Whatever issues Travis the chimp had, at least poo-flinging was not one of them.

Someone name one thing he has done in his life to indicate he is not a full blown socialist, and the Peeloshi/Reid lapdogs support his move because they have the mistaken idea they will be totally in charge of 300 million people.

Old, Retired and glad of it.

Conservatives are proud to be called conservative, yet liberals can't stand being called liberal and liberal socialists can't stand being labeled as socialists? Are they ashamed of their ideology?

Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!

Alan Keyes / Sarah Palin - 2012

Comrade Leibovich,

Please be advised that Conservatives do not refer to Chairman Zero as a Socialist to inspire fear, but rather in open contempt.

Get used to the Socialist title.  I throw it in the faces of all my Liberal friends and then I make them dispute it with facts.  They can't and usually get mad, but like I have been telling them, the nice days of getting along are over, this is WAR. There is no second place in a War, McCain didn't seem to grasp that but the rest of us had better.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you."

Why doe the NYT fret? I thought they were proud that an unabashed socialist got elected POTUS. Now there's a heapin' helpin' of chicken MacNuggets in every POTUS.

Oh give me a break...

They ought to quit whining...heck wasn't it one of the leftist mag rags like Time or Newsweek who had 'We are all Socialists Now' on the cover?

They had better count themselves lucky it hasn't been something more than a word like socialism as far as I am concerned.

I'm so confused!  Ya know.. woohoo we're socialist... we're all socialists now... socialism is cool.

yay... and stuff? No? Mr Emanuel you need to have a word with your minions and get your talking points straight.

They don't like that we keep changing their name but they keep moving their game.

The Liar-in-Chief was raised by socialists and indoctrinated by socialists from an early age. He IS a socialist, and we have to say it with conviction and never back down.

 nice to see they don't address the truthfulness of it at all. I could understand a defense of policy, saying it's not socialist and explaining why using methods other than some liberal talking head saying "no it's not!"..instead they complain the word is being used as a insult and is commonly thrown about....that has not a thing to do with the correctness or appropriateness of the word. but then if their only defense is the "label" is used too much, then they can't say it's being used wrong...

"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is like calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".

"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same&quo

"Liberals" are not socialist. Lets stop calling them that. It's too nice.

The correct term for their agenda is "fascism." Everything Obama and the Democrats are striving for is fascist in nature. Many of us had it wrong over the last several years. We called them socialists and Marxists. Now, we can correct that error.

Want a good example of their fascist policies? Start with this one:

Fallacies of the Green Movement

The Times may not worry about socialism - they are probably socialists. But like the Nazi Party did to the communists, so too will the fascists in this country do to the weaker "liberals" who draw the line with socialism.

They need to choose: Either get on board with fascism, or stop apologizing for the fascists and report the real news.

*If you like the comments, check out the articles.

Actually, he's more of a fascist; he doesn't want to buy businesses, he just wants to control them, while the private citizens pay for everything.  So, "fascist" is more accurate than "socialist".

You can't please these people....first they don't like the title Liberal, now they don't like Socialist and 'want' to be called Liberal....and now the even more ambiguous 'Progressive' is becoming popular.  

What stinks is I love Progressive music (Rush/Styx/Kansas/Dream Theater) and they're hijacking the word Progressive!

You can't please these people....first they don't like the title Liberal, now they don't like Socialist and 'want' to be called Liberal....and now the even more ambiguous 'Progressive' is becoming popular.  

What stinks is I love Progressive music (Rush/Styx/Kansas/Dream Theater) and they're hijacking the word Progressive!

They aren't fascist, socialist, communist or democratic. They are all those things under one term: Oligarchy!!! A government controlled by a select group of people. Let's not confuse ourselves anymore. The USA is not a democratic country. It's a Republic. Rule by law and in a real republic the role of the government is limited, leaving the people alone. The republic is supposed to protect the rights of the citizens. Not walk all over them.

What we have right now is an Oligarchy government. We do not have what our Constitution demands. We have strayed from it. Let's stop making labels that are all the same things. Totalitarian government is an Oligarchy.

Those who label themselves are allowing the "democracy" theory to invade our politics. Labels such as: socialist, liberals, democrat are all under the Oligarchy type government. The nation is a "republic" as our founding fathers has repeatedly told us. They warned us about "democracies" and purposely didn't want such a government.

The republicans have gotten away from our roots. The true political parties are libertarian, republican and constitutionalist. Those who fall back on the core values of the founding father's intentions are the true political parties of the USA. All else is an enemy of the state.

We are under the greatest threat in the nations history. We are currently going even further down the slop to "communism" or totalitarian government. Our republic is in serious danger of being gone for good. We need to call them what they are...totalitarian or Oligarchy.

Alexander Hamilton: "We are a Republican government. Real liberty is
never found in the despotism or in the extremes of a Democracy."

Obama is a Socialist.  He said so himself, to Joe The Plumber, in an unguarded moment. (those are the moments he's most truthful . . clinging to guns etc.)

I haven't totally dismissed the "my Muslim Faith" at this point.

So don't be at all surprised that his efforts with the Stock Market are so successful.  The Market is reacting exactly the way he wants it to.

We won the cold war!  Why did we surrender?

 Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska, repeatedly accused Mr. Obama of wanting to "spread the wealth," an offshoot of Mr. Obama's caught-on-tape exchange

1.
to charge with the fault, offense, or crime (usually fol. by of): He accused him of murder.

  For the love of all the fish that fart in water. There is no need to ACCUSE him of anything. All you have to do is QUOTE him saying AND I QUOTE - Quote to follow - Obama >>>> "I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody"

 Debate the merits of European socialism? In case anyone is paying attention to the news, Europe is burning! They are rioting in the streets. Europe has double digit employment in the GOOD YEARS. By the way, this year, not good. 

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

This is SOBama's Religion!

And

Socialism/Marxism is his political objective!

It is what it is!

however his methods of achieving them are more like that of Karl Marxs.jmo

There are so many things for the NYT to fret over and yet they find the time and space to devote to a real or imagined slur. Imagine that, glad to hear it. Some might call this "karma". They won't be around much longer to fret over anything so this is just a passing footnote on the newsreel of life.

Brian Williams is still wiping Obama's man juice off his chin.

"To sin by silence when we should protest, makes cowards of men" -Ella Wheeler Wilcox