Just contrast the current David Letterman sex scandal against the 2004 Bill O'Reilly sex scandal.
Last night, left-leaning CBS Late Show Host David Letterman announced on his program that he had sex with female staffers. Letterman's announcement was spurred by the plot of a CBS producer to force the host to pay $2 million in exchange for his silence on the matter.
ABC, CBS and NBC largely portrayed Letterman as a victim on the morning shows.
CBS, Letterman's network, unsurprisingly went to bat for the comedian. "Early Show" guest host Chris Wragge even used it as way to plug Letterman's show.
A shocking announcement last night. The big headline today for the ‘Late Show' with David Letterman should have been that for the first time in over 15 years since the ‘94 winter games in Lillehammer his biggest ratings gap over ‘The Tonight Show,' but instead he wakes to headlines like this, ‘I had sex with staff' and other various papers here and around the country that are going to lead with this story today. It is big, shocking news.
Correspondent Kelly Wallace began her report by putting Letterman in the victim's spotlight.
Video Below Fold
DAVID LETTERMAN: "This whole thing has been quite scary. I had to go downtown to testify before the grand jury and I had to tell them how I was disturbed by this, I was worried for myself. I was worried for my family. I felt menaced by this."
KELLY WALLACE, correspondent: It was a monologue unlike any other for the "Late Night" funny man. David Letterman told his audience he had been blackmailed and then made a remarkable personal admission.
Later, Hollywood publicist Michael Levine told Wragge that this isn't going to do "much of anything" to Letterman's reputation. He also noted, "This would be far worse if he were a preacher or politician ... there is an extremely close likable relationship between David and his audience. I think he should be fine. I think this will be a punch line or one of his top ten lists a year from now."
ABC's Andrea Canning also portrayed Letterman as a victim and spun the story as just the latest in a line of attacks on Letterman:
It's not the first time he's taken on scandal head-on from behind his late night desk. Just a few months ago, Letterman apologized to Sarah Palin, after what many considered an inappropriate joke about one of her daughters. In 2005 police uncovered another plot, by a former Late Night employee, who threatened to kidnap his son, Harry. And in the '80s and '90s, Letterman was repeatedly stalked by a schizophrenic fan.
Canning did not point out that the Palin controversy and this latest "extortion scheme" were a direct result of Letterman's actions. Instead, she placed a positive spin on how the comedian dealt with the situation, "Now, he's handling the latest twist the best way he knows how: with a joke."
The Washington Post's Howard Kurtz explained away Letterman's behavior on GMA. He told co-host Robin Roberts, America's a forgiving country. And in the age of John Ensign and John Edwards and Mark Sanford, I don't think too many people are going to be utterly shocked that somebody rich and famous, you know, was fooling around."
Kurtz did concede, "This is humiliating and damaging for a guy who just got married, and who had to tell his audience - his fans - that he'd engaged in behavior that he described as creepy."
The caption NBC ran under its Letterman segment on "Today" read, "Letterman victim of $2 million extortion plot.
Networks ran with a different perspective five years ago about Bill O'Reilly's sex scandal.
O'Reilly filed a countersuit against Andrea Mackris, a former Fox News producer, who claimed O'Reilly sexually harassed her and sought $60 million in damages.
The day after the story broke, on October 14, 2004, ABC and NBC gave the scandal nearly the same weight as they did a presidential debate.
GMA host Charlie Gibson introduced the 2004 story, "Diane, next we turn to the allegations against Fox News star Bill O'Reilly. A female producer for his broadcast claims O'Reilly sexually harassed her for years. But O'Reilly and Fox have gone on the offensive, suing the woman and her lawyer."
"Today" host Lester Holt introduced NBC's story, "Cable TV anchor Bill O'Reilly is locked in the fight of his life today. He's being sued for sexual harassment by a producer on his show. We'll talk to her live in a moment but first O'Reilly, himself. He calls it a shakedown, and has filed his own suit, taking to the airwaves last night to defend himself."
And CBS appeared to revel in the news. As reporter Sharyn Alfonsi noted "He's built a career pointing fingers. Now, Bill O'Reilly is on the other side of an ugly allegation. The conservative talk show host is accused of sexually harassing Fox News producer Andrea Mackris."
It will be interesting to see if the networks continue reporting Letterman's story. They reported on O'Reilly's until the end of October 2004.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
No respect for women
October 2, 2009 - 11:59 ET by Gat New YorkAn awful lot more will be coming out about Letterman's Harem and combined with his outright sexist abuse of Sarah Palin does this guy become a liability to CBS?
Letterman
October 2, 2009 - 12:03 ET by merlin61One word, "hypocrite." describes Mr. Letterman. He owes more than an apology to Sarah Palin. He owes an apology to us all because he's disgusting. I wish the staffers would sue him and win.
Sue him for what? I don't
October 2, 2009 - 12:35 ET by JasonCSue him for what? I don't see any accusations of harassment or non-consent. That is what makes it different from O'Reilly's situation.
I wouldn't paint Letterman as a victim - though going the blackmail/extortion route was sleazy of this staffer - but I also don't think this will amount to a thing.
We don't know that yet, Jason
October 2, 2009 - 15:23 ET by BlondeBut it ought to be interesting.
I hope he fails, too.
this will be buried
October 2, 2009 - 12:01 ET by katainkentfaster than a chicago mob hit - and under the same amount of cement.
On the bright side, maybe Lettermen will quit? Nah...
____________________________________________
The Emperor, he has no clothes
Letterman won't quit, he
October 2, 2009 - 12:03 ET by Radical1979Letterman won't quit, he said on the tape I saw he was trying to keep his job. He's at NBC, part of the "do as I say not as I do" ideology, so sadly, he won't be let go.
I can't watch him
October 2, 2009 - 12:08 ET by katainkentnot even for 30 seconds. He oozes slime. Now I know why.
____________________________________________
The Emperor, he has no clothes
Actually he's at CBS, but
October 2, 2009 - 12:53 ET by balboaActually he's at CBS, but whatever.
I know it's gross, but I'm
October 2, 2009 - 12:07 ET by Radical1979I know it's gross, but I'm wondering how many staffers Letterman had sex with. It sounds like more than 2 or 3 or I don't think it would be a big deal. He's such a scumbag.
Radical.... I noted the "s"
October 2, 2009 - 16:43 ET by celatorRadical.... I noted the "s" on staffer also. We can't know at this time exactly what has been going on, how many staffers were in on it, what the circumstances were, but it begins to smell rancid right from the gitgo.
It's bad enough for a CEO or manager to have sex with his or her staffer, with all the powerplays that implies. But to have multiple encounters with different staffers over time raises some large, ugly questions.
His joking "Oh, well," explanation is more than troubling.
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
Bill O'Reily?
October 2, 2009 - 12:08 ET by Kingfish17Any woman that would have sex with Bill O'Reily is a perspicatious blooter!
"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them." Judge Smails
I hope he didn't bloviate
October 2, 2009 - 13:27 ET by JasonCI hope he didn't bloviate too much.
Only because no one likes a
October 2, 2009 - 13:28 ET by JasonCOnly because no one likes a talker. Ce n'est pas une double entendre.
Nice recovery for a double
October 2, 2009 - 15:24 ET by BlondeMas fina (I'm practicing my spanish now).
I hope he fails, too.
Todo Bien!! Blonde David
October 3, 2009 - 00:22 ET by rockyracoonTodo Bien!! Blonde
David Letterman a victim????? Hmmmmmmmm....NO!!!
There was something about
October 3, 2009 - 16:40 ET by JasonCThere was something about that post for which a double post would have been kind of obscene...
Dave
October 2, 2009 - 12:17 ET by jaywlDave, as befits one of the chosen, was only sampling the offerings. Obviously this worked out for him in that he has found his soul mate. Bill O, on the other hand, despite any admission in the settlement, must have been a real pervert (according to the MSM). At least that's the way they played it. Is it any wonder? Letterman could claim VP Cheney was a killer and be treated as a hero. Oh, you say he already did that?
So Letterman had sex with a
October 2, 2009 - 15:03 ET by goldbarSo Letterman had sex with a staffer when he was single. Bill-O sexually harassed a staffer multiple times when he was married, lost his case and had to pay his victim probably millions. Which is worse?
Ah, so you're well-versed
October 2, 2009 - 21:06 ET by G. MayAh, so you're well-versed in the details of both cases then?
Let me answer your question.
October 2, 2009 - 22:08 ET by Mike BrattonSince both are sins, both instances are equally bad.
There. Any other questions?
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport...
We don't know the timeline
October 3, 2009 - 08:06 ET by Tom PaineWe don't know the timeline of the affairs. Letterman's son was born in 2003 and he had an ongoing relationship with his current wife for about 10 years before that. You are right in that he wasn't "married" until about a year ago. I guess since liberals don't hold themselves to any standards of behavior they are immunized against any charges of bad behavior.
More Top Ten
October 2, 2009 - 13:22 ET by slickwillie2001More top ten, this from AT:
10.) I learned everything I needed to know from Governor Mark Sanford.
9.) If you met my wife, you'd be fooling around with staffers, too.
8.) I was just doing research for a documentary about Bill Clinton.
7.) But they were the size of canned hams!
6.) You probably didn't realize that smarmy is an aphrodisiac.
5.) There is no truth to the rumor that I had my staffers assume that "slutty flight attendant look."
4.) It wasn't really me, it was my wily alter-ego, Shag-boy.
3.) Have you seen the ratings Conan has been getting?
2.) It's not like I'm Roman Polanski or something.
1.) It might have been adultery, but it wasn't adultery-adultery.
From: http://www.americanthinker.com
PS: Will the other TV talkshow hosts get on him, or is there some kind of professional courtesy there?
good job slick. I like
October 2, 2009 - 14:24 ET by USA4freedomgood job slick.
I like #5.
Can you spell karma..
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
Superb! MSNBC - The
October 2, 2009 - 16:24 ET by winston smithSuperb!
MSNBC - The Place For Lunatics
Five stars, slick...
October 2, 2009 - 16:37 ET by JerFive stars, slick...
Jer
Dear Dave, Here are the top
October 2, 2009 - 19:04 ET by USA4freedomDear Dave,
Here are the top 10 words that you might want to look up, never mind I will give you the definitions..
#10
hyp·o·crite n
Somebody who gives a false appearance of having admirable principles, beliefs, or feelings.
#9
co·me·di·an n
A humorous entertainer
An actor who plays comic roles
Somebody who is or tries to be amusing (often use dironically)
#8
per·vert vt
To lead somebody or something away from what is considered good, normal, moral, or proper
Somebody whose sexual activities are considered abnormal (disapproving)
#7
fin·ished adj
With no further prospect of success or development
#6
hu·mor·less adj
Lacking a sense of humor
Having no amusing aspect
#5
dis·mal adj
Depressing to the spirit or outlook
Very poor or inadequate
#4
art·less adj
Lacking skill, knowledge, or elegance
#2
hid·e·ous adj
Extremely unpleasant or horrible to see
Frighteningly horrible to hear
Morally repulsive or disgusting
Causing a great deal of suffering
#1
kar·ma n
The Hindu and Buddhist philosophy according to which the quality of people’s current and future lives is determined by their behavior in this and in previous lives.
Hey Dave don’t call me I’ll call you. (Wink..)
Singed,
Sarah Palin
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
Unlike O'Reilly, Letterman
October 2, 2009 - 13:54 ET by JerUnlike O'Reilly, Letterman admitted his bad behavior.
Jer
nothing reveals an honest man
October 2, 2009 - 14:00 ET by katainkentlike the threat of blackmail?
____________________________________________
The Emperor, he has no clothes
As far as we know, none of
October 2, 2009 - 14:03 ET by balboaAs far as we know, none of Letterman's flings filed suit against him, or involved new and interesting uses for falafel.
So you don't think the
October 2, 2009 - 14:08 ET by MightyMouthSo you don't think the blackmailer had one of the flings in the wings (so to speak) ready to split the take? How else would the blackmailer know for sure short of a threesome?
"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"
If you've read the news
October 2, 2009 - 15:30 ET by balboaIf you've read the news coverage, one of the past flings dated the blackmailer later, and told him about the affair.
So I was right they were
October 2, 2009 - 16:40 ET by MightyMouthSo I was right they were going to split the take?
"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"
Probably; it makes sense,
October 2, 2009 - 21:19 ET by arkansaszippersProbably; it makes sense, anyway.
Mine wasn't a comment about
October 2, 2009 - 15:34 ET by JerMine wasn't a comment about Letterman's motivations, just the fact that he publicly acknowledged the sexual indiscretions, in contrast to O'Reilly who paid a huge amount of money to buy silence and to preclude the necessity of an admission.
Jer
in your eyes
October 2, 2009 - 16:08 ET by katainkentthis makes him what... a better man? Or just pointing it out. I dislike O'rly and find them both equally slimy.
____________________________________________
The Emperor, he has no clothes
In my eyes, aside from
October 2, 2009 - 16:33 ET by JerIn my eyes, aside from harrassment issues which aren't yet--and may never be--fully developed, Letterman's sexual indiscretions were far more egegious than O'Reilly's, but the former's willingness to admit them demonstrates at least a small measure of integrity not shared by the latter.
Jer
I see it a bit differently
October 2, 2009 - 17:20 ET by katainkentmaybe his ego is simply so large that he thinks he can walk through this particular fire with his career intact.
____________________________________________
The Emperor, he has no clothes
I don't see why he can't -
October 2, 2009 - 21:23 ET by arkansaszippersI don't see why he can't - the whole him-not-being-a-politician argument holds some weight; he doesn't make a career out of claiming to be upholding family values. He screwed around on his significant other, something a lot of people in this country are probably guilty of at one point or another. That doesn't really affect his ability to entertain. I'm not crazy about his show myself, but I don't really care either way what he does on his own time. I don't think he'll lose a lot of fans because of this. I could be wrong, but that's pretty rare...
Truly his confession must
October 2, 2009 - 21:11 ET by G. MayTruly his confession must have been motivated by pure forthrightedness!
Haha
October 2, 2009 - 14:03 ET by boomerconHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, etc.
Some questions come to my
October 2, 2009 - 14:23 ET by gladiatory2kSome questions come to my mind in this admission:
Did he have part in any of these employees being hired?
Did he make sexual advances or did it come from the employee?
Did these employees feel sleeping with Dave would advance their career?
Were the staffers hired on the basis of looks?
It's been years since I have been in a business law class, but I seem to remember some case law governing hostile work environments associated with sexual advances coming from a person with a position of power. It would almost seem like this is the type of thing feminists should rail against. I know he is a media darling, he could probably commit a horrible crime and leave the country to avoid prosecution and the media would STILL come to his defense. Hehe but whoever heard of THAT happening?
Sexual Harassment
October 2, 2009 - 16:34 ET by ScottyDogNot only are there questions, you would think at the very least having sex with co-workers would violate the CBS code of employee conduct.
At the very least you would think he would be subject to termination and or charges of sexual harassment.
If you look upon "The Late
October 3, 2009 - 08:11 ET by Tom PaineIf you look upon "The Late Show" as a corporation, then Letterman is the CEO. Care to speculate how long the CEO of a fortune 500 company would surrive if a story like this broke?
Not 'blackmail' blackmail
October 2, 2009 - 14:38 ET by slickwillie2001Folks, this wasn't real 'blackmail' blackmail. The accused did it because one of Letterboy's dalliances was with the accused's wife. This is more retaliation than blackmail. He should have tried civil court before blackmail.
I suggest we be lenient with the accused, since he has been through so much. No one was really harmed here anyway. I suggest two weeks of community service.
Letterman's Unfunny!
October 2, 2009 - 14:51 ET by dcheckieCan't you just picture his facial expression as he finalizes the evil deed? Yeeew...
Well I wouldn't have before,
October 2, 2009 - 21:25 ET by arkansaszippersWell I wouldn't have before, but I can now - thanks for that. Now I need a shower...
Letterman Top Ten - O'Reilly's erotic phone calls?
October 2, 2009 - 15:10 ET by Gary HallPerhaps one of the gang here can search a bit - was curious as to what Letterman might have put in his Top 10 on the topic of Bill O'Reilly's little scandal back in 2004. Colleen and Carolyn pegged the date here at Oct. 13, 2004.
I found this one, from Nov., 2004.
Top Ten John Kerry excuses -- and the No. 1 excuse was:
I'm going bet that Letterman laid it on pretty thick.
(;~/ gary
This is just the beginning
October 2, 2009 - 15:26 ET by slickwillie2001This is going to drag on for months folks, so enjoy the ride. There are clearly multiple women as Letterboy admitted, and their names have to come out. Divorces will happen, blamed on Letterboy. More angry husbands. Maybe some real harrassment suits against Letterboy, and also against CBS for allowing the atmosphere in the workplace that allowed this. Are we supposed to think that the bigs at CBS didn't know about this?
How about women at CBS that were not involved, will they look at their lack of career progression and think, –so that's why I didn't get that promotion. Maybe we will still see some civil suits over the adulterous affairs from the cuckolded husbands.
And where's Letterboy staying? Is he in a hotel yet? Will his pre-nup agreement hold, or what did it say about adultery? Clearly the adulterous affair happened post-marriage, otherwise the blackmail threat carries no weight. This might mean a long divorce battle for Letterboy and wife, which will be thoroughly reported by the New York media.
This will go own and own and own...
Remind me..
October 2, 2009 - 17:48 ET by RedGuyBlueStateRemind me again why Letterman is relevant to ANYTHING.
He hasn't been funny in decades, most of the country has gone to bed before he's even on the air each night and he's probably still sore he didn't get the Johnny Carson spot all those years ago.
I'll Bet That The Left Hates This
October 2, 2009 - 17:53 ET by DoktorFrankenNow they have to come out and defend - to varying degrees - this load of crapulance and even attribute a measure of ''integrity'' to subsequent actions ''explaining'' things that are inherently devoid of any integrity whatsoever.
What a morally poor existance they must have to make an effort to cover a POS like Letterman. Odd - when a Conservative is found to have done something reprehensible like this, you would be hard pressed to find a true Conservative defending it.
JMHO, you understand.
One thing you have to give Letterman credit for...
October 2, 2009 - 18:52 ET by alwaysconHe broke the scandal publically before anyone else did. He's done what so many politicians on the left and right fail to do - realize when they're backed into a corner and just come clean. So often, time and again, it's lies and deception and cover-ups that destroy these people. If these indiscretions were consentual and he wasn't abusing his position, this will all be forgotten in a week. He got ahead of the story.
Letterman is a "sleaze bag" and I said that before...
October 2, 2009 - 19:53 ET by jawebster1I heard he had sex with his employees. What's worse than a sleaze bag? A "scum bag"? He would be fired if he were anyone else (who was not a liberal and not famous). Jim Webster
Did you know that scumbag is
October 2, 2009 - 21:29 ET by arkansaszippersDid you know that scumbag is slang for condom? I just found that out the other day - I never knew that word was so nasty.
David Letterman
October 2, 2009 - 20:39 ET by FormerMarineOfficeris a banal, lecherous freak, who somehow thought creating a fiction about the rape of adolescent girl by a professional baseball player was comedy.
Letterman and Polanski sharing a cell at Folsom, that would be comedy.
Another O'Reilly scandal reveller...
October 2, 2009 - 21:51 ET by MCLIJazz...was Keith Olbermann. To this day, he still refers to the allegations as fact and the settlement as an admission of guilt. All O'Reilly haters, mostly on the far-left, do that.
channel surfing on a Friday night...
October 2, 2009 - 22:14 ET by traderjamesWhy do you suppose MSNBC was running a "Headliners and Legends" on Letterman? The last time they pulled one out of the can was when Teddy Kennedy...
I'm no fan of Letterman's.....
October 3, 2009 - 03:12 ET by Gecks...but it seems to me that if this happened before he married the mother of his child (i.e. made the committment), then his wife would have no grounds to have any pre-nup broken. On the other hand, I find it sleazy that he should take advantage of interns working for him in this way. I also agree that any woman who worked at that show and did not get promoted and the ones who did got the cush jobs should think about filing a complaint at the least.
We also could be going about this all wrong. After all, he is the darling of the liberal set, and there are alot of young liberal women out there (God knows why), who would fall for his charms (such as they are). This does not make it sexual harrassment, it just makes it creepy.
Now a personal message to Davey boy:
Dave, I stopped watching your show a long time ago. The only time I tune in is when you have someone on that I like. Fortunatly for me, I have picture in picture, which allows me to watch my regular cable show full screen, and your show, silently, while I wait for your guest I want to see to come on. You sir are a a$$ monkey. I would call you a d_ck wad, but there is actually a use for those.
Gecks
"Your right to Life, Liberty, and the Persuit of Happiness ends at my front door, and my wallet!"-Me!
The only reason I know who
October 3, 2009 - 04:41 ET by RR GOPThe only reason I know who Letterman is:
1. Fell asleep watching one thing, and woke up with this chucklehead on.
2. Wife had control of the TV-was too lazy to get up and move to a different room.
3. Ambushed by Letterman clips on other TV shows.
Such an annoying smartass and his fame is beyond me...and I like a good laugh and entertaining shows. Don't get it.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.