NY Times Finds Only Anti-Obama Videos Misleading

Photo of Clay Waters.

The front page of Sunday's New York Times featured the paper's latest defense of Barack Obama against alleged Internet smears -- reporter Jim Rutenberg's "Political Freelancers Use Web to Join the Attack."

Rutenberg went to Culver City, Calif. to profile leftist filmmaker Robert Greenwald and his cottage industry of anti-McCain films. While Rutenberg chided two conservative filmmakers for making dubious claims in their anti-Obama videos, Rutenberg found nothing misleading or objectionable in Greenwald's films, or anywhere else on the left end of the Internet.

Check this contrast:

The change has added to the frenetic pace of the campaign this year. "It's politics at the speed of Internet," said Dan Carol, a strategist for Mr. Obama who was one of the young bulls on Bill Clinton's vaunted rapid response team in 1992. "There's just a lot of people who at a very low cost can do this stuff and don't need a memo from HQ."

That would seem to apply to people like Robert Anderson, a professor at Elon University in North Carolina whose modest YouTube site that features videos flattering to Mr. Obama and unflattering to Mr. McCain, or Paul Villarreal, who from his apartment in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, has produced a harsh series of spots that attack Mr. Obama and make some claims that have been widely debunked.

On a video by Jason Mitchell featured on Eyeblast.tv, Rutenberg wrote:

The segment's announcer notes that Mr. Obama's father was Muslim, asserts that the candidate attended a Muslim grammar school in Indonesia for two years, and asks, "When we are at war with Islamic terrorism, can Americans elect a man with not one, not two, but three Islamic names?" One on screen image shows Mr. Obama's face morphed with that of Osama bin Laden.

Mr. Mitchell says he sticks close to the factual record, but the video has been widely criticized as over the line. Mr. Obama is a Christian. The school he attended in Indonesia was secular.

The Times, hypersensitive to any criticism of its preferred candidate, gave the Obama campaign's official "anti-smear" site yet another plug:

Three weeks ago, the Obama campaign started a Web site called "Fight the Smears" to, among other things, debunk portrayals of Mr. Obama as Islamic. It allows its users to e-mail the information easily to friends.

Greenwald's bravenewfilms.org site features several mockingly anti-McCain videos, including one titled "John McCain Is Dr. Strangelove," interspersing clips from the classic satire with clips of John McCain on the trail, in order to characterize McCain as a crazed warmonger.

Another video with a similar McCain-as-warmonger tone truncates a McCain quote from a town hall meeting to imply McCain wants the Iraq war to go on for "maybe 100" years. What McCain actually said at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire in January 2008 (in answer to a question about Bush saying American troops may have to stay in Iraq for 50 years):

"Maybe 100. As long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed, it's fine with me and I hope it would be fine with you if we maintain a presence in a very volatile part of the world where al Qaeda is training, recruiting, equipping and motivating people every single day."

The Media Research Center's Brent Bozell flagged another false Greenwald commercial in a recent column:

The ad is set in "President McCain's Women's Health Clinic." When a woman asks the perky blond nurse their about her contraceptive options, she's handed a list. When the woman protests it's a blank piece of paper and repeats that she asked about birth-control options, the nurse cheerily replies: "And at the McCain Clinic, you don't have any."

Then a graphic reads: "John McCain voted against requiring insurance companies to cover prescription birth control." The fallacious argument within is that if the government doesn't pay for contraceptives, or force insurers to pay for contraceptives, then no contraceptives are available. There's no "option" to purchase your own condoms or birth-control prescriptions? Where are the media smear-fighters on this obvious howler?

Yet Rutenberg didn't flag any of Greenwald's left-wing videos for being misleading, only those from conservatives.

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

And the lemmings march on...

Is it any wonder that today's impressionable youth look to the wisdom and decisiviness of the liberal media and discount the obvious bias?

Afterall, it is they, the MSM, who have constructed (or, desconstructed) the current surreality that our youngsters cling to in time of distress...er...about like those poor unwitting Pennsylvanians who cling to their Bibles and guns...but I digress.

"NY Times Finds Only

"NY Times Finds Only Anti-Obama Videos Misleading"

In other breaking news, a new study has found that the Pope is a Catholic...

i read something today on

i read something today on CNN's political ticker that was, well, beaming with pride: a commercial calling out politicians who they feel have oil ties and doing so with a George Bush soundalike.

sickening, the hypocritical mindset....

"stupid" NYT?

You know this country needs a solid person to run the country. This person cannot be short on experience, cannot flip-flop, must be a geniune patriot, understand the world as it really is and not have uptopian blinders on. In short, why have anyone else but the best?

Yet the NYT and the other "stupid" liberal media just do not get it. They are so naive. They would compromise the welfare of the USA just to see their candidate of choice win, even when that candidate is highly underqualified. And what so bad about that is, not only will the rest of us suffer, but so will the NYT and other liberal media along with us.

Why are they so "stupid"? Do they have a suicide wish? If they have to cover up for all his weaknesses with "smoke and mirrors" all the time, do they not understand what they are doing and that should be a "red flag" that Obama is not fit to be president?

 

Senator Obama Denigrates Muslims

<b>Senator Obama is NOT a Dirty Muslim!</b>

"What you won't hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a

wedge," says Mr. Obama, while denouncing statements of him being a Muslim as a smear. Why is the

presidential candidate who claims to be religiously inclusive is treating the word "Muslim" as an

insult? Apparently, it is OK for Mr. Obama to be associated with terrorists like William Ayers or

racists like Jeremiah Wright, but God forbid somebody would call him a Muslim! No, he won't stand for

that kind of smear! We admit that most terrorists are Muslims, but most Muslims are not terrorists and

the statement on Mr. Obama's website is insulting to hundreds of millions of people.

How could a man who discards his family heritage in favor of political expediency be even considered for

presidency of the United States? Where are all the so-called "Islamic civil rights groups" like CAIR,

MPAC, ISNA, MAS, etc. who are quick to defend every Islamic terrorist, but are silent when Muslims in

general are being denigrated? Would Mr. Obama have the same reaction if someone claimed that he was

raised as a Jew? We sincerely doubt that.

"In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example, have a more urgent

quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken

their sense of security and belonging. They have been reminded that the history of immigration in this

country has a dark underbelly; they need specific reassurances that their citizenship really means

something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II,

and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." <i>Barack Obama,

"The Audacity of Hope", page 261.</i>

Well, the political winds did shift in an ugly direction. Is equating "Muslim" with "smear" Obama's idea

of "stand[ing] with [Muslims]?

<b>Muslims Against Sharia demand immediate removal of "SMEAR: Barack Obama is a Muslim" statement from

the official Barack Obama's website as well as an apology for giving the word "Muslim" a negative

connotation.</b>

<a href="http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/2008/06/senator-obama-is-not-dirty-

muslim.html">http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/2008/06/senator-obama-is-not-dirty-muslim.html</a>

Update:
Obama changes "SMEAR: Barack Obama is a Muslim" to "SMEAR: Barack Obama is secretly a Muslim" as well as

removes his pledge not to use religion as a wedge from site's header.

Truth Monger...

Is that you again?

45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm