Cheap Shots: NYT Executive Editor Attacks O'Reilly, Coulter, and Kristol

  • Bookmark and Share

New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller is participating in the paper's "Talk to the Newsroom" online chat this week, discussing, among other things, the potential for the Times to again start charging for online content, but also taking cheap shots at conservatives Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter and even just-released columnist Bill Kristol in an ill-advised attempt at satire. 

Keller's running commentary also marks the third time in less than a week that a Times editor has gone after FOX News talk show host Bill O'Reilly.

The first was this, from Sunday's lead editorial on racist Republicans opposed to immigration:

Google the words "Bill O'Reilly" and "white, Christian male power structure" for another YouTube taste of the Fox News host assailing the immigration views of "the far left" (including The Times) as racially traitorous.

The second attack on O'Reilly came via a post on the the paper's editorial board blog, "The Nativists Are Restless, Continued," after the Fox News host devoted the first half hour of the Monday night edition of "The O'Reilly Factor" taking on the Times for attacking him.

Finally, in his online chat, Keller took cheap shots at conservatives O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, and even one of his former employees, recently released conservative columnist Bill Kristol, while trying to be funny.

Here's the exchange Keller had with a reader, responding to a serious question with a flippant answer:

Q. I think a lot of young journalists and editors, myself included, are curious about what a day in the shoes of Bill Keller is like. Can you walk us through a normal work day for The Times's executive editor?

A. Really? You'd be interested in that? Well, I think my life is pretty much what you would imagine it to be.

I wake up most mornings to the telephone, invariably some world leader or international celebrity seeking my counsel. Lately it's been a lot of President Obama -- again with the damn puppy? -- but sometimes it's Richard Holbrooke to pick my brain about Afghanistan, or Bruce Springsteen asking if it isn't time for another Arts and Leisure cover story about Bruce Springsteen. The valet brings breakfast with the handful of newspapers that have not gone out of business. In the limo on the way to the office, I help Warren Buffett sort out his portfolio and give trading advice to George Steinbrenner, not that he ever listens.

At the office, Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and I have our morning conference call with Vladimir Putin, Hugo Chavez, Kim Jong-il and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad -- plus Fidel Castro when he's compos mentis. Dictating the world's agenda entails a lot of conference calls. I've been encouraging the cabal to save some money by using iChat, but first we have to persuade Putin to wear a shirt.

Lunch at the Four Seasons is always a high point. Today it's my weekly tête-à-tête with Bill O'Reilly. He's really not the Neanderthal blowhard he plays on TV. He's totally in on the joke. After a couple of cosmopolitans, he does a wicked impression of Ann Coulter. We usually spend the lunch working up outlandish things he can say about The New York Times and making fun of Fox executives. (Once Rupert Murdoch showed up for a lunch date, and O'Reilly had to hide under the table for half an hour.)

I spend most of the afternoon writing all the stories for the front page. (You knew those were all pseudonyms, right?) I write Tom Friedman's column, too, but, I swear, Bill Kristol wrote all his own stuff.

By then it's time for drinks and dinner. If you're reading this, Julian, I think the duck tonight. I had the foie gras for lunch. And no time for dessert. The Secretary of State is coming by to give me a back rub.

Hillary Clinton giving Bill Keller a back rub? There's content I'd pay not to see.

Keller also took a job at political blogs, in response to a question about why the Times was obsessed with Caroline Kennedy while virtually ignoring the other candidates for the New York Senate seat vacated by Hillary Clinton. Keller responded:

I can't speak for the political blogosphere -- even a stopped clock is right twice a day -- but we had good reason to believe, and our reporters and editors still believe, that Caroline Kennedy was the governor's choice up until the day she told him she was having second thoughts.

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times. You can follow him on Twitter here


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Of course they are going after Fox News....

They distracted and misled the American people into voting for Obama, it only make sense that they will go after the only network that dares to ask Obama tough questions.

 Goebbels would be proud!  Congrats MSM!!!

Haha ...

> After a couple of cosmopolitans, he does a wicked impression of Ann Coulter.

 

Pretty funny bit, actually. 

Mr. Keller misread the question

The question he seemed to answer was:

 Mr. Keller can you please display how much of a pompous, elitist, Liberal agenda-driven floozie you are?

"We will not tire, We will no falter, We will not fail." President George W. Bush, October 26, 2001

The obvious response to

The obvious response to someone's lame attempt at humor would be "don't quit your day job". But judging by NYT's performance under Keller, the obvious response would be "you should quit your day job".

Google This!

Google the words:

Bill Keller, failed newspaper, failure, gray lady on fire, douche bag, political party hack, idiot.

Keep Googling the words.

What an idiot. WTF does googling a set of words mean?

I can't wait to hear the day that this group implodes.

I think in Bill's wee brain,

I think in Bill's wee brain, he was being serious...

New York Times

Miserable failure at taking PRAVDA's place.

 Keller: “A lively,

 Keller:

“A lively, deadly serious discussion continues within the Times about ways to get consumers to pay for what we make,” he said. “Really good information, often extracted from reluctant sources, truth-tested, organized and explained -- that stuff wants to be paid for.”

How can Bill Keller expect the public to pay for content that has nothing of substance or reality?  The only reason I read the Times online is to get a "taste of looney left" for strictly entertainment purposes only.

(shouldn't I be charging Mr. Keller for the ability to read this comment?)

Rovin

THE NEW YORK SLIMES...

You gotta love just how bitter & clueless those at the NY Slimes are. Hard to believe their circulation numbers are falling consistantly everyday. The crap they print EVERYDAY, the hard left agenda that they push, & the inability to understand that the majority of Americans don't give a damn what they print. All of that means the NY Slimes stock price sucks, & they are treading water. It is only a matter of time before they get a bailout because as a "historical & influencial American institution", thy are too important to fail. I can hardly wait...

 

"...it's still We The People, Right?"  Megadeth 

What color is this comedian anyway?

I assume he's a white guy. Does he think he's immune from what is coming down the pike with racist, socialist Barry Sotero running the show?

Thank God not all conservative voices have been silenced yet and thank God for Fox.

What color is this comedian anyway?

I assume he's a white guy. Does he think he's immune from what is coming down the pike with racist, socialist Barry Sotero running the show?

Thank God not all conservative voices have been silenced yet and thank God for Fox.

What color is this comedian anyway?

I assume he's a white guy. Does he think he's immune from what is coming down the pike with racist, socialist Barry Sotero running the show?

Thank God not all conservative voices have been silenced yet and thank God for Fox.

Stick a Fork in The Grey Lady Bill, She is Done...

Poor old Bill Keller.  Must be real tough watching his old lefty rag disintegrate right before his eyes.

But cheer up Bill. There is a good chance Rupert Murdoch will buy your old rag and you might get to meet Bill O'Reilly in person. Think of all the big fun you two will be having. Ha! Ha! Ha!

Excellent

These "attacks" by Keller and his ilk are analogous to the flailing attempts of a passed-prime (read washed-up) fighter hanging on for dear life.

They're going down for the count.

Keep Punching

If the NYT's has to close

If the NYT's has to close shop, I say we all meet somewhere and party for a weekend!

Obama Fading Fast

 

 Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

NY Times?

I didn't know that the New York Times is still a newspaper!  Keller will probably need to find another liberal newspaper to go to.  America knows how awful liberal papers really are. And for what it's worth, "Mr. Keller is a PINHEAD"!

Gee, what a coincidence

A Mexican billionaire saves the rapidly deteriorating New York Times from the brink of financial disaster by propping up the Left Wing rag with billions of Pesos, and within weeks the NYT goes on an aggresive search and destroy mission against illegal immigration opponents.

OC... LOL... Don't they

OC...

LOL...

Don't they already do that for nothing...errr...I mean their leftist agenda.

Oxy,On O'Reilly the

Oxy,

On O'Reilly the other night, Jim Pinkerton suggested the Mexican bailout as a reason for The NYT attack on him and O'Reilly et al, but O'Reilly pompously and condescendingly dismissed it as a reason. I think he wanted to keep the focus on himself - he loves being in the spotlight, so he loves this.

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

This is consistent with Keller's treasonous...

This is consistent with Keller's treasonous release of sensitive information, which "in his judgement" needed to be released to the American people. Keller doesn't give a damn about the American people or the United States of America. I hope the Times starts charging for online content, it might hasten its demise.

Thalpy.... Oh now, that

Thalpy....

Oh now, that is the best idea I have heard all day....I hope they do too.

Talk about priceless.

So, here's the

So, here's the scenario:

You're in NY city, you can't get cell phone reception, there are no Internet hot spots for you laptop, but you spy a newstand.  Hungry for news, you approach the newstand only to find there are just two choices.  The NYT or the National Inquirer.  Which do you choose?

Yeah, I new that newstand guy was going to be stuck with a lot of NYTs on his hands!

Hey, Keller!  Sold that building downtown, yet?  So, you can keep the paper afloat?  lol

NYT = fish wrap

 

NYT =

catbox liner.

"Not to be a republican at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head." - Francois Guisot

Hey JDH, At Least The Inquirer Can Claim To

report the news, some of the time.  After all, they did break the story of the Edwards affair.  Actually, they were the only "news" organization pursuing that story.  Speaking of which, all's quiet on that front.  If it had been a Republican, do you think we would still be hearing about it today?

I, for one, hope the NYT closes down for good.  All the employees at their local unemployment office and their HQ demolished.

"For The First Time In My Life, I Am No Longer Proud Of My Country Because It Seems Like, Socialism Has Made A Comeback"

His ship is sinking and all

His ship is sinking and all he can do is this? He should instead devote some of his time to saving his job.

Let's see...

Bill Keller & New York Times:

Circulation and revenue trending generally...DOWN

Bill O'Reilly & FOX News:

Viewership and revenue trending generally...UP

So, do we need a statistician to explain this for us?

 A drowning man gasping for

 A drowning man gasping for air.

the Times and O'Reilly

"the third time in less than a week that a Times editor has gone after FOX News talk show host Bill O'Reilly.'

Wow!.. the THIRD time this week. Well, by my count that now changes the total score of attacks launched by one against the other as follows: 

NYT AGAINST BOR: 14

BOR AGAINST NYT:  1, 369 

Jer

The NYSlimes knows that Fox

The NYSlimes knows that Fox has more credibility and greater readership/viewership than the Slimes, and LoophObama's Administration is going to come crashing down soon despite the best efforts of its propagandists (oops, reporters) of the Slimes. Thus, the Slimes must try to bring down Fox to put off the day of reckoning. Won't work. Slimes is sinking and its debts may cause the Slimes to cease to exist before the end of the Loophobama Administration.

NYT AGAINST BOR: 14 BOR

NYT AGAINST BOR: 14

BOR AGAINST NYT:  1, 369 

Let's follow that up:

NYT AGAINST BOR: 14, # OF SUBSTANTIVE ATTACKS, 0

BOR AGAINST NYT:  1, 369 # OF SUBSTANTIVE ATTACKS. 1,369

D

 

Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.

Misleading numbers

Exactly. The difference being that Bill talks about NYT's insanity on a number of issues, whereas NYT is simply engaging in personal attacks.

Fairly obvious to me.

Bolton/KEYES 2012 

And BO'Reilly is winning

And BO'Reilly is winning this fight.

I imagine the NYT will declare bankruptcy way before O'Reilly will.

In the marketplace of ideas, the NYT is getting kicked to the curb due to its idealogical attacks on america that americans can not support.

If a paper keeps telling me I am a bad guy when I know to the contrary, I will stop purchasing that paper.

Of course, Bill is winning

Substance vs. No substance.

Bolton/KEYES 2012 

I imagine the NYT will

I imagine the NYT will declare bankruptcy way before O'Reilly will.

You may very well be right, BD...but it wouldn't be because of O'Reilly--although I'm sure he would take credit for it.

Jer

May I Polish your Apple Sir?

I think a lot of young journalists and editors, myself included, are curious about what a day in the shoes of Bill Keller is like. Can you walk us through a normal work day for The Times's executive editor?

I am speechless.

let's try this

Google "lost circulation" and "dwindling profits" and you'll soon understand that the executive editor is lowering himself to mingle with the peasants out desperation.

Nothing draws more hits to your website than posting snarky remarks about BOR and Ann Coulter. And nothing attracts lefties faster than a chance to hobnob with a wealthy elite.

Lay off the sour grapes Mr. Keller.  

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.