NYT Questions Palin's 'Parenting'; Bumiller Flubs Palin's AIP 'Membership'


Editor's Note: A longer version of this article originally appeared on our affiliated site Times Watch.

Bristol Palin's pregnancy made the top of the fold of Tuesday's New York Times in a story by Elisabeth Bumiller, who helpfully summarized all the scandalettes (and at least one fake one) burbling around the Palin pick in "Disclosures on Palin Raise Questions on Vetting Process."

A series of disclosures about Gov. Sarah Palin, Senator John McCain's choice as running mate, called into question on Monday how thoroughly Mr. McCain had examined her background before putting her on the Republican presidential ticket.

On Monday morning, Ms. Palin and her husband, Todd, issued a statement saying that their 17-year-old unmarried daughter, Bristol, was five months pregnant and that she intended to marry the father.

Among other less attention-grabbing news of the day: it was learned that Ms. Palin now has a private lawyer in a legislative ethics investigation in Alaska into whether she abused her power in dismissing the state's public safety commissioner; that she was a member for two years in the 1990s of the Alaska Independence Party, which has at times sought a vote on whether the state should secede; and that Mr. Palin was arrested 22 years ago on a drunken-driving charge.

Bumiller's claim that Palin "was a member for two years in the 1990s of the Alaska Independence party" is evidently dead wrong. The McCain camp went after Bumiller by name, accusing her of having "made up her own story," and for good measure produced Palin's voter registration showing she's been a registered Republican since 1982.

Greg Pollowitz at National Review Online called Bumiller's front-page piece, implying Palin was insufficiently vetted by the McCain campaign, "garbage journalism," noting that many of the Alaska sources Bumiller quoted are some of Palin's political enemies, including Lyda Green, the State Senate president, and Randy Ruedrich, the state Republican Party chairman, who Palin filed a complaint against for misusing public resources.

Reporter Kate Zernike appeared on a related "Back Story" podcast at nytimes.com and was asked by an unidentified male co-host about Palin's daughter's pregnancy:

Host: "But Kate, is this an act of support? I mean, is everyone going to interpret it that way? If you knew your daughter was pregnant, 17 years old, and someone came to you and said, Hey, you want to be Vice President --"

Zernike: "Yeah, that's exactly the question."

Host: "-- would you maybe think, hey, I don't want to do this, I got some issues in my family?"

Zernike: "Yeah. No, I think that's exactly the question. Then it becomes more of a question of parenting and of judgment on her part."

 

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It's a race to the slimy bottom

and I gotta say that the NYT once again is winning.  These issues have nothing to do with policies.  I guarantee there will be no substance at all in the NYT when reporting on Palin during the next few months.  You will read about everything else under the sun because they know that her policies and decisions as a politician are actually very popular and not just with Alaska.

Craig Whitney

I thought the  NYTimes didnt publish these types of baby stories???

Like the John Edwards baby story...they refused to even try to investigate it.  Regardless of their lack of any attempt to expose the story, the ombudsman further drank the kool aid when he bought this line from the Standards editor ("standards", snort!):

Still, Edwards-Hunter was “classically not a Times-like story,” said Craig Whitney, the standards editor.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/08/10/nyt-edwards-scandal-not-our-style-unproven-mccain-affair

 

needs a bib

Right now, Chris Matthews is just drooling at the mouth saying several times that Palin was part of a Secessionist Movement, even after Howard Fineman told Chris that the McCain campaign had documents to dispute this.

Also, Politico is posting Palin Oppo Research. Where is the Biden or Obama Oppo Research?

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

The media has declared war

The media has declared war on Sarah Palin and after several trial balloons that were attacked, they seem to have settled on an all-encompassing "inadequate vetting process" - as if John McCain would never have picked Gov. Palin had he known these things. This is just taking the individual pails of slime and sewage and putting them into one big barrel and lobbing it at her. From what I've learned about her, I like Gov. Palin, but if I didn't like her, I would still vote for her now.

McNotObama '08

Gay Marriage Okay

Gay Marriage is fine with the Times.  Have a child out of wedlock or a disabled child though?

Vetting Process

Does anyone know where the "vetting process" media action line came form? Can it be traced back to orders from the Obama campaign?

Wouldn't It Be Nice?

Wouldn't it be nice if the MSM spent this much time and put forth this much effort to investigate Barak Obama, who is at the top of his party's ticket? It would be nice if they....oh, let's see...investigated Barry's relationship with William Ayers.

The press has reached a new low. That's pretty hard to do, too.

It's always my instinct, however, that their bias and unfairness backfires on them all the time. I don't think it fools the voting public at all.

Question...

What about the husband? Why discount him altogether?

If the Governor was a man, NONE of this business about ‘can she care for her kids’ would be an issue. AC360 asked the question using BHO as the example…”i dont hear anyone asking obama if he can manage his family and take on the President’s job.”...hard to believe, but he did...answer:  crickets.

The Left’s blind desire to defend liberalism even allows them to rationalize being sexist to push the point. The man of the house cant possibly raise his own kids if she’s not there full time. (but folks, didnt joe biden raise his kids after the accident?..was he unfit, was that bad judgment? )

Fact is, if the Gov. was a Man, we wouldnt be having the conversation. (there’s your sexism). The fact that the left is willing to argue the point - knowing it paints them as sexist - all to promote liberalism - is fascinating.

Liberalism Uber Alles