 1979 he escaped while recovering from his injuries in a prison ward at Bellevue Hospital. He fled to Mexico where he was arrested again after a shoot-out with Mexican authorities. In 1988 the Mexican government allowed him to go to Cuba where he received asylum and began working on a doctorate in international relations (Howell, 1994).
Victor Gerena, a member of another Puerto Rican separatist group, Los Macheteros, also received asylum in Cuba. Gerena participated in the 1983 armored car robbery in Greenwich, Connecticut, that netted $7.2 million. An Argentine-born former spy for Cuba claims that he helped get Gerena and some of the proceeds from the robbery out of the United States and into that country. The Castro government refuses to confirm his presence there (Morrison, 1996).
Not all of the leftist revolutionaries of the 1970s and 1980s fled to Cuba. Donald Bunting, a member of the Black Liberation Army and longtime associate of Joanne Chesimard, was arrested in 1998 in Bradley Beach, New Jersey, after barricading himself in his apartment for 26 hours. He was wanted for a June 1, 1998, armed robbery. Police used tear gas and a high-pressure water hose on his residence before he surrendered.
During the siege he shot and killed a police dog that had been sent into the apartment building (Reuters, 1998).
Cuba not only provides a safe haven for leftist extremists wanted in the United States, it also provides a forum from which they can continue to espouse their political beliefs and work to inspire others still in the United States to take up the cause. Most of the people granted asylum in Cuba have one of two political agendas. Those aligned with the FALN and Los Macheteros want Puerto Rico to become an independent socialist nation aligned with Cuba. Others associated with Joanne Chesimard and the Black Liberation Army want to carve out a separate black nation in the southeastern United States. Almost all of them have been convicted of¾or charged with¾terrorist crimes, including murders and bombings.
LEFTIST AGENDAS IN THE UNITED STATES
Provisional Party of Communists
The Provisional Party of Communists is a group that was founded on Long Island, New York, in 1972 by Gerald William Doeden. The original agenda of the group was armed revolution, but this idealism spiraled downward, eventually leading to the arrest of several of its surviving members in 1996 when it was referred to as a group of “political Moonies” (U.S. Newswire, 1996). Former members of the group claim that at one time it had a military wing trained in guerrilla tactics. The group recruited young followers by offering what it claimed was progressive volunteer opportunities and then used cult brainwashing techniques to “turn them into soldiers for a revolution aimed at overthrowing the United States government” (U.S. Newswire, 1996).
Doeden claimed his name was Gino Parente-Ramos and said that he was Mexican, hoping that his false identity would attract support from certain groups and individuals.
He was actually of Norwegian descent and a native of Minnesota (Markon, 1996, November 13). The group headquarters was raided in 1984 after the FBI received a tip that it was about to launch an armed revolution against the government. However, only a few guns were found, and no charges resulted from the raid (Kessler, 1996).
This was not the first raid on a Parente-Ramos enterprise. Before locating in New York, he ran The Little Red Bookstore in San Francisco from which he sent threatening letters to local officials. Using the name the Liberation Army Organization (LARGO), he claimed that armed guerrilla groups were about to launch attacks on public buildings. No charges were brought following the raid on the bookstore and the investigation of LARGO (Kessler, 1996).
The Provisional Party of Communists used a number of front names and organizations including the Women’s Press Collective. Recruiting literature claimed the Collective offered an opportunity to write “progressive things for our newsletters” (Markon, 1996, November 14). Irene Davidson and her 18-year-old daughter signed up after visiting a table set up at a festival in Brooklyn’s Prospect Park. Unfortunately, she did not become suspicious when the recruiters provided vague answers to most of her questions. The daughter moved into the cult’s headquarters where she was subjected to long lectures on everything from American politics to the Russian revolution and slogans such as “Just Do As You’re Told.” The daughter became depressed and quit the group after she had been shipped to a small field office in upstate New York (Kessler, 1996).
A Catholic church official became associated with another of the front groups, the Eastern Farm Workers, in the early 1980s believing that he would be helping collect clothing and other donated items and money for farm workers. However, when he arrived at the Eastern Farm Workers office, he was handed a manifesto that said the group's objective was to overthrow the U.S. government (Wick, 1996).
The Provisional Party of Communists came to the attention of authorities again in 1996, the year after Parente-Ramos died. Police raided their Brooklyn headquarters and found 17 handguns, five shotguns, one airgun, blackjacks, and knives. They also found dummy grenades, five pounds of black powder, three bulletproof vests, handcuffs, holsters, false identity documents, and $42,000 in cash. Three people were charged with criminal weapons possession, and another 35 members were subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury as a result of the raid (McCool, 1996).
Stream of Knowledge
In 1993 an African American who identified himself as Shayarahla said during an interview on a television station in Albuquerque, New Mexico, “The white man has been killing the black man, killing the Puerto Ricans, killing the Indians, and he’s got to pay for his crime. Black men,” he said, “get ready for war!” (Southern Poverty Law Center, 1997).
Shayarahla is a member of a small group called the Stream of Knowledge, which is an offshoot of a black supremacist movement referred to as the Black Hebrew Israelite religion. They believe that God is black, that Whites are devils, and that Blacks are the true Jews—God’s chosen people (Southern Poverty Law Center, 1997).
In Albuquerque members of the group meet in a white stucco building known as the “War Zone.” The word YASHARAHLA is painted on the front window, and a gruesome mural depicting sword-bearing black men standing triumphant over bloodied white bodies is on the inside, according to law enforcement officials. Local police believe the group has been building an arsenal since 1992 and preparing for a racial war (Southern Poverty Law Center, 1997).
The group is believed to have been formed by John McGee III (who calls himself “Ya Han Na Ga”) and Carl Anthony Bennett (“Ka Ariah”). McGhee is employed in the commissary at Kirkland Air Force Base, and Bennett is a counter clerk at the Veterans Administration Medical Center. Their initial meetings were held in an apartment, but they moved to the “War Zone” in 1993. They are recruiting at military bases and in prisons, preparing for the war that will end in a black victory in the year 2000. The group owns property valued at approximately $900,000 in Albuquerque and funds itself through tithes, a security company it runs, and a product called Mid East Oils that is sold at a local flea market (Southern Poverty Law Center, 1997).
Law enforcement officials believe the Stream of Knowledge may be linked to an armed compound outside of Pueblo, New Mexico, and a faction in Tempe, Arizona. Police in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Oklahoma, Texas, and New Mexico are investigating the activities of the group (Southern Poverty Law Center, 1997).
This report doesn't include all the Anarchists' actiivities in Seattle, the shooting of a US Army soldier in Arkansas, the continuing sabatoge of lumber areas by driving spikes into trees by crazy envirionmental whackos (a practice which causes the chain on the saw to sever from its mount and vicously injure the logger) or the host of other violent attacks throughout history by Left Wing Nuts against their fellow citizens as a way to make a political statement.
Not to mention William Ayers.
ACA
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
Very comprehensive job there, ACA, well done
Fri, 08/14/2009 - 14:29 ET by SickofLibsBut it's like explaining gravitational theory to a four-year old who asks "Why did the ice cream fall off my cone?"
He's none too bright, this little fella, and he's just going to stick his tongue out at you.
Hee Hee
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 20:50 ET by Blonde"They" "They" "They"
Solly, chollie.....we are not remotely close to who you think we are. But carry on, we love idiot trolls like you. :)
I hope he fails, too.
"..armed with no facts and
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 20:55 ET by black47211"..armed with no facts and no knowledge.."
Are you talking about the protesters, or the elected officials? I know for a fact that on at least 2 occasions an American citizen had the bill with them and read from it verbatim, while the elected officials had no responses because they hadn't actually read this thing.
Talk about wearing a raw pork chop around your neck when you step into the lion's den.
They didn't read the Porkulus Bill and they haven't read this one and yet we are supposed to trust their judgments? That simply makes no sense at all, and defies conventional and pragmatic wisdom.
Liberals confound me with their elitism and entitlement mentality.
www.pelicanmarsh68.blogspot.com
Young Jerkoff:
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 21:00 ET by SickofLibsWow. Signed up almost a month ago; first post here. It's easy: you meet the girl, if she likes you, you're both adults, you do it. No need to spend weeks peering into her bedroom window like a pervert. Man up. So...
...first off, I congratulate you on your impeccable spelling and punctuation, totally at odds with what we expect from the garden varieties, which leads me to believe that your nom de plume is BS. Anyway...
..so on to your post: your grandma or grandpa (or your mommy or daddy), who are the demographics of the "mob", are too old for military service, so nobody is suiting them up for Afghanistan (unless you have Taliban contacts that could use them for human shields). They have a right to voice their opinions on things that will affect them, and you are a totally full of shit* to imply that they are uneducated or are not entitled to express their opinions when their own government is calling them un-American.
I have a feeling you're not going last very long here, so make the most of it, Jerkoff!
(Just be sure to get screenshots to take back as trophies to show the kids, K?)
Profiling?
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 19:57 ET by desertphreakSo the Left may profile when it comes to their constituents?
Man is not free unless government is limited. There's a clear cause and effect here that is a neat and predictable as a law of physics: As government expands, liberty contracts. -Ronald Regan
Hannity/Jackson Lee
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 20:07 ET by bigtimerHannity is showing the link here I put here this morning regarding the arrogance of Sheila Jackson Lee during her TH Meetings...talking on the phone while a gal is asking her a question.
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
BT: Thank you for that
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 15:28 ET by stratmanBT:
Thank you for that link. That was rude.
I wonder if Jackson took a call after she bumrushed the stage at the Michael Jackeson memorial service?
→ I'm bummed out
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 20:09 ET by Cool ArrowWe had a Town Hall meeting here today at 4:30.
OK, Mike Conaway is a Republican, and I was mad at him for folding like a cheap suit on TARP, and sent him an Email to that effect at the time.
But does it not strike anybody as insulting that these Town Halls are scheduled during work hours? I mean, doesn't it seem those of us who work for a living are excluded?
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Gee, isn't America mostly
Wed, 08/12/2009 - 22:53 ET by RR GOPGee, isn't America mostly white?
I'm amazed at how many times I've had to explain to people that this country is not 50% black, but only about 11-12%.
But, given the brainwashing by the usual Leftist suspects in the entertainment industry, the MSM, television, Hollywood and the government I'm surprised more people don't assume whites are actually a minority.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.