NY Times Sniffs: Sen. Gillibrand Too Conservative for Multi-Ethnic State of New York

  • Bookmark and Share

Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand is the new senator from New York, replacing Hillary Clinton, who resigned her Senate seat to become Secretary of State in the Obama administration. But the New York Times hasn't exactly rolled out the welcome mat. So far the paper has done little but nag Gillibrand for being insufficiently liberal, pushing her to back away from her stands against amnesty for illegal immigrants and her support of gun rights.

A Metro section story by Kirk Semple on Wednesday, "Drawing Fire on Immigration, Gillibrand Reaches Out," argued that Gillibrand must adapt by moving to the left to appease her diverse and apparently angry vast new constituency.

During her one term in the House of Representatives, from a largely rural, traditionally Republican district, Kirsten E. Gillibrand was on safe political ground adopting a tough stance against illegal immigration.

Ms. Gillibrand, a Democrat, opposed any sort of amnesty for illegal immigrants, supported deputizing local law enforcement officers to enforce federal immigration laws, spoke out against Gov. Eliot Spitzer's proposal to allow illegal immigrants to have driver's licenses and sought to make English the official language of the United States.

But since her appointment by Gov. David A. Paterson last week to fill the Senate seat vacated by Hillary Rodham Clinton, Ms. Gillibrand has found herself besieged by immigrant advocates and Democratic colleagues who have cast her as out of step with a majority of the state, with its big cities and sprawling immigrant enclaves.

Caroline Kennedy was considered New York Gov. David Paterson's original choice for the seat. If Kennedy had not bowed out in chaotic fashion, would the Times now be running stories insisting that a Sen. Caroline Kennedy move to the right and broaden her appeal past her insular, Manhattan liberal elite (including Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger) friends? Doubtful.

Semple casually turned the race card:

The flap over Ms. Gillibrand's immigration record underscores the political challenges she faces as she broadens her political constituency from an overwhelmingly white district along New York's eastern fringe to the entire state. Census data show that about 21 percent of the state's population and 36 percent of New York City's residents were born overseas, said Andrew A. Beveridge, a demographer at Queens College.

Gun-control advocates, including Representative Carolyn McCarthy, a Democrat from Nassau County, have also taken sharp issue with Ms. Gillibrand's opposition to some gun control measures, with Ms. McCarthy threatening to run against her.

Is the liberal Carolyn McCarthy somehow more representative of the state of New York than Gillibrand?

Still, Ms. Gillibrand has not backed down from her long-standing opposition to "amnesty" for illegal immigrants, which has left some immigrant advocates wondering whether she would support any law that would establish a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.

The Times characterized her voting record in the House as more conservative than her colleagues, although Gillibrand's record during her year of office was safely left-of-center. The American Conservative Union rated her voting record a whopping 8 points on a scale of 1-100. Despite that, Semple filled his reporting with warning signs:

In the House, where she served from 2007 until this week, Ms. Gillibrand frequently voted more conservatively on immigration issues than a majority of her Democratic colleagues.

In votes that pitted her against a vast majority of her fellow Democrats, she sided in favor of bills that required adult occupants of affordable housing to provide proof of residency and that penalized cities that protected undocumented immigrants, such as New York.

She also diverged from the overwhelming majority of Democratic representatives by voting in favor of bills that increased financing for law enforcement against illegal immigrants and that protected businesses requiring their employees to speak English on the job.

She is a co-sponsor of the SAVE Act, widely disparaged by immigrant advocates, which aims to crack down on illegal immigration with more border guards and surveillance technology, accelerated deportations and a mandatory program requiring employers to verify the immigration status of employees.

There was more scrutiny of Gillibrand's unwelcome nods to the center in reporter Michael Powell's "Welcomed in Washington, Scrutinized Back Home," who repeats the insinuation that Gillibrand is too conservative to represent the entire state in all its ethnic diversity:

She possesses a veteran politician's easy style, serving kisses on the cheeks to her colleagues and hugs for her nieces and nephews who came to witness her swearing-in. But the road from representing a rural and distinctly conservative district encircling Albany to taking responsibility for the entire state comes with sizable potholes.

Since Gov. David A. Paterson announced her appointment on Friday, she has been lashed for her positions on guns -- very much in favor -- and illegal immigration -- very much against -- with downstate Democrats rumbling about primary challenges.

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"establish a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants"

That's easy.  Go  home, now.  Apply for a visa, come back when you're granted a visa, then apply for citizenship.  See how easy that was?  What part of illegal don't liberals understand? 

That would seem to cover licenses, housing, "sanctuary" and other illegal immigrant issues.  

Go ahead dems, demonize her, primary her, defeat her.  We'll sit back and enjoy the show.

UN That was, indeed, EASY! Now let's see how many

in Congress Kirsten can lead down that path!  She certainly seems to have a ease about her - MUCH more likable than either Hillary or Caroline!

I only hope she doesn't get hooked into tossing her principles aside.  STAY STRONG FOR THE ENTIRE STATE OF NEW YORK, KIRSTEN!  It's hard for big-city folks to realize there are other values than their own!

Our country needs more people willing to stand pat on their values, not those of Pelosi or Reid!  And especially NOT for whatever "pork" their so-called leaders will use to try to buy their principles. 

STAY STRONG FOR AMERICA, KIRSTEN! 

It is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue. ~ Sam Adams

Gillibrand, on immigration.. yahoo

Ms. Gillibrand, a Democrat, opposed any sort of amnesty for illegal immigrants..

Reminds me of the old Harry Reid (something the NY Times would never remind the reader of):

"Our borders have overflowed with illegal immigrants placing tremendous burdens on our criminal justice system, schools and social programs," Reid said in 1993. "

"If making it easy to be an illegal alien is not enough, how about offering a reward for being an illegal immigrant? No sane country would do that, right? Guess again. If you break our laws by entering this country without permission and give birth to a child, we reward that child with U.S. citizenship and guarantee full access to all public and social services this society provides."

"Safeguards like welfare and free medical care are in place to boost Americans in need of short-term assistance. These programs were not meant to entice freeloaders and scam artists from around the world." "Americans have seen heinous crimes committed by individuals who are here illegally."

"Recent terrorist acts, including the World Trade Center bombing, have underscored the need to keep violent criminals out of the country."

Oh, that last one? Senate Majority Leader, Democratic nitwit, Harry Reid, was talking about the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

Imagine - had the national media supported his views then, as they do him and other like-minded nitwits now, the World Trade Center might still be standing. Just a thougth. (;~/ gary

Excellent thought it is

Excellent thought it is Gary.

Proof is in the pudding.

We shall see how she votes...won't we.

The Dream Act will come up again...we shall see how she votes...wanna' bet she'll vote for it?

NYT/Gillibrand

Just pinchie baby sticking up for his sweetie, princess caroline.

NYT

I thought these guys are going out of business.  Just wait till Slim sees what his investment bought him.

Hold on now

I thought the libs in this country, INCLUDING those in congress wanted the USA to be like every OTHER socialist/marxist/communist country in the world.  Well, just how many of those socialist/marxist/communist countries have borders that are as porous as ours?  I mean, just how HARD was it to get behind the Iron Curtain illegally or inside the Great Wall of China or N. Korea illegally?  It must have been and must be easy as pie to be an illegal alien in THOSE countries.  Why not take a poll and find the answer to THIS question.  LMFAO

Well, to get elected she had to ..........

"Talk the talk". I will withhold judgement until I see her "Walk the walk" on the big stage.

From the race baiting part of the article - 

Census data show that about 21 percent of the state's population and 36
percent of New York City's residents were born overseas, said Andrew A.
Beveridge, a demographer at Queens College.

So? 79% and 64% of NYC residents were not! Do those numbers reflect the percentage of African Americans?

So what does it matter if

So what does it matter if 36 percent of NYC residents were born overseas? What does it have to do with NYC voters and NYS voters? What is the percentage of NYC and NYS voters born overseas? That would be the relevant immigrant group. I am anti illegal immigrant but am pro legal immigration. One can be both, you know? One can say I am pro home ownership but against policies that allow people who can't afford homes to get loans they can't afford. Or to state that since I am against undocumented people entering the homes of other people to use their property without the owners' permission I treat our country the same way.  

If you do not have legal status here you should not be amnestied.

If you purchase or obtain stolen property and hold it for twenty years should that property become yours free and clear? Mere passage of time doesn't necessarily permit an unlawful act to somehow become lawful.

And what about that term 'enclaves of immigrants' isn't that somehow a racist or bigoted term? How about enclaves of illegal immigrants?

 

Good for her.

I can't say I love this woman, but I sure don't hate her.  I am hoping her conservative stance on several issues will come to fruition and she will come to our side somewhere down the line.

And while this sounds childish, I am deriving no small sense of glee in seeing how she is ruffling the liberals' feathers.

"Liberate tutume ex inferis, liberal puppets."  Me.