New York Times reporter Larry Rohter once again rode to Barack Obama's defense in Tuesday's "Ad Campaign" watch, a review of John McCain's latest TV ad accusing Obama of letting gas prices rise. In "McCain Links Obama and High Gas Prices," Rohter eviscerated McCain's ad for daring to blame Obama for rising gas prices.

From the script of the ad, quoted by Rohter:

Gas prices. $4, $5, no end in sight. Because some in Washington are still saying no to drilling in America. No to independence from foreign oil. Who can you thank for rising prices at the pump? (chant) Obama, Obama.

A clearly displeased Rohter rushed to Obama's aid:

ACCURACY Mr. Obama is not against all drilling for oil and gas, only drilling offshore, a crucial word in the debate on energy policy but one never mentioned here....even before the recent spike, oil prices had been rising for a decade, the result of a variety of political and economic factors in places as far afield as China, India, Venezuela and Nigeria. So it is difficult to understand how Mr. Obama, a first-term senator, can be held responsible for that phenomenon.

Since offshore drilling has been in the news lately (Bush recently lifted the ban), it's pretty clear that's what the ad is talking about. You can only squeeze so much into 30 seconds, after all.

Rohter also pushed the usual "many economists and energy experts" to the front to provide cover for Obama's position against a gas tax rebate. Then Rohter made the true but unhelpful point that gas prices have been rising for a decade. If that's the case, then why has the media only making a big deal of it in the past year or so?

Rohter concluded by calling the ad "misleading on nearly every substantive point."

Rohter has experience passionately defending Obama against what he considers unfair conservative attacks, as he did in a July 11 Times feature "Check Point" after Obama had come under attack for promoting bilingualism for U.S. citizens:

"Instead of worrying about whether immigrants can learn English -- they'll learn English -- you need to make sure your child can speak Spanish," [Obama]said. "You should be thinking about how can your child become bilingual. We should have every child speaking more than one language."

Conservative and "official English" groups immediately interpreted Mr. Obama's statement as an endorsement of the idea that "Americans should be forced to learn to speak Spanish," in the words of the Americans for Legal Immigration PAC. But that not only misrepresents what Mr. Obama said, it also ignores the views he has expressed in the past on the proper role of English and foreign languages in American life.

A fuller version of this critique can be found at Times Watch.

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.