After dismissing it in a brief story on Tuesday as "G.O.P. Query Involves 1% of Giving to Obama," the Times' Michael Luo and Griff Palmer finally decide that Obama's plethora of odd donors may be politically newsworthy. They finally devoted a more serious story to the matter on Friday ("Fictitious Donors Found in Obama Finance Records"), which comes after Newsweek's Michael Isikoff's similar piece back on October 4. Luo and Palmer ran down some of the more entertaining entries from Obama's dubious donor list:
Last December, someone using the name "Test Person," from "Some Place, UT," made a series of contributions, the largest being $764, to Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign totaling $2,410.07.
Someone identifying himself as "Jockim Alberton," from 1581 Leroy Avenue in Wilmington, Del., began giving to Mr. Obama last November, contributing $10 and $25 at a time for a total of $445 through the end of February.
The only problem? There is no Leroy Avenue in Wilmington. And Jockim Alberton, who listed his employer and occupation as "Fdsa Fdsa," does not show up in a search of public records.
An analysis of campaign finance records by The New York Times this week found nearly 3,000 donations to Mr. Obama, the Democratic nominee, from more than a dozen people with apparently fictitious donor information. The contributions represent a tiny fraction of the record $450 million Mr. Obama has raised. But the questionable donations -- some donors were listed simply with gibberish for their names -- raise concerns about whether the Obama campaign is adequately vetting its unprecedented flood of donors.
And:
It appears that campaign finance records for Senator John McCain, the Republican nominee, contain far fewer obviously false names, although he has taken in about $200 million in contributions, less than half Mr. Obama’s total. Mr. McCain did collect about $173,000 from donors who appear in campaign finance records with only a name and have no other identifying information. Mr. Obama collected about $314,000 from such donors.
—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Karl Rove planted this
October 11, 2008 - 07:20 ET by ThisnThatKarl Rove planted this story. It was he who made the donattions. He even wrote the story under someone else's by-line because this is nothing more than a Republican dirty-tricks scheme to try to paint the Messiah as something less than a boy scout. /sarcasm
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Who would have thought that
October 11, 2008 - 08:09 ET by JerryWho would have thought that the NYT would release their "serious" story on Friday, the "nobody pays attention" day?
It is my understanding that McCain has released the list of ALL donors, including those giving under $200. Obama refuses to do so, and his under $200 list contributed over $200 million.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
First of all, they are only
October 11, 2008 - 08:17 ET by JerryFirst of all, they are only looking for "obviously fictitious" names. This is completely subjective and is probably only the tip of the iceberg.
Secondly, they did not look at Obama's "McCain-Finegold" loophole list, the under $200 donors, because he refuses to release it.
Thirdly, they try to say "he did it too" by using the broad statement, "McCain... contain far fewer... but he had less than half the contributions..". HOW FEWER? Did they find ANY? I suspect they would have plastered the story with examples if they had found some.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
So what
October 11, 2008 - 08:29 ET by DingbatWho cares. Mc is running a be nice to Osama campaign so there will be no mention of this from Mc's camp. Sigh
I feel much better now that
October 11, 2008 - 10:29 ET by KevpotI feel much better now that McCain has assured me that I don't need to fear Obama as president.
Thanks, John. Why don't you just wear an Obama t-shirt at your next rally?
John McCain
October 11, 2008 - 10:43 ET by NorthCoasterThis is not a Collegial debate with OBAMA! Stop acting like a Senator!!!!!!!
Tell the story of where you are heading, then compare where we will be with OBAMA and his ACORN/Leftist cronies. The real reason for the stock market tanking further is that OBAMA's repressive taxation scheme is already affecting the markets!!!
Who in their right minds, other than Warren Buffet would invest now?
Fdsa...wow ASDF...hmmm very
October 11, 2008 - 09:22 ET by Radar_OneFdsa...wow ASDF...hmmm very creative..I bet George Soros finally got his Mavis Beacon CD in the mail. Well...it goes to show...Soros is trying to buy Socialism
Barack Obama= Half Honkey...ALL Donkey
Sloppy Journalism
October 11, 2008 - 09:33 ET by VegasGuyThis story is based on "an analysis" of records, but not an exhaustive analysis and not all of the records. If it were a legitimate story, it would contain more specifics on fictitious donors found per number or records examined and something like a statistical extrapolation to the contributor base as a whole. To say this is the tip of the iceberg is accurate but unconvincing. Where is the methodology, and where are the overall analyses and projections?
We see similar sloppy work regarding ACORN. Every examination produces fraudulent registrations, but there is never a comprehensive analysis based on "sampling". It's as though the media doesn't really want to address the scope of the issues. Sloppy work, at best.
It's about time
October 11, 2008 - 10:38 ET by NorthCoasterIt's about time that someone noticed. Don't expect much to be made of it.
Never Bought it
October 11, 2008 - 11:18 ET by wiseprincehttp://www.voicesint...
I never believed that these "small donors" amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars was ever believable. I also don't think in the final analysis anyone in the MSM will care that the election is being heavily influenced by those who wish for the fall of America