NYT Mag: As Isolated POW, McCain Didn't Learn Correct Liberal Lessons in Vietnam

Photo of Clay Waters.

Matt Bai, a major contributing writer for the New York Times Sunday Magazine, described John McCain's service in Vietnam in his big cover profile, "The McCain Doctrines," by suggesting that McCain's five years spent isolated in a POW camp meant he didn't learn the correct liberal lessons from the Vietnam War, resulting in his support for the Iraq War.

While the Times found Sen. John Kerry's service in Vietnam gave him credibility on his opposition to the Iraq War, McCain's five years spent isolated in a POW camp has evidently cursed him with the narrow perspective of America, right or wrong.

Explaining why McCain still supports the Iraq War, Bai wrote:

Among his fellow combat veterans in the Senate, past and present, he is the only one who has continued to champion the war in Iraq; by contrast, Kerry, Webb and Hagel have emerged in the years since the invasion as unsparing critics of American involvement there. (In a new book, Hagel, who voiced deep concerns about Iraq even as he voted for the war resolution in 2002, predicts that the war will turn out to be "the most dangerous and costly foreign-policy debacle in our nation's history.") This divide among old allies may be the inevitable result of a protracted war that has cleaved plenty of American households and friendships. But it may also be that the war is revealing underlying fractures among the Senate's Vietnam coalition.

There is a feeling among some of McCain's fellow veterans that his break with them on Iraq can be traced, at least partly, to his markedly different experience in Vietnam. McCain's comrades in the Senate will not talk about this publicly. They are wary of seeming to denigrate McCain's service, marked by his legendary endurance in a Hanoi prison camp, when in fact they remain, to this day, in awe of it. And yet in private discussions with friends and colleagues, some of them have pointed out that McCain, who was shot down and captured in 1967, spent the worst and most costly years of the war sealed away, both from the rice paddies of Indochina and from the outside world. During those years, McCain did not share the disillusioning and morally jarring experiences of soldiers like Kerry, Webb and Hagel, who found themselves unable to recognize their enemy in the confusion of the jungle; he never underwent the conversion that caused Kerry, for one, to toss away some of his war decorations during a protest at the Capitol. Whatever anger McCain felt remained focused on his captors, not on his own superiors back in Washington.

Not all of McCain's fellow veterans subscribe to the theory that the singularity of his war experience has anything to do with his intransigence on Iraq. (Bob Kerrey, for one, told me that while he was aware of this argument, he has never believed it.) But some suspect that whatever lesson McCain took away from his time in Vietnam, it was not the one that stayed with his colleagues who were "in country" during those years -- that some wars simply can't be won on the battlefield, no matter how long you fight them, no matter how many soldiers you send there to die.

"McCain is my friend and brother, and I love him dearly," Max Cleland, Georgia's former Democratic senator, told me when we talked last month. "But I think you learn something fighting on the ground, like me and John Kerry and Chuck Hagel did in Vietnam. This objective of ‘hearts and minds'? Well, hello! You didn't know which heart and mind was going to blow you up!

"I have seen this movie before, and I know how it ends," says Cleland, who lost three of his limbs to an errant grenade during the battle of Khe Sanh. "With thousands dead and tens of thousands more injured, and years later you ask yourself what you were doing there. To the extent my friend John McCain signs on to this, he is endangering America's long-term interests, and probably his own election in the fall."

What Bai doesn't get into: That John Kerry came back home and, as a spokesman for Vietnam Veterans Against the War, infamously denigrated his fellow troops before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1971. An excerpt from Kerry's testimony:

I would like to talk, representing all those veterans, and say that several months ago in Detroit, we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably discharged and many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia, not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command....They told the stories at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country.

That didn't stop Kerry from turning the 2004 Democratic National Convention into a military parade, and he exploited the three Purple Hearts he was awarded in Vietnam -- until the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth turned the tables by questioning their legitimacy.

(Hat-tip Mr. L)

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Had to take a walk after I read this....

HAT TIP TO YOU AS WELL! 

I couldn't believe what I was reading on Sunday when I discovered this article. I actually had to put the Times Magazine down, put on my jacket and go for a walk for fear I might break something.

This is probably the first article that I read in a major news pub. where they've gone this far to marginalize McCain's service and time spent in the Hanoi Hilton. While McCain was having his shoulders seperated, Kerry was marching against people like McCain and the military and comparing them to Ghengis Kahn.

What's next? Will they begin to insinuate that McCain, because he was the son of an Admiral, that that makes him military royality? That he wasn't like the ordinary, middle class grunt?

Mr.L

master plan

This is part of the grand master plan to take a baseball bat to John McCain any way they can.  It hits us right between the eyes, makes us sick to our stomach but do you know what a lib does when he reads this?  One of his/her eyebrows will raise and he/she will say "hmmm" and move on to the next smear piece like nothing happened.  It's a disgrace but it will continue on an hourly basis and only get worse.  It will embolden them to the finish line.

The MSM isn't going to do anything to McCain...

...that he has not already done to the Republican party, and, more importantly, to the coservative movement.

We are being smothered by government in this country. - Neal Boortz

RD... I found the perfect

RD...

I found the perfect McCain t-shirt...

 http://www.cafepress.com/cp/moredetails.aspx?showBleed=false&ProductNo=265338817&colorNo=4&pr=F

"Abstain from McCain"

Ct, ROFLMAO!

That is beyond PERFECT!!!

Day'em! I have got to get me one of those! Hell, perhaps three or four.

BTW-Thanks for making my week. :-)

We are being smothered by government in this country. - Neal Boortz

Glad you liked it.

It really does fit him to a "T".

Pun intended of course.

"Abstain from McCain"

Glad you liked it.

It really does fit him to a "T".

Pun intended of course.

"Abstain from McCain"

damn that's good  McCain

damn that's good 

McCain did tell us to "lighten up" didn't he...

hee-hee-hee

"They [Senators] are wary

"They [Senators] are wary of seeming to denigrate McCain's service"

The senators don't have to. That appears to be the job of the MSM.

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

McCain's Learning Curve

Re: "McCain Didn't Learn Liberal Lessons In Vietnam"

Correct.

He learned them after he was elected to the US Senate as a Republican.

Max Cleland

"...says [Max] Cleland, who lost three of his limbs to an errant grenade during the battle of Khe Sanh."

Did he really lose his limbs during the battle of Khe Sanh?  I heard a different story. 

We have so many people who can't see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion that the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one.

-Ronald Reagan

Blunt City

I am not sure if it was during a lull in that particular battle but it is a fact that he and some buddies were drinking some beers and releasing some steam when Cleland saw a lonely grenade and thought it was his own or not engaged and picked it up and...

Cleland should get credit for having served but it is dishonest for the writer to portray Cleland's injuries as having resulted during the heat of battle. A young and possibly tipsy Cleland made an stupid mistake that he lives with now every day of his life.

The real news might be

That someone apparently read or was forced to read Hagel's book. Let's just say it's not exactly a best seller. Not that Reason did all that great of a job reviewing it, as comments here, including but not limited to mine, make clear.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

That didn't stop Kerry from

That didn't stop Kerry from turning the 2004 Democratic National Convention into a military parade, and he exploited the three Purple Hearts he was awarded in Vietnam -- until the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth turned the tables by questioning their legitimacy.

....also too bad McCain didn't stick up for the Swiftboaters.

Some things aren't easily forgot...I am used to and expect the bias from the leftists in the msm of all venues...I wasn't ever expecting what McCain did when it came to the Swiftboat Veterans either. 

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Unitaryexecutive

I think Cleland lost his limbs in an accident with a grenade. I'd research this to be sure, but I am not sure where I'd get the straight story and where I'd get the revised "hero" history.

This seems to be the

This seems to be the closest I can find on what transpired with Clelland's reelection and what the msm did, it also includes what happened to him regarding the loss of his limbs if this is correct....I have read various reports...this seems the fairest.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Specious Liberal Rationale #712,356,498

Essentially this writer's view deligitimizes anyone that was not involved directly in Vietnam in making any judgement on the conflict. Otherwise how could an average Joe or Jane Blow that didn't serve in Vietnam have any more legitimacy that McCain who actually served in country and then, of course, was captured and confined to inhumane conditions for all those years, in choosing the "truth" of Vietnam. What John McCain didn't see on the battlefield while in captivity he learned subsequently from contemporary news sources/books just like those that didn't serve.

I don't believe this is an example of muddled thinking but a conscious attempt to deligitimize McCain who of course has served on the Armed Intelligence Committee for years, took part in an official review of the conflict, and has visited since several times.

This constant shifting standard where at certain times one needs to have served to be considered able to legitimately comment on military issues and then in a heartbeat switches to no experience necessary if, say, you are Barack Obama, Hillary or Bill Clinton, is intellectually dishonest. It's the same rationale that covers anti-war protests by middle schoolers and takes their every anti-war comment/quote as the peak of enlightenment. Pure poppycock.

Bait and switch

The same can be said of the others in reverse. They didn't share McCain's experience, so how can they grasp the lessons that he learned? Why is Kerry's experience more "politically accurate" than McCain's? Answer: it isn't. This is just thinly disguised rationalizing.

The rhetorical trick here is a simple bait-and-switch. The reporter wants to undermine McCain's political strong point, namely, his service in Vietnam. He wants to undercut the political value of McCain's service. But he can't report his own opinion as an opinion. How can he turn it into a report? Simple: find someone noteworthy (like fellow senators) to mouth the same assertions he wants, and then he can "report" on the fact that they said it. If anyone calls him on publishing his opinion, he can deflect the criticism by claiming that senators saying these things is itself newsworthy. It's a load of crap, but reporters do it all the time.

By the way, the reporter here is only 39, so he never served in Vietnam himself. How can he possibly judge the proper lesson of Vietnam? And for that matter, why bother informing the public about different perspectives on Vietnam experience, since the overwhelming majority of Americans didn't have either kind of experience?

This is strange. I was

This is strange. I was there before and after Kerry was, and for much longer than he was, and I never did the things Kerry accused me of, nor do I "share the disillusioning and morally jarring experiences of soldiers like Kerry". Of course, there were very, very few veterans like Kerry. As a matter of fact, VVAW members are few and far between these days. Well, actual Vietnam veterans, anyway. As a matter of fact, less than .1 percent of 1.0 percent of members of that group were, in fact, Vietnam veterans.

 Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

...it is

...it is "strange..."

It's almost as if the US MSM....is deliberately and knowingly distorting America's Viet Nam experience simply for petty partisan political points...?!

But, gosh - that would be incredibly heinous and deplorable and treasonous and traitorous and truly the actions of pondscum lying bastard filth...

if it were true...

Matt Bai passively plays the Crazy Vietnam vet card

In trying to understand McCain, Bai tries to pidgeon-hole him in the traditional liberal way.  Since Kerry, Hagel, Cleland, and Webb are against the Iraq War, then it goes to follow that McCain should be, too.  But he's not.

So, what makes him different?  Oh, it just has to be the 5 years in captivity, which left him deranged, or as at least as Cleland suggest, "didn't see the ground war up close" to really appreciate it.

But Bai's argument is counter-intuitive.  If McCain had merely been a strike pilot delivering ordnance from hundreds, even thousands of feet above the ground, he could argue that McCain say the war from a different prospective than Kerry, Hagel, Cleland, et al.

But McCain was A PRISONER OF WAR IN ONE OF THE MOST HELLISH CAPTIVE ENVIRONMENTS EVER EXPERIENCED BY AMERICAN SERVICEMEN.  For yeaers, he was locked in isolation from fellow Americans and tortured.  He had to have gone through a lot of soul-searching during that period, to find meaning to what they were being subjected to, and how to deal with it.  He and his fellow POWs had to bolster each other at their darkest hours. 

FOR FIVE YEARS. Mr. Bai!  Never knowing when or if he'd be repatriated.  Coming home after donig his best to a country that neither celebrated nor appreciated his personal sacrifice.

Wouldn't a human being who survived that ordeal be LESS supportive of war? 

What "Dr." Bai is doing is excusing McCain's position on the war in Iraq by wrongly attributing it to trauma-induced psychological injury.

 

 

Re: Matt Bai

"Whatever anger McCain felt remained focused on his captors, not on his own superiors back in Washington."

Naturally, the liberal Matt Bai believes that the "lessons learned" by Kerry, Webb, and Hagel are the "proper" lessons to come out of the Vietnam War, and has no room for dissenting opinions. Therefore, McCain is obviously "wrong".

What a weenie Bai is!!

Great point Mr Bai raises

Sen McCain was deprived of his freedom in a POW camp and exposed to socialist/communist methods of torture. Sens Kerry, Web and Hagel were free and exposed to the socialist/communist propaganda via their liberal associates the US media.

And then there's this comment by Mr Bai, "...Kerry, Webb and Hagel, who found themselves unable to recognize their enemy..."

I think he's on to something.

by suggesting that McCain's

by suggesting that McCain's five years spent isolated in a POW camp meant he didn't learn the correct liberal lessons from the Vietnam War

Gee, lets take a look at some of those lessons he missed out on.

  • Naturally assume your country is wrong at all times, and is the source of all ills int he world today.  (Global warming, poverty, disease, etc) 
  • Just when you have the enemy on the ropes, call off the dogs and allow them to slip into a supposedly neutral country to attempt to refit their shattered cadres.
  • Train your allied forces to defeat an insurgency, but not a conventional force as you will promise that your forces will surely handle the conventional enemy attack.  Sign numerous peace treaties with thugish Communist forces that you know will not adhere to them, but it makes you FEEL good.
  • Then when they are attacked by an armored force in an conventional assault, pull the rug out from under them.
  • When you discover the "War Hero approach" will not get you much in a run for the house as a liberal, then heap dirt upon your comrades and run as the Anti- war candidate ala John Kerry.
  • Throw mud on US troops as often as possible, denigrating them at any opportunity.  While doing so, enthusiastically support the Weather Underground by remarking how "Dedicated they are" as community activists.
  • Just assume that militants of any type are chic ala Che.
  • Find any group of thugish terrorists and attempt to equate the US Marine Corps to them in order to make the Terrorists seem likeable.

Good start on the lessons John McCain likely missed out on?

 

BD, that's a good list but

BD, that's a good list but here are some more lessons.

The S. Vietnamese forced into re-education camps just weren't smart enough to embrace Communism, and no human rights were violated in those re-education camps and everyone was treated great.

The Boat People fleeing, were actually not trying to escape the utopian society of Vietnam, but were actually trying to get on boats so they could go around the world and spread utopian Vietnamese Communist love.

Those people who were stuck on the Skyluck for a long time outside Hong Kong, were also people who just weren't smart enough to love Communism.

 

Ah yes, that and the boat

Ah yes, that and the boat people actually being out on the water in rowboats to try to set new records for long distance sailing in boats six feet or less as they tried to get to Hongkong.

THat and the South Vietnamese who crammed themselves into the wheel wells of the last C-141's, died from lack of oxygen at altitude and dropped out were not fleeing oppression, just trying to save a few bucks off plane tickets.

So they won't buy "Reporting

So they won't buy "Reporting for Duty!" from McCain, eh?

The lesson of Viet Nam was that if you let the enemy dictate policy through subversive protest movements, you lose.

Why didn't we hear this

Why didn't we hear this line of reasoning during the Republican Primaries?

 "Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"

Matt Bai attempting to

Matt Bai attempting to explain McCain's 5 years as a POW makes about as much sense as a kindergartener with a wet diaper trying to explain how to fly an A-4 Skyhawk off a carrier. He is obviously out of his league and has absolutely no knowledge about these things.

McCain is qualified to expound on the experiences of being a POW for 5 years. He lived it. Matt Bai might be qualified to tell us about his experiences wearing women's undergarments, but that's about it.

Matt Bain never learned the lesson of Vietman

It seems that Matt Bain never learned the lesson of Vietnam ether, as he doesn't seem to remember that the Vietnam War ENDED in 1973 when the Paris Peace Accords were signed. The war was over and we didn’t lose. Our troops came home victorious after defending South Vietnam from invasion. Yet, no seems to remember this little fact.

People always seem to confuse the end of the Vietnam War in 1973 with the fall of Saigon in 1975 (I've even heard people blame Nixon for "losing" the war!). It seems like NO ONE remembers that that was a second Vietnam War, one that started TWO YEARS after the first one ended and our troops came home, and it was this SECOND war, one where we didn't get involved, that lead to the fall of Saigon and the end of the democratic government in South Vietnam.

Why do so many people forget that it was the democrats in congress, the ones who cut off ALL military and financial aid, who allowed the second war to start and the North to be victorious? Had we supported the South Vietnamese government and actually give them the financial aid and military equipment that they required, the second invasion would not have happen and South Vietnam would be a democracy today. Instead of supporting an allied democracy, the liberal democrats in congress cut off ALL aid after the Vietnamese government failed to meet the benchmarks that the democrats here decided that Vietnam needed to meet. Sound familiar? It should as the democrats are pulling the same crap again in Iraq. It’s obvious that the Democrats WANT other countries to fail just to make our military look bad. Shame on them all for their lack of patrotism and foresight.

Dice it & splice it any way you want . . . we lost

You can try to re-define victory and defeat in Vietnam by splitting it into two events, but even then, we still lose.  Why?

Because we promised to provide the ARVN with the resources and US air power necessary to defeat another Communist invasion, as the ARVN did quite well in 1972.  But before the ink was dry on the peace treaty (and as you noted), we were already determined to withhold sufficient military aid -- including critical close-air support -- from the ARVN.

The Paris Peace Treaty was just a facade devised by Kissinger and company so we could extract ourselves from South Vietnam and save some face.  They knew that the Communists negotiators like Le Duc Tho couldn't be trusted, but it didn't matter. 

After the Eisenhower years, we escalated our military involvement in Vietnam as part of our global containment policy.  By '69'-'70, our government no longer had the stomach for the fight, despite successes under GEN Abrams and Vietnamization.

Strategically, we threw in the towel and looked for the 'honorable' way out.

 

I can't hold a match to John McCain

  That said, let me offer this...

  I was in the Navy 20 years, 17 years of that spent overseas.

  This put a serious filter on the news I received from stateside. At first I thought this was bad. Now I realize...

  That was 17 years the MSM was not filling me full of propaganda and leftist memes.

  I have been out 7 years now and I have learned one thing listening to the MSM now...

  I want to go back. overseas that is. I want that filter back. as long as I still have my link to NB, I will be ok.

I'm John Kerry and I need a Bandaid

Yeah. Unlike War Hero Kerry's FOUR MONTHS IN VIETNAM, McCain spent all his years of imprisonment, especially 'the worst and most costly years of the war sealed away' in a cozy little bamboo cage. When he wasn't getting his teeth kicked out.

And unlike Kerry who probably spent most of his time figuring out ways to injure himself just enough to get to that magic #3 Purple Heart and a ticket on the next boat out of Vietnam, McCain and other  downed pilots obviously learned nothing from getting shot out of the sky at 10,000 ft.

»→ Sickoflibs

That's just a ketchup stain.  But here's your Purple Heart.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!